Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Since no one else (but zeon) has mentioned this particular long opportunity, and since it is so far worth up to six ES points, I'll post this now rather than later.

 

It should be self-explanatory. The green dots represent most if not all the available entry points, selection of which depends on the skill, talent, and risk-tolerance of the individual trader.

 

 

Perhaps we could also do the same for exits? I've had a go at it myself, but I can't see a reason to hold on till the close.

 

I'm assuming we went long either at "1": break of the supplyline after a selling climax on support or at "2": after a re-test on lower volume.

 

After price makes a little swing low we can connect the low of the re-test with this low (the bar right next to "2") and draw a demandline.

 

"3": first exit, very cautious because there's only a break of the demandline (which was quite steep in the first place), and we're not even at resistance

 

"3a": a new demandline can be drawn, there's again demand coming in (high volume) and price continues upwards

 

"4": price is at resistance but fails to break through, this is a nice target to exit or lighten your position

 

"5": break of the second demandline after a failure to breach and two bars later price falls on decent volume with the bars closing on the lows. Exit the rest of your long position.

 

Because of the high volume at "5" and because it drops back a couple of points, I can see no reason to stay in. Though some people might trade by leaving one contract on till the close with their stop at breakeven I'll continue with this assumption:

 

After "5" there's a congestion on decreasing volume. I would think this means lack of demand, because prices fail to rise. However there's no continuation to the downside and prices rise back to resistance and break higher at "6" (confirmation by volume and bar closes at the highs).

 

"7": looks like a test of resistance now turned into support

 

"8": break of the demandline, high volume: a lot of supply

 

"9": back at support and end of the day.

es_20080421.thumb.GIF.d0ab9897a341a0e8e4abab2aef5ec494.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Wyckoff ever talk about volume in relation to waves? He spoke about small waves building into larger waves and then trends, and also viewing waves as an indicator of trend change, but don't recall reading about volume in the context of a wave chart?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did Wyckoff ever talk about volume in relation to waves? He spoke about small waves building into larger waves and then trends, and also viewing waves as an indicator of trend change, but don't recall reading about volume in the context of a wave chart?

 

Definitely. I'll post some examples this week from the course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He even developed a few indicators based on intraday wave volume, time and momentum that SMI calls the Force, Momentum and Optimism/Pessimism Index today. Someday we can take a look at these. Few people realize that W used indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps we could also do the same for exits? I've had a go at it myself, but I can't see a reason to hold on till the close.

 

 

You could put in a trend channel or a resistance line off the AM wave highs. It started trending with higher highs/higher lows after the shake out at 5. The upper trend channel was a reasonable target.

5aa70e5a19789_SPYTLs.thumb.png.2ee6fb687aacc28cff75be7deedbd2d7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something I posted elsewhere:

 

Yes, there need to be criteria for exits. But the nearly universal problem that beginning traders have with regard to exits is a desire to trade all in then all out. Add to that the fact that they are nearly always trading with one contract or one lot, and you have a doomed setup.

 

The solution to exits is a simple one: trade as if you were trading five contracts or five lots and abandon the idea of being able to exit with all of them at the exact top or bottom. The goal is to make money, not to prove to oneself what a superior trader one is.

 

Then determine in advance where each of those contracts will be sold. For example, if one is trading support and resistance, sell the first contract at one or the other. Sell the second contract, for example, at the lower high or the break of the trendline, whichever comes first. Sell the third at whatever you didn't sell at for the second. Sell the fourth, for example, at a breach of the last swing low. Leave the fifth, for example, at breakeven.

 

Then sell the first contract at whatever point you predetermined and paper trade the other four. Do this for several months. When it becomes second nature, carry the second contract for real. Sell the first and second contracts at your predetermined points. Paper trade the remaining three.

 

And so on.

 

Simple.

 

No wringing of the hands, no thumb-twiddling, no head banging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd love to see that. Thanks.

 

In fact, I think W looked at average wave volume also and called it Activity, volume divided by time. I'll check it out to be sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In fact, I think W looked at average wave volume also and called it Activity, volume divided by time. I'll check it out to be sure.

