Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Trade Intensity

Recommended Posts

My motivation was to understand what the approach was all about, implementing the indicator (partly for the sake of doing so) made that easier to see for myself. I quite like looking at novel approaches that meet certain criteria (which this did despite relying on an indicator!) . I don't actively look for them and my primary motivation is curiosity rather than anything to do with my own trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so I change the chart I have from 2m to 1s and this is what I see. Conclusion; you still need to interpret what you are seeing. It's of nowhere near what OP's indicator caliber but it helps showewhat, thanks.

1243360166_58_UploadImage.thumb.png.ead32bedadff6b2d9180ad25106274a4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely....of course that is the nature of trading regardless of approach. Tools don't make the craftsman. My grandfather was a scratch golfer and he could go round 2 under just as happily with 5 clubs as a full bag. I was grateful for that when I cadied for him :)

 

Eidt: btw the OP recommends constant volume bars for reasons described earlier in the thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice Honvly,

 

Where they soley based of intensity or did you have S/R levels or something? Are you looking at absolute values or relative, I notice some faint grid lines on the histogram and the trades all seemed +1000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  honvly said:
Some trade intensity based trades taken today:

 

Nice trades and well done. I can see why you would take every trade except the last one listed to the right of your chart. Can you say why this was taken ?

 

 

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Nice Honvly,

 

Where they soley based of intensity or did you have S/R levels or something? Are you looking at absolute values or relative, I notice some faint grid lines on the histogram and the trades all seemed +1000.

 

I was looking at absolute values >1100 yesterday. The automated trades were based on intensity filtered by high values on the unnamed indicator below that.

 

The trade on the right edge was taken because the red intensity went above 1100.

Edited by honvly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, pretty much as I guessed. I'd be interested if you see many failures as you are watching it real time. One of the greatest drawbacks (imho) of these sorts of chart are that they are real time only so you can't study historical charts. Maybe with NT 7.0.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honvly I wonder if you are prepared to share the code? I never quite put the finishing touches on my version and it looks like you have. Understand if not of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  daedalus said:
I just think that is an awesome indicator. Thanks for sharing your screenshots honvly. Now if only I was smart enough to convert it to .eld.... ;)

 

Here are some shots from yesterday's trade that show an upgrade to the original - both of which run in Trade Station.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/commercials-very-active-today-filtered-intensity-6064.html#post66410

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
The link appears to be broken UB, I am getting a 404?

 

Heres the real one...

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f34/commercials-very-active-today-filtered-intensity-6064.html

 

UrmaBlume - I know they run in TS but I belive you said you had to create a new .dll to house all of the data, etc. right?

 

Is there anyway to get a proxy of this information in a more simple, if not less accurate way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's something that bothers me does tradestation plot Constant Volume bars correctly?

 

For example with CV 100 bars. If you have a bar already with 95 contracts in and an order for 150 contracts completes will tradestation a) complete the first bar b) plot a full 100 vol bar c) start plotting an incomplete bar with 45 contracts??

 

I had a feeling it was one of these apps that stuffed everything into one bar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Here's something that bothers me does tradestation plot Constant Volume bars correctly?

 

For example with CV 100 bars. If you have a bar already with 95 contracts in and an order for 150 contracts completes will tradestation a) complete the first bar b) plot a full 100 vol bar c) start plotting an incomplete bar with 45 contracts??

 

I had a feeling it was one of these apps that stuffed everything into one bar?

 

They add the last trade so that sometimes the constant volume bar is a little over, if it is an especially big transaction it will print multiple bars at the same time. This has no effect on intensity if you know the true elapsed time, the true volume and apply the proper time of day normalized filters. BTW these filters also must deal with the change in buying and selling volume designation that happens on these extremes - its not just volume/time - there is much more required for optimal performance of this indicator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Here's something that bothers me does tradestation plot Constant Volume bars correctly?

