Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Well well, DB posting charts with a left hand/outside lines on (channel line). What is the world coming to :o Seriously I had been under the impression that you did not pay much attention to left hand lines. Is this something you have changed in your trading or is it more likely something I have mis remembered?

 

Personally I rather like channel lines and will take a trade from the outside one (despite most people recommending against it as it is counter trend). Of course context and confluence help. (need to think of another C)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As I have not read the SMI course, what do you reckon are the main modifications to the original Wyckoff. Gary Fuller at ltg-trading , I presume employs the former as there are numerous references in his archived charts to

"COB - change of behavior", "Jumping over the Creek", "Break of Ice", terms which Wyckoff never used.

 

Too many to get into. Primarily, the original course is much simpler and more straightforward. The Wyckoff material I've provided here and in my Blog is from the original course. But the course is 500 pages long. To compare and contrast would take an enormous amount of time.and would serve no practical purpose.

 

I learned long ago to focus on source material. What the originators say about their own work is often quite different from what others say about it and do with it (assuming that the "others" acknowledge the sources of their work in the first place, which is not common). That's why I have a first edition of Schabacker and a fourth edition of Edwards and Magee (before editors started rewriting it). When I was playing with indicators, I read Wilder and Appel.

 

There's certainly nothing immoral about Tom Williams or any of these other people offering their own interpretations of Wyckoff's work. One must keep in mind, however, that one is not trading Wyckoff but someone's version of Wyckoff, and the two may be worlds apart (if one is trading at all; one can learn to provide impressive chart analyses and yet be completely unable to trade them).

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well well, DB posting charts with a left hand/outside lines on (channel line). What is the world coming to :o Seriously I had been under the impression that you did not pay much attention to left hand lines. Is this something you have changed in your trading or is it more likely something I have mis remembered?

 

I don't. I'm more interested in the (potential) support and resistance that are provided by the market -- such as a swing point -- than I am the imaginary support and resistance that are provided by a line that I manufacture.

 

But Wyckoff used these lines to help him track demand and supply, momentum, and stride, and all of that is perfectly legitimate. The trap lies in persuading oneself that the lines one has drawn begin to provide support and resistance themselves, which is (a) illogical and (b) not the point of drawing the lines in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't. I'm more interested in the (potential) support and resistance that are provided by the market -- such as a swing point -- than I am the imaginary support and resistance that are provided by a line that I manufacture.

 

But Wyckoff used these lines to help him track demand and supply, momentum, and stride, and all of that is perfectly legitimate. The trap lies in persuading oneself that the lines one has drawn begin to provide support and resistance themselves, which is (a) illogical and (b) not the point of drawing the lines in the first place.

 

AH Ok Ithought that might be your view. Having said that it seems that there is all sort of 'geometry' in the markets that, while there is no directly attributal 'reason', certainly seem to exist and repeats often enough to be more than random. This can certainly be exploted if that is the traders desire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AH Ok Ithought that might be your view. Having said that it seems that there is all sort of 'geometry' in the markets that, while there is no directly attributal 'reason', certainly seem to exist and repeats often enough to be more than random. This can certainly be exploted if that is the traders desire.

 

The key word being "seem". Most likely is that we're just throwing virgins into the volcano.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a carefully considered word. You have to be very careful of perceptional bias, but thats true of any aproach. If you are rigorous in your definitions you can test some of these things to see if there is statistical significance. For example some of Morge's pitchfork behaviour has 80% or so probability after years of extensive testing.

 

I seem to remember you saying mid points of your rectangles often significant, mid points of swings often seem to be too. Why I wonder? I guess you could argue that being a half way point its a place that both bulls and bears are likely to draw a line in the sand. A bit more abstract are measured moves A-B = C-D. The market does appear to have a tendency to move in similar size segments. And the list goes on. I remain more open minded to some of these sorts of things that to other even though, as you point out, these lines dont represent anything in and of themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wyckoff, however, didn't base his approach on geometry but on behavior. The "midpoint" to which he paid so much attention represents a return to equilibrium, what some people call a reversion to the mean, what MP calls the value area and the POC. If price doesn't return to the level at which one might expect to find equilibrium, one can interpret that as strength, which may lead to a higher level of equilibrium. If it drops below that level, one can interpret that as weakness and a search for a new, lower level of equilibrium.

