Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

  DbPhoenix said:
Failure to Breach.

 

(I see TradeRunner is watching my back)

 

Thanks, I actually was asking about the previous day tupapa asked you about. For number 3, he asked why no short, and you said congestion. It doesn't look like congestion until after the red circle he has drawn where the entry would be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Seeker said:
Thanks, I actually was asking about the previous day tupapa asked you about. For number 3, he asked why no short, and you said congestion. It doesn't look like congestion until after the red circle he has drawn where the entry would be.

 

You're assessing it in hindsight. Read left to right, not right to left. Via replay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order to avoid an unnecessary number of posts for each day's trading, I'm going to return to this and add to it as the need arises during the day. Therefore, even though you've "read it", come back to it for updates.

 

First, a look at breadth.

 

Second, the dailies.

 

Third, the hourly.

 

Fourth, 5m.

 

Fifth, the trading session until 1130. Win 88%, Profit 90%.

 

 

Those who want to track this arc from the beginning should click here, April 2nd. The cumulative win rate so far is 83.5% and the profit % is 91.

M1.thumb.png.74af5443ac452e96b96c8b7a69464476.png

M2.png.2b16c2b0dde1778b7791c3343d7fd249.png

M3.png.f6bc6d3901818667b3538d4699f63cec.png

M4.png.526586f2400263827da797ed4f8ca3e6.png

M5.png.1bd82f619d382583231bd53c141b3157.png

M6.thumb.png.a5a6dec237e80410aafe294444d9bb1c.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dunno if anybody here trades EOD but Bunds are at Resistance and:

 

-There was a break of the DL.

-Wave 2 was longer than Wave 1 in time and extent.

 

If buyers can't push above resistance and wave 3 results in a LH/Double Top, a short seems legit to me...

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35792&stc=1&d=1366051483

Bund.thumb.png.6d8203c129fb24c8d04c355085be8716.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to see how price behaved when it reached the levels of support drawn above (two posts up), first bouncing off 2810, then dropping all the way to the trendline (and, again, trendlines don't offer support or resistance; price turned there because of the distance from the mean).

 

It's particularly interesting to note how price behaved when it reached the trendline (second chart). It then launched itself into "oversold" territory and retreated back into the warmth and comfort of the trend (it currently sits at 2809). Of course, it could reverse again and plummet. But so far everything is panning out the way it usually does.

 

Chart 3, Hourly

 

Chart 4, 5m

 

There were a half-dozen risk-free entries on the 5m yesterday after the bounce off 2770, even if one just set a cover stop and went to bed.

 

 

 

I'm going to wrap it up early. Rarely have I seen buyers and sellers so evenly matched. Though I wasn't expecting fireworks today, this is rather pitiful, and if I weren't doing this for demonstration purposes, I probably wouldn't even have traded at all today.

 

Plus there's the fact that here it is 1045EST and I'm the only one who's posted anything to TL, except for a few vendors, so I'm more or less talking to myself.

 

For anyone who's keeping track, win % today was 33 and the profit % was 53 (cumulative win%, 78, profit %, 88).

T1.png.f4d33fe6ebfa4533aedc086397c7ac09.png

T2.png.de64077a61d3a67ecf27be2e403aca96.png

T3.png.1a2006c6804505760073f0130c473087.png

T4.png.14f843b917d8fefc6b89663b7c3fb689.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  TradeRunner said:
what if % profit? % of what?

 

The percentage of traded points that were in profit. If you trade 10pts and nine of them are in profit, your profit % is 90.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Today was disappointing in that I knew what to look for and what to do when I saw it, but price zipped right past my entry.

 

The "oversold" condition of a couple of days ago was not rectified the next day, and yesterday price dropped right back down to that level and below. This was not good. Buyers had today to step up to the plate, and they didn't. And since everyone was looking at this and many had written about it, I expected something reasonably decisive at or near the open, but not so decisive that I couldn't get a trade on. What could have done was enter premkt, but that's outside my risk tolerance on a day which is expected to be "volatile".

 

In any case, thinking that there might conceivably be support at last night's swing lows and that buyers might actually show up and that sellers might be using this as an opportunity to profit from what might turn out to be a fakeout, I took the long opportunity. But buyers never showed up. So the LOLR was clear.

 

Next support level was 38, but I wasn't going to wait and hope. 13pts was perfectly okay with me for 45m work.

 

Win % 100, Profit % 100. Cum Win % 82, Cum Profit % 90.

Th1.png.a0b4309c7543ff1910b0a92a0948e7e0.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
The percentage of traded points that were in profit. If you trade 10pts and nine of them are in profit, your profit % is 90.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Today was disappointing in that I knew what to look for and what to do when I saw it, but price zipped right past my entry.

 

The "oversold" condition of a couple of days ago was not rectified the next day, and yesterday price dropped right back down to that level and below. This was not good. Buyers had today to step up to the plate, and they didn't. And since everyone was looking at this and many had written about it, I expected something reasonably decisive at or near the open, but not so decisive that I couldn't get a trade on. What could have done was enter premkt, but that's outside my risk tolerance on a day which is expected to be "volatile".

