Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

We are again in a clear downtrend, and have to make use of july levels to define SR as no meaningful congestion is at hand during the last months.

 

At 63, we are near the bottom of Nov 9. During the morning there has been some support at , 60, but is yet to be tested during the following minutes, if 60 does not hold these are my levels of interest:

 

54

47

38

 

 

Why?

 

Db

 

.........................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My recount of the day,

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32823&stc=1&d=1352826065

 

1. After the open prices reached the S level at 54, there buyers managed to keep sellers above 53 and finally set a DB.

2. As prices reached 60 some supply came into the market, but is was not enough to stop buyers from taking prices even higher.

3. At first it appeared as if 68 would not provide enough R , but after reaching 72 sellers managed to take the prices down to 68 again, there buyers started coming in again.

4. By the end of this trading range their strength had shifted again to the buyers side, as the upwaves became stronger.

5. Sellers held the market at R at 76, and after a Triple Top, sellers took control of the market.

6. Seller’s strength faded at S at 68, where buyers rapidly erased sellers decline and managed to break above R at 76.

7. But then a LH signaled that buyers lacked the strength to take prices even higher, this gave sellers the chance to mode to the MP of the 68-76 area where buyers managed to take the market up to R again.

8. There a LH signaled buyers weakness, that then developed into a down move, that.

9. After a new attempt at R, finally made it to S.

10. At 68, sellers ran out of steam after a strong and swift downwave, giving buyers the chance to set a HL and from then, although not without effort a rise towards R.

11. By this time 76 was no longer holding as R and prices crossed swiftly.

12. By 11:00 prices managed to reach the 84 level.

5aa7117975d18_NQ12-12(30Tick)13_11_2012.thumb.jpg.f2da56e243410a582ff8d96ec5105c3c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13.11.12 The opening was something of a surprise given that S at 2561 and the PDL of 2556 were broken beforehand. (Looking for short opps would be the sensible option given the trend and that we were yet to test the bottom of the trend channel).

 

Post open, the fact that buyers consolidated at 2561 (note cluster of bars) before moving above 61 should indicate that buyers were at least willing to fight their battle in higher territory.

 

66 was a less obvious level of S/R, and a brief brk of the dl did nothing to suggest that sellers were going to step in here.

The larger reaction came at 72, but the pullback could not reach 66 and those looking here to join in the prevailing trend were disappointed.

Note that the move up from 66 to 72 did not pause to create a swing point, which meant that there no levels of significance in between.

 

The next upwave from 66 to 75 was almost vertical, and again did not create a swing point along the way, which may be a factor in the increasing length of the downwaves. Price comes back all the way to 67, before expanding almost vertically again to 79. All this suggest that 72 was not an important level, and the PA provides little to suggest where S/R may next form.

 

A dt at 79, followed by a LH, mimics what happened at 75. Buyers are clearly struggling (note fanning of dl's), but the LH's at 66,67,69 reflect the uncertainty of the selling pressure.

The break of the hinge to the downside fails, buyers step in to hit 85, a rise of 30 pts from the OL.

 

Exiting and re-entering the long would have led to as much frustration as those looking for a short until the eventual upmove from the hinge. (The chart contains areas where I felt entries were valid, exiting at brks of dl's / sl's).

5aa71179879b3_NQ100(1Minute)20121113postmkt.png.95b11aa81f65f74758fabe4c89fd5053.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first chart has my premarket s/r lines the second chart I readjusted some of the lines as s/r shfted. A few things to consider, this chart was marked up after trading hours so I had the benefit of hindsight and time,I was watching this in RT and most of my notes were from 9;30 to 11;00. I am in the process of drafting a trading plan entering on RET's after HH's and LL's.This is a work in progress any comments and corrections would be welcomed.

1.I was watching 60 and 56 for support

2. price dropped through 60 premarket and appeared to be holding at 56.Price rallied off 56 but buyers couldn't even get price back to 60. The market opens with a push below 56 to 53 where support comes in and pushes market higher

3. Price breaks the LSH and forms RET. Buying pressure pushes price to HH.

4.Another HH and RET and price makes HH.

