Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Yesterday there was an upthrust in the Nasdaq and the Dow. There was also an upthrust of sorts in the SPX, but there've been so many over the past few weeks that they are forming their own base :).

 

Whatever these thrusts mean in and of themselves does not matter as much as where they are occurring, i.e., against important, previous support. Therefore, both intraday and EOD traders would do well to concentrate on how price behaves at this particular juncture.

 

As the resident Candlestick guy, I'll tell you that just finding a shape and calling it a reason to trade is exactly why candlestick analysis does not work for some. B/c that's a completely inaccurate way of using them. :doh:

 

The topic of this thread seems to encompass a broad range of interesting elements.

 

Brownsfan, as you're the "resident Candlestick guy", would candlestick analysis tell you to take the upthrust on the NQ as a short signal? It was on decent volume and into previous support (context). Seemed pretty good to me, but I'm not an EOD trader. Intermediate trend still up though.

 

Has anybody else observed that there seem to be a whole lot more of "one-way days" then before? Or is it just my perception?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The topic of this thread seems to encompass a broad range of interesting elements.

 

I hope so.

 

Has anybody else observed that there seem to be a whole lot more of "one-way days" then before? Or is it just my perception?

 

I stopped keeping records of this sort of thing some time back, but daily ranges are twice what they used to be, and the number of trend days has dramatically increased. It's been suggested that two-thirds of the trading days end up in the quartile opposite to where they began.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I stopped keeping records of this sort of thing some time back, but daily ranges are twice what they used to be, and the number of trend days has dramatically increased. It's been suggested that two-thirds of the trading days end up in the quartile opposite to where they began.

 

I remember February last year, at a certain point the daily range contracted to around 10 points on the NQ. On some days even less than that. But that was before the correction. Nevertheless amazing to see 40-50 point days.

 

Contraction and expansion in volatility is normal I suppose, but the sudden increase in trend days seems odd. Not that I care a lot about the underlying reasons, but did Wyckoff or anybody else have something to say about this? I believe Steenbarger wrote something about it too in his blog recently...

 

Btw, do you still use the daily range as a potential warning signal the intraday move has exhausted? Had a look at your blog and I did notice some new elements (TICK for example)... a lot of new material to digest, that's for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't recall W saying anything about it specifically. One can infer certain things, but I've seen inferences become axioms, and that can lead to all sorts of trouble. One can infer, for example, that the "smart money" hasn't a clue, which helps to explain a lot of what's been going on. But there's not much one can do with that unless he can become especially sensitive to volume surges, breakouts, and fades. There have also been very good trades on both the long and short sides in what anybody would call very dull markets. So, again, one has to be sensitive to flow and pay little or no attention to individual bars.

 

One of the few rules-of-thumb that appear to hold up is that one can't expect one trend day to follow another in the same direction. There has to be a rest of some sort at some point, even if it's only a turn in the opposite direction (e.g., the /\/ pattern we've followed the past three days).

 

As for the daily range, no. As I understand auction market theory better, I rely more on support and resistance. Auction market theory also adds another level to Wyckoff, which enables me to become more sensitive to flow. A side-effect to this is that I don't trade as much, which can be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on how one looks at it.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: Incidentally, you posted something about bias. If one looks at market internals and the behavior of small, mid, and largecaps, it's difficult not to acquire a bias. However, it is absolutely essential that one remember that the market can be irrational for far longer than one might believe. Therefore, one must focus on what's there, not on what one expects to be there or wishes to be there.

 

The "smart" money is not any smarter than anybody else. There's just more of it. So when the elephants are swaying back and forth or wandering in a circle or taking a nap, one must be sensitive to that and not make more of it than it is. And if one gets tired of waiting for the mouse and decides to hang it up ten minutes before the big stampede that begins as soon as they've left the room, that's okay too. One can't trade well if he's so bored that his eyes are beginning to bleed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the various "upthrusts" and why they didn't make good shorts today, it may help to set aside overhead resistance for the moment and look at the trend, or "stride".

 

Note here that even though the YM and ES are struggling, they are also each coming off their respective demand lines. And while they have been unable to maintain their strength since mid-April, they nonetheless remain in uptrends in this interval.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6424&stc=1&d=1210900714

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6425&stc=1&d=1210900724

 

.

As for the NQ, note that its demand line has altered its course.

 

.

attachment.php?attachmentid=6426&stc=1&d=1210900724

 

Keep in mind that resistance is not a line but a zone. And that the herd is always right. Except at turning points.

 

 

.

