Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

playafh69

Stops and Targets

Recommended Posts

Ive been trading for a while( and profitable), and I keep running to the same two problems. One is stops. All my trades start as scalps, but i hold 1 or 2 cars depending on my size to swing with to try to capture larger gains. My average time in the markets are about 10 min(including swings).

I want to know peoples opinions about stops. One is placing them around swing points (like 15 ticks above or below last high/low, not one tick) or just using volatility based stops, like 3xATR on a 3 min chart(which is what i currently use).

Second is targets. I am a discretionary trader, and I try to read the markets when i wanna decide targets. If its a trending market, I usually go in heavier size with larger targets(methods of trying to decide trend strength is price action, expanding volume, AD line and trend.....) I also wanna get opinions on this as well, do you trail stops using ATR method like above, or do you just get out no matter what when it hits your target????

Is it better to always trail or have defined stops. Remember, my stops are always larger than my initial profit targets, thats why im asking. I currently trail but get out when tape starts to weaken. This method works great in choppy markets since i can literally get out near swing points, but I miss out on big moves when its trending(old habits and mainly because i hate getting burned when i give back profits). Example of stops and targets is risk $120, first target is $60, second target is around $200. But again, i do get out sometimes even at first target when i notice tape starting to weaken(great advantage which really helps me become profitable)... Im not going to get into what i mean by tape reading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ive been trading for a while( and profitable), and I keep running to the same two problems. One is stops. All my trades start as scalps, but i hold 1 or 2 cars depending on my size to swing with to try to capture larger gains. My average time in the markets are about 10 min(including swings).

I want to know peoples opinions about stops. One is placing them around swing points (like 15 ticks above or below last high/low, not one tick) or just using volatility based stops, like 3xATR on a 3 min chart(which is what i currently use).

Second is targets. I am a discretionary trader, and I try to read the markets when i wanna decide targets. If its a trending market, I usually go in heavier size with larger targets(methods of trying to decide trend strength is price action, expanding volume, AD line and trend.....) I also wanna get opinions on this as well, do you trail stops using ATR method like above, or do you just get out no matter what when it hits your target????

Is it better to always trail or have defined stops. Remember, my stops are always larger than my initial profit targets, thats why im asking. I currently trail but get out when tape starts to weaken. This method works great in choppy markets since i can literally get out near swing points, but I miss out on big moves when its trending(old habits and mainly because i hate getting burned when i give back profits). Example of stops and targets is risk $120, first target is $60, second target is around $200. But again, i do get out sometimes even at first target when i notice tape starting to weaken(great advantage which really helps me become profitable)... Im not going to get into what i mean by tape reading.

 

Stops and targets are different for everybody. It's probably difficult for anybody to tell you what you should do, let alone give specifics about stops & targets since you haven't told us much about your style other that you're scalping.

 

But this is my 2c:

 

stops should be placed at a technical level, and not be a result of "ah this is how much money I'm willing to risk on this trade". If the trade carries too much risk, lower your size or skip the entry.

 

If you're scalping then you'll miss out on big moves. If you want to catch big trending moves, you'll have to stay in longer. That might not be suited to your style of trading...

 

You might also want to use the search feature, since there are plenty of threads dealing with the subject you raise and you might find some more answers there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think i gave enough details about how i trade, im not going to give away my method. I said that all my trades start out as a scalp, meaning that i wanna get rid of half as soon as it goes in my favor to lesson risk, but i hold some for the bigger moves.

 

Im guessing your saying that you prefer to use the last swing high or low instead of volatility based stops.

Any others????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think i gave enough details about how i trade, im not going to give away my method. I said that all my trades start out as a scalp, meaning that i wanna get rid of half as soon as it goes in my favor to lesson risk, but i hold some for the bigger moves.

 

Im guessing your saying that you prefer to use the last swing high or low instead of volatility based stops.

Any others????

 

Instead of exiting as soon as possible, you could protect your risk by moving your stop closer or to breakeven. Just a thought.

 

Sometimes there are no swingpoints on the bar interval you've chosen, and price can move in a straight line reversing sharply too. As always, context is what matters and I can't say there's a one-fit-all solution. You'll have to find a compromise between risk and potential reward. If you want to catch the big swing, you'll have to sit through some retracements.

 

My stops aren't affected that much by volatility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EVERYTHING in any market happens for a reason.

 

Don't ask what others do, learn the players of your market of choice and through trial and error, find what is the highest returning combination of stops and trails which produce the highest return with minimal risk.

 

Once you understand how the main market movers move your market, determining stops and when to exit will become obvious, simple and easy to read.

 

Knowledge is king.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stops: I place at some sort of technical level - S/R level mainly.

 

Profit Targets: No matter what you do, you'll always be wrong. Once you accept that, you can be at peace w/ it.

 

What I mean is that you will NEVER, EVER, EVER have the perfect exit all the time. Some trades are much better to pick off a previous level and be happy; while others will reward you for hanging on all day. In my years of trading, profit targets have always been my arch nemesis till I realized that profits will never be perfect. Never. Once I realized AND accepted that, I worked w/ the tools I had in front of me.

 

From there it's a matter of tracking your statistics and finding what is the most profitable and/or least risky model you have at your disposal. If you are not tracking your trading, that's problem #1. Track your possible exit points and if you accumulate enough data, it will be clear as day how you should be exiting your trades. If you are not serious enough to do that or just shooting from the hip, good luck b/c you will need it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.