 

As to whether or not anything one draws or plots can have any statistical significance at all is a subject best left to a general trading discussion. For the purposes of this thread, the only "pattern" per se is the hinge, which, again, is the result of specific trader behavior, and therefore exists outside the trader himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wyckoff, however, didn't base his approach on geometry but on behavior ... For the purposes of this thread, the only "pattern" per se is the hinge, which, again, is the result of specific trader behavior, and therefore exists outside the trader himself.

 

Surely Wyckoff identified more patterns than the hinge in his work, no? The climax is a pattern just as much as the hinge, and probably more so. The climax has a certain set of characteristics that form a pattern in volume, spread and close, and it is based on trader behavior. The same can be said of the secondary test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I, on the right path to reading price and volume. Saw a hard push down, at 11:26 leading to a bit of a light demand push up. Then, we see buyers putting in effort getting decent results to take price back up to the median level. As soon as price finds this area, I see no effort and no results to get back above it, which would show potential for more demand. Sure enough price falls off a cliff making new lows. Just how I read that in real time, no trade was taken, since I'm concentrating on listening to the market not trading it currently.

no.thumb.PNG.6b5ed10b5523a5ea40eac215985e35bb.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a day like today, i.e., a trend day, it's easy to come up the wrong conclusions regarding volume since the smaller waves are pretty much irrelevant to the larger.

 

The key here is shorting resistance at 2005. After that, all you have to do is follow the line of least resistance by means of trend lines and swing points. Typically, price will move sideways during lunch on days like this, and it did so today. Since it rose above a prior swing point only once, at 1300 (ET), you needn't do anything more than just wait and watch your profits increase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good looking bounce off the top of the lower range for the SP500 today. It appears the upper range is back in control for now.

 

Then again, perhaps not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a day like today, i.e., a trend day, it's easy to come up the wrong conclusions regarding volume since the smaller waves are pretty much irrelevant to the larger.

 

The key here is shorting resistance at 2005. After that, all you have to do is follow the line of least resistance by means of trend lines and swing points. Typically, price will move sideways during lunch on days like this, and it did so today. Since it rose above a prior swing point only once, at 1300 (ET), you needn't do anything more than just wait and watch your profits increase.

 

Hindsight is 20/20... if price had gone up all day, you prob'ly would've said 'the key here is buying support at 1990'. After all, price opened around support, the trend from yesterday was up. There's a very similar example in your blog. So why not do it today? After all, price traveled all the way to resistance next. You can even draw a demandline next to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Then again, perhaps not.

 

The key words were -- correctly -- "for now", which is an aspect of this that the pundit wannabees continue to miss. While they may pay lip service to the idea of taking it all "day by day", they are also compelled to "make calls" in order to demonstrate how much they know. Or, actually, don't know. And thus get it wrong yet again.

 

We are now back where we started at the "selling climax", and those who bought here and stopped thinking have now watched all their profits evaporate. Or at least ES and YM (NQ has given back only 75%). What will be interesting now is how they react.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hindsight is 20/20... if price had gone up all day, you prob'ly would've said 'the key here is buying support at 1990'. After all, price opened around support, the trend from yesterday was up. There's a very similar example in your blog. So why not do it today? After all, price traveled all the way to resistance next. You can even draw a demandline next to it.

 

No reason not to buy the midpoint at 1990, if that's a part of one's strategy. However, doing so would not be "key" to playing the trend day, and the trend day provided the sideways midday movement that I referred to and that I've noted several times in previous posts on the subject.

 

Or one could stubborly hold to a bullish bias, ignore the test of resistance, and stand by while watching most or all of his long profits evaporate. But that's the difference between trading reality rather than dreams.

 

An update to the ES chart I posted last week:

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=6294&stc=1&d=1210192233

Image2.gif.48e1040920d78952ddcc8f401afcbe05.gif

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or one could stubborly hold to a bullish bias, ignore the test of resistance, and stand by while watching most or all of his long profits evaporate. But that's the difference between trading reality rather than dreams.

 

 

The same could be said of yesterday. There was a 'test' at 1990, high volume and the initial reaction pushed price lower, just like today. The difference is that price continued higher while today it reversed. So one should have reversed longs too yesterday than?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The same could be said of yesterday. There was a 'test' at 1990, high volume and the initial reaction pushed price lower, just like today. The difference is that price continued higher while today it reversed. So one should have reversed longs too yesterday than?

 

No, one should have traded what was in front of him, buying a test of support at or around 1015 (in the case of the NQ), waiting through the midday sideways movement, then following the trend upward until the close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, one should have traded what was in front of him, buying a test of support at or around 1015 (in the case of the NQ), waiting through the midday sideways movement, then following the trend upward until the close.

