Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

Trader P/L 2009

Recommended Posts

  Robert Joyce said:
Ok, so what is Mr. Black's method..... If I may be so bold as to ask....

 

It might be best for you to search "jack hershey"

Edited by Soultrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tried to find this Jack Hershey and all I could find were reams of stuff on how no one can figure out just what his method is and that there are no results. I still have not found anything that is written by him. Or is this all just a big joke so that whenever someones strategy is hard to discern they call is the 'Jack Hershey method'.

 

Not that I am looking for a new method to trade, I'm just curious, It's my balls that I am having trouble locating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  HAL9000 said:

Now to the 2 point noise:

The charts below show 2 point range bars (based on 5 s bars, so some are larger and the open of the next bar might be the close of the last 5 s bar, i.e. they are not really range bars).

One idea of me is:

Lets assume that 6 points moves are quite often, but they also stall then.

If you entered missing the first 3 points, why not just exit when 6 points are

reached (with 2 or 3 points profit).

Then wait for a pullback of 2 or 4 points for reentering into the same direction as before.

That would be really playing noise.

 

 

Hal - that first chart is nice (and clean). I agree w/ Thales that some stuff jumps out at you...

 

1) I am not sure how these are color coded, but could something work with buying new blues and selling new reds?

 

2) Consider shorting new highs when turns red, buying new lows when turns blue. Again, not sure how you are color coding these, but on this chart it provides some timely entries after a base has been put in.

 

That is a clean chart Hal and could be something to work with IMO. Consider starting a new thread dedicated to it as many on the forum won't see this one post.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11090&stc=1&d=1243995706

5aa70ede8bd0b_TLHAL.gif.fae9d0754eac90bdc9ce9a78d8b47be9.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Diablo, I have read alot of it now and it actually makes sense to me. His method is strangely similiar to mine. Only I use EMA's on different time frames combined with stochastics to see 'trends within trends'. And I just love 'regression channels', after reading Hershey's stuff I will be using them alot more. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Here are today's trades. Both were great trades, but unfortunately neither one resulted in a profit. The COV trade may actually be my largest loss on a single trade (42 pennies/share) this year. I'll post the charts over at the "Day in a Life" thread.

 

Total loss for the day: -$0.52/share traded

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70edf0cd10_6-3-2009Trades.jpg.c4a6b6577f7c39d119b94dd7ad2f6453.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thales, Brown -

 

Thank you both for your comments about my charts,

 

sometimes I think that a clean chart is much better tradeable than one with many indicators. On the clean chart you can see the trendlines and s/r lines, even if you are not drawing them.

 

Brown, your approach has merit, I think that it should have produced winners today,

but I haven't checked it yet.

 

I currently read Law of Charts, and then I will read about the TTE.

 

After that I will try to sort things out. And then I will start a thread.

I think then it will make sense.

 

Hal

Edited by HAL9000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brutusdog said:
i see some mention of Watts systems round here and poked round the net a bit and found this.....no idea if it works but here is what i found!

 

http://www.wattstrading.com/Simple2minuteSP.pdf

 

That's not the Watts System - but it's from Watts. It's a free PDF he hands out if you sign-up on his maillist.

 

I've been studying the Watts for several months and have to say I'm very pleased with it. If anyone's interested I'm trading it live on this thread: Daybreak Trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bathrobe said:
No trades today or rest of week.

 

Brownsfan, do you use the same setups on bonds as you do on indecies or currencies?

 

Yeah, basically the same thing although it seems easier on bonds many days. If I had to pick one market, I'd probably just trade bonds. The reason I don't do that now is that I just don't know day-to-day which of my main ones will be the better one to trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, no real trades today, the building I live in had electrical problems and advised they would be turning the power on and off several times today so I didn't want to get caught in a trade and no computer... yikes. So as you already know any excuse will do, so I traded my sim again today. 20 trades.... actually had more losers than winners but ended up

$250. I caught one real good trade right around 8600 on the YM and rode it for 52 pts. So that was nice, hopefully tomorrow will bring some 'real' profits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm back from a needed vacation and will be trading on friday. I will post results. It's good to see this tread still going. I was thinking that I will also start to include charts of my trades to get some feedback. I think that posting charts would help a lot of us, for starters it would get us to save charts of our trades which many traders agree is an important step in becoming a better trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

Two trades today, lost 23 pennies on COST short and made 15 pennies on TEL long.

 

Total for the day: -$0.08/share traded.

