Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Predicting Breakouts - Accumulation/Distribution

Recommended Posts

As price consolidates the question is always, how will it break from the consolidation?

 

The answer is that the Net New Trade or net buying and selling during the consolidation will usually tell the story.

 

The graph below represent trade on 12/16/2008 in the hours before and immediately after a Fed announcement.

 

The bottom graph is our calculation of Net New Trade and is reset at midnight PST. Primarily we use this to determine the net longs or shorts for the session but it also is a very good measure of intra-session net accumulation/distribution.

 

Notice that in the hours before the announcement (which came just after 1100 PST) price was completely flat and traded whithin narrow and well defined boundaries.

 

During that same 4 hour period before 1100 Net New Trade demonstraded steady accumulation.

 

This is a further demonstration of how different measures of buying and selling power do a better job of predicting price than price base indicators such as CCI, MA, EMA, Stochastics, RSI, Bollinger Bands......

 

While the chart below shows almost a whole session the same indications are present in micro intra-session time frames for all of these indicators.

 

clue.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words.

 

There are many different ways to calculate accumulation/distribution/moneyflow, this is ours.

 

We are a small group of private traders and none of our technology is for sale. We do however engage in conversations about the concepts behind our work such as the posts here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets engage in a conversation!!! It looks like the standard money flow indicator something like:

 

if (trade is >= ask)

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] + thisVol;

else

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] - thisVol;

 

It is helpful but hardly a new development.

 

How is your indicator different than MFI?

 

Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, lets engage in a conversation!!! It looks like the standard money flow indicator something like:

 

if (trade is >= ask)

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] + thisVol;

else

VolumeAccm = VolumeAccm[t-1] - thisVol;

 

It is helpful but hardly a new development.

 

How is your indicator different than MFI?

 

Thanks again!

 

While we do it a bit differently the base concept is close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While we do it a bit differently the base concept is close.

Okay, so let's dig here, as this seems to be the base of most of your developments. How are you measuring buying vs selling pressure? This is important, because it is quite obviously not bid/ask differences, so must be a different angle. The number of contracts sold is the exact same as bought in all situations, so you're obviously measuring pressure using something similar to bid/ask. Possibly price movement (buying pressure = on uptick, selling pressure = on downtick)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... Possibly price movement (buying pressure = on uptick, selling pressure = on downtick)?

 

Or on the wave. To me, it looks as if you might be calcuating the small swings (or waves) and designating them as either up or down. Volume (or perhaps some other measure of activity) is cummulated by adding the volume in the up waves and subtracting volume in the down waves.

 

Even if this is not on the right track, you have something that looks very good here.

 

Eiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or on the wave. To me, it looks as if you might be calcuating the small swings (or waves) and designating them as either up or down. Volume (or perhaps some other measure of activity) is cummulated by adding the volume in the up waves and subtracting volume in the down waves.

 

Even if this is not on the right track, you have something that looks very good here.

 

Eiger

 

 

seems using the XTL concept in Advanced Get showing up-swing and down-swing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seems using the XTL concept in Advanced Get showing up-swing and down-swing.

 

Not familiar XTL & Advanced Get. The cumulative up/down swing volume just seemed logical from the chart. Nevertheless, I can see how useful this can be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is this indicator

 

Unbounded?

 

UnNormalised?

 

Reset each day?

 

I don't think this reveals to much...my strong hunch is yes to all.

 

Yes to all three, it is reset everday at midnight PST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seems using the XTL concept in Advanced Get showing up-swing and down-swing.

 

This work has nothing to do with Elliott Wave/GET. GET is based solely on price, this particular indicator does not use price in any form as any part of its calculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This work has nothing to do with Elliott Wave/GET. GET is based solely on price, this particular indicator does not use price in any form as any part of its calculation.

Okay, so it seems calculating volume of waves isn't how you do it (as that uses price). I asked before, but the post may have been overlooked: Mind sharing what you are looking at for measuring up/down volume (as you said before, it isn't at bid/ask)? I don't think this little bit of information would threaten your trading systems in the least, and would probably help some of us follow what you're doing further.

 

Thanks :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This is interesting - for one, because during congestion it better for me to fade my 'accumulators'

 

Urma, does Net New Trade have a trade size condition in its calculations?

 

Thanks,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

This is interesting - for one, because during congestion it better for me to fade my 'accumulators'

 

Urma, does Net New Trade have a trade size condition in its calculations?

 

Thanks,

 

zdo

 

ZDO,

 

How astute, good catch. Transaction size as a measure of cash commitment.

 

While the indicators I have posted here do not include this consideration, others we use do.

 

From a macro prospective what we, as micro short-term action junkies do, is try, in a very precise manner, to locate out of sync commitments of cash to the market place.

 

Again, Good Catch ZDO - In many very diverse markets, immediate knowledge of large/out of sync cash commitment can spawn profits. Regardless of time frame, there is almost always high intensity trade at the extremes.

 

 

cheers

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As price consolidates the question is always, how will it break from the consolidation?

 

While the chart below shows almost a whole session the same indications are present in micro intra-session time frames for all of these indicators.

 

 

Since 4 days, the ES is consolidating in a range. Does your indicator works for this period too? What is it telling us about the breakout?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=9236&stc=1&d=1232942141

ES_30.PNG.123998e388ec19eca3cc229611751f35.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before computerized exchanges pit traders held one huge advantage over the public and other off the floor traders - THEY COULD SEE THE ORDER FLOW.