 

 

You're being somewhat selective. About yesterday, you're assuming one is long when price hits 1990, so he stays in or takes some off his position off instead of shorting. While today you are assuming that shorting 2005 is 'the key trade', because the trader is still flat.

 

If you look at it from another pov, you could easily say short 1990 yesterday (high volume) and go long on support 1990 today, expecting a continuation of the uptrend. Your reply is going to be that there's no reason to short yesterday as the demandline wasn't broken which is correct, but neither was it today if you draw one from 1990 up to 2005. I'm sorry, but it seems like the decision to take the trade or not, depends on something else which you forgot to tell us perhaps.

 

Also, there was no way knowing today was going to be a trend day. You said it yourself, after a trend day (like yesterday) we usually have a consolidation day. So was there a reason not to go long off support today? And if a trader was long, should he not have patience and perhaps take off some of his position at the next resistance (2005), but leave some open. You've given plenty of examples yourself. So, following the approach you illustrated, one would exit part at 2005, wait for the demandline to break to exit some more and exit the rest at break-even. Not a whole lot of profit and he misses out on the big move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm assuming that one is long when price hits 1990 because he ought to be long if he's paying attention. If he isn't, then the twists and turns you get caught up in with regard to "1990" are irrelevant to the task.

 

And, no, there was no way of knowing that today would be a trend day. One shorts resistance then follows the line of least resistance. That's it. But since you refuse to study any of this, or practice, it all continues to be a mystery to you.

 

As I've said repeatedly, you don't understand support, resistance, price action, the relationship between price and volume, nor have any sort of defined and tested setup to enable you to take advantge of whatever you might learn if you were to study and practice. Instead, you prefer to take direction from message board posts.

 

If you refuse to do the work, you're going to continue to be confused. And there's absolutely nothing I can do about that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I'm assuming that one is long when price hits 1990 because he ought to be long if he's paying attention. If he isn't, then the twists and turns you get caught up in with regard to "1990" are irrelevant to the task.

 

 

I can understand one is long yesterday from earlier on in the day.

What I don't understand is why you choose to ignore the possibility that one is long today, from support, at 1990 (for the reasons I stated), but you choose to focus solely on the short from resistance. While, if I'm reading the chart from left to right, at the time is at resistance, he is still in a long trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His post had to do with the action at midday. I addressed that within the context of the trend day. With a different context, I would have addressed it differently. That's what "context" means.

 

If you ever get around to study and practice, all of this will eventually become clear. However, as long as you continue to avoid doing the work, you'll also continue to ask the same questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ten Core Ideas of Trading Psychology

by Brett Steenbarger

 

1) We are most likely to behave in inhibited or impulsive ways, violating trading rules and plans, when we perceive events to be threatening;

 

2) What we perceive to be threatening is a joint function of events themselves and how we think about those events;

 

3) A key to gaining control over trading and maintaining consistency is to be able to reduce the threat associated with market events and process adverse outcomes in normal, routine ways;

 

4) We can reduce the threat associated with adverse market events through proper money management (position sizing) and through proper risk management (limits on losses per position);

 

5) We can reduce the threat associated with adverse market events by training ourselves to respond calmly to adverse outcomes (exposure methods) and by restructuring how we think about those outcomes (cognitive methods);

 

6) Optimal skill development in trading will occur in non-threatening environments in which learners can sustain concentration, optimism, and motivation;

 

7) A proper mindset is therefore necessary to the development of trading skills, but does not substitute for such development;

 

8) The cultivation of trading expertise is a function of the amount of time and effort devoted to learning and the proper structuring of that time and effort[emphasis mine];

 

9) Proper structuring of learning involves the setting of specific, doable, cumulative goals and the provision of rapid feedback and correction regarding the achievement of those goals;

 

10) Practice does not make perfect in trading or anything else; perfect practice makes perfect[emphasis mine]. Training must gradually build competencies and correct deficiencies in a manner that sustains a positive mindset and optimal concentration and motivation.

