Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Why Market Depth is Useless As an Indicator

Recommended Posts

The ultra short term bursts of uber intense trade that often establish local intra-session extremes is never shown as resting orders it is auto-executed in a series of orders separated by only a few thousandths of a second.

 

The chart below shows a spike in trade intensity but while this high volume of trade was being executed it was never shown at any level as a resting order by market depth. This trade was auto-executed.

 

While commercial traders CAN successfully hide their method and whether the trade was an opening or closing transaction, they can't hide the fact of their transactions.

 

tradeintensity1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is quite fascinating stuff UrmaBlume. Thanks for sharing.

 

What platform are you using to write these indicators? Seems like everyone is out to win the volume analysis race.. trying to dig deeper into analyzing what lies within a volume bar. However, I do like your approach of analyzing the number of transactions with time.... or is this something else? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SoulTrader,

 

Thanks for the kind words. Not at all like the responses I got from one of your other, less informed, moderators.

 

You are right about volume analysis - it's all that really matters. After all it is volume that motivates price - Price doesn't motivate price and the passage of time does not motivate price, it is the occurrence of trade (buying and selling) that motivates price.

 

Knowing that it is not the passage of time but rather the occurrence of buying and selling that drives price makes one wonder why anybody would ever base their trade on indicators with price as the prime input (EMA, Bollinger, RSI, Candlesticks, Stochastic, CCI....) and to further compound the error, apply those indicators to time constant data vessels.

 

Three decades ago I was taught that the best indicators of future price don't have price as any part of their calculation.

 

As I have mentioned I run a small PRIVATE trading and technology company and the first thing I teach our new traders is that it is buying and selling that drives price. That none of our intra-session charts are time constant charts and almost none of our indicators have price as ANY part of their calculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
This is quite fascinating stuff UrmaBlume. Thanks for sharing.

What platform are you using to write these indicators? Seems like everyone is out to win the volume analysis race.. trying to dig deeper into analyzing what lies within a volume bar. However, I do like your approach of analyzing the number of transactions with time.... or is this something else? Thanks.

 

We use Trade Station. I am the oldest contiuous user of products developed by Bill Cruz. I even bought his Temp S&P system almost 30 years ago before there was TradeStation, SuperCharts or Omega Research.

 

TradeStations does have some issues. For us many are centered around the lack of granularity with the TS time stamp. For applications like our Market HUD we use dll's to export the data to applications we have written in C++. For finer granularity in the usage of time we access the windows kernel.

 

A couple of months ago we investigated the possiblity of changing to Ninja and ZenFire data. We were able to speak to management at both Ninja and ZenFire and found the ZenFire data stream to be great but that the way Ninja handled the data stream made the data not suitable for our purposes plus Ninja is very young software and needs a couple of more versions before it will be ready for real power users. The best we got out of the discussion was meeting with Mirus futures. Great attitude, great rates and super day margins. They even support member rates and the CME volume incentive plan that gets total round trips in the ES down to $1.80 round trip. While Ninja is not yet ready for our level of trade decision support processing we may have to get it just for executing trades at Mirus and keep Trade Station for the analysis part.

 

And thanks again for the kind words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TRO did share his indicators with the forum. I suppose Urmablume's will remain a secret although the concepts I suppose can be programmed by anyone with coding skills.

 

I find value in Urma's posts, for example I am quite interested in exploring more on tick charts. Lets say by using a 100 tick chart, I can simply program to count how many bars were drawn in lets say a timespan of 1 minute... this would somewhat be similar to what Urmablume is sharing?

 

I was just brainstorming right now of an historgram like indicator... not sure how effective this could be but perhaps someone else can expand on it? Thanks.

tick.thumb.png.5ae648b5ed9128fe3e460bc6a672c48e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To get back somewhat on topic...

 

UrmaBlume, since your indicator/analysis relies greatly on speed I would highly suggest posting a short video showing several (since they only last a second or so) of these spikes thoughout the day. You could even stream your charts live for a day on ustream.com for free. It would also be helpful if you could post an intraday chart (full rth day) showing where these spikes occurred so an individual could get the bigger picture. These would be much more helpful to everyone. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
...I was just brainstorming right now of an historgram like indicator... not sure how effective this could be but perhaps someone else can expand on it? Thanks.

 

Hi James,

Have you created an indicator for that? If so can you share the ELD?

 

Thanks

bakrob99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bakrob99 said:
Hi James,

Have you created an indicator for that? If so can you share the ELD?

