Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

goody01

Convert MT4 Indicator into Tradestation Eld?

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I found 2 interesting and promissing indicators based on MT4 and would be happy to have them available for TS.

Anyone here "billangual" able to code MT4 and Easylanguage? Have MT4 code available and can post it.

 

Many thx in advance,

 

Goody

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my version. Feel free to modify.

 

1. MA_WRP indicator

 

{ Mimic VininI_BB_MA_WPR.v1.mq4 }

 

inputs: WRP_Len(55), MA_Len(3), BB_Len(89), BB_Std(1);

 

Vars: WRP(0), WRPMid(0), WRPUP(0), WRPDN(0), sDev(0);

 

{WRP = (PercentR( WRP_Len )+50 )*2 ; WRP with scale > 100}

 

WRP = PercentR( WRP_Len );

WRPMid = Average( WRP, BB_Len );

SDev = StdDev( WRP, BB_Len );

 

WRPUP = WRPMid + BB_Std*sDev;

WRPDN = WRPMid - BB_Std*sDev;

 

 

Plot1(Average(WRP, MA_Len), "%R w/BB" ) ;

Plot2(WRPMid, "WRPMid" );

Plot3(WRPUP, "WRPUP" );

Plot4(WRPDN, "WRPDN" );

MA_WRP.ELD

Ma-WRP.thumb.jpg.06658c11407d1882ef8f067540cbad30.jpg

Edited by phim9hi3n

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi phim9hi3n,

 

great, many thanks for your help here!

Not sure what you think about it, but it seems to give a good help about where you are in a trend and if it maybe going to change. I had 2 screens attached in my first post.

There is some info available about the TDI on the Web to dig in a bit deeper, compassfx.com seems to be a good start.

 

So thx again and good luck,

 

Goody:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

I found 2 interesting and promissing indicators based on MT4 and would be happy to have them available for TS.

Anyone here "billangual" able to code MT4 and Easylanguage? Have MT4 code available and can post it.

 

Many thx in advance,

 

Goody

 

I found also interesting indicator and I think it will be useful for others traders . I will apreciate if somebody helps me "trunslate" this code into Easylanguage TS. Thanks in advance,

Alex.

CycleIdentifier.mq4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want add picture of this indicator with parameters:

PriceActionFilter=1;

Length=3;

MajorCycleStrength=4;

UseCycleFilter=false;

UseFilterSMAorRSI=1;

FilterStrengthSMA=12;

FilterStrengthRSI=21;

It seems to be similar to Kelly indicator.

Thanks.

Alex.

indicator_cycleidentifier.gif.ccfc309a983de1ca0175455d1e98dfd6.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:) Yes, I found some info about TDI which is helped me in writing the code.

 

2. TDI w VolBand indicator.

 

Enjoy and lucky on trading.

 

Great job on converting the TDI to tradestation!

 

Here's my contribution, the attached Wilders Smooth is the same as the "Price Channel" the orignal poster shows in the screenshot, and as the Synergy method on MT4. Plot Wilder's twice, 1 with Price = high, 1 with Price = low. Length is 5.

WILDERS SMOOTH MA.ELD

synergy.thumb.jpg.d5c75bc5f3316a081236a8faca29cc8b.jpg

Edited by jeffx
attach schreenshot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

any1 could help me to convert this please :)

 

its only my simple indicator to plot local time on chart

 

extern int corner=0;

extern int X=0;

extern int Y=0;

extern int Font_Size=10;

extern color Font_Color=Red;

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

//| Custom indicator initialization function |

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

int init()

{

//---- creates and sets Object Label

if(ObjectFind("LocalTime")<0) ObjectCreate("LocalTime", OBJ_LABEL, 0, 0, 0, 0);

ObjectSet("LocalTime", OBJPROP_CORNER, corner);

ObjectSet("LocalTime", OBJPROP_XDISTANCE, X+10);

ObjectSet("LocalTime", OBJPROP_YDISTANCE, Y+Font_Size);

//----

return(0);

}

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

//| Custom indicator deinitialization function |

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

int deinit()

{

//---- deletes Object Label

if(ObjectFind("LocalTime")>-1) ObjectDelete("LocalTime");

//----

return(0);

}

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

//| Custom indicator iteration function |

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

int start()

{

//---- set and reset Object Label text to show current local time

ObjectSetText("LocalTime", TimeToStr(TimeLocal(),TIME_SECONDS), Font_Size, "Arial", Font_Color);

//----

return(0);

}

//+------------------------------------------------------------------+

Edited by furtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

//+----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------+
/ / | Hodrick - Prescott Filter.mq5 |
/ / | Copyright 2010 gpwr |
/ / | vlad1004@yahoo.com |
//+----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------+
# property copyright "gpwr"
# property version "1.00"
# property description "Hodrick - Prescott Filter"
# property indicator_chart_window
# property indicator_buffers 1
# property indicator_plots 1
# property indicator_label1 "filter"
# property indicator_type1 DRAW_LINE
# property indicator_color1 Red
# property indicator_style1 STYLE_SOLID
# property indicator_width1 1

//===================================== INPUTS ========== =================================
input int Per = 50; / / HP filter period
input int N = 500 / / # of prices to smooth

/ / Global variables
int PrevBars;
double Lambda;

/ / Indicator buffers
double hpf [];

/ / Custom indicator initialization function -------------------------------------------- - +
void OnInit ()
{
/ / Initialize global variables
  PrevBars = Bars (_Symbol, _Period) -1;
  Lambda = 0.0625/MathPow (MathSin (M_PI / Per), 4);