 

Most of this, however, has to do with feel rather than calculation. For real-time trading, I haven't found any of it to have much practical value. For one thing, by the time one has considered all of this, the trade entry is long gone. And, of course, what was meant by "indicator" a hundred years ago is worlds different from what's meant today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there need to be criteria for exits. But the nearly universal problem that beginning traders have with regard to exits is a desire to trade all in then all out. Add to that the fact that they are nearly always trading with one contract or one lot, and you have a doomed setup.

...

 

Simple.

 

No wringing of the hands, no thumb-twiddling, no head banging.

 

 

I agree this sounds all very simple. But most books I read consider scaling out as a less profitable strategy in the long run. This strategy also assumes that you only take one trade a day and try and maximize it's potential. Which I fine I suppose as far as it goes. In trending days, this will keep you in the market with at least a small part of your position till the end. But in ranging days it might mean several stop outs at break-even. Perhaps it's just not possible to find a 'one size fits all' exit strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether the tactics employed by somebody who writes a book (assuming that he trades, which cannot be assumed at all) are appropriate for any given individual depends on how alike they are in their goals, risk tolerance, etc. Scaling in and out can be far more profitable than all-in/all-out. Depends on how good the trader is.

 

Also, it doesn't assume that one makes only one trade a day. It assumes that he makes only one trade in a given direction at any one time. He can also scale in if he likes. Unless one knows whether the day is going to be a trend day or not in advance, that particular issue is irrelevant.

 

The point is that most beginners want to know where to enter and where to exit as if there's only one entry and one exit. This can lead to years of frustration. One can elect instead to be a grown-up about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Something I posted elsewhere:

 

Yes, there need to be criteria for exits. But the nearly universal problem that beginning traders have with regard to exits is a desire to trade all in then all out. Add to that the fact that they are nearly always trading with one contract or one lot, and you have a doomed setup.

 

The solution to exits is a simple one: trade as if you were trading five contracts or five lots and abandon the idea of being able to exit with all of them at the exact top or bottom. The goal is to make money, not to prove to oneself what a superior trader one is.

 

Then determine in advance where each of those contracts will be sold. For example, if one is trading support and resistance, sell the first contract at one or the other. Sell the second contract, for example, at the lower high or the break of the trendline, whichever comes first. Sell the third at whatever you didn't sell at for the second. Sell the fourth, for example, at a breach of the last swing low. Leave the fifth, for example, at breakeven.

 

Then sell the first contract at whatever point you predetermined and paper trade the other four. Do this for several months. When it becomes second nature, carry the second contract for real. Sell the first and second contracts at your predetermined points. Paper trade the remaining three.

 

And so on.

 

Simple.

 

No wringing of the hands, no thumb-twiddling, no head banging.

 

Thanks for this explanation of scaling out multiple contracts, Db. Excellent advice. I'm sure an annotated chart with these ideas applied would be appreciated by many. Personally I'm a more visual kind of guy, and always find your annotated examples to be very good learning material.

 

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In fact, I think W looked at average wave volume also and called it Activity, volume divided by time. I'll check it out to be sure.

 

I think I read that they used the length of the actual ticker tape per half hour or something like that for the activity at one time. Maybe in today's world it would be tick volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think I read that they used the length of the actual ticker tape per half hour or something like that for the activity at one time. Maybe in today's world it would be tick volume.

 

Here's a little from the course. The chart examples are too voluminous to post. I'm not sure what Wyckoff used for Activity. SMI uses volume/time for Activity today.

 

Even if you plan to become an active, day-to-day trader, it is better at first to learn to analyze the market’s tape action from a Wave Chart rather than from the tape itself. The chart teaches you to become a sound judge of the market, for by its use you become familiar with all the elements necessary in successful trading: judging the lifting power as compared with the pressure; the market’s responsiveness or lack of responsiveness to the rotation of supply and demand; the speed of the advances and declines as measured by the net price change and duration of the buying and selling waves; the character of the buying and selling as revealed by proportional changes in activity and volume on advances and declines; and more especially, the changes from strength to weakness, from weakness to strength, and back again.

 

All of these factors are revealed by the Wave Chart. It is the pulse of the market.