 

I may be done for the week as I have a meeting in the morning that will keep me from trading the AM session.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70edfc3b35_6-4-2009Trades1.jpg.1cbe055f48fbd646bd90bc731f326b40.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, sorry only sim trades today. 16 trades of 2 YM contracts. I was never stopped out but I exited several before they hit my stop. Anyways I was up $345. pretend dollars... yech... See you tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, As I would never start real trading on a Friday, sim trades again today but for 180pts on the YM. All 2 contract YM trades but there were about 30 trades for $905. profit. 10 even trades, 4 stopped out for full 21pt, the rest were real nice winners. I tried very hard this week to cut my losers and ride my winners and when I had a good buy at an extreme like that low this morning I removed my limits and just let it run. Also these more range bound days are great for my EMA crossover signals. So I'm pumped for Monday to start with real money again.

 

The other thing I did was the later in the day it got the sooner after I was winning a trade I moved my stop up to even to protect the money I had, so there were unfortunately too many trades at or very near even, but that is a small price to pay for protecting profits. Next week I report real trades all week long.

 

Anyways you have a good weekend, I've got my son's soccer games to look forward to, we'll see you on Monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6-5-09

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11133&stc=1&d=1244241244

 

 

 

And for the boneheaded play of the day:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=11134&stc=1&d=1244241260

 

I was short on bonds into the AM news (as I was long EC at same time). Both trades were gorgeous - instant +$300/ct. See a difference in the end result?

 

:doh:

 

EC trade nice and easy winner.

 

ZB trade - somehow I butchered that into a loss... I got in and the trade was stuttering as everyone was waiting for the 830am news. I saw a small profit at one point and grabbed it. Trade then gave me a 2nd chance to short before the news. I took it, but this time I was going to be smart and put a snug stop on....

 

Meanwhile I was comfortable letting my EC trade just go.

 

Really dropped the ball here, should have just been 2 trades for +300/ea trade vs what I created there.

 

Live and learn.

 

Always doing the 'learn' part though w/ trading...

6-5-2009.png.efc6e25f86eeee5992cdb49abe98d054.png

zb.png.fcfec770be564f4d3c20334f53c571e7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much like Maverick said to Goose, after being implored to "Take the shot"...it just didnt feel right. Revenge trading (from the past couple weeks of destruction) is an invitation to disaster.

 

Did some watching of the market this week - with very little trading. If anything - it helped my discipline. Avoided making those "jump in - the market is moving trades". Perhaps it was fatigue - perhaps it was crazy work schedule - or just maybe - I am becoming a bit more diligent to sticking with my plan.

 

Missed two entries by a little - which would have been nice trades. But thats life. No chasing cars.

 

Will be in front of the screen for a limited time the next two weeks - happily because of vacation. Will try to keep active via some pre-set swing trades.

 

Good weekend to all. Not much else to post. Like the idea of posting charts - will include that in my future posts as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

Here are today's results: Three trades, two stocks. Short PSA for +19 pennies/share, long BCS for + 15 pennies/share, and then long BCS again for -10 pennies/share. Total for the day +$0.24/share traded, and for the week +$2.49/share traded.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Thales

5aa70ee02ced4_6-5-2009TradeswithWeeklyTotal1.jpg.2c45c2bfeeb2ecec125008e1205a288d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brownsfan,

 

Do you take trades regularly based on how what you think the news will be?

 

Personally and I do not claim to be even somewhat good at interpreting how news will effect markets trades like this can be a lot like gambling for a day-trader. I usually sit out news, speeches and fed announcements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bathrobe said:
Hi Brownsfan,

 

Do you take trades regularly based on how what you think the news will be?

 

Personally and I do not claim to be even somewhat good at interpreting how news will effect markets trades like this can be a lot like gambling for a day-trader. I usually sit out news, speeches and fed announcements.

 

Great question BR. Here's how I treat news - on most markets, I LOVE it! And you can see why in the above charts I posted.

 

Basically I just take my setups as they occur, regardless of news on all markets EXCEPT oil. I have to stay out of oil trades on Wed inventory numbers b/c that is way too jumpy for my liking.

 

But on the indexes, bonds and currencies, I will get into a trade and hold through the news if I get a setup beforehand. If there is not a setup, then I just wait. In other words, I don't try to guess where the news might drive the markets (I'm not a fundamental trader at all).

 

With that said, trading news is not for the faint of heart. If you want to see your P/L jump hundreds/thousands in seconds, then give news a try on SIMULATION.

 

I can't stress enough that I only take a trade when my normal setup occurs and that I don't trade oil on inventory day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.