Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

UrmaBlume

Trade Intensity

Recommended Posts

Contracts traded are contracts traded..... the total over the same time period have to be the same no matter how you view it..... don't they ?

 

I think I'm with darthtrader, especially after visiting their website..... I smell a rat.

 

Dean.

 

well I don't really agree with this...Look at the difference between TWAP and VWAP...the fact there is a big difference is obviously quite important if your taking things to this level.

Thats why all these "VSA" threads on here to me are laughable...there should be no difference between TWAP/VWAP...else you assume things that are obviously false.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Contracts traded are contracts traded..... the total over the same time period have to be the same no matter how you view it..... don't they ?

I like to give people the benefit of the doubt but I think I'm with darthtrader, especially after visiting their website..... I think I smell a rat.

 

Dean.

 

The volume histogram would of course look the same but a histogram of the intensity/rate of trade would not and this calculation requires more granularity of time than is avialable in TS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what kind of chart would show this kind of action? A 1s chart? A 100ms chart? 10ms? Because, while TS doesn't support these types of intervals, feeds like Zenfire might come close enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So what kind of chart would show this kind of action? A 1s chart? A 100ms chart? 10ms? Because, while TS doesn't support these types of intervals, feeds like Zenfire might come close enough.

 

Atto,

 

Thank you, I appreciate the thought that goes into your posts.

 

This post, however, still misses the essence of measuring trade intensity.

 

Very short term time charts would just show a succession of trades - no spikes as most of this trade is broken down into small sizes anyway. The same would go for constant volume bars.

 

During a 1 minute bar trade intensity may spike to 100,000 contracts per minute (and does several times per day) even though only a few thousand contracts were traded during that minute. Volume in this bar did not spike, intensity did. This concept scales both up and down with either time or volume.

 

In the emini S&P trade averages about 5 - 6,000 contracts per minute during the day session. This trade is not evenly distributed throughout the day.

 

For the sake of this example - We have 2 charts - a 1 minute chart and a 5k contract bar chart. Without regard to price, trade is flowing at a steady 5k contracts per minute.

 

Volume Bars are all even, all averages of volume are flat. Now if 2k of the 5k contracts traded inside one of these bars trades at a very fast rate then there will be a huge spike in our measure of trade intensity but no spikes in any other traditional measure of volume.

 

As soon as Trade Station and other packages achieve better time granularity traders will be able to plot a host of more relevant indicators of trade flow and we know of no better indicators or motivators of price change than the flow of trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm sure I understand your concept (of intensity). However, I was simply asking what kind of interval could capture this stuff. For example, I trade on NinjaTrader with ZenFire for data, which gives very good live tick data. It seems as though this "retail" feed would work just fine, as I get the actual ticks. From there, it would be rather trivial to write a Ninja strategy that uses the tick data to gauge intensity my measuring how fast the ticks are coming in against a fast clock (such as a 100ms timer). Am I missing something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I'm sure I understand your concept (of intensity). However, I was simply asking what kind of interval could capture this stuff. For example, I trade on NinjaTrader with ZenFire for data, which gives very good live tick data. It seems as though this "retail" feed would work just fine, as I get the actual ticks. From there, it would be rather trivial to write a Ninja strategy that uses the tick data to gauge intensity my measuring how fast the ticks are coming in against a fast clock (such as a 100ms timer). Am I missing something?

 

Any interval can capture intensity - the point is that it must be measured outside the bar and imported. As shown a 1 minute or 30 second bar could very easily show normal volume yet contain a huge spike in intensity.

 

When using ticks you must remember to consider the size of the tick and not just the number of ticks.

 

Using a 100ms timer and volume flow could definetly produce a useable measure of trade intensity. We measure this intensity via 3 different algorithms.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I'm sure I understand your concept (of intensity). However, I was simply asking what kind of interval could capture this stuff. For example, I trade on NinjaTrader with ZenFire for data, which gives very good live tick data. It seems as though this "retail" feed would work just fine, as I get the actual ticks. From there, it would be rather trivial to write a Ninja strategy that uses the tick data to gauge intensity my measuring how fast the ticks are coming in against a fast clock (such as a 100ms timer). Am I missing something?

 

I thought much the same. I would present the high intensity and low intensity value of the 'sample period' or bar. I guess the peak intensity of that sample period is the thing most would be interested in. Possibly how long it was sustained above a threshold would be interesting.

 

Darth I know the 'why tradestation' question wasn't addressed to me but you gotta love how quick and easy it is to prototype stuff (well I do at least).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UrmaBlume,

 

The timer resolution of Windows machines is about 16 milliseconds. The jitter of the packets in an internet connection is at least 10-20 milliseconds. How do you deal with or avoid issues coming from the millisecond frequency?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any interval can capture intensity
I take this comment as meaning it's time frame independent and instead of dealing with micro seconds one could use such information for larger intraday moves or swings? Is this statement correct and if so, have you done any research on the larger interval "intensity spikes"? If you have, could you post some charts? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thread.

