Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Predicting Breakouts - Accumulation/Distribution

Recommended Posts

As price consolidates the question is always, how will it break from the consolidation?

 

The answer is that the Net New Trade or net buying and selling during the consolidation will usually tell the story.

 

The graph below represent trade on 12/16/2008 in the hours before and immediately after a Fed announcement.

 

The bottom graph is our calculation of Net New Trade and is reset at midnight PST. Primarily we use this to determine the net longs or shorts for the session but it also is a very good measure of intra-session net accumulation/distribution.

 

Notice that in the hours before the announcement (which came just after 1100 PST) price was completely flat and traded whithin narrow and well defined boundaries.

 

During that same 4 hour period before 1100 Net New Trade demonstraded steady accumulation.

 

This is a further demonstration of how different measures of buying and selling power do a better job of predicting price than price base indicators such as CCI, MA, EMA, Stochastics, RSI, Bollinger Bands......

 

While the chart below shows almost a whole session the same indications are present in micro intra-session time frames for all of these indicators.

 

clue.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words.

 

There are many different ways to calculate accumulation/distribution/moneyflow, this is ours.

 

We are a small group of private traders and none of our technology is for sale. We do however engage in conversations about the concepts behind our work such as the posts here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets engage in a conversation!!! It looks like the standard money flow indicator something like:

 

if (trade is >= ask)

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] + thisVol;

else

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] - thisVol;

 

It is helpful but hardly a new development.

 

How is your indicator different than MFI?

 

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, lets engage in a conversation!!! It looks like the standard money flow indicator something like:

 

if (trade is >= ask)

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] + thisVol;

else

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] - thisVol;

 

It is helpful but hardly a new development.

 

How is your indicator different than MFI?

 

Thanks again!

 

While we do it a bit differently the base concept is close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While we do it a bit differently the base concept is close.

Okay, so let's dig here, as this seems to be the base of most of your developments. How are you measuring buying vs selling pressure? This is important, because it is quite obviously not bid/ask differences, so must be a different angle. The number of contracts sold is the exact same as bought in all situations, so you're obviously measuring pressure using something similar to bid/ask. Possibly price movement (buying pressure = on uptick, selling pressure = on downtick)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... Possibly price movement (buying pressure = on uptick, selling pressure = on downtick)?

 

Or on the wave. To me, it looks as if you might be calcuating the small swings (or waves) and designating them as either up or down. Volume (or perhaps some other measure of activity) is cummulated by adding the volume in the up waves and subtracting volume in the down waves.

 

Even if this is not on the right track, you have something that looks very good here.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or on the wave. To me, it looks as if you might be calcuating the small swings (or waves) and designating them as either up or down. Volume (or perhaps some other measure of activity) is cummulated by adding the volume in the up waves and subtracting volume in the down waves.

 

Even if this is not on the right track, you have something that looks very good here.

 

Eiger

 

 

seems using the XTL concept in Advanced Get showing up-swing and down-swing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seems using the XTL concept in Advanced Get showing up-swing and down-swing.

 

Not familiar XTL & Advanced Get. The cumulative up/down swing volume just seemed logical from the chart. Nevertheless, I can see how useful this can be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is this indicator

 

Unbounded?

 

UnNormalised?

 

Reset each day?

 

I don't think this reveals to much...my strong hunch is yes to all.

 

Yes to all three, it is reset everday at midnight PST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seems using the XTL concept in Advanced Get showing up-swing and down-swing.

 

This work has nothing to do with Elliott Wave/GET. GET is based solely on price, this particular indicator does not use price in any form as any part of its calculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This work has nothing to do with Elliott Wave/GET. GET is based solely on price, this particular indicator does not use price in any form as any part of its calculation.

Okay, so it seems calculating volume of waves isn't how you do it (as that uses price). I asked before, but the post may have been overlooked: Mind sharing what you are looking at for measuring up/down volume (as you said before, it isn't at bid/ask)? I don't think this little bit of information would threaten your trading systems in the least, and would probably help some of us follow what you're doing further.

 

Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is interesting - for one, because during congestion it better for me to fade my 'accumulators'

 

Urma, does Net New Trade have a trade size condition in its calculations?

 

Thanks,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

This is interesting - for one, because during congestion it better for me to fade my 'accumulators'

 

Urma, does Net New Trade have a trade size condition in its calculations?

 

Thanks,

 

zdo

 

ZDO,

 

How astute, good catch. Transaction size as a measure of cash commitment.

 

While the indicators I have posted here do not include this consideration, others we use do.

 

From a macro prospective what we, as micro short-term action junkies do, is try, in a very precise manner, to locate out of sync commitments of cash to the market place.

 

Again, Good Catch ZDO - In many very diverse markets, immediate knowledge of large/out of sync cash commitment can spawn profits. Regardless of time frame, there is almost always high intensity trade at the extremes.

 

 

cheers

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As price consolidates the question is always, how will it break from the consolidation?

 

While the chart below shows almost a whole session the same indications are present in micro intra-session time frames for all of these indicators.

 

 

Since 4 days, the ES is consolidating in a range. Does your indicator works for this period too? What is it telling us about the breakout?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9236&stc=1&d=1232942141

ES_30.PNG.123998e388ec19eca3cc229611751f35.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before computerized exchanges pit traders held one huge advantage over the public and other off the floor traders - THEY COULD SEE THE ORDER FLOW.

