Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Trader P/L 2009

Recommended Posts

To cure the tendancy of anticipating a reversal (which I do too often) I started to play with the chartgame.com. It was mentioned by DB somewhere.

I think that it has the potential - after many hours - to reverse this tendancy and maybe allow one to leave the profitable trades to run (another thing which I don't do yet)

 

Gabe

 

Thanks Gabe and Db - that is a fun game! Too bad it does not allow you to short.

 

Will this keep an ongoing track record via cookies, or will it start as a new user each time you play?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

chartgame1.jpg.2a7929b2c5fb2e1bfe07820654a6ea5c.jpg

chartgame2.jpg.70e91a7d80e1c97108b2f97152a020c4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Gabe and Db - that is a fun game! Too bad it does not allow you to short.

 

Will this keep an ongoing track record via cookies, or will it start as a new user each time you play?

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

It keeps track (via cookies I believe)

 

Gabe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi imorgan,

 

Perhaps you would consider looking for stocks behaving as WFR did today. This is a common occurrence, and in many ways it is exactly the same as FNET yesterday only different.

 

Both stocks had early, strong moves, and each offered three buy points. Now, here is a caution, the third buy point off of any base usually finds that the rally out of that base is completely retraced or more. Therefore, when you have a strong move, either up or down, where two narrow consolidations at the highs breakout to new sustained highs, I typically do not buy the third breakout. This applies to intraday rallies as well as daily and even weekly charts. Late stage bases tend to be weak. The traders who had bought the first two breakouts are usually selling on the way out of the third breakout. If the third does not retrace, and the stock offers a fourth, I will sell into that fourth breakout.

 

Both FNET yesterday and WFR today offered three buy points. The first two led to positive results. The third breakouts stalled and a correction ensued. This much is almost scripted. Everyday, day after day you will see stocks behaving like this (for both rallies and declines). Here is where they are different: FNET's correction never ceased, and the stock never saw a new high. WFR, on the other hand, traced out a patter that some might call a "cup with handle." You can call it "macaronie and cheese" for all it matters. The point is that the stock recovered and made new highs. It did so at 12:35 EDT, more than three hours after the open. You will find these stocks breaking to new intraday highs after 12 noon. The often do so on the half-hour (12:30, 1:30, 2:30, 3:30). The time is not a requirement, just sharing an observation.

 

For a day trade, you have a fixed, limited time. Why bother messing around with buy or sell points that may or may not lead to desired new highs or new lows? Be patient. Be demanding (but not too demanding or you will create a trading checklist that will forever keep you out of the market).

 

Others may differ, and perhaps you will too, but the channels you are drawing do not look particular useful to me.

 

Also, I may only close about 38% of my stock trades with a profit. But, if I simply wanted to trade for tiny 5-10-15 penny moves, I could close a much, much higher percentage of my trades for a profit. In other words, most of my trades show a 5-15 penny profit soon after entry. My willingness to see which will go for a dollar necessitates that I allow many of these small profits to run to a small loss. I suspect that these channel breaks you are using here will perhaps lead you to a similar winning% as me, i.e. approx 38%. But your average profit will likely be much too small to overcome your high % of losses. Why? Because you are buying into resistance. As with FNET, many of these stocks will not go on to make new intraday highs, which means you will experience fewer runners.

 

You are new. Why start bad habits right from the beginning? I will tell you from personal experience, bad habits inculcated today will be damaging to you for many years to come. Why put yourself through that? I did. I hate to use such language, but frankly, it sucks.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

 

That is exactly the wisdom I needed. I really appreciate your thoughts and ideas. You can expect better entries from me from now on.

 

Quick question: I know you usually put your stop loss at some natural support level below your buy but sometimes those seem like they would be too large to keep your loss average so small. Do you have a maximum stop amount you use in the event the natural support level is too far from the entry or does that just mean the R/R isn't good enough to take the trade?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sim trading. Didn't get to the market until 10:30 or so. Decided to take a trade off the 466 tick instead of the 15 min as there wasn't anything really setting up on the 15min that I could see, but knew there would be some opportunities on the shorter time frame.

 

Had a buy stop at 1066.25 one tick above the last swing high where the top ellipse is. I didn't have time to set a sell stop before the buy was triggered. I had a 2 and 3 point target on 2 contracts as you can see on the first chart. I am trying out an ATM strategy on the Ninja Trader to try and trade a runner is the reason for 2 contracts. You can see the targets and the sell stop I had at 2.5 points below the entry.

 

The price hit my buy stop and pretty quickly went up to my first target and and misses it by 1 tick, comes back down and begins to make lower highs and lower lows. On the second chart you can see where I drew the down channel to show that. So I was starting to get concerned.

 

About that time my wife came in and started talking about how it looked like it was going down now, gonna be a loser, etc., and reinforcing my thoughts, so I pulled my targets down to BE and got out at BE (I wouldn't have gotten out of the trade if she hadn't come in and done that. :) ) Of course right after I did that it shot up and hit my 2 point target as you can see on the 2nd chart. Told my wife what happened and she suggested she needed to stay out while I was trading since she knew she influenced me to get out at BE instead of hanging in the trade. I said that I agree with that. LOL.

