Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

dazman

Indicator Advice

Recommended Posts

what are the best indicators for the ES. I know enough to be dangerous but am trying to make the best sense of a combination of them macd, rsi, srsi, mov. avgs. and what parameters do you use. Also, does anyone know anything about the indicators that traders international uses to overlay the actual chart. I believe that they use a rsi and stochastics. It is a ninja trader feed through e-signal. I've just finally funded my mirus account and am struggling. I do great on paper, but the fills are just simply different. Any help suggestions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is completely dependent on what you want to use the indicators for. Each indicator needs to serve a purpose--what do you want the indicator to tell you? How will each indicator improve your strategy?

 

Edit: I should add that indicators are not a REQUIREMENT. It is perfectly possible to have a profitable strategy that doesn't use any indicators at all, so keep that in mind, and only use an indicator if you really think it would help you in a way that pure price action can't do directly. Sometimes I think of indicators as "visual aids". They can make something apparent in a single glance which might take longer to see clearly if you were just looking at bars on a chart.

Edited by diablo272

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks diablo,

 

That in fact is what i am trying to do is put together a game plan. I'm still learnig about how navigating around ninja it can be a bit frustraing some times. I wonder if n7 will help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering all that has eventually to be unlearned by so many traders who go the indicator route, I urge you to at least skim the following thread:

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f30/price-action-only-5074.html

 

Even if you incorporate indicators later, understanding price action will enable you to understand them and make the most of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this 'chatting' thing, but I have been studying and watching the es and ym mini's for several years and trading both practice and real accounts. The thing about any indicator or value of any kind is they are only relative to another value. Any value by itself is useless, it has to be compared. For example the Macd is a comparison of ema's usually the 9, 12, and 26. The signals are generated with cross over's. The same with Stochastics. But these also have to be compared with the same signals generated in different time frames. For intraday I use the standard Macd and slow Stochastic on a number of time frames say the 1 min and the 5 min charts. Now for example the oscillation of the stochastics from overbought to oversold on a one minute chart will happen 2 or 3 times while the five min. moves only once from overbought to oversold. I use the longer term chart for index direction and the short term for entry points. This is a simple system and to be sure I look at many more indicators at the same time, like trin, tick, and most importantly 'technical pivots'. I know this is getting long winded but the real point I want to make is that you have to learn to read these indicators yourself and this can only be done through observation over a long time..... usually years.... or you could just sign onto one of the guru's and trade his interpretation of data; but at the end of the day you will be no further ahead. You have to learn to 'read' the data yourself... period... or you will never have the confidence to trade profitably for yourself. Remember though you don't have to know everything to be able to 'read' the markets and it is 'trade management' that will make you money not reading the markets. The fact that you can stop yourself out of bad trades and let your winners run combined with a 'coin toss' for entry.... you should be able to make money. But if you have a simple signal generating system like the one I described above combined with good trade management skills you will do just fine. Hope this helps. Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.... so I had a good look at 3 relative time and sales windows; 1<, 50<, and 200< . I saw these three used by some guru so thought I would try to see what they are all about. I tried to google for an explanation of how to interpret them but the best I got was 'screen time', other than the obvious meaning larger players 200< usually are the volume surges that will push the price in their direction. That part is simple but these also have to be juxtaposed with S/R and I assume technical pivots would be good to keep an eye on. So I guess I'm asking for someone who uses 'price action' as represented by time and sales could give me a detailed description of how they traded the ES today for example. How they read it or what....

 

What really got me interested is when one of you mentioned all the stages one goes thru, from the Guru, thru indicators, and finally to 'pure' price and volume. Who knew I was only in a 'stage'.... lol lol. Well, again I would be very interested to get some more insight into this 'tape reading'..... thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Contrary to the 'indicators are bad' phenomena that has swept through TL, I would say find what works for you and then work it.

 

Each indicator has a strength/weakness. You need to know what those are and how to maximize the strength and minimize the weakness.

 

Examples
:

MOVING AVERAGES
= great in a trend, can get beat up in non-trends

OSCILLATORS
(such as MACD) = can work well in non-trend, can try to catch a falling knife in a trend

TREND FOLLOWERS
(such as Trix) = very nice in trend, not so great in non-trend

FIXED LINES
(such as pivots, fibs) = can provide timely support/resistance, can also provide levels that in hindsight were meaningless

There is a common them here though... whether or not you are in a trending market. Sounds easy enough to say, but identifying that in real-time takes a lot of practice and screen time.

 

So while having a screen of 40 indicators is repeatedly redundant, you can use them and you can make money using them. In it's purest sense of form, it'd be great to pull up a 1 or 5 minute chart and just know instinctively when to buy and when to sell, but that's difficult, esp for a new person. When you are new, having something that can give that added confidence is needed.

 

Here's the catch w/ indicators though .... if you play w/ them and test out all different settings and such, you may never stop testing and playing. There are so many indicators out there that it's rather amazing. My suggestion would be to find a trending one and non-trending one and see if you can get them to work w/ each other.

 

There's also been mention of confluence and that can be pretty powerful IMO. Confluence meaning when multiple things are saying the same thing - whether that's a mix of indicators, fixed lines, time frames, etc. etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always had good luck using the DMI.

The D+ and D- lines will show you the trend direction, while the ADX line show you the trend strength.

 

I will NOT enter a trade until the ADX line is (1) below 25%, (2) flat or riseing upward.

 

Put this on a chart (greater than 5 min) and look back and see what it tells you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  dazman said:
what are the best indicators for the ES.

 

Price Action alone + Ample Screen Time,

 

however if you need to use other indicators, then you need to ask and answer from your self what diablo272 proposed in post #2

 

"This is completely dependent on what you want to use the indicators for. Each indicator needs to serve a purpose--what do you want the indicator to tell you? How will each indicator improve your strategy?"

 

Good Luck...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  brownsfan019 said:
...

OSCILLATORS (such as MACD) = can work well in non-trend, can try to catch a falling knife in a trend...

 

 

different class of indicator complement each other

 

oscillators are never used alone, or with another oscillator.

they are always meant to work with a trend indicator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Robert Joyce said:
Tams, how do you differentiate between indicators and oscillators, and could you give me a few examples.

 

 

when you say indicator (the red highlight above), I assume you missed the word "trend" from my post.

 

 

oscillator is a type of indicator.

 

oscillator goes up and down...

usually centered around zero, for scales of +1 to -1,

or,

centered around 50, for scale of 0 to 100.

oscillator has bounds -- it will not go above the upper limit, nor below the lower limit.

 

(ps. MACD can seem to go "boundless"... )

 

 

 

a trend indicator might look like it oscillate too,

but it is not centered around a value,

nor does it have bounds.

 

 

 

 

stochastic is an oscillator

moving average is a trend indicator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I split oscillators into two types bounded or unbounded (which I think is probably the norm). As Tams says they should all be centred. You can usually make an unbounded oscillator bounded by some sort of normalisation. CCI is another example of an unbounded oscillator. Unbounded oscillators still don't reach infinity they are 'bounded' by statistics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.