Image3.gif.5a7e044508724f425cdcf696a8bc976d.gif

Image4.gif.015e7c3c92be79db2109e5d6831469e7.gif

Image5.gif.726592b33ff5a711510526f26b785935.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Keep in mind that resistance is not a line but a zone. And that the herd is always right. Except at turning points."

 

I don't know if you've read the wisdom of crowds but its worth adding to your late night reading pile. One thing I found interesting was a distinction made between situations when crowds are wise and situations when they are not. Crowds are wise when they vote individually - wiser than the individuals. Crowds cease to be wise when they start paying attention to what everyone else is doing the ultimate expression of which is group-think. Does that remind you of anything :)

 

A comment on volume and Wyckoff. I never got volume. I kept trying. For years. And I still didn't get it. I think my problem was that I tried to assign too much importance to it, vsa like, and it wasn't until I'd read a million of dbphoenix's sometimes irritatingly vague posts and peoples sometimes frustrated questions that I started to get it. Now volume is an integral part of my trading and the most useful thing it does is keep me out of trades I would have taken without the little clues that volume adds to the pattern of price movement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A comment on volume and Wyckoff. I never got volume. I kept trying. For years. And I still didn't get it. I think my problem was that I tried to assign too much importance to it

 

See post 387.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Keep in mind that resistance is not a line but a zone. And that the herd is always right. Except at turning points."

I think my problem was that I tried to assign too much importance to it, vsa like, and it wasn't until I'd read a million of dbphoenix's sometimes irritatingly vague posts and peoples sometimes frustrated questions that I started to get it. Now volume is an integral part of my trading and the most useful thing it does is keep me out of trades I would have taken without the little clues that volume adds to the pattern of price movement.

 

Yes patience, persistence and effort pays off with wyckoff and db's posts in the end, when I first started with candlestick charting , I went through similar phase, thought I had discovered the holy grail, all I had to do was to identify engulfing patterns, doji, morning , evening star etc and money would roll in, took some time to learn the importance of context, same is happening in the VSA world, to the newly so called enlightened wannabe traders who have emerged out of the 3 recent weekend seminars on VSA armed with the ability to read all the footprints of the smart money, mulling and chewing of every upbar and downbar. When an effort is made to point out the fallacy and the divergence of VSA from its original source Wyckoff, instead of engaging in productive discussion, it is looked upon as an attack on their Gurus teachings and in turn they try to teach you the right way of trading, sometimes I wonder how Db manages to persist and keep on casting pearls..............and putting up with the aggro.:crap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When an effort is made to point out the fallacy and the divergence of VSA from its original source Wyckoff, instead of engaging in productive discussion, it is looked upon as an attack on their Gurus teachings and in turn they try to teach you the right way of trading

 

I find it strange. People with more experience are offering advice after having been through the exact same material and it's looked upon as hostile. If somebody in my field (medical) acted that way after coming out of residency with another person who had years of experience they'd be laughed at and ignored. That rarely happens though because you'd have to be a fool not to pay attention to somebody who's been around the block.

 

You guys made a valiant effort and have probably helped winnie at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how I see it. Haven't gone through the whole thread yet, but I suspect similar charts have been posted before. Big hinge formed in January/February, which broke out to the downside. The midpoint of the hinge seems to be the starting point of a move up. Since the March low we haven't really seen anything other than higher highs and higher lows. The red supply would indicate than price isn't even overbought. And, as illustrated in your post, the demand line has taken a steeper angle. I'm not sure what all of this means 'in the big picture' but I can't deny the fact that (a) the bulls have regained two thirds of the move down in a relatively short period and (b) the March low looks like a re-test of the selling climax in January, and © the downtrend line is broken. :hmpf:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6433&stc=1&d=1210925534

 

Regarding the various "upthrusts" and why they didn't make good shorts today, it may help to set aside overhead resistance for the moment and look at the trend, or "stride".

 

The blue rectangle is where I expected some sort of pause, and in fact I believed the upthrust two days ago to be a sign of rejection. That's why the U-turn yesterday came as a relative surprise and got me trading on the wrong side.

 

One of the few rules-of-thumb that appear to hold up is that one can't expect one trend day to follow another in the same direction. There has to be a rest of some sort at some point, even if it's only a turn in the opposite direction (e.g., the /\/ pattern we've followed the past three days).