 

more.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
    • By millonmethod
      Hello everyone!
      I am an advanced trader, with many years of experience (about 15 years - 10 living exclusively from this)
      I am going to give you some tips that you must know:
      There are going to be many people who tell you that trade is easy, that with only crossiing a line  with another one you will win a lot of money.... and that´s not true.  No, Sir, reality is far away from that. Many people who start arrive here with the hope that someone "gives them" a free method, they watch youtube videos thinking that this will give them the "strategy" and in a few days they realize that it does not work for them - they lose money - and then They go looking for a new one ... and so on. YES, IT´S TRUE YOU EARN IN TRADING, A LOT. BUT THINK: for a few to win (10% + any BROKER) many others must lose (90% people). YOU MUST HAVE A MONEY MANAGMENT FORMULA ( you can email me) People study so many years to live on this, not because they are dumb, but to know what they do, when, and have absolute effectiveness. It´s very easy to get lost here: do not disperse, jumping from one to another strategy WILL NEVER give you money, it will only waste your time and make you nervous when trading. PEOPLE WHO CHANGE THEIR METHOD CONSTANTLY : LOOOOSE ALWAYS.   If you have the knowledge to develop it, take your time and do it.  Always try it first on DEMO for at least 2 weeks! If not: search to buy a solid strategy (no you tube videos pleassse ! Avoid losing money! ) This is like any business, it requires some capital to start (capital = money in the broker + solid made /purchased strategy) If you are lost: I RECOMMEND YOU NOT TO WASTE TIME IN YOUTUBE, JOIN PEOPLE WHO HAVE EXPERIENCE AND IF YOU ARE GOING TO BUY A METHOD ... PLEASE !!!! DO NOT BUY 10 BAD AND CHEAP METHODS, SAVE MONEY AND BUY ONLY 1 BUT EXCLUSIVE AND MUST ALLWAYS HAVE SUPPORT !!!!!  Do not buy Signals! They never keep up with constant profits! One week will win and the next will lose. Nothing that does not depend absolutely on you will give you the money you are looking for. And if you do not have a strategy (made or purchased) do not even try PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: DO NOT USE REAL MONEY! AT LEAST 2 WEEK DEMO FREE HELP HERE!!!!!  IF YOU FOLLOW MY ADVICE YOU WILL BE PART OF THAT 10% WINNER, email me.
      Have a nice trading day
       
