Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Robert

Chart Patterns: Reliable?

Recommended Posts

Can one rely on strictly chart patterns to trade the markets? For example: triangle, wedges, flags, pennants, etc...

 

Do you think one can make money in the markets in the long run relying only on chart patterns? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ask some of the older and successful trading veterans, most used to hand-drawn chart patterns before modern technology. They never used anything else since the advent of the personal computer, except it has quicken their analysis. My mentor used it for 15 yrs, still making money today. Patterns are the meat of my trading. Not complaining so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think undoubtedly yes. If you add a bit of 'context' so much the better. Of course realistic expectations are important! Just like any method patterns can fail but on balance they 'work'. It is because they tend to be a graphic representation of sentiment. (I guess some of the more exotic ones like Bats and Gartleys are less so). If you stick to flags, pennants, double tops, 2bs, 12'3s etc. You can develop profitable and simple strategies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe in the May issue of "Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities" magazine Bulkowski has an article discussing exactly this. He went back and ran some analysis on some of his previous patterns to see if their reliability had drop off in today's markets. I believe he was very surprised to find that their reliability was not what they once used to be and found far more failures than previously. You might want to have a read of the article to see exactly what he had to say about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chart patterns are reliable-- Mastering them is another subject....so too is Trading them profitably .

 

The problem that many have with patterns or their claim that chart patterns are not reliable is usually linked inexperience of understanding Price action or other variables like not enough time to master a pattern...to truely know it like the back of your hand and that takes time.

 

Part of the mastery is realizing that many variables influence any particular chart pattern that is trying to form. Because of this fact Programmatic back testing via a code usually will miss the value and the true reliability of chart patterns--In contrast a trader that has mastered his favorit chart patterns knows exactly when to trade them and when to let them go by. He has learned to be aware of the influencing variables and understands their impact on what he is trading , thus he can make appropriate adjustments on the fly.

Asking a Code to do the same thing is near impractical, unless you have a team of top notch programmers at your disposal and even then I dont think you would get the same results....some things just cant be communicated through code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pappo is correct with his assessment of Pattern logic and coding/testing patterns.

In my experience, patterns do have excellent reliability with great repeatable logic.

Many successful traders have implemented patterns/code logic to take advantage of them.

Most pattern success or failure depends on knowing the pattern logic with market

context and knowing how/where they are forming. Without market context logic,

testing patterns is a futile exercise. Programmers tend to miss this logic when testing

patterns. Also, individual mastering of patterns requires thorough market knowledge

and experience and mastery may be limited to just few patterns. Coding patterns may be

more difficult for even most seasoned programmers too.

 

 

Excellent trading ideas are discarded due to poor coding and poor back-testing methods.

I have seen this many times in my career as many brilliant programmers with great ideas

but with little or no trading knowledge discard their concepts as not profitable due to

novice back-testing methods/results. Also, each trading platform have various trade

execution logic and hence many Automated Trading Systems back/forward testing results

suffer from wrong/poor execution methods.

 

 

Here is an example of a recent Bloomberg Article where TA was slandered.

 

"Stock Charts Fail Forecast Test in Complete S&P Miss (Update3)" by Michael Tsang and Eric Martin

 

Stock Charts Fail Forecast Test in Complete S&P Miss (Update3) - Bloomberg.com

 

Tsang and Martin (journalists) with little TA and no real trading/investing/programming

experience published an article and slandered the TA and indicators due to their wrong

back-testing results... Bloomberg published the article as it was written by their journalists.

Many TA experts (Murphy, McClellen et. al.) have written their concern to Bloomberg.

The editors at Bloomberg have softly admitted but sadly it was never removed.