 

Whenever a nice trending day presents itself, I suspect the next day to be more of a ranging one and am cautious about intraday reversals. Lately however, it seems there's only one way of catching the whole range, and that's by leaving at least something of your position on till the end of the day. Yesterday was pretty straightforward imo, if you got the right entry from the start that is... Red dot is short entry(*).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6434&stc=1&d=1210925534

 

Price started off in the right direction, but paused immediately. The congestion led to a change in the demand/supply equilibrium, on which price reversed and I stopped myself out for a small loss. I'm still wary of SAR, so I stood aside and waited for a later entry but I don't like taking trades late in the day. I also had +/- 1990 as support.

 

I've circled a setup from my early days. Upthrust (or a shooting star in candlestick analysis) at potential resistance. High volume too, if you plot it. Doesn't this constitute as a short signal as per VSA? Anyway, demandline not broken, so it's a lower probability trade.

 

 

______

 

(*) My actual entry was on the YM, but the principle is the same, I used an NQ chart because that's the instrument you trade.

ndx_daily.GIF.d224e224eed5551362e25b57cb9ce8b6.GIF

nq_20080515.GIF.2a309f4896bc70b3f03987162f939a4c.GIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is how I see it. Haven't gone through the whole thread yet, but I suspect similar charts have been posted before.

 

Unfortunately, the thread may already be too long. It's unreasonable to expect newcomers to plow through hundreds of posts, many of which may not even be especially pertinent. Splitting all of this into multiple threads is a possibility, particularly if its popularity continues (it's become the most-viewed thread in the TA forum, after VSA).

 

I've circled a setup from my early days. Upthrust (or a shooting star in candlestick analysis) at potential resistance. High volume too, if you plot it. Doesn't this constitute as a short signal as per VSA?

 

Given the several varieties of VSA, I really can't say. However, VSA and Wyckoff have little to do with other. VSA is about bars; Wyckoff is not. VSA also takes an entirely different view of the market environment than Wyckoff does. This is not unlike the difference between those who obsess over candlestick patterns and candlestick names and candlestick shapes and those who see candlesticks as illustrations of market dynamics and price flow.

 

Wyckoff would have you "ride the wave". As long as you got in at the correct point, you'd ride the trend until it was broken, or at least changed its character. If you didn't get in at the correct point, you'd still have to be aware of it and determine any subsequent entry based on where that correct entry was, then trade as though you were pyramiding. The market doesn't know whether or not a trader missed the correct entry and couldn't care less. Thus the landscape doesn't alter itself for him just because he wasn't around when the low-hanging fruit was ripe for the picking. Entering later also carries implications for the width of the stop, and though one may feel like a Grade A putz for having missed the correct entry on a trend day, standing aside may be the best option for the account balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lately however, it seems there's only one way of catching the whole range, and that's by leaving at least something of your position on till the end of the day.

 

Addendum: about this, see post 207.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Knowing how much people love my cajas famosas, here is what I'm looking at now. Those who've followed from the beginning will recognize this as an amalgam of several POVs previously posted.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6442&stc=1&d=1210942741

Image7.gif.6567e6b6fc6a91e824e7d6c5bf377ac6.gif

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wondering if the US $ will resume the downtrend?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6466&stc=1&d=1211008316

 

There appear to be simultaneous potential FX setups to possibly take advantage of this on the dailies:

 

Longs:

  • AUDUSD breaking out?
  • EURUSD springing?
  • GBPUSD off support?

 

Short:

  • USDJPY top of channel

5aa70e62ee470_USIndex.thumb.png.aca7bc501e0d7637f5fb9a917124fb40.png

AUDUSD.thumb.PNG.067cdb0e24f1dc14cf0eadaf08b36bd1.PNG

EURUSD.thumb.PNG.712c0a6d5dbc1624c72dd4974b9f23fe.PNG

GBPUSD.thumb.PNG.64ce7435b33398b410ea6853b6593038.PNG

USDJPY.thumb.PNG.59140883329233818820c4993f63c260.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the popularity of this thread and that it has reached a length that discourages all but the most devotedly curious from reading all of it, and due to the variety of topics contained within this one thread, James has graciously allowed us to tranform the thread into a forum.

 

As a forum, the essentials can be made into Stickies and easily found and accessed. And the various aspects of Wyckoff's approach can be discussed separately, making life easier for those with special interests. Gassah and I are the moderators and will be initiating threads that are of interest to us. However, anyone who wants to pursue some particular aspect of Wyckoff's approach is welcome to open a new thread himself.

