Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Sanook

VSA Entries and Stops

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I've been looking into VSA for a few months now. I find the story VSA tells of what's happening on a chart quite fascinating, but I'm still yet to find any solid agreement on how to actually trade VSA.

 

Even watching the videos TG have put out, the story is wonderful, and it all makes sense on the left side of the chart, but I often ask myself where's the actual trade? Where do you enter and where do you place the stop on the right edge?

 

When I try to answer this, I usually get caught in no demand after no demand, perplexed as to which one is actually the trigger. Or an upthrust that a few bars later is taken out by another higher upthrust. Similar to what happens with basic price action trading and death by a thousand stops.

 

Would any VSA traders be kind enough to post some real trades in this thread, or show some options to consider before making a trade.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been numerous live trades, options, and considerations shown on the main VSA thread here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f151/vsa-volume-spread-analysis-part-ii-3428.html. Yesterday, I detailed both considerations and entry options here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f151/pure-vsa-5357.html.

 

Why not take the bold step and post a chart or two where you were confused in pulling the trigger. People here will be glad to help you. But, without the context, it's hard to respond in a way that will be helpful for you.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Eiger,

 

I'll put some charts together.

 

Meanwhile, you (or anybody else) could greatly clear something up for me by answering this. On your first 3-minute ES chart from the recent Pure VSA thread, you say, 'Good locations to initiate shorts were at F, G & H.

 

Could you explain why C, the no demand bar, is also not a good location to short. If I could finally get my head around this problem of seeing no demand bars and instantly thinking short, I'll be making progress.

 

With regards to F, would I be correct in thinking that you'd enter a tick below and place the stop a tick above.

 

With regards to G and H, I'll assume again entry is a tick below, but is the stop placed above G and H, or is it left above F. I personally would leave it above F, but if that is seen as being unnecessary then I'll reconsider.

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why not take the bold step and post a chart or two where you were confused in pulling the trigger. People here will be glad to help you. But, without the context, it's hard to respond in a way that will be helpful for you.

 

Eiger

 

There are a few things that confuse me on this 15m chart.

 

1. I'm reading and re-reading MTM, but I still don't really get the entries. All I can see on this chart are the two no supply bars. The first is maybe not great as it closes on it's lows, but the second one looks valid. Even placing a stop behind the high volume down bar would result in a loss. The only other entry I see, but I'm not convinced in the slightest, is the green arrow that could be a test.

 

I see these high volume bars quite often now and what they often lead to. As Tom Williams has called it recently in the VSA webinars, it's this 'churning' period after that totally confuses me. The only solution I can see is to not actually use a stop.

 

2. Again, from the recent VSA webinars, both Tom and Sebastian have said that the bar I have marked is not no demand, as there is strength in the background. However, re-reading the VSA 1 and 2 threads here, it is often stated that these bars are no demand. Quite confusing.

 

3. Again, from the VSA 1 and 2 threads here. Is it standard practice to place these S/R levels that are derived from the wide range bars? I have used one and the green arrow bar does seem to react to it. Is this just coincidence?

 

Thanks.

VSA.jpg.9b07f8d739569fae2240087d827305f1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a quick response to your chart & questions:

 

A - Climactic action - highest volume, wide spread close off the lows at the end of an accelerating downtrend

 

No Demand? Yes, this is technically a No Demand bar as it is an up bar that has volume less than the previous two bars. However (and this is the important point), it occurs after potenetial strength, i.e., the selling climax. No Demand and Test bars occur all over the charts. They must be in the right place to be significant. Always, always, always look to the background first. When there is a SOW in the background, we look for No Demand. When there is a SOS in the background, we discount No Demands

 

1 - market reacts into the high volume area of A and is unable to draw supply - bullish.

 

2 - wide spread up bar close on the highs on strong volume - bullish.

 

B - A higher high is put in - bullish.

 

C & D - Testing occurs at the line you drew. This is candlestick analysis. VSA shows by volume and spread that there is no supply at this level. D is a Hidden Test or Reversal Bar in the right place - this is bullish a chioce entry location.

 

E - Another Test - bullish and a nice entry.

 

3 - Higher high

 

F - Shake Out followed by a bullish up bar

 

G - Test and another choice location for an entry

 

Hope this is helpful,

 

Eiger

5aa70eb031486_ChartExampleFeb1009.thumb.png.b012d75a0511cec7ca0593675b054534.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

F - Shake Out followed by a bullish up bar

 

sure eiger... keep your little dream pillow going.... i'd love to see you call that a shakeout as it is printing...

 

good luck with your real trading.... after all you still need luck trading this brand of guess-ology

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bruno,

On VSA Eiger and others are merely trying to get across the main concepts and principles via static charts, realtime is always going to be tough even if you look at any other method ie. candlesticks, woodie cci, taylor, wyckoff, rsi divergence, elliot, gann etc.

 

attached is a similar analysis via wyckoff as taught at http://www.ltg-trading.com, you can clearly see that this is the only way to illustrate the principles , what is pointed out is what to look for, they don't tell you enter here, exit there etc. it is upto us to learn how to read price/vol in realtime and exploit the moves.

 

If you have concluded that there is no value at all in VSA, best to leave it, why read about it when you could be making progress learning some other way of trading. It will only lead to unnecessary arguments.

 

However if there is anything specific that you do not understand on VSA, put up the question and then if somebody is awkward you have a valid reason to contend.

Have gone through that experience myself recently;)

5aa70eb052aa4_similaranalysisviawyckoff.png.351ca77b60ea6f73717d83c9246b9913.png

5aa70eb0595a6_anotheronES.png.28805eed6a06842ba2a31764f3b26fda.png

Edited by HAKUNA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.