Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ZenMachine

Differences Between Markets

Recommended Posts

Hello board!

 

I'm a total newbie who just starting learning about trading. I'm thinking to focus on the YM first and study how the market behaves and the business of trading, as the YM (from what I understand) is one of easier markets for beginning traders.

But once I get comfortable with it, I'd like to venture out to forex markets, possibly JPY/GBP or JPY/EUR.

 

Here's my question. Are futures and forex markets similar enough so leaning in one and moving to another makes sense? Or are they so different that learning in one and changeing to another is a waste of time, and I should rather start and stick in one area?

 

Thanks for your input.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would start in whichever market you ultimately want to trade, and then switch if you need to. No market is going to be significantly "easier" than any other if you're just starting out and don't have a specific reason for trading the YM instead of a given currency pair. You're better off getting more experience in the market you're really interested in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup... start with what you want to trade. They all have a "personality".

 

I mean, all markets are going to print up basically the same kind of patterns, but the ES for example has more backfill than say the YM or NQ because it is arbitraged with the big contract so it doesn't move as much "in a straight line" as the YM/NQ/TF sometimes due to that because its always backfilling with the big contract.

 

Likewise, the FX markets have a different personality than a lot of the emini's... They tend to get momentum going in a swing and will BLAST through prior highs or lows... where in the mini's where this still happens sometimes, its much more likely to stop run or fake you out because the pit is pushing the market through those areas to catch people...

 

Again, these examples aren't 100% all the time (or even 40%) but each market has its own personality so I say learn where you want to stay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...I'm a total newbie who just starting learning about trading. I'm thinking to focus on the YM first and study how the market behaves ...But once I get comfortable with it, I'd like to venture out to forex markets, possibly JPY/GBP or JPY/EUR.

 

Here's my question. Are futures and forex markets similar enough so leaning in one and moving to another makes sense? Or are they so different that learning in one and changeing to another is a waste of time, and I should rather start and stick in one area?

 

 

 

re: "I'm a total newbie who just starting learning about trading... start and stick in one area?" etc. Imo, as a total noobie, you should not yet know which instrument(s) you will ultimately end up trading. A noobie should stay open to exploration, not totally haphazardly, but still with a questioning of what fits and is energizing. Yes the 'signatures' between instruments, for example ndx's and fx, are different but exposure to many in the beginning is imo ultimately beneficial... particularily if you are keeping a eye on developing systems that are truly transferable (ie yes they are "similar enough")

Basically, do what it takes to become extremely adaptive - even if you stay with just one market you will find that its 'signature' rotates and changes too. In the beginning, be open, flitter about(with your mind not your money :) ), enjoy - you will know when it's time to settle down and start to specialize... All these comments are fairly general. You alone can determine what is best for your particular nature.

 

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One step at a time there newbie. :roll eyes:

 

Pick a market - Indexes or Forex - and then roll w/ it. The grass may look greener on the other side initially, but this business is hard enough as it is w/o trying to be a market master in multiple, different markets.

 

I personally would suggest the regulated world of the US futures contracts.

 

INDEXES: ES, YM, NQ

 

BONDS: ZB, ZN, ZF

You can't go wrong IMO with any of those. I would pick one subgroup (indexes or bonds) and then focus on that subgroup - meaning, watch the ES and NQ while trading the YM. You don't have to trade the ES or NQ, but just see how the react in comparison to the YM. The moves should be similar, but also a little different.

 

This thread is a good little thread about bonds. I'm having a field day in bonds lately and barely even look at the ES anymore. Of course this depends on your trading style, but I think too many overlook bonds in their search.

 

If you need some software, I would demo Open ECry's. It's free to customers and you can get a free trial as well. I believe the trial is 2 weeks, but if you ask nicely, you should be able to get an extension on that if needed. Data IS INCLUDED in their package. Hard to beat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for more inputs.

I've decided to NOT decide on one instrument, and keep an open mind. There are things I need to learn (i.e. the big picture) before deciding what I'll be trading in at this point.

Again, thanks all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for more inputs.

I've decided to NOT decide on one instrument, and keep an open mind. There are things I need to learn (i.e. the big picture) before deciding what I'll be trading in at this point.

Again, thanks all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what's the smallest amount of capital you need to trade YM?

 

I've heard to go with a big margin requirement incase the account blows up but what's a good amount to start with to just get a feel with say one contract?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jupiter,

 

As far as I know, the smallest amount of capital you need to (day) trade one YM is $500.

As far as is realistic, (and not being eaten up in high commissions and bank wire fees, btw :( ) real "staying power" starts around 12-15,000 USD per car.

.. very generally speaking though - your individual experience and edge may push that higher or lower... hth

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
what's the smallest amount of capital you need to trade YM?

 

This can save you much money:

 

Start paper trading and do it until you are consistably profitable over a longer time period (if daytrading say 2 weeks in a row (that's still short), if interday trading much longer).

 

When you have found a way of becoming profitable on paper you will know EXACTLY how much downside you have to expect from your strategy. Then you can easily answer your question by yourself.

 

As long as you cannot answer the question by yourself this is a failsafe indicator that you better stay away from real money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.