 

Thanks

bakrob99

 

Oh no, Im not a programmer and I currently dont use TS anymore. But I suppose it wouldnt be too hard to code up for someone with programming skills?

 

If I can code this up in CQG I will share the code. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Lets say by using a 100 tick chart, I can simply program to count how many bars were drawn in lets say a timespan of 1 minute... this would somewhat be similar to what Urmablume is sharing?

 

I was just brainstorming right now of an historgram like indicator... not sure how effective this could be but perhaps someone else can expand on it? Thanks.

Or it is possible to plot simple time histogram to 100 tick chart, for example. I played with tick and CVB charts with time histograms when I was looking for a way to understand price movement. Hovewer, later I found that my brain easier processes or understands simple time interval charts with volume histogram. Anyway, you still get the same information, that is activity over time, or time over activity.

What is different in UrmaBlume's approach is imho just a speed of evaluation and hence a speed of his reaction, too. He doesn't wait for 100 tick, 100 CVB or 5 sec bar to finish. That's why the need for a low latency precise data feed. But the principle is still the same: A reversal on high activity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
A couple of months ago we investigated the possiblity of changing to Ninja and ZenFire data. We were able to speak to management at both Ninja and ZenFire and found the ZenFire data stream to be great but that the way Ninja handled the data stream made the data not suitable for our purposes

 

Thanks for the great information. Can you go into details about how Ninja handles this data stream making it unsuitable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  honvly said:
Thanks for the great information. Can you go into details about how Ninja handles this data stream making it unsuitable?

 

I don't know if this is why but I think I saw UrmaBlume or someone else mention in another thread that Ninjatrader changes the timestamp that comes in from Zenfire so you no longer get the microsecond granularity. That might be what he's referring to.

 

Not sure why it matters. Zenfire has an API you can interact with directly so any shortcomings of Ninjatrader are irrelevant. Doing the level of analysis that UrmaBlume is doing, I would just go direct with the API. Then you don't have to be stuck in some charting vendor's paradigm of how they think you should be analyzing the market. Paint anything you want (I prototyped a fun zoom panel you can zoom in and out of the market ad infinitum) however you want. You want higher timeframe data together with other data? Trivial in any way, dimension, etc. In fact, you could even define a non-linear time axis. To paraphrase Scotty on Star Trek: "Candlesticks? How quaint".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
SoulTrader,

 

Thanks for the kind words. Not at all like the responses I got from one of your other, less informed, moderators.

 

You are right about volume analysis - it's all that really matters. After all it is volume that motivates price - Price doesn't motivate price and the passage of time does not motivate price, it is the occurrence of trade (buying and selling) that motivates price.

 

Knowing that it is not the passage of time but rather the occurrence of buying and selling that drives price makes one wonder why anybody would ever base their trade on indicators with price as the prime input (EMA, Bollinger, RSI, Candlesticks, Stochastic, CCI....) and to further compound the error, apply those indicators to time constant data vessels.

 

Three decades ago I was taught that the best indicators of future price don't have price as any part of their calculation.

 

As I have mentioned I run a small PRIVATE trading and technology company and the first thing I teach our new traders is that it is buying and selling that drives price. That none of our intra-session charts are time constant charts and almost none of our indicators have price as ANY part of their calculation.

 

My comment to you is simply that buying and selling occur over time, so time is a factor. When the market is testing a top it may take 2 minutes to break through or 20.

 

Also the resting orders are extremely important as the market order hitting the bid is a buyer buying on the bid. sell 1 buy 1. When bids in a 5 tick range suck in 10 12 15 thousand contracts, where is the aggression. Buying or selling.

 

If you trade every ocurrance of volume spikes and change in Delta your bank account will go down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  UrmaBlume said:
The ultra short term bursts of uber intense trade that often establish local intra-session extremes is never shown as resting orders it is auto-executed in a series of orders separated by only a few thousandths of a second.

 

The chart below shows a spike in trade intensity but while this high volume of trade was being executed it was never shown at any level as a resting order by market depth. This trade was auto-executed.

 

While commercial traders CAN successfully hide their method and whether the trade was an opening or closing transaction, they can't hide the fact of their transactions.

 

tradeintensity1.jpg

 

 

I use both bid/ask data as well as volume, trade events, and price movement. All these things impact future price. I trade the ES. I am very interested to hear about how you can possibly predict the market without taking price into consideration. Because of the tick size I had to specifically build my system for the ES. If I want to use my system on other instruments I would have to rebuild it with the other instrument price considerations. Any information about how to consider market sympathy without price data would be greatly appreciated.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.