/ / Map indicator buffers
  ArraySetAsSeries (hpf, true);
  SetIndexBuffer (0 hpf, INDICATOR_DATA);
  IndicatorSetInteger (INDICATOR_DIGITS, _Digits);
  IndicatorSetString (INDICATOR_SHORTNAME "HPF ("+ string (Per )+")");
}

//====================================== MAIN ========= ===================================
int OnCalculate (const int bars,
               const int prev_calculated,
               const datetime & Time [],
               const double & Open [],
               const double & High [],
               const double & Low [],
               const double & Close [],
               const long & tick_volume [],
               const long & volume [],
               const int & spread [])
{
/ / Check for insufficient data and new bar
  if (bars <N)
  {
     Print ( "Error : not enough bars in history!");
     return (0);
  }
  if (PrevBars == bars) return (bars);
  PrevBars = bars;

/ / Initialize indicator buffer to EMPTY_VALUE
  ArrayInitialize (hpf, EMPTY_VALUE);

/ / Reverse indexing direction for Open
  ArraySetAsSeries (Open, true);

/ / Main cycle ---------------------------------------------- -----------------------------+
  for (int i = 0; i <N; i + +) hpf [i] = Open [i];
  HPF (N, Lambda, hpf);
  return (bars);
}
//==================================== FUNCTIONS =========== ==============================
/ / Hodrick - Prescott Filter -------------------------------------------- -------------------+
void HPF (int n, double lambda, double & x [])
{
  double a [], b [], c [], h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, hh1, hh2, hh3, hh5, hb, hc, z;
  ArrayResize (a, n);
  ArrayResize (b, n);
  ArrayResize (c, n);

  a [0] = 1.0 + lambda;
  b [0] =- 2.0 * lambda;
  c [0] = lambda;
  for (int i = 1; i <n - 2; i + +)
  {
     a [i] = 6.0 * lambda +1.0;
     b [i] =- 4.0 * lambda;
     c [i] = lambda;
  }
  a [1] = 5.0 * lambda +1;
  a [n - 1] = 1.0 + lambda;
  a [n - 2] = 5.0 * lambda +1.0;
  b [n - 2] =- 2.0 * lambda;
  b [n - 1] = 0.0;
  c [n - 2] = 0.0;
  c [n - 1] = 0.0;

  / / Forward
  for (int i = 0; i <n; i + +)
  {
     z = a [i] - h4 * h1 - hh5 * hh2;
     hb = b [i];
     hh1 = h1;
     h1 = (hb - h4 * h2) / z;
     b [i] = h1;
     hc = c [i];
     hh2 = h2;
     h2 = hc / z;
     c [i] = h2;
     a [i] = (x [i] - hh3 * hh5 - h3 * h4) / z;
     hh3 = h3;
     h3 = a [i];
     h4 = hb - h5 * hh1;
     hh5 = h5;
     h5 = hc;
  }

  / / Backward 
  h2 = 0;
  h1 = a [n - 1];
  x [n - 1] = h1;
  for (int i = n - 2; i> = 0; i -)
  {
     x [i] = a [i] - b [i] * h1 - c [i] * h2;
     h2 = h1;
     h1 = x [i];
  }
}

 

It's Hodrick-Prescott Filter coded in MT4. it's widely used in econometrics or bussiness forecasting. hope someone convert it to Tradestation.

i've tried by myself but i've stucked in the Forward iteration part. he used one variable named x in the forward interation and it's third parameter of the function itself. but i don't know how to handle it on Tradestation.

Edited by r4bb1t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

It's Hodrick-Prescott Filter coded in MT4. it's widely used in econometrics or bussiness forecasting. hope someone convert it to Tradestation.

i've tried by myself but i've stucked in the Forward iteration part. he used one variable named x in the forward interation and it's third parameter of the function itself. but i don't know how to handle it on Tradestation.

 

if you have tried, but are unwilling to share your "efforts",

what chances are someone would like to collaborate in this ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
any1 could help me to convert this please :)

 

its only my simple indicator to plot local time on chart

 

Here is code that puts the clock on the chart. See the ELD file. I got it from the TradeStation, EasyLanguage Forum:

 

eKam Clock and Timer

 

Here is some really simple code that I create:

 

Once
Begin
Value1=Text_new(D,T,H,numtostr(T,2));
End;

Text_SetString(Value1, NumToStr(T,2));
Text_SetLocation(Value1, D, T, getappinfo(aihighestDispValue));

20100526131127BarCountdownTimer.ELD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here is code that puts the clock on the chart. See the ELD file. I got it from the TradeStation, EasyLanguage Forum:

 

eKam Clock and Timer

 

Here is some really simple code that I create:

 

Once
Begin
Value1=Text_new(D,T,H,numtostr(T,2));
End;

Text_SetString(Value1, NumToStr(T,2));
Text_SetLocation(Value1, D, T, getappinfo(aihighestDispValue));

 

 

this code only gives you the ending time of the bar.

 

you should use currenttime:

 

Text_SetString(Value1, NumToStr(CURRENTTIME,0));

 

 

MultiCharts user can use CURRENTTIME_s, which gives the seconds portion of the time.

 

 

ps. there is a function/keyword to format the time into hh:mm:ss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
this code only gives you the ending time of the bar.

 

you should use currenttime:

 

Text_SetString(Value1, NumToStr(CURRENTTIME,0));

 

 

MultiCharts user can use CURRENTTIME_s, which gives the seconds portion of the time.

 

 

ps. there is a function/keyword to format the time into hh:mm:ss

 

Okay. Thanks. I learned something new. See, it's worth sharing code even if it's not perfect. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if you have tried, but are unwilling to share your "efforts",

what chances are someone would like to collaborate in this ?

 

i understand what you meant and i'd like to share anything i have. but i really have nothing.

i meant was i just tried to write some pseudo code to know if it's possible by myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.