Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

stockmarcus

Risk Per Trade for Intraday Trading?

Recommended Posts

Hey,

 

Just would like to ask a subjective question to see what other people do.

 

For intraday trading what percentage of your trading funds do you put a risk?

 

Im learning the equity indices, and have started to think that 0.25-0.5% sounds reasonable, given 15+ trades in a session. How does that sound to experienced traders?

 

There are points that feed into this question im sure:

- How good your strategy is

- How easy is it to contain losses in your market etc.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest ivanbaj
  stockmarcus said:
Hey,

 

Just would like to ask a subjective question to see what other people do.

 

For intraday trading what percentage of your trading funds do you put a risk?

 

Im learning the equity indices, and have started to think that 0.25-0.5% sounds reasonable, given 15+ trades in a session. How does that sound to experienced traders?

 

There are points that feed into this question im sure:

- How good your strategy is

- How easy is it to contain losses in your market etc.

 

Thanks

 

I believe in fractional Kelly. I am currently using 1/4 Kelly trying to up it to 1/2 Kelly. To use Kelly you have to have an idea of your edge. For example if your edge is 10% - Kelly will be 10%, 1/2 Kelly 5% and 1/4 Kelly will be 2.5% of your equity per trade.

 

If your goals is optimal growth of your equity with disregard to the rest then Kelly is the way to go. If your goal is preserve capital then fix betting with less then 1% will be good.

 

At some point one finds that his edge is real and I would suggest pushing it to up to 1/2 Kelly. Full Kelly is not applicable as there is no way to know for sure that your edge is constant. The draw down will be devastating by the time you find that you need to adjust the bet size.

 

It seems that the usual 2% suggested by many books and traders works good for most. This would suggest an edge of 5% to 10% for most. I am crazy to be assuming that my current system gives me 20% edge. It is working for me so far so I am using 5 to 10% bet sizes. But don't try this unless you relay relay think that you have 20% edge.

 

Another fought is that you need a certain number of trades to be able to determine your edge with good statistical probability. I use 60 trades for me. It is different based on your projected win%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  stockmarcus said:
Hey,

 

Just would like to ask a subjective question to see what other people do.

 

For intraday trading what percentage of your trading funds do you put a risk?

 

Im learning the equity indices, and have started to think that 0.25-0.5% sounds reasonable, given 15+ trades in a session. How does that sound to experienced traders?

 

There are points that feed into this question im sure:

- How good your strategy is

- How easy is it to contain losses in your market etc.

 

Thanks

 

You entry dictates your risk. You can not have a mental stop. 1 to 2% per trade risk is a general guide line; it is good.

 

It is the trader who is suppose to design risk/reward ratio.

 

If you are a beginner, it is good to put tight stops. If you need to put tight stops, you have make entries that allows you tight stops. In a sense, looking for tight stop entries could refine your entry strategies.

 

Tight stop could be found in some entries, where the risk could be less than 1%

 

Happy Trading

Gokul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  gsalvadi said:
You entry dictates your risk.

 

Can you elaborate on this? I don't understand how your entry dictates your risk? I thought that your stop does?

  Quote

If you are a beginner, it is good to put tight stops. If you need to put tight stops, you have make entries that allows you tight stops. In a sense, looking for tight stop entries could refine your entry strategies.

 

I don't agree with this. Your stops should be placed at the correct place regardless if you are new or not. If you determine that an optimal stop is 10% below your entry price, this makes no sense to place the stop 5% below your entry price, just because you are new. This is much better to trade a smaller size with a 10% stop with a lower probability to get stopped out than a larger size with a 5% stop with a good chance to get stopped out by normal market fluctuation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say 'intraday' trading, what do you mean? 30 minute charts with 1-2 trades per day or 30 second charts taking 10 trades per hour?

 

The reason I ask is that if you are taking 1-2 trades per day, then I think you can and will have to give your trade more room to work, which means a bigger stop. If you take 10 trades per hour, you better keep the stops reasonable or you will blow your account in no time.

 

In general a 1-2% is what you will read, esp in books; but that is pretty arbitrary. Are we talking about a $5000 account or $500,000?

 

I hate to say it, but the answer IMO is "it depends".

 

This reminds me of a parallel w/ poker playing - when you ask someone how they play AA, the real answer is "it depends". Just asking - how to I play the rockets and providing no other info doesn't cut it. Same here, just asking how much to risk per trade doesn't cut it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks for replying. I can appreciate its a very subjective question.

 

The basis for the question was attempting to calculate the number of contracts i can trade given, 1) trading funds, 2) an number of points for average maxiumum loss*, and 3) a good percentage risk per trade for intraday trading.

 

No of CFD index contracts = (trading funds adjusted for currencies * good risk percentage) / average max loss,

 

given that cfd index contracts move in $1 local currency per point, which would result in that max loss value not (often) being greater than that suggested percentage of trading funds.

 

Will take the 1-2% from general wizdom, thanks. I like being conservative so was thinking 1/2 a percent to limit that risk, but my skills are getting better, 1% doesnt sound bad.

 

Will keep in mind trying to quanitfy my edge based on performance. Not sure if id adjust my trading amount based on that metric though.

 

*or better, from an idea of whats the maximum distance i can get out in when the trade is incorrect. Using european indices and my current trading style, 10 points is a safe average maximum. My trading strategy (and the behavior of the ftse and dax) usually let me get out at a much smaller loss, but 10 points would be an absolute 'youre wrong'. And i generally (try to :)) avoid getting in near market open. I use minute bars and trade as often as there are price patterns which could lead to a profitable transaction.

 

Just in case, im currently using a practice account with 5k US. Improvement in technique has been good. Recently got to 5 consecutive days profit. No not using real money yet :) When i do use real money, balance trading balance will be about the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

StockMarcus - I cant add much more than the others except to say that make sure you are comfortable from a risk loving/averse point of view with whatever system/method for position sizing you adopt......otherwise you will not stick to it (when losses occur), and you will find it harder to grow your contracts as you grow your account size.

 

good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.