Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Jugador

This Guys Good!!

Recommended Posts

Guest Fedup

hi jugador,

 

why is it when you say good things people assume automatically your selling something!..i see your screenies and great job man! good luck with transfering to live...you may hit a wall here and there but keep after it! Id like to see what your using on ninja trader as far as software, maybe we can share war stories! but good for you my man!:applaud:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Fedup said:
hi jugador,

 

why is it when you say good things people assume automatically your selling something!..i see your screenies and great job man! good luck with transfering to live...you may hit a wall here and there but keep after it! Id like to see what your using on ninja trader as far as software, maybe we can share war stories! but good for you my man!:applaud:

 

Actually only 1 guy assumed that and they had a post count of 1. Is posting two days results on a simulator really that much of a "good thing"? Seems pretty random to me but hey what do I know? Anyway if you like that sort of thing you will love this thread http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f103/trader-p-l-2009-a-5521.html where a couple of people post there live results pretty much every day.

 

Btw Jugador hows it going mate? Are you still hitting it pretty consistently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Fedup said:
hi jugador,

 

why is it when you say good things people assume automatically your selling something!..Id like to see what your using on ninja trader as far as software, maybe we can share war stories! but good for you my man!:applaud:

 

Well, you can't really blame folks for being suspicious. There are a lot of unscrupulous people out there. :roll eyes: It sounds like your not sure what Ninjatrader is. It is a software. I saw a link the other day here on this site. It's free to evaluate, so check it out. :cool: Thanks for the applause! :haha:

 

  BlowFish said:
Btw Jugador hows it going mate? Are you still hitting it pretty consistently?

 

Well, I shifted my attention the last few days. I've been focusing on "position sizing strategies". Here's one I kinda like... I start with 1 contract, if it's a winner, I trade 2 on the next trade. If it's a winner, I start over and go back to 1.

 

If the 2nd trade (2 contracts) loses, I still go back to 1. I quit if I lose 4 trades in a row. The sequence is 1,1,1,2. Basically, what I'm looking for is back-to-back winners. If I can get 1 back-to-back winner before I lose 4 in a row, I have a profit. If I lose 4 in a row, I lose $625 (minus any profits) and call it a day.

 

Here's a screenie from this morning. I lost the 1st trade (1 contract), and won the 2nd trade (1 contract), and won the 3rd trade (2 contracts). So, I made $235...

 

Still got a bunch of back testing to do! :roll eyes:

3twenty6.thumb.jpg.bdd3a8e26b3548e5f739b81fde4975f9.jpg

Edited by Jugador
Incorrect info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
Jug - you should join us here!

 

Thanks for the invite. Right now, I don't really want the pressure of accountability. But, I may join in later on when I feel I can keep up with you! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Jugador said:
Well, you can't really blame folks for being suspicious. There are a lot of unscrupulous people out there. :roll eyes: It sounds like your not sure what Ninjatrader is. It is a software. I saw a link the other day here on this site. It's free to evaluate, so check it out. :cool: Thanks for the applause! :haha:

 

 

 

Well, I shifted my attention the last few days. I've been focusing on "position sizing strategies". Here's one I kinda like... I start with 1 contract, if it's a winner, I trade 2 on the next trade. If it's a winner, I start over and go back to 1.

 

If the 2nd trade (2 contracts) loses, I still go back to 1. I quit if I lose 4 trades in a row. The sequence is 1,1,1,2. Basically, what I'm looking for is back-to-back winners. If I can get 1 back-to-back winner before I lose 4 in a row, I have a profit. If I lose 4 in a row, I lose $625 (minus any profits) and call it a day.

 

Here's a screenie from this morning. I lost the 1st trade (1 contract), and won the 2nd trade (1 contract), and won the 3rd trade (2 contracts). So, I made $235...

 

Still got a bunch of back testing to do! :roll eyes:

 

very good fib progression ( aka snowballing) From FF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you are on the right track with looking at money management strategies. You can take something pretty marginal and show a profit with good MM. In fact that was really the heart of the original turtle system, starting small on a break out and pyramiding fairly aggressively. The signal was pretty much an x day breakout (from memory) nothing sophisticated.

 

Something else occurs to me.... essentially you are fading the turtle system right? You might want to look for something called 'Turtle Soup' and I think there is even a 'Turtle Soup +1'. It was a system (by Linda Bradford Raschke I believe) that does just that (fade turtles). I imagine that might be pretty interesting to you. Might be in her street smarts book which is (unusually) a book I don't have!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
You can take something pretty marginal and show a profit with good MM. In fact that was really the heart of the original turtle system, starting small on a break out and pyramiding fairly aggressively. The signal was pretty much an x day breakout (from memory) nothing sophisticated.

 

Yeah, I'm pretty convinced MM is key. Yeah, the entry signal was just a simple breakout of the Donchian channel. On System 1, it was a 20 period, and on System 2, it was a 55 period.

