Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

  tomerok said:
Who knows.... and who cares...

one of the biggest lessons i learned in past months is i do not know where is price heading.

i can only craft a plan to attack any direction price will decide to take.

 

I'm assuming this post intention was igniting participant's response and ideas, but without any clear view to the left any answer is valid.

 

 

 

Tomer

 

Absolutely, and I don't think it is coincidental that this questions was asked in the Auction Market Theory thread :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tomerok said:
Who knows.... and who cares...

one of the biggest lessons i learned in past months is i do not know where is price heading.

i can only craft a plan to attack any direction price will decide to take.

 

I'm assuming this post intention was igniting participant's response and ideas, but without any clear view to the left any answer is valid.

 

 

 

Tomer

 

 

yess true we dont know where price is hading next.. , but its the bears who are in charge

not the bulls .. just focusing on the current picture , the bulls allready showed their strenght

 

therfore i would lookout for longs atm , but also be cautioned on any supply hitting teh market .. but till now we dont have a lower high , the current attempt of a rallie is still in play ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Bern said:
I would say that it really depends on the timeframe.

 

To know where is potential support or resistance would help.

 

If I had to choose, given the waves rythm and length, given where was the last swing high in what appears as an uptrend in this timeframe, I would say that this is a retracement.

 

I will not mention anything about volume since this is a chart with a rather small bar interval.

 

I want to change this to what I answered:

 

To know where is potential support or resistance is of paramount significance for answering the question.

 

I would add that my feeling is that the question is a tricky one ;) : it does not provide enough information to answer it satisfactorily. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PrymeTyme said:
its a retracement in an uptrend

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34299&stc=1&d=1359276529

 

But if no more buying comes in then price might drift sideways, at some point those holding stock might start getting worried that price is not rising, which may encourage them to sell, which may encourage more selling as there'd be a lower high & break of the uptrend line.

 

I think "be prepared" is good advice. It's hard for me to be prepared for whatever happens. If we could see more then perhaps we'd get a better picture. But we can't so we have to go on what we've got (or stay out until we're comfortable with the setup).

 

Which actually brings me in a bit of a circle to wonder if you (PT) are right and if we're only going to go on the current chart that we can see perhaps long is best (trade with the trend) at least until we get more information. But the movement from A to B looks a bit stop-start to me, it's on low volume (perhaps a more average amount of volume would indicate a continuation?)

 

In your description of the chart you wrote that 'Volume tends to increase on rallies and decrease on reactions' - but there is no increase of volume in the current rally so far (from A to B).

 

Perhaps it is just the way I am that I seem to currently favour countertrend trading, so I tend to find myself looking for trades which match that bias.

Edited by Perrin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Perrin said:
But if no more buying comes in then price might drift sideways, at some point those holding stock might start getting worried that price is not rising, which may encourage them to sell, which may encourage more selling as there'd be a lower high & break of the uptrend line.

 

I think "be prepared" is good advice. It's hard for me to be prepared for whatever happens. If we could see more then perhaps we'd get a better picture. But we can't so we have to go on what we've got (or stay out until we're comfortable with the setup).

 

Which actually brings me in a bit of a circle to wonder if you (PT) are right and if we're only going to go on the current chart that we can see perhaps long is best (trade with the trend) at least until we get more information. But the movement from A to B looks a bit stop-start to me, it's on low volume (perhaps a more average amount of volume would indicate a continuation?)

 

In your description of the chart you wrote that 'Volume tends to increase on rallies and decrease on reactions' - but there is no increase of volume in the current rally so far (from A to B).

 

Perhaps it is just the way I am that I seem to currently favour countertrend trading, so I tend to find myself looking for trades which match that bias.

 

Hi Perrin

 

 

yup , te rallie from A to B is on low volume , and tapperd off quite heavy

i may forgott to add that in my description .. or make it clearly,,

 

but what does it tell us ?

 

first off price advances even on low vol. and that by itself isnt bearish per se

it just means that there isnt much activity atm ,

 

but due to the recent background (strenght) its not the bulls who have to proof their ground

the bears are the ones who need to come out and show their hands ...