5.Price hits 72 I had 67-70 as a zone of R another RET and push to HH's

6. R at 77 price was sitting at the top. RET

7.looked like price was moving up but I think the buyers needed a break price trades down to S at 68

8.buyers step in and take price up to 79

9.HH at 79 looking for a RET

10. Small drop price can't get back to the highs drops again PA getting a little choppier.

11. Buyers take price higher but can't reach the highs LH.

12 sellers push price to LL.looking to shoert a rally?

13.Price moves lower but sellers lack conviction price doesn't reach the lows at 10;08.

14. LH shorting oppt?

15 slightly LL. I was so intent looking for HH's LL's I only now recognized the TR. buying pressure takes price up to the top of range

16. HH. quit for the day

nq1.thumb.jpg.0234a679926834e898bab89d052911f2.jpg

nq4.thumb.jpg.381579cfba0d178b591b8fc78bba0cab.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

below 2600 are my numbers for the 14th.

90.25

86

71.5

60.75

51.5

41.5

29.75

they are drawn from the june - july time frame.

could be argued that they should be refreshed,

drawing from the november 8 thru 13 period.

when then were drawn, they were very stong; ie

spread between 3, 4 or 5 swings so i elect to continue with them.

2012-11-13_1956.png.0b1b90d4db3edbff97e587c367dccc41.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Futures in pre-market are showing some strength. Price is weak but has started to resist downward continuation around 63. This may be an early attempt by demand to halt the downward movement. 63.5, 64, 64.5, 65 are some levels where supply might show up in case price rises. Lets see if this is the start of an attempt to get out of the trend channel. Note the tighter supply lines to enhance the supply and demand dynamics.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32836&stc=1&d=1352891683

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32835&stc=1&d=1352891683

 

Gringo

5aa7117a4590f_QQQ2hr.png.e92c29c5f94cfca2e3ea8cf3fe6c9874.png

5aa7117a49971_QQQDailyMinimal.png.79b6d7d2599639b60a1c675ea3111eb6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After setting a HL yesterday buyers did not manage to break above 584, if this was short selling then perhaps today we will not get much of a following, if not we will see.

 

My levels for the day. (at 7 AM prices are around 576):

 

Bellow price:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32838&stc=1&d=1352894951

 

569

557 MP area -559 Yest low

553 Mon Low - 554 Top of a minor TR in July 25-26

547 Top of Jun 11 to 14 TR

 

 

Above Price:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32839&stc=1&d=1352894951

 

584-587-589 various congestion points.

597

607

5aa7117a559a4_NQ12-12(100000Volume)14_11_2012.jpg.d5582ca70dc17468d11bf2e66b1ace52.jpg

5aa7117a5a6c5_NQ12-12(10000Volume)14_11_2012.jpg.05e38b26d2b68c55e5fd6da6d888cbb3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Long term view : price still "lean" on the DL, though a clear Support is now visible

Last 3 days formed a hinge like congestion, which looks like is ready to break out.

Last 2 TR are aligned with their MP

Price is popping up at pre-session, last TR high R holds

 

 

Areas of interest

2607

2597

2585

2572

2557

 

 

 

 

Tomer

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32840&stc=1&d=1352895269

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32841&stc=1&d=1352895269

5aa7117a65838_NQ12-12(5760Tick)14_11_2012.thumb.jpg.4b6238b75d4b8af1b2069f8a5ce14310.jpg

5aa7117a6fe69_NQ12-12(720Tick)14_11_2012.thumb.jpg.a95a2480f86d2f738686647b311fe05b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A question arose yesterday regarding Wyckoff's instruction regarding interday trends and the intraday trader and my own modification of it. The following is an attempt at clarification.

 

Wyckoff wrote that the trader's actions should be based

on judgment of the technical position: Supply and demand --support and pressure.

 

No news, earnings or other corporate or fundamental statistics are considered; we use only those which relate to the factors: Price Movement, Volume and Time.

 

The active trader who is a Tape Reader is concerned only with the immediate trend of the small moves in the market. This trend can be detected by this Method soon after the opening of the Stock Exchange...

 

This form of trading disregards the long trend of the market, as well as the intermediate trends. It takes instant advantnge of the technical rallies and reactions that promise to yield a profit in the same stock market session, on either the long or the short side of the market.

This instruction, of course, must be understood within the context of tape reading, i.e., trading ticks. There were no bar intervals as there were no bars, just ticks (transactions). There were no charts other than those drawn by hand by the trader, hence the utility of point-and-figure. There was of course no "zoom".

