Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

suriNotes

A Case for @ES Double Bottom...

Recommended Posts

Double Bottom/Double Top patterns are reliable when they are confirmed and do have high reward/risk ratios. The confirmations only occur when price reverses and trades above/below [X] bar high/low or SwingHighs/Swing Lows and exhibits strong momentum with Gaps/wide-range bars etc. There may be other forms to detect Double bottoms. Failed Double Bottoms and Double Tops may be signaling stronger prior trend and could be forming multiple bottoms/tops.

 

One of the way to trade Double Bottom/Double Tops (Irregular DT/DBs) popularized by Trader Vic's 2B detection... 2B Tops/Bottoms also fail and 2Bs tend to be more reliable in Longer-Term charts when they are forming near other support and resistance areas.

 

Presented here is a case for such 2B Top/Bottom patterns for @ES Weekly and @ES Daily Charts... Just a scenario. Also, note the third chart, where @ES Monthly retracing (near) to 100% of prior Swing.

 

Nothing signifies it is a Double Bottom, but just a case... Every major analyst is shooting for S&P 600 soon :)

 

On Weekly charts, @ES needs to close above 782 and on Daily Charts @ES needs to close above 752 to confirm 2Bs...

 

Regards,

Suri

ESD_2BWeekly_Mar0109.gif.583c8cf2d710ced3864ba71129359189.gif

ESD_2BDaily_Mar0109.thumb.gif.4e97a2a6555633ff53b4fedcd070a795.gif

@ES100_Feb2809.gif.3dc9ca435a3253bf4a31da8a032fc89d.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi James,

 

Thanks for your post...

 

Here is a little better illustration of How 2Bs' are traded from my old files (2B Buy logic provided).

 

ES Weekly is shown with 2B Top detection and trade-setup.

 

Basic idea behind 2B Top sell is:

Wait for the bar to [CLOSE] below the breakout bar. {Confirmation Bar for 2B Top}

Sell below the [LOW] - x ticks of the Confirmation Bar. {Trade}

 

 

2B detection process and trade-triggers are little elaborate (code-wise).

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

  Soultrader said:
Hi Suri,

 

Ive attached your chart with revision to indicate the confirmation point for the short. Can you please confirm if this is correct? Thanks.

2B_Buy_Sell.thumb.gif.89b6c11c771b0c54e93f804fa9e7c562.gif

2B_ESWeekly_Illustration.thumb.gif.ac9ee3bf2bfd23e88cea28111bfe5325.gif

Edited by suriNotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello folks

 

I think the case for a bottom of any kind is rather slim at this point.

 

Simply put I think this market is news driven

 

Rather then using Daily or Weekly charts I prefer using 570 minute bars or candles. I notice price tends to respect the two EMAs fairly consistently.

 

Looking at the chart attached one can observe the most recent wide range bar representing activity from midnight to the open on Friday 27 Feb

 

I like to calculate the midpoint of "wide range bars" and use that point as a line in the sand for a possible retracement. The horizontal lines to the left of the WRB represent an area where I might be interested in a long term swing trade. Alternatively I would see a test and failure of this area as a possible signal to short the market.

 

I like the 2b setup. Intuitively it seems right, but in the current market I notice that price tends to consolidate for extended periods of time, before showing any conviction. It is this tendency to wiggle around in a range that causes problems for some traders. I hope to avoid this by looking for confluence of several possible signals before acting.

 

For tomorrow's intraday trading the previous value area high happens to be 748. The previous value area low is located at 739.50. As I write this we are wiggling around just about 720....Depending on the overnight, news and other considerations I would be looking for a test of previous VAL to tell me what the world is thinking about the economic situation we are in. After that it is all about reacting to what I see.

 

The "other considerations" include the status of the 10yr & 30yr bonds and the Libor.

 

For what its worth, a failure test at 739 would probably mean a move down to 716.50. Failure at that point would mean a move down to 693 even.

 

Best of luck to everyone tomorrow

 

Steve

snapshot-484.png.a5c08251f0d27bbcee19cde3e6d40722.png

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As can be seen in the attached CV chart, we stayed in a range most of the previous trading session.

 

Last evening, Asia took it on the chin with Korea and Japan dropping significantly (mostly on regional news and conjecture about US policies).

 

We bounced off of 711.25....

snapshot-485.png.2f3915bb328847685dd25415c16a0593.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Suri

 

Many thanks for the previous symmetry chart

 

Could you please check my 2B-Bull trade, it paid off handsomely but not sure If I put in the order at the right level (Green line 741.25) ?

Did your indicator plot this on 610Tick or 2minute chart ?

For some reason its easier for me to spot 2B-Buys rather than 2B-Sells

Would you have taken it if your context (Fib Grids) didnot agree, as everything was heading south ?

 

I took snapshot just before and after it triggered, please refer to my chart and comment

 

Many Thanks

Minoo

Trade-2B.thumb.PNG.f8fb5d42efcebd25a14286541fd29767.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the update for @es Symmetry and Butterfly Pattern with Target 820.

Also note the number of bars to reach the target is 12 with a 76.48% of prior swing price range.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

  suriNotes said:
Here is the Symmetry Analysis (Both Price and Time) for the Butterfly Pattern...

 

Regards,

Suri

@es_MAR2509.gif.cff6768e49d5bc7dd92d5bd68967154f.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Taz,

 

Thanks for your post...

 

I am not a big follower of Cycle theories, but

I noticed the symmetry of swings and thought

it was an interesting find....

 

JM Hurst talks about 40-period cycle (and others) to describe trends

in his book "The Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing"

and 1/2 cycle (20 period) lengths to find targets/patterns etc.

 

Regards,

Suri

 

 

 

 

  Tasuki said:
Suri, what's the deal with 41 days? Looks interesting, but is there any rhyme or reason to a 41 day cycle?

Tx, Taz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.