 

As an added note, I don't use the MA on the chart. I keep forgetting to take it off from my previous method of trading. Since I have been trading the price action only, I don't even notice it is there.

5aa70f27b69c5_ESa9-17-09.thumb.JPG.f2d19a17f9d05cfc4035e8d19ccaf599.JPG

5aa70f27bdf4b_ESd9-17-09.thumb.JPG.6765676471f153e4213a74bd0882f593.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quick question: I know you usually put your stop loss at some natural support level below your buy but sometimes those seem like they would be too large to keep your loss average so small.

 

If the loss would be too large, adjust your position size or skip the trade - there will always be others. Most of my losses occur after price has pulled back once and resumed its rally, allowing me to raise my stop loss. So, for example, I may have an entry at 35.75, with a stop loss at 35.25. My entry is filled, price rallies to 35.99, and then pulls back to 35.63. I raise my stop loss accordingly after price rallies back to or above 35.99. Price rallies to 36.02, and then collapses to 34.99, stopping me out for a 13 penny loss on its way down.

 

The initial stop is for those times where your entry is triggered, and price turns and drives right through that stop. It is an emergency, a disaster, a worst case scenario type of stop. My average loss is small because I rarely experience such a worst case stop out (though I do indeed have them from time to time).

 

More often, would be this example: I have an entry at 35.75, with a stop loss at 35.25. My entry is filled, price rallies to 35.99, and then pulls back to 35.74. I raise my stop loss accordingly after price rallies back to or above 35.99. Price rallies to 36.02, and then collapses to 34.99, stopping me out for a 3 penny loss on its way down. Of course, if I were buying or shorting in the middle of muckity muck like you then I would expect to see my worst case stop hit more frequently.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will say this about trading S/R. I LOVE being able to set my stops to get in the trade and be able to walk away instead of having to stare at a chart all the time. I set a buy and sell stop before I went to church tonight, and when I got back it had hit the sell stop, executed the trade and my ATM strategy in NT got me out with the 2 points I look for.

 

Another thing, trading off the 15 minute chart, I just go look at it throughout the day, and if I see a setup, I place my stops and walk away. I love trading off the big picture. Of course it is still just sim trading, but starting to trade S/R instead of indicators has taken a lot of the tension, stress, pressure and whatever else I had been experiencing when sim trading or thinking about going live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another good learning day. My stop was too close to last natural stop. Would have been a good trade if I had trailed as I think I would have trailed it.

HGG (-$0.31/share or -1.7%)

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=13579&stc=1&d=1253308683

 

Stops should not be "too close to last natural stop." Your stop loss is either right or it is wrong. If it is right, it will take you out at a point at which price action is no longer immediatley favorable to your position. It can be wrong in too ways: It can take you out before price action has turned unfavorable, or it can take you out too long after price action has turned unfavorable. You seem to believe that your stop loss was wrong for the first reason.

 

Take a close look at where you entered, and see if you can find a more logical placement for a stop loss for a position entered at the point you entered. I suggest you do this by starting at the beginning of the day and marking off entries and initial stops.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stops should not be "too close to last natural stop." Your stop loss is either right or it is wrong. If it is right, it will take you out at a point at which price action is no longer immediatley favorable to your position. It can be wrong in too ways: It can take you out before price action has turned unfavorable, or it can take you out too long after price action has turned unfavorable. You seem to believe that your stop loss was wrong for the first reason.

 

Take a close look at where you entered, and see if you can find a more logical placement for a stop loss for a position entered at the point you entered. I suggest you do this by starting at the beginning of the day and marking off entries and initial stops.

 

I marked up a new chart of HGG at higher highs where a buy opportunity looked reasonable and noted the corresponding stop at the last natural support level.

 

My thinking on the stop is that it should take you out before you lose more than you are willing to risk on one trade or take you out if price action starts confirming it is going to move unfavorably in comparison to the reason you entered the position.

 

Additionally, if price starts to move below the last natural stop that would be an indication through price action that there is a high probability that price will begin to move against you and therefore you should be out of the trade.

 

In my first example, I noted that I thought the stop was too close since price ran back very close to the natural support level and the moved back up. Given that support is more of a small range than it is an exact price my belief is that I should have had the stop $0.04 below the last natural stop to give a little wiggle room for support to hold. However, you have much more experience with this so your thoughts would be useful.

hgg.thumb.JPG.88d8362e6baaae2fa1a88e8cce2746b1.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My thinking on the stop is that it should take you out before you lose more than you are willing to risk on one trade or take you out if price action starts confirming it is going to move unfavorably in comparison to the reason you entered the position

 

This should not be an either/or statement. The amount you are risking on the trade should be a function of position size relative to the difference between you entry and your stop loss. The stop loss is set by price action, not your account equity or risk parameters.