 

Now that the thread has "opened up", it will now be closed.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since you are talking about waves, it could be interesting, what happend since 2000. I compared the downmove from the high to the low in October 02 with the upwave to October 07. This upmove last nearly two times longer than the preceding downmove. Volatility increased since the last high and in this view it's doubtable, if the 1250 lows forms a long term bottom. If I'm correct in Db's interpretation of support and resistance, the we have resistance at 1555 and support at aroung 800. To mitigate the worse scenario, we need now a rally up.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6038&stc=1&d=1208251512

 

Swing points provide a form of support and resistance, yes, but it's somewhat different from the support and resistance provided by zones. The "resistance" provided by points, particularly if they are isolated, is provided primarily by the inability of the trader to find a trade (which, after all, is the business of the trader). There's nothing going on up there, or down there, so price returns back to an area where these trades can be found, which is where the "value area" comes from.

 

In a V formation, price never stays anywhere long enough to provide these zones, and one is equally likely to find a trade at point A as point B or C or any other point. Since the ES has reached that top zone twice now, the resistance it provides is a bit more formidable than a single point. But whether we make a trip all the way down to the bottom is anybody's guess. If you'll look closely at this particular chart, what appears to be a V has some of those value areas or consolidations within it. 2004 was spent going more or less sideways, then the first half of 2005, then the second half of that year, then a little more than half of 2006. Each of these represents a potential waystation. We're at the first of them now.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concerning the charts at the end of the PDF “Determining the trend of the Market”.

 

These price bars has the “close” only, no “open” hash mark. For some reason W felt the open was not an important piece of information, or at least not important enough to record it.

 

So I'm thinking to myself, Why wasn't the “open” price important?

It might be that, at the time there was not the gamesmanship of gaping the opening price outside the previous days range, resulting in triggering the EOD orders at an unfavorable price. Or,

 

Maybe, a open price, had no importance to the overall story the market is telling?

 

Anyway, I know the “opening” price is significant to a modern day traders plan of action, Maybe the “open” is not so important to EOD traders?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question, sulong (I was afraid the first question might be something along the lines of "Did W wear boxers or briefs?"). And I don't want to pundit the answer because I really have no idea, and there are some awfully smart people in this neighborhood.

 

It may help to keep in mind that these charts were done by hand (though they may have been provided by a service). Therefore, one would include only that information that he considered to be important, as today. Ergo the open price may not have been considered to be all that important (I know the logic here is a stretch and that there may be other possible conclusions). It may also help to keep in mind that W was not about bars but about flow, or "waves" (but you knew that). He was also about energy, and balance, and he would more likely have been interested in who won the daily contest than in what the relative positions of the players were at the beginning of the contest. Whatever follow-through there might be the following day would be told by the high and the low.

 

All this is just conjecture, though. I'll have to chew on this some more. The answer may be embarrassingly simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How about Gann ? Wasn't he one of their comtemporaries ? Besides his writings, his amazing trades were verified by the Ticker magazine back in 1909. I guess nothing is popular with the TL crowd here unless it has something to do with volume ?

 

Actually, Wyckoff seems to have thought that Gann was pretty hot stuff, which I found surprising (and I should have included Elliott). But perhaps this could be addressed in the new Wyckoff Forum rather than the VSA thread (what you quoted was posted before the new forum was created).

 

I thought the above was an interesting question.

 

Especially since so many Gann followers seem to depart from the belief that it IS possible to predict the markets. Although I can honestly say I have not studied anything Gann related in depth, it seems like some of the foundations are similar to Wyckoff (supply, demand, support, resistance, trendlines), with one extra layer, being the 'time' factor...

 

OAC, Perhaps a reason why so little Gann talk is to be found, is because there are 'issues' about his 'credibility' (the use of astrology for example), where I believe there weren't any about Wyckoffs.

 

This might be interesting, Gann interviewed by Wyckoff:

http://www.tradingfives.com/gann/wd-gann-interview-1909.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since Gann may not be "Wyckoff-related", perhaps opening up a Gann thread elsewhere in the TA forum might be the way to go. Perhaps someone who's actually read one or more of his books (I haven't) might then shed some light on the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good question, sulong

Ergo the open price may not have been considered to be all that important (I know the logic here is a stretch and that there may be other possible conclusions). It may also help to keep in mind that W was not about bars but about flow, or "waves" (but you knew that). He was also about energy, and balance, and he would more likely have been interested in who won the daily contest than in what the relative positions of the players were at the beginning of the contest. Whatever follow-through there might be the following day would be told by the high and the low.

 

All this is just conjecture, though. I'll have to chew on this some more. The answer may be embarrassingly simple.

 

Could the possible answer be that Wyckoff was not about intra-day trading?

erie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.