For example with CV 100 bars. If you have a bar already with 95 contracts in and an order for 150 contracts completes will tradestation a) complete the first bar b) plot a full 100 vol bar c) start plotting an incomplete bar with 45 contracts??

I had a feeling it was one of these apps that stuffed everything into one bar?

 

 

don't know about TradeStation, but MultiCharts is doing a pretty good job: it would take the left over and use it to start the next bar.

 

You can check to see if the software is handling the volume properly by adding the volume histogram to the volume bar chart. The volume is supposed to cap at the CVB resolution.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=10989&stc=1&d=1243528809

CVB.gif.67864e2d2058342607b0c9510a7b6dea.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlowFish said:
Honvly I wonder if you are prepared to share the code? I never quite put the finishing touches on my version and it looks like you have. Understand if not of course.

 

The code isn't ready to be shared, as the indicator values still seem inaccurate when compared to UrmaBlume's original. There are still too many failures to reverse, good trades below the absolute threshold, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough. I have to say I didn't post code mainly out of respect to UB's work though sent code privately to a few people.

 

I am comfortable that ninja and zenfire are getting the data that is required accurately. I would bet you a penny to a pound that it is more accurate than the TS setup. I think maybe 'accuracy' is not your issue. I wonder if what sets the OP's charts apart are filtering and smoothing? The underlying principles I think are probably well understood by people and not what's at issue.

 

My early code (which was only a proof of concept in ninja) whilst ragged looking and not as 'nice' as the originals seams to reveal the same behaviour. There will also be visual differences due to how TS plots stuff. If I get 500 contracts with the same time stamp (this could be one 500 lot or 500 one lots) NT will display this as 5 or 6 bars. I keep 'ramping up' the intensity in this case which seems appropriate behaviour if the change in time is 0. The fact that UB's charts dont have many series of bars where ohlc are all the same suggests to me TS isn't plotting correctly because they occur in Ninja and Multicharts all day long with 100 contract bars. This maybe has the effect of emphasising those high intensities in TS. Sometimes flaws in implementation produce desirable artefacts. My method of carrying over intensities emphasises them too. (i posted some charts earlier in the thread where you can see this 'sawtooth' effect).

 

Hope that made some sense (lucidity goes down hill after midnight) and might give you some things to look at.

 

btw I have mentioned before but it bears repeating...I think if you get a decent low (or zero) lag smoother you might be pretty impressed with the results. You could try Hursts or one of Ehlers maybe. My hunch is that might be the 'secret sauce', mind you a dull old ema would probably do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I'm late to this party, I'm just now looking at this thread. It makes me think: if my assumption is that a market player is 'pulsing' the market with orders to hide their considerable volume, then:

 

1) Intensity would be high (contracts/time)

2) total pulsed volume would be high (otherwise who cares?)

3) total pulsed volume would be largely directional (mostly upticks or mostly downticks)

 

(doesn't that seem sensible, or am I missing the point?)... so any algorithm I'd devise would combine the 3 factors.

 

so maybe... volume/time is intensity... and if I post-process the 'pulsy' trades, then: some variation of volume^2/time would highlight high volume 'pulses' over low volume ones... and if I change it to (volume*(upvol-downvol))/time it would be similar to volume^2/time in amplitude if the pulse is highly directional, and diminished if it is a mix of buys and sells.

 

I don't know, just thinking out loud. I may just try it, sometime.

 

 

(and yeah, it sucks that TS doesn't split trades for their volume bars like the rest of the world... it causes our users all kinds of "my chart doesn't look like your ninja chart" anxiety)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  RichardTodd said:
Sorry I'm late to this party, I'm just now looking at this thread. It makes me think: if my assumption is that a market player is 'pulsing' the market with orders to hide their considerable volume, then:

 

1) Intensity would be high (contracts/time)

2) total pulsed volume would be high (otherwise who cares?)