 

As it turns out, I've been working on an NT indicator in C# to track "trade intensity" in a way that may be similar to what is described in this thread, actually bid - ask volume delta, i.e. derivative of volume delta: d_Delta/dt.

 

I'd be curious to know what UrmaBlume and other's opinions are on a suitable time interval. So far I have been tracking on a per bar interval on very fast constant volume charts but I don't feel this is fine enough resolution to really see the spikes. Still a work in progress.

Edited by Pepperdog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey UrmaBlume,

 

thanks for sharing this indicator. I am not sure whether I have correctly understood how you actually calculate 'trade intensity', so can you please correct me if my interpretation is wrong on how you calculate this:

 

- You calculate the time span between to the current trade and the previous trade (that's why no latency is so important)

- You then divide the number of contracts of this trade traded by this time span. For example, 40 contracts were traded after just 0.0001 minutes (=0.06 = 60 milliseconds). So you do 40 / 0.0001 = 40.000. That would mean that the 'trade intensity' would be 40.000 contracts per minute.

 

What I am now wondering is how you you summarize this information for all trades that occur in 1 minute. Do you have one bar for each second that is the average of the 'trade intensities' in that second?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I was feeling a bit bored this morning so I knocked up something in Ninja. With the results I got I feel that you might be doing a bit of smoothing after you have processed the data? I found that the Intensity can slam around a bit.

 

Agekay my hunch is that the two histograms (in UB's charts) show peak trade intensity and lowest trade intensity for the bar - max and min values if you like. Could be wrong there. Anyway it seems that the peaks are what is interesting.

 

Here's a couple of squished up charts. The 'saw tooth' is interesting this is an artefact due to data arriving with the same delta time. I chose to add this hence the saw tooth what I really should do is reset it on a new bar. Just messing around really.

5aa70eaba68e1_ES03-0927_01_2009(100Volume)2.thumb.jpg.4db970f9e455c3ebd48f3afbca1f0482.jpg

5aa70eabae6ed_ES03-0927_01_2009(100Volume)3.thumb.jpg.0ee84f258725863924801a6932f9536e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too, I whipped one up using AgeKay's formula and averaged the trade intensities over the bar.

 

Here are the millisecond differences of a bunch of ticks. I assume the ones with 3-7 ms differences are trades that happen one after another.

 

3.0003

0

3.0003

3.0003

49.0049

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

2.0002

7.0007

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

6.0006

3.0003

4.0004

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

5.0005

3.0003

5.0005

3.0003

6.0006

3.0003

0

48.0048

2.0002

95.0095

3.0003

4.0004

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

3.0003

44.0044

128.0121

 

tradeintensity.thumb.png.3895edfd9923198561514cee52714d86.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey UrmaBlume,

 

thanks for sharing this indicator. I am not sure whether I have correctly understood how you actually calculate 'trade intensity', so can you please correct me if my interpretation is wrong on how you calculate this:

 

- You calculate the time span between to the current trade and the previous trade (that's why no latency is so important)

- You then divide the number of contracts of this trade traded by this time span. For example, 40 contracts were traded after just 0.0001 minutes (=0.06 = 60 milliseconds). So you do 40 / 0.0001 = 40.000. That would mean that the 'trade intensity' would be 40.000 contracts per minute.

 

What I am now wondering is how you you summarize this information for all trades that occur in 1 minute. Do you have one bar for each second that is the average of the 'trade intensities' in that second?

 

What we do aside - measure the time for a block of a constant size and extrapolate to cpm. We take this a step further so that our work not only reveals intensity but also the degree of trader commitment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BlowFish and honvly, thanks for posting, very cool. What feed did you use in that case with NinjaTrader?

 

BlowFish, what calculation did you use for your indicator? Something similar to my interpretation?

 

honvly, what do you with the 3-7 ms differences with regards to the formula I posted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What we do aside - measure the time for a block of a constant size and extrapolate to cpm. We take this a step further so that our work not only reveals intensity but also the degree of trader commitment.

 

UrmaBlume, thanks for chiming in.

 

Do these program trades always chop up their orders in constant sizes? Seems rather dumb to me if they want to disguise their intentions.

 

What do you mean by trader commitment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a chart I posted earlier with one difference, the blue verticals are at 1 minute intervals, but this time I added the light coloured verticals every 1 second, anyone notice the Intensity..... :-)

 

 

185 trades in 1 second, contracts = 1342

 

now also don't dismiss the 1 second before the intense second.

 

52 trades in 1 second, contracts = 985

 

so I see 2 ways to inject volume in a very short time without it being obvious in higher timeframes, lots of smaller trades, or a few large trades. It's almost like the large spikes are a test.... of liquidly?

 

You can see a similar thing happening if you use a 1 Volume chart and plot vertical line every second.

