Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

  forrestang said:
Some observations on the primary trend for EU with regards to this thread. I think the pic is self explanatory, so post if something doesn't make sense.

 

Well stated.

Price is consolidating at a long term Prime Resistance top.

Prime PPF of Resitance is the confirming oscillation of that top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Logic said:
Well stated.

Prime PPF of Resitance is the confirming oscillation of that top.

 

So when would you know? Would you consider that PPF that occurred(the major one on the right of the chart) a Prime PPF to confirm that top?

 

Or would you need to see a LL created first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
So when would you know? Would you consider that PPF that occurred(the major one on the right of the chart) a Prime PPF to confirm that top?

 

Or would you need to see a LL created first?

 

You know when the Prime Oscillation is created and that is coordinated now at the price level at 1.4627.

 

A LL confirmes the PPF (LH)

Another LH is further confirmation of the top.

Another PPF (LH) is further confirmation.

 

The Ninja Trader template I posted has both the trading oscillations and Strength oscillations listed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have an EU chart for some analysis.

 

First let me ask, is the idea to define the trend based on HHs and HLs? I am attaching a pic showing the basic trend that everyone has understood for a while. Is this how you would go about defining the trend similar to this pic.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24304&stc=1&d=1303824267

 

Also once you have that HH or LL, is the idea to then enter on the next pb once that trend has been defined as shown in the picture? Also, you are willing to take countertrend trades against the direction of the OVERALL trend, as long as it matches the direction of the current leg you are trading correct?

 

Next, just attaching a picture of the EU action currently. Right now, there was a LL put in place, now we have a HH. So does that mean this current pa is just still stagnant and we need to wait for a trend to be put in place?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24303&stc=1&d=1303824267

Prime2011-04-26_080603.thumb.jpg.35e56fa453a0c0ddd6254c9fbe6ec876.jpg

5aa7106f62316_4-26-20118-12-34AM.thumb.png.2898ecdedee3e42238ab3dadedde0c16.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forrestang said:
I have an EU chart for some analysis.

 

First let me ask, is the idea to define the trend based on HHs and HLs? I am attaching a pic showing the basic trend that everyone has understood for a while. Is this how you would go about defining the trend similar to this pic.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24304&stc=1&d=1303824267

 

Also once you have that HH or LL, is the idea to then enter on the next pb once that trend has been defined as shown in the picture? Also, you are willing to take countertrend trades against the direction of the OVERALL trend, as long as it matches the direction of the current leg you are trading correct?

 

Next, just attaching a picture of the EU action currently. Right now, there was a LL put in place, now we have a HH. So does that mean this current pa is just still stagnant and we need to wait for a trend to be put in place?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=24303&stc=1&d=1303824267

 

The annotating of your chart is perfect. Look how my chart is different. I break the indicator up to Trading oscillations and Strength oscillations. If you want to talk about it, let's SKYPE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't receive Crude Oil data and am new to Multicharts, so I am having a little trouble following the chart template. Is the following correct?

 

1. The price portion of the chart is 343 volume bars with labels based on the prime trading oscillations on the next fastest chart, which would be 49 volume bars.

 

2. The second pane is the ERG and ERG histogram based on the 343 volume chart.

 

3. The bottom pane is the ERG histogram from the 2401 volume chart.

 

4. A change in the color of the ERG histogram on the bottom pane shows a change in

SHORT term strength?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  prby78 said:
I don't receive Crude Oil data and am new to Multicharts, so I am having a little trouble following the chart template. Is the following correct?

 

1. The price portion of the chart is 343 volume bars with labels based on the prime trading oscillations on the next fastest chart, which would be 49 volume bars.

 

2. The second pane is the ERG and ERG histogram based on the 343 volume chart.

 

3. The bottom pane is the ERG histogram from the 2401 volume chart.

 

4. A change in the color of the ERG histogram on the bottom pane shows a change in

SHORT term strength?

 

The template I posted was for NinjaTrader not MultiCharts.

Email me and I will send you the indicator and a template workspace for Multicharts.

(wm.schamp@pricephysics.com)

 

1. Price bars are 343 Volume Bars.

2. 2nd pane is Trading ERG & Trading ERG Histogram based on the 343 Volume Bars

3. Bottom pane is the Strength ERG & Strength ERG Histogram based on the 2401 Volume Bars

4. Change in color in Trading ERG or Trading ERG Histogram is where the primary Trade entries and Trade exits take place & specifically where Long Term Strength is confirmed from the Trading ERG.

5. Change in color in the Strength Histogram is where we see short term strength. We do not use the Strength ERG. Too long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Logic said:
I break the indicator up to Trading oscillations and Strength oscillations.

 

  forrestang said:
When you have an opportunity, could you further explain this?

 

Yes, please. I second the request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Strength Histogram

 

Yes, I understand where it is on the chart and what its based on, but I was hoping for more information on how it is used in your method.

 

As I recall from wading through the mess in that other forum the largest volumeframe was used to determine Primary Trend: Bull or Bear. Or am I mistaken? Does the Strength Histogram replace that?

 

I noticed that most of the trades you've shown were taken in agreement with the color of the strength histogram. So do you use the strength histogram as a filter?

 

Any insights you're willing to share are appreciated greatly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  prby78 said:
Re: Strength Histogram

 

Yes, I understand where it is on the chart and what its based on, but I was hoping for more information on how it is used in your method.

 

As I recall from wading through the mess in that other forum the largest volumeframe was used to determine Primary Trend: Bull or Bear. Or am I mistaken? Does the Strength Histogram replace that?

 

I noticed that most of the trades you've shown were taken in agreement with the color of the strength histogram. So do you use the strength histogram as a filter?