 

Regards,

Suri

Edited by suriNotes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me the idea that a market is overbought or sold is absurd, yet people use stochastics like a "grail machine"....5,3,3 no 15,9,9....No 8,3,3.....No.....the Angle.....No the Cross of the stochs.....No.......the Macd with the stoch ...No...oh wait the 15 min must align with the 5 min.....No....wait the

Ema 34 must retrace before the CCI will give us a hook, oh yes , oh yes, oh yes, Meg Ryan in Harry met Sally now screams in the restaurant.......Eureka..........OH NO, There was news and the stochs of the 15m got tangled with the 5 and the leading index is at its monthly high plus the stoch is overbought, yes yes yes and now even Harry joins Meg ....oh no The fed killed us with the news, bloody hell maybe next time I will use a faster MA to compensate for the lack of feed accuracy due to my broker...oh wait that it, the feed is broken, I will buy a better feed : CQG(XXXX$), Bloomberg(xxxxxxxxx$) thats its , that was the problem the feed, oh wait its not the feed its the fact that I have to pea while trading, so I will read trading in the Zone again to distract my pain of trading through my Urinal glans directly unto the stoch 15,9,9 on the 3 Min which is the way to go, but wait my platform does not have Range Bars and everybody knows range bars are the way to go, unless the bottleneck is the CPU which is not strong enough to play DOOM and trade at the same time, so I will get a better CPU , oh wait, I have thunder storms so a great UPS is required....YES EUREKA ITS THE UPS GUYS, Much better than any technical analysis tool out there.

 

 

daily candle is it....lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For me the idea that a market is overbought or sold is absurd, yet people use stochastics like a "grail machine"....5,3,3 no 15,9,9....No 8,3,3.....No.....the Angle.....No the Cross of the stochs.....No.......the Macd with the stoch ...No...oh wait the 15 min must align with the 5 min.....No....wait the

Ema 34 must retrace before the CCI will give us a hook, oh yes , oh yes, oh yes, Meg Ryan in Harry met Sally now screams in the restaurant.......Eureka..........OH NO, There was news and the stochs of the 15m got tangled with the 5 and the leading index is at its monthly high plus the stoch is overbought, yes yes yes and now even Harry joins Meg ....oh no The fed killed us with the news, bloody hell maybe next time I will use a faster MA to compensate for the lack of feed accuracy due to my broker...oh wait that it, the feed is broken, I will buy a better feed : CQG(XXXX$), Bloomberg(xxxxxxxxx$) thats its , that was the problem the feed, oh wait its not the feed its the fact that I have to pea while trading, so I will read trading in the Zone again to distract my pain of trading through my Urinal glans directly unto the stoch 15,9,9 on the 3 Min which is the way to go, but wait my platform does not have Range Bars and everybody knows range bars are the way to go, unless the bottleneck is the CPU which is not strong enough to play DOOM and trade at the same time, so I will get a better CPU , oh wait, I have thunder storms so a great UPS is required....YES EUREKA ITS THE UPS GUYS, Much better than any technical analysis tool out there.

 

 

daily candle is it....lol.

 

 

Programmer,

 

You couldn't be more spot on. Thanks for the chuckle. I do a bit of training and have heard all of that buschwa again and again before the wannabees begin to learn. If it was that easy, you couldn't get a cab.

 

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can one rely on strictly chart patterns to trade the markets? For example: triangle, wedges, flags, pennants, etc...

 

Do you think one can make money in the markets in the long run relying only on chart patterns? Thanks

 

Robert,

 

Practical answer: Yes.

You can trade ‘classic’ chart patterns successfully

> by placing a pattern in context / background. Others have described this well here and other threads.

> by being ok with sloppiness in their formation. Btw often on the right side of patterns, the obvious, ‘prettier’, more symmetrical patterns don’t seem to fair as well as the misshapen, ugly, unattractive ones. They get faded more?

> by implementing active position management, knowing where your pattern failure point is and ruthlessly stopping out there.

> by not expecting them to work. (rephrasing the preceding one in terms of attitude)

> by being patient, precise, and demanding with your entry placement.

> by developing skills at sizing proper scaling out– some before target, some at target, and some (as many as possible) left on for runners…

> by sizing correctly – this one might should be first!