 

In the pits to signal a buy the trader showed both hands palms inward - one hand indicated price and the other the size. Palms out to sell.

 

Orders come from either outside the pit via the phone banks or from traders inside the pit.

 

Inside the pit are several different kinds of traders - individual speculators, brokers, locals and most important of all - the commercial traders. These commercial traders execute large size speculative and hedge trades for the big firms and funds. Everybody in the pit makes sure he knows exactly who these guys are and knows that when the commercial trader puts his palms out to sell that he probably has enough selling to do to put in at least a short term top.

 

With this understanding, should a trader look toward the phone bank and see a sea of palms he knows that a wave of selling is about to hit the market. At the same time should he see a known commercial with palms out he knows size selling is coming.

 

In our trading we use an indicator of session net new commercial trade as shown below. This chart shows several hours before an announcement from the Fed - While price was completely flat - accumulation by commercials was obvious.

 

While it is easy to miss the excitment and energy of the floors of old at the Merc and CBOT - we online traders have it better than they ever did.

 

 

clue.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You already posted this indicator over HERE. If you had something more to say about it you probably should have just added it to the other thread. At the very least you should have used a new chart that wasn't two and a half months old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an entirely different discussion that happens to use the same chart. Because it is different it is not appropriate to post it on the other thread.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to find myself on this web site again inadvertently after Googling something related.

 

I thought I might mention (my 2c) that if you want to spot accumulation/ ditribution than you can use the CD indicator. In the more retail markets (specifically the currencies) you will see large divergence in the CD and price chart before large reversals. Just plot it out for a couple of weeks and you will see it happening each day. There is a bit more to it than that, but if you think about market dynamics you might be able to put it together.

 

This is not so prevalent in the ES. A bit in the ZN but works slightly differently. You can look at retesting levels but lower values of CD to show less strength and possible reversals. This market is a lot thicker so is more reliable, also has a lot of games by big prop firms being played.

 

Also, if CD moves significantly higher and price doesnt move, you can assume some type of accumulation or distribution. It is easy to see in the currencies and ZN where the big money is (exiting an old position/ taking partial profit/ starting a new position) but not so much in certain other markets like ES. Like I said, ES will pretty much track CD all day as it is a very market order driven instrument.

 

I highly recommend plotting the CD for a variety of markets over the medium term and understand their players, characters and cycles. And dont listen to the standard way of reading the CD for every market. It is different for each market based upon its depth and players. There is more to look at but this is good info!:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I thought I might mention (my 2c) that if you want to spot accumulation/ ditribution than you can use the CD indicator. In the more retail markets (specifically the currencies)

 

Where do you get this info?

All markets are predominately institutional. And most institutional trades are not speculative

 

The wrong assumptions make the game very dangerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt think it is the wrong assumption. I am only talking as per the COT reports.

 

I would say that ES and currencies have a lot of dumb money in them (as per the usual expression). This doesnt mean that there isnt just as many (if not more) commercial and non-commercial speculators to balance their positions, because there is. But there is a huge difference between 10% small trader involvement and 30% small trader involvement and what this means for how the market moves day to day.

 

For example, at the moment the S&P futures (see full COT report) you will see that both the commercials and non-commercials (eg hedge funds) are net short. There needs to be some pretty big small time trader involvement for this to happen. Who is holding the other side of their trade? Well not me, I can assure you of that, I am short. But a lot of small traders are long. In other markets, the commercial and non commercial move almost inversely as their is practically zero non-reportable positions.

 

Example- heavy retail markets:

 

--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE

NON-COMMERCIAL | COMMERCIAL | TOTAL | POSITIONS

--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------

LONG | SHORT |SPREADS | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

($50 X S&P 500 INDEX) OPEN INTEREST: 3,190,988

COMMITMENTS

440,541 487,310 84,694 2121988 2391851 2647223 2963855 543,765 227,133

 

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST: 27,216)

15,851 -19,411 3,893 -23,622 57,523 -3,878 42,005 31,094 -14,789

 

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS

13.8 15.3 2.7 66.5 75.0 83.0 92.9 17.0 7.1

 

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS: 546)

108 108 54 215 219 347 357

 

 

Example Non-retail

 

BUTTER (CASH SETTLED) - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE Code-050642

FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/25/14 |

--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE

NON-COMMERCIAL | COMMERCIAL | TOTAL | POSITIONS

--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------

LONG | SHORT |SPREADS | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(CONTRACTS OF 20,000 POUNDS) OPEN INTEREST: 6,905

COMMITMENTS

579 4,168 22 4,965 2,286 5,566 6,476 1,339 429

 

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST: 518)

188 281 -1 342 194 529 474 -11 44

 

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS

8.4 60.4 0.3 71.9 33.1 80.6 93.8 19.4 6.2

 

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS: 31)

8 6 3 14 9 22 18

 

 

 

I think the main point I was trying to make is that a plot of CD can show you accumulation/ distribution. But it really depends on the market on how you should interpret it. Simply by definition, if their is divergence in the price and the cumulative delta then their has to be a surplus or lack of limit orders from the previous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.