Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

walterw

The Holly Grail Vs Optimization

Recommended Posts

Hello dear fellow traders ¡¡

 

I was thinking this weekend as I am preparing a technical update, why do we traders have certain tendency to study in new frontiers of technical analisis ?

 

Is it the look for the Holly Grail ? mmm... or is it that technical optimization is really posible ?

 

First of all let me make clear that the Holly Grail does not exist... you will never find it... and chimps dont drink water with grails, less sacred ones...

 

NOW, optimization DOES EXIST... and this is as true as you can change the way you trade with very simple optimizations...

 

Evolution of a method its posible, it takes time and normally, its funny, but the optimization comes in a simple presentation... too complex things most probably are not too much optimized...

 

The other day I drove on a friends BMW, pure pleasure, very simple presentation of the pannel, not to much buttons, not too much lights, simple presentation but a great optimized piece of automotive engineering ¡¡ now BMW has been optimizing their cars since some time now... lots of years of getting their product optimized, are their cars perfect ? no, not perfect, but yes optimized... same happens with Technical Analisis... can it be perfect ? NEVER.... can it be optimized ? thats for sure...

 

I am a strong beleiver that practical experience is the best teacher in order to produce optimization on Analisis... trading has attached a series of sensations, joys, frustrations, discipline, undiscipline, patience, non patience, etc... all this must observed in the process of optimization...

 

for example, my friends BMW has some nice lights outside on the doors when you aproach it from outside... mmmm maybe some BMW engineers thought thru experience that some times having light when aproaching a car may be very usefull on a dark night... you see... as time goes by, we find new things that could be revisited on our technical methods...

 

Thats why some traders drive on BMW`s (technically speaking) and other ride an old Oldsmovile year 60... you see, it depends specially on your actitude towards accepting what can be optimized...

 

An open mind is needed for this... the right actitude to accept when you are not totally correct on your performance and offcourse you must beleive on the fact that optimization is possible...

 

Are you looking for the Holly Grail ? stop doing so.... better use your time for optimization.... cheers The Chimp.

 

PD: BMW X6 aint that nice ?

x6_wallpaper_02.thumb.jpg.9c88ce3b1a8641d2bf5dc42b01f81a4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've posted before, I just think the whole concept of the "Holly Grail" should be disgarded. Its just a poor metaphor for a fruitless path as far as trading research goes.

The biggest danger with the holly grail mindset IMO is that it ignores your opponent. We aren't really trading against eachother here, we are trading against hundreds of millions of dollars in data analysis and infrastructure trying to analize as much data as possible and find the smallest relationships between the data sets.

To me if you want to sharpen the edge of your analysis, the trail has already been cut for you. Its obviously not in throwing 40 indicators all doing basically the same thing, then using the tradestation optimizer to dance through different settings find patterns in the clouds.

The way to do it is store massive amounts of tick data of related instruments and then use the well studied field of data mining algorithms to find non random patterns. The barriers to entry are nothing financially, the software is all there ready to use for free basically. The real barrier to entry to the next level of analysis is that the knowledge and background needed to take advantage of this stuff is substantial. Just because something is hard to do, to write it off as the search for something that doesn't exist, when your literally trading against the thing you don't believe exists is foolish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  darthtrader3.0beta said:
I've posted before, I just think the whole concept of the "Holly Grail" should be disgarded. Its just a poor metaphor for a fruitless path as far as trading research goes.

The biggest danger with the holly grail mindset IMO is that it ignores your opponent. We aren't really trading against eachother here, we are trading against hundreds of millions of dollars in data analysis and infrastructure trying to analize as much data as possible and find the smallest relationships between the data sets.

To me if you want to sharpen the edge of your analysis, the trail has already been cut for you. Its obviously not in throwing 40 indicators all doing basically the same thing, then using the tradestation optimizer to dance through different settings find patterns in the clouds.

The way to do it is store massive amounts of tick data of related instruments and then use the well studied field of data mining algorithms to find non random patterns. The barriers to entry are nothing financially, the software is all there ready to use for free basically. The real barrier to entry to the next level of analysis is that the knowledge and background needed to take advantage of this stuff is substantial. Just because something is hard to do, to write it off as the search for something that doesn't exist, when your literally trading against the thing you don't believe exists is foolish.

 

Are you referring to neural networks ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  walterw said:
Are you referring to neural networks ?

 

Well neural networks are one of many well studied data mining algorithms, the perceptron model is one of the oldest. The "holly grail" meme drives me so nuts because I truely believe it short changes us as retail traders as far as what software is brought to market. It just seems odd to me that we can buy software that can plot every absurd idea known to man, ships with every useless indicator ever devised but you can't buy off the shelf retail software that stores the thousands of dollars of TICK data that we are all streaming to our machines daily in a useable format like SQL. You basically have to do it yourself.

I installed some poker software the otherday that installed SQL light for a database to keep track of players betting and it has simple tools for manageing the database. I guess my point is I've never been interested in something and part of online communities that shun technological innovation like retail trading does. Music technology is probly a better analogy. Of course you can still record music with a 4 track recorder but the music world jumped all over the advancing computing power in the 90s like there was no tomarrow to the point that you can do things with an off the shelf computer today that was totally unimaginable 15 years ago for any amount of money.

Retail trading software is basically the same as it was 15 years ago with some minor tweaks. The only guys who have truely embraced technological innovation are the big guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before one talks about The Holy Grail we need a clear and concise description, can anybody provide that?

 

I can share some of my thoughts in the meantime...

I believe that much of the money spent in algorithm trading is in developing user-friendly interfaces and also in developing methods for smooth and seamless distribution of large orders. I think it is extremely hard to keep as low profile as possible during distribution, the idea is to influence the market at least possible to obtain the best price.

Likewise the hardware storage costs alot of money - storing tick data can be extremely difficult both in hardware and software.

 

My guess would be that an individual can build a trading system and store data at a price around $ 100,000, this would cover 20-25 shares divided into 2 different markets. This is very detailed I know, purely estimations build from my experience. Now we can do some math... try to cover 50.000 different equities spanning 20 different markets - and this is only equities, take forex, options etc. Wuaaaaa what a bill :)

 

I am 100% sure that these things here cost huge amounts of money:

http://www.microsoft.com/casestudies/casestudy.aspx?casestudyid=4000002610

Edited by januson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.