 

Any insights you're willing to share are appreciated greatly.

 

I'm on SKYPE. It's easy to share my sreen to show you. Picture is worth a thousand words you know. Let me know if that works. Email me at wm.schamp@pricephysics.com and I will forward you my contact info. I do SKYPE every afternoon after trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Logic,

 

I just finished reading THE thread from ET and finally got some basic idea.

 

Before I could ask some questions with specific setups I wonder if you could do me a favor.

 

I took the indicator from the other site and wonder if this looks right compared to your chart especially histogram part?

 

I don't have old data and couldn't compare my chart vs yours that you posted here.

 

If this doesn't look right or if you have updated version could you please share it?

 

This chart is from 1-18-12 and time's pacific time. It's 2401 volume.

 

Thank you.

PFLOGIC.thumb.jpg.b07da451529a9ecfcfe4cdbbe52b167f.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  kalalex said:
Hi Logic,

 

I just finished reading THE thread from ET and finally got some basic idea.

Before I could ask some questions with specific setups I wonder if you could do me a favor.

I took the indicator from the other site and wonder if this looks right compared to your chart especially histogram part?

I don't have old data and couldn't compare my chart vs yours that you posted here.

If this doesn't look right or if you have updated version could you please share it?

This chart is from 1-18-12 and time's pacific time. It's 2401 volume.

Thank you.

 

One thing I've found in the many years of using these charts is that real time data and historic data are different. This is why I've always stated that the key to trading is learning to read a chart and that begins with a chart constructed with Constant volume bars. You've done that . . . well done!

 

Now the indicator. Whatever indicator you use it shouldn't be confined to a range. The Sto and MACD are range bound and that is why they are worthless. Most other indicators are just as worthless for the same reasons. This is why I use the Ergodic. It is not because it is range bound not because it has some magical power.

 

Now that I've set the ground rules and explained what I learned digging through and watching over 40,000 hours of real time data, I can tell you the key. Take ANY indicator that isn't range bound, apply it to the chart, adjust it to show you the extreme oscillations and make it smooth to ease you into being comfortable with making decisions on what is shown on the chart. Then watch that chart to establish your confidence in making decision based on those oscillations.

 

The chart you posted is as good as any and if you learn to read it you will be consistently profitable. If you want to play with the parameters in your off hours to see if you can improve on them . . . go for it. That is a good way to learn the indicator.

 

Since posting that thread on that other website, I've tweaked the parameters and improved on them. I've even had a programmer create a program that will read the chart in real time. It will label the entries, exits, reverses, stops and exits in real time. It will display trade alerts on the screen and send trade and exit alerts to my email.

 

A new day is dawning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Logic said:
One thing I've found in the many years of using these charts is that real time data and historic data are different. This is why I've always stated that the key to trading is learning to read a chart and that begins with a chart constructed with Constant volume bars. You've done that . . . well done!

 

Now the indicator. Whatever indicator you use it shouldn't be confined to a range. The Sto and MACD are range bound and that is why they are worthless. Most other indicators are just as worthless for the same reasons. This is why I use the Ergodic. It is not because it is range bound not because it has some magical power.

 

Now that I've set the ground rules and explained what I learned digging through and watching over 40,000 hours of real time data, I can tell you the key. Take ANY indicator that isn't range bound, apply it to the chart, adjust it to show you the extreme oscillations and make it smooth to ease you into being comfortable with making decisions on what is shown on the chart. Then watch that chart to establish your confidence in making decision based on those oscillations.

 

The chart you posted is as good as any and if you learn to read it you will be consistently profitable. If you want to play with the parameters in your off hours to see if you can improve on them . . . go for it. That is a good way to learn the indicator.

 

Since posting that thread on that other website, I've tweaked the parameters and improved on them. I've even had a programmer create a program that will read the chart in real time. It will label the entries, exits, reverses, stops and exits in real time. It will display trade alerts on the screen and send trade and exit alerts to my email.

 

A new day is dawning.

 

It looks like you've come far since the thread in 2009.

Also it's seems that you advanced from trading just pullbacks after HH or LL (that's the basic concept I took from the other thread about your system).

 

If you think I should stick with the indicator I have and be proficient with it

could you post an ES chart, preferably 2401 volume, so I can at least have a chart to base off for comarison.

I know you said it can by ANY non range-bound indicator but it's a CONFIDENCE thing from knowing mine's close enough to yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching over 40,000 hours of real time data works out to - a typical long day of 12 hours of screen watching over 3333 days or 13.332 years if 250 trading days/year.

 

So unless this is covering a far greater period than 13+ years "Billy needs a new hobby and/or just see the light of day".

 

Unless a fat finger was involved in calculations. But then again you don't care for time, now do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SunTrader said:
Watching over 40,000 hours of real time data works out to - a typical long day of 12 hours of screen watching over 3333 days or 13.332 years if 250 trading days/year.

 

So unless this is covering a far greater period than 13+ years "Billy needs a new hobby and/or just see the light of day".

 

Unless a fat finger was involved in calculations. But then again you don't care for time, now do you?

 

12 hours per day X 20 trading days a month X 12 months a year X 15 years = 43,200 hours.

 

The first 9 years it was more like 16 hour days and that doesn't count the typical 15 hour weekends reviewing the weekly data for any errors.

 

Billy's focus was to create a consistently profitable trading program. I did. So I guess all those hours were worth it. I get a kick out of all the hundreds of traders that have made fun of my work over the years that are still trying to put a consistently profitable week of trading together. A typical neurosurgeon's time in training is well under 15,000 hours but people say I couldn't accomplish what I've accomplished with nearly 3 times the time involved.

 

:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.