 

...This closing price then becomes the starting point from which you carry forward your chart of the buying and selling waves for the next and succeeding days. Thus you will have a continuous, zigzag line which portrays the market’s price action from the one session to another, minute by minute and from hour to hour; and from this chart you are enabled to judge the factors of:

 

1. Price movement – the number of points advance or decline.

 

2. Time elapse in each movement – up or down.

 

3. Comparative lifting power or pressure on each up and down swing.

 

….Thus far we have not considered the volume of trading nor the activity because it is better, first, to learn to judge the factors just enumerated – i.e., Price Movement, Time and Comparative Lifting Power or Pressure.

 

After you have mastered these, you should begin the study of volumes and the intensity of action (activity) in connection therewith. This will give you added understanding and power.

 

(Incidentally, it should be noted that the activity index has no relationship to the price movement as recorded in the Wave Chart table, and it is only indirectly related to the time and volume figures because it represents the rate at which orders are flowing into the market, not a ratio between time and volume.)

 

…when volume is increasing while price is rising or decreasing while price is declining, the inference is usually bullish – unless the increase is unusually large, in which case the sudden increase may indicate the culmination of the particular movement accompanying the abnormal volume.

 

Similarly, when volume is increasing on the down waves and decreasing on the up waves, the indications are usually bearish – unless the volume surge is abnormal, in which case the abnormal volume may indicate the approach or the actual culmination of the movement.

 

The chart studies which follow will illustrate….

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The attached is a SPY wave for the past four days. The bottom graph is volume and you can observe the relationships of the waves. I highlighted the the large move up that wasn't supported by volume and the next wave up that had disproportionately high volume suggesting the presence of supply,

IMO.

attachment.php?attachmentid=6165&stc=1&d=1208912519

5aa70e5a661ed_SPYWave.thumb.png.0783e063521304f913c4a445e9e42a1d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gassah,

 

what does wycoff say about up gaps, which are for the most part achieved on light volume as you chart indicates? Does "W" talk about 'other time frame buyers'? Could it be possible that an 'other time frame buyer' saw value and bought overnight(which caused the gap) and then "finished his buying" into the opening where the buyer knew supply would be? Does the fact that the 'buyer finished' give the illusion of mass supply or mass demand? How does 'W' view price going to where the "size" is? just wondering....thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The attached is a SPY wave for the past four days.

 

If you take the OHLC of the intraday volume plot and make daily candlesticks from them you get what SMI calls the Optimism-Pessimism Index (OP). You can use it to identify divergences with price or to see volume strength or weakness as at the Jan low where volume climaxed first and led price higher.

attachment.php?attachmentid=6168&stc=1&d=1208942265

5aa70e5a7cfcd_SPYO-P.thumb.PNG.bad3ef6a12aff3da0a30f9fda72e7603.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" the the large move up that wasn't supported by volume and the next wave up that had disproportionately high volume "

 

Is this what is meant by comparative lifting power?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you take the OHLC of the intraday volume plot and make daily candlesticks from them you get what SMI calls the Optimism-Pessimism Index (OP). You can use it to identify divergences with price or to see volume strength or weakness as at the Jan low where volume climaxed first and led price higher.

[/center]

 

Very nice. Are you doing all this by hand via Wyckoff Secrets Revealed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Very nice. Are you doing all this by hand via Wyckoff Secrets Revealed?

 

Basically, yes. I only do it for SPY and it takes 9m a day in Excel to do the entire Trend Barometer and OP. All the calculations are derived from the same waves so it isn't a stretch to do them all at one time. I don't follow SMI's rules for the wave determinations. Wyckoff never actually stated his rules for how to determine which bars go into what waves and I mainly differ from SMI by placing climax volume into the next wave instead of going by where price turns around. I think this is a better reflection of supply and demand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
" the the large move up that wasn't supported by volume and the next wave up that had disproportionately high volume "

 

Is this what is meant by comparative lifting power?

 

I'm not sure what this is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
" the the large move up that wasn't supported by volume and the next wave up that had disproportionately high volume "

 

Is this what is meant by comparative lifting power?

 

Not exactly. Comparative lifting or selling power precedes a consideration of volume. If one ignores this and relies on volume climaxes, he will find that volume climaxes aren't as common as he might expect, and he won't be trading much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.