 

The primary value of the interday trend in this regard would be to alert the trader to the conditions for a possible reversal, i.e., when price approaches or bounces in the proximity of one side or the other of the trend channel, as below:

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32837&stc=1&d=1352894217

 

 

 

Otherwise, for intraday trading, this information is of little or no use. My own comment on the matter -- "interday trend is largely irrelevant to the daytrader unless some important level that might affect the intraday trading is nearby" -- was made in appreciation of the fact that the modern-day trader has many other tools at his disposal, including digital intraday charts that can display data in a near-infinite variety of forms, at the very least showing intraday trends and trading ranges, hence the second part of the statement: unless some important level that might affect the intraday trading is nearby. If, for example, the daytrader is tracking an upmove, he'd be wise to consider that he's approaching a trading range from a previous session, a range which might well offer important resistance. This hinge, for example, formed two days ago, has offered resistance twice, once yesterday and once this morning:

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32842&stc=1&d=1352895360

 

 

 

To ignore such information simply because it is from a previous session would be self-defeating.

 

Therefore, even though whatever interday trendlines the trader might come up with may be irrelevant to an intraday trade, particularly since it is the trader who came up with them, the levels and zones provided by trading ranges, since they are "drawn" by the market, may have an important influence on price's movement and the profitability of the trade.

 

Db

5aa7117a5013b_NQ100(Daily)20121113103536.png.d790e6eaf4e7eef9d008aff91aac04f4.png

5aa7117a7601a_NQ100(15Minutes)20121114050747.png.7c4bed5c82e72acaf5e2fc081e39006e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The following is a copy of a post I just made to the TBP thread. I've copied it here because it is particularly pertinent to trading intraday trends:

 

 

A question arose yesterday regarding Wyckoff's instruction regarding interday trends and the intraday trader and my own modification of it. The following is an attempt at clarification.

 

Wyckoff wrote that the trader's actions should be based

on judgment of the technical position: Supply and demand --support and pressure.

 

No news, earnings or other corporate or fundamental statistics are considered; we use only those which relate to the factors: Price Movement, Volume and Time.

 

The active trader who is a Tape Reader is concerned only with the immediate trend of the small moves in the market. This trend can be detected by this Method soon after the opening of the Stock Exchange...

 

This form of trading disregards the long trend of the market, as well as the intermediate trends. It takes instant advantnge of the technical rallies and reactions that promise to yield a profit in the same stock market session, on either the long or the short side of the market.

This instruction, of course, must be understood within the context of tape reading, i.e., trading ticks. There were no bar intervals as there were no bars, just ticks (transactions). There were no charts other than those drawn by hand by the trader, hence the utility of point-and-figure. There was of course no "zoom".

 

The primary value of the interday trend in this regard would be to alert the trader to the conditions for a possible reversal, i.e., when price approaches or bounces in the proximity of one side or the other of the trend channel, as below:

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32837&stc=1&d=1352894217

 

 

 

Otherwise, for intraday trading, this information is of little or no use. My own comment on the matter -- "interday trend is largely irrelevant to the daytrader unless some important level that might affect the intraday trading is nearby" -- was made in appreciation of the fact that the modern-day trader has many other tools at his disposal, including digital intraday charts that can display data in a near-infinite variety of forms, at the very least showing intraday trends and trading ranges, hence the second part of the statement: unless some important level that might affect the intraday trading is nearby. If, for example, the daytrader is tracking an upmove, he'd be wise to consider that he's approaching a trading range from a previous session, a range which might well offer important resistance. This hinge, for example, formed two days ago, has offered resistance twice, once yesterday and once this morning:

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32842&stc=1&d=1352895360

 

 

 

To ignore such information simply because it is from a previous session would be self-defeating.

 

Therefore, even though whatever interday trendlines the trader might come up with may be irrelevant to an intraday trade, particularly since it is the trader who came up with them, the levels and zones provided by trading ranges, since they are "drawn" by the market, may have an important influence on price's movement and the profitability of the trade.