 

I found this timeline indicator and changed it to display vertical lines every second instead of minutes like it was designed to do, unfortunately it is hugely CPU intensive now and pretty much unusable on my average home laptop. If anyone knows how to make it more CPU friendly, someone asked if there was another way of drawing a vertical line in this post:

http://www.ninjatrader-support2.com/vb/showthread.php?t=13440&highlight=vertical+line

and here is the link to the indicator the moderator said to take look at how to do it.

http://www.ninjatrader-support2.com/vb/local_links.php?catid=1&sort=N&page=1&pp=15&keyid=86

 

I want to thank UrmaBlume for helping me to see this, and I would edit an earlier post if I it was possible, my apologizes UrmaBlume.

 

Dean.

5aa70eabcac68_Ticks185-ES03-0923_01_2009(1Tick).thumb.png.eebc6e0f8a32e967bf121fc013eaf955.png

TimeLines_Seconds.zip

Edited by deanz
added missing link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlowFish and honvly, thanks for posting, very cool. What feed did you use in that case with NinjaTrader?

 

BlowFish, what calculation did you use for your indicator? Something similar to my interpretation?

 

honvly, what do you with the 3-7 ms differences with regards to the formula I posted?

 

I am using Zen-Fire.

 

Right now I am just dividing the contract size by the 3-7 ms differences and averaging this value across all ticks in a bar. However, I believe that the 3-7 ms differences are artifacts of NinjaTrader's bar processing speed. To improve the accuracy, I am going to try to increase the millisecond differences by filtering out trades less than 10 contracts and splitting bid/ask volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

honvly I would be cautious of using plain old bid/ask, as UrmaBlume has said in this post:

 

Most Data Vendors designate trade on the ask as UpVolume and trade on the bid as DnVolume. We have found flaws in that approach and use something close but, still different.

 

We calculate buy and sell imbalances over several volume/time frames and then further pre-process this data into inputs to both linear and non-linear analysis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If anyone knows how to make it more CPU friendly, someone asked if there was another way of drawing a vertical line in this

 

From what I've seen to do anything usefull with drawing in ninja that is complex it seems you have to override plot(). I might be way off but I think what happens when you don't do this is ninja paints all the bar data with plot then paints over that with whatever you have in onbarupdate..I get the feeling that if you do your drawing within plot, its all painted on one pass.

I'm still struggling with figuring out how to do much when it comes to the X cordinate though.

Maybe we can get a ninja coding sub forum on here? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

185 trades in 1 second, contracts = 1342

 

now also don't dismiss the 1 second before the intense second.

 

52 trades in 1 second, contracts = 985

 

Had all of these trades the same size?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlowFish and honvly, thanks for posting, very cool. What feed did you use in that case with NinjaTrader?

 

BlowFish, what calculation did you use for your indicator? Something similar to my interpretation?

 

honvly, what do you with the 3-7 ms differences with regards to the formula I posted?

 

Ninjatrader with Zenfire. Felt like a challenge and I find coding Ninja challenging :) It uses the .Net frameworks DateTime construct which will returun ticks (100 nano seconds resolution). Obviously far greater than is actually available in the real world!

 

I pretty much used your interpretation AK because when I thought about it, it seems like the right way to do it.

 

I am still wondering about smoothing to which end I have tried adding average intensity per bar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am using Zen-Fire.

 

Right now I am just dividing the contract size by the 3-7 ms differences and averaging this value across all ticks in a bar. However, I believe that the 3-7 ms differences are artifacts of NinjaTrader's bar processing speed. To improve the accuracy, I am going to try to increase the millisecond differences by filtering out trades less than 10 contracts and splitting bid/ask volume.

 

I dunno but I think you might have an issue I get several clear flurries with a time difference of zero and a more varied spread of values. Are you using DateTime.Now.Ticks? ..........Time[0].Ticks does not work.

 

Here's some sample output (FTSE).

ninja.doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dunno but I think you might have an issue I get several clear flurries with a time difference of zero and a more varied spread of values. Are you using DateTime.Now.Ticks? ..........Time[0].Ticks does not work.

 

Here's some sample output (FTSE).

 

So what do you do with the time differences of zero since you can't divide by zero?

 

And what do you mean by FTSE? Is that the sample output of the UK FTSE 100 stock index?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So what do you do with the time differences of zero since you can't divide by zero?

 

And what do you mean by FTSE? Is that the sample output of the UK FTSE 100 stock index?

 

Stick the salami back together again :) That's why you get that sawtooth effect on the chart's I posted when you get a whole bunch of activity that spans several bars but with the same time stamp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
    • DUMBSHELL:  re the automation of corruption ---  200,000 "Science Papers" in academic journal database PubMed may have been AI-generated with errors, hallucinations and false sourcing 
    • Does any crypto exchanges get banned in your country? How's about other as Bybit, Kraken, MEXC, OKX?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.