Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

newtrader

Divergences: Indicators?

Recommended Posts

I frequently hear people talk about the importance of reading price action or reading tape. But I never see any specifics about how to learn this method. Any suggestions other than "time and experience"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I frequently hear people talk about the importance of reading price action or reading tape. But I never see any specifics about how to learn this method. Any suggestions other than "time and experience"?

 

Start with Wyckoff's Day Trader's Bible, attached as a pdf below. Then,

 

Techniques of Tape Reading

 

Tape Reading and Market Tactics

DTB, 1919.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I frequently hear people talk about the importance of reading price action or reading tape. But I never see any specifics about how to learn this method. Any suggestions other than "time and experience"?

 

Wow old thread having said that an interesting one. To me reading PA and the tape are kind of different things, though related. To me PA is about how price moves. Higher highs/lows, ledges, ranges etc. I think in the past I have posted a whole bunch of references. But a couple of quick (free) ones of the top of my head...check out Joe Ross' law of charts and The first couple of Fibonacci trader journal entries about Gann swing chartist. 'Buffy' did an article for Ensign Software too.

 

Theres a whole bunch of stuff by market 'old timers' (like Dunnigan for example) that are of value and 'grandfathered' this stuff.

 

If you want to learn about the 'tape' (which rolls volume into the mix) then as DB says Whycoff is the guy to start with. To be honest I would start with 'plain' PA as its somewhat more straightforward.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question, I've read on this thread that everything can bee seen in price. If divergence by definition is price moving one way while an indicator is moving the opposite direction, how can divergence be seen in price alone? Doesn't the concept of divergence require a second data point or source? Also, isn't a divergence just a heads up as to what may happen and not and indication of what will happen? And, aren't there indicators that have a volume component (Klinger volume) to them so that if there is a divergence part of that divergence is based on volume. I see many posts on TL that discuss price/volume divergences. Is that not part of VSA?

 

I just finished reading Trading in the Zone and from what I read and from my experience of being good a losing, it's more about what is between the ears then the method. If we have hour "minds right" then the rest will work itself out as long as the method over a reasonable number of trades provides a high enough percentage of winners to make one profitable. That doesn't mean 80-90% because money management plays a roll too. It seems to me, unless I am completely wrong that the order of importance is 1. mind right, 2. money management and 3. method. Please let me know if I'm full of it.

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It seems to me, unless I am completely wrong that the order of importance is 1. mind right, 2. money management and 3. method. Please let me know if I'm full of it.

 

David

 

David - IMO, the game that goes on between your ears is the toughest game of all in the markets. How many times have you 'gotten you too early' or 'got out too late' or 'missed a trade b/c I didn't like it', etc. etc.

 

That's all mind games.

 

And the hardest part of all in trading IMO. I think you nailed it on the head. Yes, how you trade is important, but it means nothing if your mind is not in the game and ready.

 

This 'game' we play requires an immense amount of focus and determination. This 'game' we participate in will punish you severely for lack of focus or mindset. This 'game' does not allow you to casually take a day off and be ok the next day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[...] You can safely assume as fact that some people trade better with indicators and some trade better with watching pure price action, while yet others trade better with a smattering of both. Opinions one way or the other don't change that one iota so don't ever accept other trader's "opinions" to the contrary. Opinions are pretty much like derrieres (your posterior heh, heh) and pretty much everybody has one.

 

Some traders may think they have "graduated" beyond the need for indicators and that is fine as there is plenty of room in the markets for all types. There is no such thing as a pure best method of trading no matter how much some may wish to protest to the contrary. [...]

 

Yes, I agree

 

Some trade with indicators and win

Some trade without indicators and win

Some trade with indicators and lose

Some trade without indicators and lose

 

I don't see the problem at all.

 

I rather think that traders criticising indicators, can't make a good use of them - hey don't experiment with different settngs and have no patience in finding their true help.

I visited seminar yesterday that explained elliot wave and some another obscure oscillator giving 100% winning trades at all times.

 

(????)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...

 

I rather think that traders criticising indicators, can't make a good use of them - hey don't experiment with different settngs and have no patience in finding their true help.

I visited seminar yesterday that explained elliot wave and some another obscure oscillator giving 100% winning trades at all times.

 

(????)

 

if someone can give 100% winning trades at all times,

he won't be giving seminars.

and if you have learned anything from the seminar, you won't be a lonely forum rat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if someone can give 100% winning trades at all times,

he won't be giving seminars.

and if you have learned anything from the seminar, you won't be a lonely forum rat.

 

Won't be? Why not?

 

Is this forum accepting only 50% methods as true and any better than that as fake?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Won't be? Why not?

 

Is this forum accepting only 50% methods as true and any better than that as fake?

 

no

 

because we are learned, and you are not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.