       
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MNST Monster Beverage stock, top of range breakout above 60.45, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?MNST
    • there is no avoiding loses to be honest, its just how the market is. you win some and hopefully more, but u do lose some. 
    • Date: 11th July 2025.   Demand For Gold Rises As Trump Announces Tariffs!   Gold prices rose significantly throughout the week as investors took advantage of the 2.50% lower entry level. Investors also return to the safe-haven asset as the US trade policy continues to escalate. As a result, investors are taking a more dovish tone. The ‘risk-off’ appetite is also something which can be seen within the stock market. The NASDAQ on Thursday took a 0.90% dive within only 30 minutes.   Trade Tensions Escalate President Trump has been teasing with new tariffs throughout the week. However, the tariffs were confirmed on Thursday. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports starting August 1st, along with 50% tariffs on copper and goods from Brazil. Some experts are advising that Brazil has been specifically targeted due to its association with the BRICS.   However, the President has not directly associated the tariffs with BRICS yet. According to President Trump, Brazil is targeting US technology companies and carrying out a ‘witch hunt’against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally who is currently facing prosecution for allegedly attempting to overturn the 2022 Brazilian election.   Although Brazil is one of the largest and fastest-growing economies in the Americas, it is not the main concern for investors. Investors are more concerned about Tariffs on Canada. The White House said it will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, effective August 1st, raised from the earlier 25% rate. This covers most goods, with exceptions under USMCA and exemptions for Canadian companies producing within the US.   It is also vital for investors to note that Canada is among the US;’s top 3 trading partners. The increase was justified by Trump citing issues like the trade deficit, Canada’s handling of fentanyl trafficking, and perceived unfair trade practices.   The President is also threatening new measures against the EU. These moves caused US and European stock futures to fall nearly 1%, while the Dollar rose and commodity prices saw small gains. However, the main benefactor was Silver and Gold, which are the two best-performing metals of the day.   How Will The Fed Impact Gold? The FOMC indicated that the number of members warming up to the idea of interest rate cuts is increasing. If the Fed takes a dovish tone, the price of Gold may further rise. In the meantime, the President pushing for a 3% rate cut sparked talk of a more dovish Fed nominee next year and raised worries about future inflation.   Meanwhile, jobless claims dropped for the fourth straight week, coming in better than expected and supporting the view that the labour market remains strong after last week’s solid payroll report. Markets still expect two rate cuts this year, but rate futures show most investors see no change at the next Fed meeting. Gold is expected to finish the week mostly flat.       Gold 15-Minute Chart     If the price of Gold increases above $3,337.50, buy signals are likely to materialise again. However, the price is currently retracing, meaning traders are likely to wait for regained momentum before entering further buy trades. According to HSBC, they expect an average price of $3,215 in 2025 (up from $3,015) and $3,125 in 2026, with projections showing a volatile range between $3,100 and $3,600   Key Takeaway Points: Gold Rises on Safe-Haven Demand. Gold gained as investors reacted to rising trade tensions and market volatility. Canada Tariffs Spark Concern. A 35% tariff on Canadian imports drew attention due to Canada’s key trade role. Fed Dovish Shift Supports Gold. Growing expectations of rate cuts and Trump’s push for a 3% cut boosted the gold outlook. Gold Eyes Breakout Above $3,337.5. Price is consolidating; a move above $3,337.50 could trigger new buy signals. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • Back in the early 2000s, Netflix mailed DVDs to subscribers.   It wasn’t sexy—but it was smart. No late fees. No driving to Blockbuster.   People subscribed because they were lazy. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone else is lazy too.   Those who saw the future in that red envelope? They could’ve caught a 10,000%+ move.   Another story…   Back in the mid-2000s, Amazon launched Prime.   It wasn’t flashy—but it was fast.   Free two-day shipping. No minimums. No hassle.   People subscribed because they were impatient. Investors bought the stock because they realized everyone hates waiting.   Those who saw the future in that speedy little yellow button? They could’ve caught another 10,000%+ move.   Finally…   Back in 2011, Bitcoin was trading under $10.   It wasn’t regulated—but it worked.   No bank. No middleman. Just wallet to wallet.   People used it to send money. Investors bought it because they saw the potential.   Those who saw something glimmering in that strange orange coin? They could’ve caught a 100,000%+ move.   The people who made those calls weren’t fortune tellers. They just noticed something simple before others did.   A better way. A quiet shift. A small edge. An asymmetric bet.   The red envelope fixed late fees. The yellow button fixed waiting. The orange coin gave billions a choice.   Of course, these types of gains are rare. And they happen only once in a blue moon. That’s exactly why it’s important to notice when the conditions start to look familiar.   Not after the move. Not once it's on CNBC. But in the quiet build-up— before the surface breaks.   Enter the Blue Button Please read more here: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/netflix-amazon-bitcoin-blue  Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • What These Attacks Look Like There are several ways you could get hacked. And the threats compound by the day.   Here’s a quick rundown:   Phishing: Fake emails from your “bank.” Click the link, give your password—game over.   Ransomware: Malware that locks your files and demands crypto. Pay up, or it’s gone.   DDoS: Overwhelm a website with traffic until it crashes. Like 10,000 bots blocking the door. Often used by nations.   Man-in-the-Middle: Hackers intercept your messages on public WiFi and read or change them.   Social Engineering: Hackers pose as IT or drop infected USB drives labeled “Payroll.”   You don’t need to be “important” to be a target.   You just need to be online.   What You Can Do (Without Buying a Bunker) You don’t have to be tech-savvy.   You just need to stop being low-hanging fruit.   Here’s how:   Use a YubiKey (physical passkey device) or Authenticator app – Ditch text message 2FA. SIM swaps are real. Hackers often have people on the inside at telecom companies.   Use a password manager (with Yubikey) – One unique password per account. Stop using your dog’s name.   Update your devices – Those annoying updates patch real security holes. Use them.   Back up your files – If ransomware hits, you don’t want your important documents held hostage.   Avoid public WiFi for sensitive stuff – Or use a VPN.   Think before you click – Emails that feel “urgent” are often fake. Go to the websites manually for confirmation.   Consider Starlink in case the internet goes down – I think it’s time for me to make the leap. Don’t Panic. Prepare. (Then Invest.)   I spent an hour in that basement bar reading about cyberattacks—and watching real-world systems fall apart like dominos.   The internet going down used to be an inconvenience. Now, it’s a warning.   Cyberwar isn’t coming. It’s here.   And the next time your internet goes out, it might not just be your router.   Don’t panic. Prepare.   And maybe keep a backup plan in your back pocket. Like a local basement bar with good bourbon—and working WiFi.   As usual, we’re on the lookout for more opportunities in cybersecurity. Stay tuned.   Author: Chris Campbell (AltucherConfidential) Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.