 

In the pits to signal a buy the trader showed both hands palms inward - one hand indicated price and the other the size. Palms out to sell.

 

Orders come from either outside the pit via the phone banks or from traders inside the pit.

 

Inside the pit are several different kinds of traders - individual speculators, brokers, locals and most important of all - the commercial traders. These commercial traders execute large size speculative and hedge trades for the big firms and funds. Everybody in the pit makes sure he knows exactly who these guys are and knows that when the commercial trader puts his palms out to sell that he probably has enough selling to do to put in at least a short term top.

 

With this understanding, should a trader look toward the phone bank and see a sea of palms he knows that a wave of selling is about to hit the market. At the same time should he see a known commercial with palms out he knows size selling is coming.

 

In our trading we use an indicator of session net new commercial trade as shown below. This chart shows several hours before an announcement from the Fed - While price was completely flat - accumulation by commercials was obvious.

 

While it is easy to miss the excitment and energy of the floors of old at the Merc and CBOT - we online traders have it better than they ever did.

 

 

clue.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You already posted this indicator over HERE. If you had something more to say about it you probably should have just added it to the other thread. At the very least you should have used a new chart that wasn't two and a half months old.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an entirely different discussion that happens to use the same chart. Because it is different it is not appropriate to post it on the other thread.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to find myself on this web site again inadvertently after Googling something related.

 

I thought I might mention (my 2c) that if you want to spot accumulation/ ditribution than you can use the CD indicator. In the more retail markets (specifically the currencies) you will see large divergence in the CD and price chart before large reversals. Just plot it out for a couple of weeks and you will see it happening each day. There is a bit more to it than that, but if you think about market dynamics you might be able to put it together.

 

This is not so prevalent in the ES. A bit in the ZN but works slightly differently. You can look at retesting levels but lower values of CD to show less strength and possible reversals. This market is a lot thicker so is more reliable, also has a lot of games by big prop firms being played.

 

Also, if CD moves significantly higher and price doesnt move, you can assume some type of accumulation or distribution. It is easy to see in the currencies and ZN where the big money is (exiting an old position/ taking partial profit/ starting a new position) but not so much in certain other markets like ES. Like I said, ES will pretty much track CD all day as it is a very market order driven instrument.

 

I highly recommend plotting the CD for a variety of markets over the medium term and understand their players, characters and cycles. And dont listen to the standard way of reading the CD for every market. It is different for each market based upon its depth and players. There is more to look at but this is good info!:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I thought I might mention (my 2c) that if you want to spot accumulation/ ditribution than you can use the CD indicator. In the more retail markets (specifically the currencies)

 

Where do you get this info?

All markets are predominately institutional. And most institutional trades are not speculative

 

The wrong assumptions make the game very dangerous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt think it is the wrong assumption. I am only talking as per the COT reports.

 

I would say that ES and currencies have a lot of dumb money in them (as per the usual expression). This doesnt mean that there isnt just as many (if not more) commercial and non-commercial speculators to balance their positions, because there is. But there is a huge difference between 10% small trader involvement and 30% small trader involvement and what this means for how the market moves day to day.

 

For example, at the moment the S&P futures (see full COT report) you will see that both the commercials and non-commercials (eg hedge funds) are net short. There needs to be some pretty big small time trader involvement for this to happen. Who is holding the other side of their trade? Well not me, I can assure you of that, I am short. But a lot of small traders are long. In other markets, the commercial and non commercial move almost inversely as their is practically zero non-reportable positions.

 

Example- heavy retail markets:

 

--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE

NON-COMMERCIAL | COMMERCIAL | TOTAL | POSITIONS

--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------

LONG | SHORT |SPREADS | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

($50 X S&P 500 INDEX) OPEN INTEREST: 3,190,988

COMMITMENTS

440,541 487,310 84,694 2121988 2391851 2647223 2963855 543,765 227,133

 

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST: 27,216)

15,851 -19,411 3,893 -23,622 57,523 -3,878 42,005 31,094 -14,789

 

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS

13.8 15.3 2.7 66.5 75.0 83.0 92.9 17.0 7.1

 

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS: 546)

108 108 54 215 219 347 357

 

 

Example Non-retail

 

BUTTER (CASH SETTLED) - CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE Code-050642

FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 02/25/14 |

--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE

NON-COMMERCIAL | COMMERCIAL | TOTAL | POSITIONS

--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------

LONG | SHORT |SPREADS | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT | LONG | SHORT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(CONTRACTS OF 20,000 POUNDS) OPEN INTEREST: 6,905

COMMITMENTS

579 4,168 22 4,965 2,286 5,566 6,476 1,339 429

 

CHANGES FROM 02/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST: 518)

188 281 -1 342 194 529 474 -11 44

 

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS

8.4 60.4 0.3 71.9 33.1 80.6 93.8 19.4 6.2

 

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS: 31)

8 6 3 14 9 22 18

 

 

 

I think the main point I was trying to make is that a plot of CD can show you accumulation/ distribution. But it really depends on the market on how you should interpret it. Simply by definition, if their is divergence in the price and the cumulative delta then their has to be a surplus or lack of limit orders from the previous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.