 

 

Can one rely on strictly chart patterns to trade the markets? For example: triangle, wedges, flags, pennants, etc...

 

Do you think one can make money in the markets in the long run relying only on chart patterns? Thanks

 

BS (but better?) answer:

This is why the Zen master, when asked the nature of the Buddha, beats the student's head with a stick. Our words cannot convey participation or the realization to which participation can lead.

Here’s one for you – can you trade (except randomly) for an hour, a day, a week, or in any instance(s) - completely without the use of pattern?

The real question is - which patterns are YOURS? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

PS In addition to Suri’s book, see Trading Commodity Futures with Classical Chart Patterns by Peter Brandt

Trading Commodity Futures with Classical Chart Patterns by Peter Brandt, ISBN: at the Global Investor Bookshop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very wise anecdot from an Israeli Tech trader(Ob1..) freind of mine :

 

" A guy goes to a psychiatrist,

The doc says what's wrong?

The guy says I am seeing "body-parts" on charts.

The doc says what do you mean body parts?

The guy says I am seeing head and shoulders and some Bottoms on charts.

The doc says , that is bad, and gives him some Meds.

 

After two weeks the guy comes back to the doc.

 

The doc says, well do you still see body parts on charts?

The guys says, no, no more body parts.

The Doc says, do you see anything else?

The guy says, well I do see some butterflies and flags but not that often.

The doc says, its bad and gives him some more meds.

 

After two weeks the guy returns to the doc and says, Finally I don't see

anything on my charts, just charts.

The doc says' thats great, and gives him the Rorschach test, and tells him

well what do you see in the inkbolts?

The guy says I see complex scientifically derived algorithms..

The doc says thats great, maybe you should write a book on that.

 

A year later the guy publishes a book entitled" Body parts on charts", alas

nobody buys it, because they think the guy is a lunatic. So, the guy

changes the title to "Patterns on charts". Now, everybody buys the book,

and everybody is seeing butterflies, heads, shoulders, double bottoms,

tripe heads, even some claim that after reading the book they could swear

they saw the Monica/Clinton's Stain on the ES chart, which proved to be

an amazing reversal pattern.

 

Anyway, the book becomes a best seller along with titles like:

 

A GUIDE TO DATING ETIQUETTE , by Mike Tyson

 

FRENCH WAR HEROES. by Jacques Chirac

 

MY BEAUTY SECRETS, by Janet Reno

 

MY LITTLE BOOK OF PERSONAL HYGIENE,by Osama Bin Laden

 

AMELIA EARHART'S GUIDE TO THE PACIFIC

 

and THE AMISH PHONE DIRECTORY

 

 

Anyway the joke is on me because I bought the book...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chart patterns are reliable-- Mastering them is another subject....so too is Trading them profitably .

 

The problem that many have with patterns or their claim that chart patterns are not reliable is usually linked inexperience of understanding Price action or other variables like not enough time to master a pattern...to truely know it like the back of your hand and that takes time.

 

Part of the mastery is realizing that many variables influence any particular chart pattern that is trying to form. Because of this fact Programmatic back testing via a code usually will miss the value and the true reliability of chart patterns--In contrast a trader that has mastered his favorit chart patterns knows exactly when to trade them and when to let them go by. He has learned to be aware of the influencing variables and understands their impact on what he is trading , thus he can make appropriate adjustments on the fly.

Asking a Code to do the same thing is near impractical, unless you have a team of top notch programmers at your disposal and even then I dont think you would get the same results....some things just cant be communicated through code.

Bulkowski has been successfully trading patterns for years. I came across his article after another trader I respect made a similar comment as something he had observed in trading. Its not that they don't work, but their reliability is tailing off. the other trader also mentioned that he had found increasing cases of patterns apparently failing but of you monitored them they would resume later than expected.

 

Chart patterns are essentially representations of people's beliefs about the market, these beliefs can be manipulated by the smart money operators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.