 

 

  BlowFish said:

Something else occurs to me.... essentially you are fading the turtle system right? You might want to look for something called 'Turtle Soup' and I think there is even a 'Turtle Soup +1'. It was a system (by Linda Bradford Raschke I believe) that does just that (fade turtles). I imagine that might be pretty interesting to you. Might be in her street smarts book which is (unusually) a book I don't have!

 

Right...I was fading the signals. On a typical "average range" day, you can make a bundle. It's that occasional trendy day that kills ya. :rofl: The Turtles had a strategy (it's in the pdf I gave a link to) called "The Whipsaw". Those signals are fun to fade on a choppy typical range day.

 

I believe the Turtle System works (even intraday) if you can stomach the drawdowns. But, I'm afraid my personality isn't very well suited to that style. :hmpf:

 

I'm googling Linda's "Turtle Soup", now. Thanks! :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jugador,

 

A few posts back you mentioned your fib serious for position sizing:

 

  Quote
Well, I shifted my attention the last few days. I've been focusing on "position sizing strategies". Here's one I kinda like... I start with 1 contract, if it's a winner, I trade 2 on the next trade. If it's a winner, I start over and go back to 1.

 

I was wondering how this has been working for you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  swansjr said:
Jugador,

 

A few posts back you mentioned your fib serious for position sizing:

 

 

 

I was wondering how this has been working for you?

 

Hi...Well, as some of the guys here could have probably guessed, it didn't work so great. The problem was, a couple of losers ($625) in a row wiped out my (smaller) winners. :roll eyes:

 

So, I've shifted my attention back to trying to catch a trend with The Whipsaw strategy. I lost $500 yesterday and $500 today. But, I'm not gonna be tempted to fade the signals and take $500. I'm gonna stick with it until I catch a good up or down day.

 

And, if that don't work, I'm gonna go on Ebay and see if I can get a good crystal ball! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about that. I guess a general rule is to have your losses not be out of proportion to your wins. Unless your system is very accurate with a high win ratio. I’m working on incorporating a running into my EC scalping. I think your suggestion on the position size is a good idea. That is, when I do trade two contracts the second will act as a runner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jugador, I'm pretty much at the same stage you're at - just starting out. I know I'm stating the obvious here but any system will work on some days but not others. What I find myself doing is on the days when my system doesn't work (non-trending) is looking at other indicators or other time frames trying to find the holy grail that works all or most of the time. Funny because I know there's no such thing but somehow the search calls out to me. I've come to realize that although it's called day trading I must not get caught up too much on daily results and focus on the bigger picture (monthly) results. Over the course of a month does my system produce the results desired or needed. If yes, then just keep trading that system with extreme discipline and never stray from the rules. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard a lot of expressions about how you feel when you know the hammer is comming down on your account, but this one is the funniest one I've heard in a long time...."Enter a newbie trading live....and it's sweaty palms....jumpy mouse finger....pounding heart....and eyes darting around like someone that dropped the soap in a prison shower.".....You hit the nail on the head!!!! Thanks for the laugh Freeflyva!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Actually I always though the whole point of that expression is that you have to walk the walk before you talk the talk. Seems you might have put the cart before the horse.

 

The figures don't look too bad having said that. I would say you are in a dangerous position right now. Firstly sim is pretty different to when money is at risk. The real big issue is that it seems like you are setting yourself up for is this:- If you win from the start when you get the inevitable drawdowns it is far far more difficult to deal with emotionally. This happened to me. I did extra ordinarily well when I first started trading I grew a small account to six figures over a few months in a statistically significant way (it wasn't luck). However some how I lost the thread and never have been able to capture the same mental state that I had in those early days.

 

One of the trading psychologists (maybe Elder haven't read him for years) asserts that early wins can be far more dangerous than early losses. I would have to agree.

 

Thanks for Sharing this. It's very true!

On the other side, early lost could also result in trauma and never want to go back trading. So watch start small is the key, don't be greedy, don't lose hope, but at the same time don't be too cocky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  swansjr said:
Sorry to hear about that. I guess a general rule is to have your losses not be out of proportion to your wins. Unless your system is very accurate with a high win ratio. I’m working on incorporating a running into my EC scalping. I think your suggestion on the position size is a good idea. That is, when I do trade two contracts the second will act as a runner.

 

100% Swans - that general rule is a huge realization I think and when, as a trader, you realize that minimizing each loss is 10x more important than maximizing each gain then I think you can really turn a corner in this game!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  freeflyva said:
Enter a newbie trading live....and it's sweaty palms....jumpy mouse finger....pounding heart....and eyes darting around like someone that dropped the soap in a prison shower.

 

. . . The market lets everyone win at the beginning. It likes to let you win until you get overconfident and trade more contracts. Then it's time for the Kleenex and the antacids as you scream yourself to sleep in the fetal position. At that point you'll truly understand the meaning of regret. That is....once the imodium kicks in. It is then....that your journey will begin.

 

rotlmao . . . old post but great

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.