 

it might be that , due to the lack of demand or lack of upside progress ,it may lead to supply and weakness .. due to traders unloading their holdings.. etc..

but till then , the market is strong .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After a lengthy discussion of retracements and reversals, an exercise such as this serves to focus the attention on just what retracements and reversals are and what the difference is between them. But the answer isn't as important as the process one goes through in order to arrive at it.

 

Some will immediately look at trend, support and resistance, waves, volume, compression and expansion, almost as a reflex action, the sort of thing a professional will do automatically. This likely will have much to do with the amount of time and effort the individual has devoted to the course. Others, not knowing what to look for, will decide instead that there's nothing to see.

 

There may also be an observable difference between those who do this every day in real time and those who don't, but there are people who learn how to do excellent hindsight analyses without ever having traded -- successfully -- in real time at all.

 

Think, therefore, about your process. What did you look for, if anything? Did you know what to look for? Where to start? Did you slip into a well-practiced routine? Did you recognize that everything you need to know is given to you? Did you find that you may have been following the wrong map?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
Look familiar?

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=33904&stc=1&d=1357920687

 

The Oil Hinge breakout seems imminent:

 

On the daily we are literally hugging the hinge upper limit:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34317&stc=1&d=1359367565

 

And on the 60m we are forming another Hinge, an upside breakout of this, would be a double hinge breakout, both of the daily and the 60m:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34316&stc=1&d=1359367196

5aa711aa77d6e_Oil60m.JPG.9d0b789ec532552a4c866f6c8640c9af.JPG

5aa711aa7d04b_Oildaily.JPG.c5358ae56ee7fbb3b1f3ef88a61861af.JPG

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oil Analysis:

 

Sellers were able to keep buyers at bay at 96.9, where prices were strongly rejected , now prices are back in the TR between 96.7 and 95.4.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34342&stc=1&d=1359461316

 

As for strategies:

 

REV or BO plays at the extremes.

 

Surf with the trend within the shorter term TRs levels.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34343&stc=1&d=1359461343

5aa711ab8029b_CL03-13(60Min)29_01_2013.thumb.jpg.f6cf7b7846e68cf6e25dea8ebf8c0374.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are at the top of the daily TR zone:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34344&stc=1&d=1359463268

 

Zooming in we can see how 80 provided R during the last few days when the market has been in a very boring TR.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34345&stc=1&d=1359463331

 

Stronger down waves, LLs and LHs are indications of Sellers having the upper hand, S/R levels are provided within the chart.

eurod.thumb.jpg.46cb70a967b39c9a6ebf4b9498028677.jpg

euro15.thumb.jpg.13b50e7c01fdb21a8595b823d7154f9c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sharp eyes will notice i have been converted to time based charts

I did not notice any significant edge with tick for my kind of trading

another change i have made is zooming out to 5M chart's and timing the entry on 1M

which result with a calmer experience of the trading session

 

if anyone interested i use 60 and 15 to determine levels and and come up with an action plan for the day

during the session i watch the 5m (mainly) and 1m for entry keeping the 15m open as a reminder for my general daily plan.

 

 

Tomer.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34349&stc=1&d=1359466753

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34351&stc=1&d=1359466855

5aa711abaf007_NQ03-13(60Min)1_29_2013.thumb.jpg.5b74d50bfd65e827ff0dc00d868f1e29.jpg

5aa711abb88b8_NQ03-13(15Min)1_29_2013.thumb.jpg.cde37f557dbabb2b70538db90a8ef6f4.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PrymeTyme said:
Hi Perrin

 

 

yup , te rallie from A to B is on low volume , and tapperd off quite heavy

i may forgott to add that in my description .. or make it clearly,,

 

but what does it tell us ?

 

first off price advances even on low vol. and that by itself isnt bearish per se

it just means that there isnt much activity atm ,

 

but due to the recent background (strenght) its not the bulls who have to proof their ground

the bears are the ones who need to come out and show their hands ...

 

it might be that , due to the lack of demand or lack of upside progress ,it may lead to supply and weakness .. due to traders unloading their holdings.. etc..

but till then , the market is strong .