 

In any case, thinking that there might conceivably be support at last night's swing lows and that buyers might actually show up and that sellers might be using this as an opportunity to profit from what might turn out to be a fakeout, I took the long opportunity. But buyers never showed up. So the LOLR was clear.

 

Next support level was 38, but I wasn't going to wait and hope. 13pts was perfectly okay with me for 45m work.

 

Win % 100, Profit % 100. Cum Win % 82, Cum Profit % 90.

 

Hi Db, why did you wait for the LL for the short, you ussually enter earlier. Was there something here that told you to wait for the confirmation at the break of S?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if anybody would notice that since I generally avoid breakouts. But it seemed highly unlikely that price would rebound given the circumstances, S or no S. And you'll notice that pause of agreement just before price breaks the swing low. That suggested that something was going to happen. It wouldn't have cost anything to bracket the trade, and I should probably tell you that I did, but I didn't, because a another rally didn't make any sense given the circumstances. But I should have anyway to set a good example.

 

But I also thought that if price broke down it wouldn't futz around, and if I didn't take the breakdown it would very likely be nearly done before any sort of RET took place. And the risk was pretty much zip. So I took it.

 

As for why I didn't enter the short earlier, there was no RET.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First chart: Took this shot yesterday evening and nothing has changed. We'll see what happens.

 

Open: Traders so eager to short can't even wait for the opening bell.

 

Failed to get filled twice.

 

Recap: Really wasn't into it today, but here it is anyway.

 

First short is off a RET after a breakdown through S. Second is off R. With these I don't wait for a RET because they usually take so long that by the time they occur you're already at S. Third trade is a RET off an HL and of course the break of the SL.

 

There is then another test of R but I didn't take a short here because of the previous higher low. Could have taken it anyway and exited with a small loss, but it seemed to me that buyers were in charge, again because of the higher low, which made for a shorter sell wave.

 

Next short is off a RET after the DL break. No subsequent op for a long bec no RET. Short after that is again off a RET after the DL break. Then it looked like we were getting into a TR and it was getting late and I was bored. So I quit.

 

However, for the sake of closure, just after that we broke upward to the next level of R (third chart). This is interesting because we formed a little mini-TC which included an HL. Even though we were just below an R level, one could have taken a long there for an additional 9pts. Or he could have waited until price broke thru and taken a long off that little springboard for an additional 2pts. Looks easy in hindsight, but if you're bored and tired, it's not so easy. But that's how it would have played had it been traded.

 

Win% 67, Profit% 94. Cum Win% 81, Cum Profit% 90.

F1.png.52e449026790f58f8c94bffc92276366.png

F2.png.f7b3f2e5bf5595ac110c911d08879e05.png

F3.png.b27b46a10a833c7c78f42e06b18d1c9f.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There -

 

Apologies ahead of time.... I'm sure this has been asked in this thread somewhere, just haven't been able to locate the post.

 

Just curious of the importance of understanding figure charts. Also, the importance of the ability to actually plot out each figure to help us better understand vertical charts more.

 

I could easily spend a few weeks on this area alone and just want to see if it was even an area with considering putting alot of time into.

 

Thanks to everybody who puts the time and effort in here to stay consistent! :helloooo:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i see three options.

 

immediate weekly trend TL is broken (yellow)

no new lows, in fact HL and HH after the break

hinge at 04/19/2013

 

1. i'll wait for price to BO above 2780, pullback and then enter long, looking closely for any signs of R from the LSH (red arrow)

2. i'll wait for price to re-test 2760 area, if holds i'll go long

3. i'll wait for price to re-test 2760 area, if breaks i'll go short

 

P.S. zooming out to the 60M, 360M, reveals that the down TL is still intact

taking that into account i would avoid any directional bias.

 

Tomer.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35829&stc=1&d=1366436794

Wk1-1.thumb.png.1c5d23c8a38840394fc2140183fde43f.png

Edited by tomerok

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I was referring to the entire week, beginning with Monday. A 30m bar chart for the previous week was also posted, though anyone who is interested can convert these to 60m bars or 5H or 12H or whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
Actually I was referring to the entire week, beginning with Monday. A 30m bar chart for the previous week was also posted, though anyone who is interested can convert these to 60m bars or 5H or 12H or whatever.

 

typo on my part, meant weekly trend, re-edited that.

 

Tomer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
But you won't know the weekly trend on Monday. What do you do on the 15th? And each day thereafter?

 

I was referring to my post in which i completely misunderstood your question.:doh:

 

of course i can't tell the trend on monday i would have opened up past week, month , year or whatever i needed in order to to see what going on.

 

for me looking at this chart as is without referring to the left is belongs to the CWS thread or "sharpen your entries" thread..

i have not yet mastered the surfing ability.

 

i tried to answer with that in mind and a little peaking to the left..

assuming always in position..

note the black point which represent indecision points for me.

since this is a 30M i would have liquidated and gone long, BUT let's assume this is a 1M, now there's no reason to rev since we are at the overall right direction. (small red lines marking the tops)

the second black dot would be short if i was long.

 

Tomer.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35834&stc=1&d=1366472664

Wk1-2.thumb.png.06a10561e88c4b694c0ec218b0f18beb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.