 

Db

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After the runup in the am yesterday price retraced all its gains trading back very near its open at 60. Price then traded higher overnight to R at 2585. and has drifting downward since 4:30 am.broke its TL at 7:00 am and LSH at 78.75. My levels for today 2585,2594 and 2607 above and 2570,2560-2556 below.

nq1.thumb.jpg.533a5e4d63af9ca7822baf8fcec8d874.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These are the levels I will be initially watching for today. I could add something if there is significant price action prior to opening of regular session:

 

2637-40

2615

2604

2597-2600

2585-86 13th H and ov H DT, mp TR fm 9th and 12th

 

2572-74 mp TR 13th

2553-57 SL from 13th and 9th

2538-40 mp TR July

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32844&stc=1&d=1352896012

5aa7117a86e09_NQ12-12(10000Volume)14_11_2012.thumb.png.6eabb9b9857a1ba31f64aa01c7a6131d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14.11 Pre Mkt

 

Price still at the bottom of the trend channel.

Buyers appear reluctant to take price above 2600, likewise S at 2560 has held firm, another break below may be significant.

 

R was somewhat soft during the previous days session, with 84 providing the most reliable level.

5aa7117a987ee_NQ100(Hourly)20121114PreMkt.png.68d43a97501eec7da196f05e3d77ed4a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an analysis of Dow Jones US Heavy Construction Index.

 

I came with a heavily negative bias towards the housing market. It took a little bit of adjustment to accept what price was showing than forcing bias on the analysis. You may notice a bit of downward bias earlier in the analysis on my part. By the time I reached the end some clarity of mind was beginning to emerge.

 

This is the first time I am attempting to analyse this index so there are bound to be points that I might have missed. I am not even sure who of if anyone even looks at this but it's my attempt at getting used to the housing market behaviour.

 

Top down approach: Monthly -> Weekly -> Daily chart analysis. Notes are within the charts.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32850&stc=1&d=1352909455

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32851&stc=1&d=1352909455

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32852&stc=1&d=1352909455

Daily analysis surprised me with the better behaviour than the Q's. The upside is twice as fast and the downside is comparable. Who wouldn't want an index skewed to the upside.

 

Gringo

5aa7117ab56de_HCMonthly.png.0c4790bb1611dff8b9a770871bce8d32.png

5aa7117ab9950_HCWeekly.png.71e5c850e20c26a08b48df1a80ba1792.png

5aa7117abe9c7_HCDaily.png.47c841e5d52e13e8ff0475be965a97d5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My analisys for the day:

 

This were the levels posted in the TIF thread.

 

 

Bellow price:

 

569

557 MP area -559 Yest low

553 Mon Low - 554 Top of a minor TR in July 25-26

547 Top of Jun 11 to 14 TR

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32853&stc=1&d=1352910293

 

1. After the open the market stayed in a small TR with a top at the 76 R level, after a first attempt, buyers did not manage to hold their advance, and sellers rapidly set a LH, but were not strong enough to take prices to S.

2. Once again Buyers attempted to take prices above R, bur were held on 76 by sellers who managed to take prices smoothly below the opening TR.

3. After reaching S at 68 price kept on falling but found buyers at 64, from there prices went nowhere between 9:55 and 10:12 in an 8 point TR. By 10 16 after managing to stay in the bottom of the TR and forming a small hinge, sellers finally showed their willingness to commit and managed to take prices down with decision. This made 64 the new R level when prices pulled back at 10:19.

4. S at 60 was taken out fast, and became R on the second attempt by buyers to take prices up again.(Did not have it on my pre-market analysis). After a second attempt a LH was formed and from then on prices fell fast.

5. At 54 prices found S again, formed a hinge that was broken to the downside with good volume, but sellers couldn't move bellow 50. By 11:00 the TL that started in 73 was broken and prices had started to rise.

5aa7117ac8f61_NQ12-12(30Tick)14_11_2012.thumb.jpg.238c1b7e8a890d483d7a43ea39672aa0.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This analysis is for Lowes Corporation.