 

If you are risking 1% of equity and your account is 100k, then you will risk $1000/trade. If the difference between your entry and stop loss is $1.00, then you will trade 1000 shares on that trade. If the difference between your stop loss and your entry is $0.25, then you will trade 4000 shares on that trade. Adjust your position size to fit the risk, not your stop loss.

 

If you do not wish to adjust your position size, then you will need to forego trades where the risk exceeds your risk limit. If you have a 100k account, risking no more than 1% or $1000/ trade, and you wish to trade 2000 shares/ trade, then you will be able to take any trade where the risk is less than or equal to 50 pennies/share, and you will not act on any trade where the risk is greater than 50 pennies per share. Risk is always defined as the difference between your entry price and your initial stop loss.

 

That being said, in this example you are on a two minute chart. Since you entered on a new high without a pullback, then your stop should beneath the last high, or below the 17.01 high of the 11:06 bar.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This should not be an either/or statement. The amount you are risking on the trade should be a function of position size relative to the difference between you entry and your stop loss. The stop loss is set by price action, not your account equity or risk parameters.

 

I was just thinking about the broad theoretical use of a stop loss and I know many traders do not use position sizing to manage their stop loss. I agee 100% with your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You make that on the drop from the news at 10? :)

 

I had a buy and sell stop in at 10 (forget to check if news was coming out) and only had my target set for 1 point and when the news came out I got filled and hit my target in about a quarter of a second. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You make that on the drop from the news at 10? :)

 

I had a buy and sell stop in at 10 (forget to check if news was coming out) and only had my target set for 1 point and when the news came out I got filled and hit my target in about a quarter of a second. :)

 

Yes, but I do not trade the news based on whether I think it is positive or negative, honestly I do not even no what the news was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright, let's see if we can get this thread moving along again daily.

 

For those that are new to the thread, let me do a little recap...

 

1) I started the thread 3/2009 as a way to get myself better focused and doing the job.

2) For my purposes here, I am using a smaller account that I trade to demonstrate the good and bad w/ trading a smaller account in leveraged products.

3) Here's a few questions that were asked about what I am displaying here.

4) Here's an update done on 4/12 talking about my results.

5) May 1st update.

6) Discussion of the 3 cycles as I see that you can trade in a day.

7) About page 77 or so is where I take a breather from posting daily and enjoy the summer here.

 

Plan going forward:

 

1) Try to start posting daily blotters (like before).

2) Use this thread as a motivational technique to keep my eyes on the prize and get the job done.

 

Trading plan:

 

1) Focus on 'cycle 1' as I discussed in a previous thread that is linked above. Basically, trade in the AM when I know things usually are moving.

2) Focus on markets that I know and understand what movements to expect and how to treat them.

3) Generate consistent profits w/ minimal losses.

 

That's the plan, we'll see how it goes.

 

Welcome back and welcome to those that are new to me posting here!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I traded 3 days last week and blotters are attached:

 

9/22/09: +$134.38

 

9/24/09: +$109.36

 

9/25/09: +$651.25

 

End of week: +$894.99

 

Blotters attached to this message. One thing you'll note going forward is that my blotters may be larger than previously as I take a few more trades and look to trade a market or two that I was not using previously (mainly grains).

 

 

I'll take it for 3 days of trading. I hope to get back on a regular, 5 day work week but sometimes things can get in the way. ;)

9-24-2009.png.3ee78785eec234f0f614d9b7bea8dfc4.png

9-25-2009.thumb.png.01993faef370827cad7dd4fb014ffbbf.png

9-22-2009.png.f01bab7c11213e253988f03be78ec27c.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Welcome back Brownsfan. I think the thread was a great idea.

 

Good luck to all of you in the final quarter of the year. Pretty hard to believe how quickly time passes.

 

Yeah, time sure does fly by BR.

 

Glad that you continued posting here along w/ a few new people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9-28-09: +$343.12

 

Not the best day, but good ole soybeans gave me a quick and easy pop on the open to trade.

 

Also, me and the 6E are having some issues currently so I'm putting that one on hold till further notice. Going to focus on the ZN during that time and trade more contracts if need be to 'make up' any potential profits.

 

Oh yeah, bought oil and NQ. BLEW PAST my profit target today. One of those days where holding would have been prudent. As I've said previously, probably the hardest part of trading for me - 'leaving $ on the table'. Oh well, it is what it is for now.

 

Back at it tomorrow. Done by 10:30am EST.

 

;)

9-28-2009.png.84caa8dedafbdd579b93ea474039177b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once more just sim (6A).

 

Yesterday I used the NQ successfully.

Today the 6A.

 

But its scalping,

trend trading, maybe I will figure it out within the upcoming years.

 

Well on sim I have usually losers too,

100 $ or 200 $ each, but well on sim, at least finally I survive a day now.

 

Well, maybe my time is there.

 

But this was sim scalping with 1 or 2 contracts.

6a-29_09_09-sim.png.e50571ff59320993249c87c2f91d148e.png

Edited by HAL9000
NQ -> 6A ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.