 

I think you might be focusing to much on volume, and leaving aside price and time. Personally, I only use volume intraday when I am looking for evidence of accumulation, or climactic action . I find the whole high vol on rally and low volume on correction axiom impractical and deceiving.

 

So if we leave aside volume, colored bars, the time of the day (duno abou the Us but in Europe, it is common for the market to reverse at lunch time), and that annoying Ema, we can focus on price and time, which in my opinion, are the more relevant variables.

 

Starting from around 10:40, You have an up-wave that lasts for 35 minutes and accounts for 6 points.

 

Then there is a down-wave from 1502 to 1500, that lasts only 15 minutes, the bulls are clearly in control.

 

The subsequent up-wave accounts for 6 points, but lasts only 15 minutes.

 

Then there is another down wave, which accounts for 5 points and lasts for 35 minutes, this is the first sign of trouble for the bulls, an increase in the length and extent of the down-waves.

 

Now to the final wave, which starts at around 12:15 and, even though it lasts for 40 minutes, it only accounts for a 3 point increase, resulting in a LH.

 

Diagram should explain this better:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34356&stc=1&d=1359489284

waves.png.60ed99ea37a40f2c55f56c78e89b3d9a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  tupapa said:
I think you might be focusing to much on volume, and leaving aside price and time. Personally, I only use volume intraday when I am looking for evidence of accumulation, or climactic action . I find the whole high vol on rally and low volume on correction axiom impractical and deceiving.

 

So if we leave aside volume, colored bars, the time of the day (duno abou the Us but in Europe, it is common for the market to reverse at lunch time), and that annoying Ema, we can focus on price and time, which in my opinion, are the more relevant variables.

 

Starting from around 10:40, You have an up-wave that lasts for 35 minutes and accounts for 6 points.

 

Then there is a down-wave from 1502 to 1500, that lasts only 15 minutes, the bulls are clearly in control.

 

The subsequent up-wave accounts for 6 points, but lasts only 15 minutes.

 

Then there is another down wave, which accounts for 5 points and lasts for 35 minutes, this is the first sign of trouble for the bulls, an increase in the length and extent of the down-waves.

 

Now to the final wave, which starts at around 12:15 and, even though it lasts for 40 minutes, it only accounts for a 3 point increase, resulting in a LH.

 

Diagram should explain this better:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=34356&stc=1&d=1359489284

 

 

Interesting, I hardly ever look at time, will give it a try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tupapa

 

I do actually look at time / price aswell. Called momentum ;)

The vol. Is just the the dot on the i ....

 

Its especially interresting when it takes for example 6 bars to correct (sellibg wave)

But onlx 1 or 2 bars to make back the ground and some more (buying)

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this would be a good thread to do this, but is anyone interested in discussing the use of the 1 tick chart? As a start I have some questions.

 

Do you find it useful?

What are you trying to accomplish/what are you looking for when using it?

 

I can only view a max of about 4 minutes on the chart and that is when activity begins to slow down. I really do like using it but I find myself glancing maybe a little too much at the one minute chart. Is it worth it to have such a limited view?

 

Should it be used like the time and sales, at places of potential s/r?

 

I have posted two charts and you can see the limited view I have, however in that limited view there seems to be some very important things happening. Anyone care to analyze the two charts? Obviously hindsight and you can't see the pace or flow, but just for fun I suppose.

 

P.S. It's two charts because I can't fit all the action in one window.

5aa711acd4489_NQ03-13(1Tick)1_31_2013a.thumb.jpg.bd19b854580d6282703ff3b0b3b2ac7d.jpg

5aa711acdb8e0_NQ03-13(1Tick)1_31_2013b(1).thumb.jpg.51a941dbad7caf00544e5ea8bbfa205d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tick lets you follow price as close as possible, but using it as the only source of information will put you in a very limited view position.

 

I personally cant use the 1 tick, because of ninja screen sizing issues, so i use a 30 tick chart. If you are in the screen time phase, a tick chart is a must as you will be able to understand the continuous nature of price.

 

When you begin pattern identification and backtesting you will have to use other intervals as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.