 

I should have probably checked the group behaviour as well. Maybe later I'll have a look. I am just pushing through analysis after analysis.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32858&stc=1&d=1352924091

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=32859&stc=1&d=1352924091

 

 

Gringo

LOW.png.86d007ddd151ad755f90cc3769dff39d.png

5aa7117aeac79_LOW2hr.png.b690e4b271d9a4e897bdf49ddf60ed43.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.premarket, buyers are supporting prices at 2570

2. At 8;30 a.m.price rallies to R at 75-76 and we appear to be in a TR

3.9:55 a.m. price breaks support and drops down into a new TR at 65-70

4. 10:17 price gaps down breaking support at 65 and trended steadily downward to 50

a mix of TR and trend.

nq4.thumb.jpg.ca8dd1d4d76296ddbbf6ecddea0a3165.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I wasnt able to pay much attention this morning, I did note that after the break of the opening low of 2570 (which was also S of the pre mkt TR), buyers struggled to make it back above this level. This has been mentioned previously as something to look out for and was a factor today.

5aa7117b0c423_NQ100(1Minute)20121114PostMkt.png.f488aad41a68a407c1fe53214310835b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm pretty sure that a Russian resident would say that recessions are real today. Their prime interest rate is 21%, their corporate military contractors are threatening to file bankruptcy, and sticks of butter are kept under lock and key in their grocery stores because shoplifters are stealing it in bulk so they can resell it on the black market. A downturn is cyclical until it turns into a collapse. I really don't think anyone will be buying-into this mess.😬
    • Well said. This principle is highly analogous to trading. Any human can easily click buy or sell when they "feel" that price is about to go up or down. The problem with feeling, commonly referred to as "instinctive" trading, is that it cannot be quantified. And because it cannot be quantified, it cannot be empirically tested. Instinctive trading has the lowest barrier to entry and therefore returns the lowest reward. As this is true for most things in life, this comes as no surprise. Unfortunately, the lowest barrier to entry is attractive to new traders for obvious reasons. This actually applied to me decades ago.🤭   It's only human nature to seek the highest amount of reward in exchange for the lowest amount of work. In fact, I often say that there is massive gray area between efficiency and laziness. Fortunately, losing for a living inspired me to investigate the work of Wall Street quants who refer to us as "fishfood" or "cannonfodder." Although I knew that we as retail traders cannot exploit execution rebates or queues like quants do, I learned that we can engage in automated scalp, swing, and trend trading. The thermonuclear caveat here, is that I had no idea how to write code (or program) trading algorithms. So I gravitated toward interface-based algorithm builders that required no coding knowledge (see human nature, aforementioned). In retrospect, I should never have traded code written by builder software because it's buggy and inefficient. However, my paid subscription to the builder software allowed me to view the underlying source code of the generated trading algo--which was written in MQL language. Due to a lack of customization in the builder software, I inevitably found myself editing the code. This led me to coding research which, in turn, led me to abandoning the builder software and coding custom algo's from scratch. Fast forward to the present, I can now code several trading strategies per day across 2 different platforms. Considering how inefficient manual backtesting is, coding is a huge advantage. When a new trading concept hits me, I can write the algo, backtest it, and optimize it within an hour or so--across multiple exchanges and symbols, and cycle through hundreds of different settings for each input. And then I get pages upon pages of performance metrics with the best settings pre-highlighted. Having said all of this, I am by no means an advanced programmer. IMHO, advanced programmers write API gateways, construct their own custom trading platforms, use high end computers with field programmable gateway array chips, and set up shop in close proximity to the exchanges. In any event, a considerable amount of work is required just to get toward the top of the "fishfood"/"cannonfodder" pool. Another advantage of coding is that it forces me to write trade entry and exit conditions (triggers) in black & white, thereby causing me to think microscopically about my precise trade trigger conditions. For example, I have to decide whether the algo should track the slope, angle, and level of each bar price and indicator to be used. Typing a hard number like 50 degrees of angle into code is a lot different than merely looking at a chart myself and saying, that's close enough.  Code doesn't acknowledge "maybe" nor "feelings." Either the math (code) works (is profitable) or doesn't work (is a loser). It doesn't get angry, sad, nor overly optimistic. And it can trade virtually 24 hours per day, 5 days per week. If you learn to code, you'll eventually reach a point where coding an algo that trades as you intended provides its own sense of accomplishment. Soon after, making money in the market merely becomes a side effect of your new job--coding. This is how I compete, at least for now, in this wide world of trading. I highly recommend it.  
    • VRA Vera Bradley stock watch, pull back to 5.08 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?VRA
    • MU Micron stock watch, pull back to 102.83 gap support area with high trade quality at https://stockconsultant.com/?MU
    • ACLX Arcellx stock watch, trending at 84.6 support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?ACLX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.