3) total pulsed volume would be largely directional (mostly upticks or mostly downticks)

 

(doesn't that seem sensible, or am I missing the point?)... so any algorithm I'd devise would combine the 3 factors.

 

so maybe... volume/time is intensity... and if I post-process the 'pulsy' trades, then: some variation of volume^2/time would highlight high volume 'pulses' over low volume ones... and if I change it to (volume*(upvol-downvol))/time it would be similar to volume^2/time in amplitude if the pulse is highly directional, and diminished if it is a mix of buys and sells.

 

I don't know, just thinking out loud. I may just try it, sometime.

 

 

(and yeah, it sucks that TS doesn't split trades for their volume bars like the rest of the world... it causes our users all kinds of "my chart doesn't look like your ninja chart" anxiety)

 

A couple of points:

 

First you are getting close, we describe this indicator as:

 

When taken in combination, the acceleration and deceleration of buying and selling volumes, total volume and the velocity/rate of change in the balance of trade reveal a certain dynamic that we find present at many, if not most, intra-session extremes. While these indications occur throughout the session, here are some shots of session extremes from 6/18 in ES.

 

Second there is a very strange dynamic that occurs on the extremes that throws your thoughts about Up/Dn into confusion. This dynamic is not present elsewhre throughout the sesssion and is concerned with auto executions.

 

Here is a shot of the session low and the session high from 6/18.

 

BTW - it makes no difference how TS or anybody else breaks up the volume bars as while the chart is presented on a 1k contract price bar chart the data for the indicator comes from elsewhere.

 

Also BTW RichardTodd - I used to live in Dalls (worked in Lincoln center at LBJ & Tollway) and would love to go back just to eat - The Blue Goose, Snuffers, The Riveria, The Mansion at Turtle Creek, Campesi's, and of course Sonny Bryan's.

 

618Lo.jpg

 

 

618Hi.jpg

Edited by UrmaBlume

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  RichardTodd said:
Sorry I'm late to this party, I'm just now looking at this thread. It makes me think: if my assumption is that a market player is 'pulsing' the market with orders to hide their considerable volume, then:

 

1) Intensity would be high (contracts/time)

2) total pulsed volume would be high (otherwise who cares?)

3) total pulsed volume would be largely directional (mostly upticks or mostly downticks)

 

(doesn't that seem sensible, or am I missing the point?)... so any algorithm I'd devise would combine the 3 factors.

 

so maybe... volume/time is intensity... and if I post-process the 'pulsy' trades, then: some variation of volume^2/time would highlight high volume 'pulses' over low volume ones... and if I change it to (volume*(upvol-downvol))/time it would be similar to volume^2/time in amplitude if the pulse is highly directional, and diminished if it is a mix of buys and sells.

 

I don't know, just thinking out loud. I may just try it, sometime.

 

 

(and yeah, it sucks that TS doesn't split trades for their volume bars like the rest of the world... it causes our users all kinds of "my chart doesn't look like your ninja chart" anxiety)

 

Richard,

I've started working on this as well (and was going to post about being 'late to the party' too!).

 

My first step was to measure n volume over time, currently using a static value for n. On some days this alone produces useful signals, more often far too many signals.

 

Step 2 (which I'm just starting) is to measure tick velocity, with some sort of size filter, and see how that corresponds to and interacts with the first method.

 

UrmaBlume refers to a strange dynamic at the extremes; it seems that those spikes are often marked by huge disparities between bid/ask hits, with the relation opposite to what one might expect. Many contracts are hitting the offer toward and at the high, but the offer is being replenished. Once the buy orders are exhausted, price starts to drift down, and gradually picks up speed...but I think there's more to it than this.

 

A good deal can actually be seen on a volume chart with a standard velocity histogram (1/(t2-t1)), but keeping the measure independent of the bars means provides more precision, and makes it independent of the particular chart used for display.

 

UrmaBlume, thanks for your post, and please feel free to correct or comment on mine!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.