Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JohnE

VOLUME or TPO's ???

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this is a bit off topic.

 

Am i right in assuming the followings.

 

The TPOC is the line of price, where 50% of tpos are above and 50% of tpos are below.

 

The VPOC is the line where the greatest volume traded.

 

Rgs,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be too strange to consider that a volume based profile would be exactly whats wrong with trying to decipher and find trading rules for Market Profile?

It's a fact that the opening of a market and the end of that same day are times of incredibly high volume everyday. Already then, the volume profile becomes a strange endeavor, leaning more towards these high volume times then towards the truth.

Can we trust that the truth is found in looking for more information (ie volume) while discarding the past (ie rotation).

Because something seems simpler does not mean that it is. A rotation based profile evades the daily routine of the volume "U" formation. If you trusted in the volume profile, it would almost be akin to trusting the open or close of each day as the center of your bell curve, due simply to the height of volume at those times.

Thoughts anyone???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trades are trades and they are reflected by volume. Would you rather know where the most trades took place or where price spent the most time? If the former use volume profile if the latter use TPO's. It is possible (but unlikely of course) for the POC to be at a level where a single trade for a single contract took place. The peak volume is by definition where the most trade took place so where the buyers and sellers where most in agreement. The PoC will exist where buyers and sellers are in agreement but it certainly wont necessarily be where the most buyers and sellers are in agreement.

 

Jperls excellent trading with market statistics threads have some discussions on this. They are compelling on various levels. In short volume profiles (and VWAP's with SD bands) are statistically relevant. TPO's are most certainly not.

 

if you want some arbitary 'lines' to trade against, sure, use POC, VAH, VAL, floor pivots, S1, R1, yesterdays mid point, whatever floats your boat :). They are all decent heuristics but that is all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good way to decide which is more important is to compare the reaction of price at the high TPO low volume overnight activity to the price reaction at the higher volume low tpo areas from yesterday or from earlier in the day session. Many times you will see that the high TPO low volume overnight areas trump the high volume low tpo areas in terms of reaction. I have concluded that the high TPO's are more relevant for my trading as far as the market profile is concerned.

 

I know a lot of people who only look at the market profile for the day session only. Why look at only a quarter of the picture? I took the Dalton course and know he refers to the overnight activity as "weak hands" which is truly silly since major trading firms all have overnight trading desks and most major independent traders treat the 24 hour markets like a 24 hour market and use the overnight to get in and out of positions.

 

Of course, you can certainly trade without using MP too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input guys. I appreciate it. I've got another weird observation to throw out there, please tell me what you think. Here goes!!!!!

"Volume is irrelevant!"

Here's the theory: Markets are 24 hr a day instruments. With this in mind all price movements are equal unless they overlap which makes them more valuable ( or at least more telling as places of value). The reason being that what happens around the world to influence price movement in the ES for example, is happening in various world stock markets and dollar relationships at potentially high volume but as most ES traders are asleep it is unfolding as low volume areas on the ES profile, fooling traders into thinking that certain price areas are not valuable due to low volume.

Notice that all night profiles are skewed towards the end of the night session as volume is picking up, making a volume based night profile completely and totally useless, and proving a rotation based profile as far more valuable.

The only incorrect assumption of Market Profile by Steidlemayer may have been his first, that TPO's are a proxy for volume, instead of possibly being more valuable and telling than volume.

Please let me know what you think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a lengthy thread and I haven't actual read through it, but I will agree completely with Omni's original comment. I use MP extensively (I used to compute POC moves in my head well before they happened...pretty geeky, but that is my approach). I must say, however, that I don't look at TPO's at all. I believe that, for my approach, it is a completely outdated look on the market. 30 min TPO's made sense when Steidlemeyer didn't have access to real time and accurate volume data (mostly floor trading at that time).

 

I look at volume profiles almost exclusively when it comes to assessing and using the auction as my main market-generated input. I tweet a lot on this subject and have held a couple of chats/webinars on it at various places.

 

I think the most important thing to take away from here is that MP or VP is NOT a system. It is simply a way of categorizing or organizing the market. It is what you do with that information that dictates which one suits your needs. Again, I find it easier to go with volume than TPO, but that is just a personal preference for the setups I trade.

 

Cheers,

FT71

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TPOs are useful as a measure of imbalance.

 

So long as the bid or ask moved, there was enough volume to move price and that is what is most important and this is what TPOs approximate, the # of ticks of movement in X amount of time. A market can grind sideways on huge volume --- which would be low TPO counts.

 

This is an example of a useful MP concept -- just not in probably how most think of it -- high TPOs to me are not a 'proxy for volume' --- they are a proxy for 'imbalance'...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a lengthy thread and I haven't actual read through it, but I will agree completely with Omni's original comment. I use MP extensively (I used to compute POC moves in my head well before they happened...pretty geeky, but that is my approach). I must say, however, that I don't look at TPO's at all. I believe that, for my approach, it is a completely outdated look on the market. 30 min TPO's made sense when Steidlemeyer didn't have access to real time and accurate volume data (mostly floor trading at that time).

 

I look at volume profiles almost exclusively when it comes to assessing and using the auction as my main market-generated input. I tweet a lot on this subject and have held a couple of chats/webinars on it at various places.

 

I think the most important thing to take away from here is that MP or VP is NOT a system. It is simply a way of categorizing or organizing the market. It is what you do with that information that dictates which one suits your needs. Again, I find it easier to go with volume than TPO, but that is just a personal preference for the setups I trade.

 

Cheers,

FT71

 

Would you care to let us in on just how you would specifically use a volume profile for the setups you trade. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.