Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownturtle

Price Action Only

Recommended Posts

Price is our most direct link to supply and demand. Supply and demand are fueled by 2 immutable human behaviors: fear and greed. So in essence, by trading PA you are attempting to read and anticipate the natural reoccurring human behaviors that drive the market every day. Please don't make any mistake, I am no expert...Im just a noob, but when you get into PA the market starts to make sense in so many ways, its nothing short of amazing.

 

 

Hmmm

 

I said something similar....

 

:confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

This is my first post here. All though I have monitored, i.e. checked it out, this forum for some time. So far I have gotten a good vibe from this forum, which enticed me to post here, somthing that cant be said for most other trading related forums. Thanks to all for keeping this place at a higher level humanity and hope it stays like that.

 

Most new traders are intrigued with indicators, almost to the point that they think indicators have magic.

 

The truth is, Indicators are just another way of interpreting price action.

The problem is that you still need to know which combination of indicators to use and to know that, you must have a good undersating of the markets.

 

When I first started trading, I was mesmerized by indicators...it took several months to figure out their true nature and when that realization clicked in my head, well......

It was not hard to decide to learn to trade off of price action only. Im very grateful for making that decision, at an early stage of my trading, it was the right choice for me and my personality. I trade by Price action only no indicators not even volume.

 

As far as Price action traders thinking they are superior, yeah I agree they do have a tendancy to walk too tall in the trading community. If you ask me, its not an entirely valid assumption on their part, P/L is all that matters at the end of the day, week, month , year.

 

For me trading is both a Business and an Art. If a trader can be succesfull in both of these areas (business & art aspect) it really does not matter if they are doing it with indicators or trading by price action only.

 

The key is to understand our tools completely.

 

 

Regards..

Edited by sep34

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. I just read a book by Tom Williams {TradeGuider System} that sheads a lot of light on PA. The problem with newbys is jumping from system to system in search of enlightenment.I am certainly one of them. If reading this book doesn't wake you up to what you are up against.[Professional Money]. It may even scare you into how can I win against these guys?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah.. I heard some good things about that book from several people as it gives a good picture to how the markets work and particularly helpful for the incoming trader aside from talking about VSA basics.

 

 

Regards..

 

Do not fear the big boys, Infact I consider them my Friends....With out them I could not earn $1. --Anonymous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if 2 identical people started at the exact same time. One started trying to find the right indicator combo, and one started by trying to learn and understand how price moves...who becomes successful first?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder if 2 identical people started at the exact same time. One started trying to find the right indicator combo, and one started by trying to learn and understand how price moves...who becomes successful first?

 

Thats a tough one.

 

depending on how you define success...

 

Personality make up has a lot to do with it. Some traders have a craving to really understand why price did this or did that...those type of traders usually are attracted to Price Action trading and will give up indicators.

 

I would venture to say, confidence has a lot to do with performance and anything that gives you greater confidence will be represnted in your overall performance/P&L and thats why in my opinion it really depends on the indivduals personality.

 

 

 

Regards..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder if 2 identical people started at the exact same time. One started trying to find the right indicator combo, and one started by trying to learn and understand how price moves...who becomes successful first?
Pappo had some good points...

 

...but it also would depend on what you mean by "right indicator combo". Do you mean throwing up random indicators and settings for running back tests on them looking to look for a historic positive expectancy? Or do you mean picking a very simplistic indicator such as the stochastic and/or a moving average and creating a rainbow type gathering of information to measure a large spectrum of time frames to which one can better analyze how they interact with one another. Though the latter is an "indicator combo", I would still consider it as reading price action. I personally feel that many people get confused with the concept of "lagging" information. Even if you are using pure price tick by tick you are comparing it to something that has happened in the past. People get in trouble with indicators when they mix and match different ones with random settings. I would guess that the major majority of people that play with indicators do so in this fashion which is why if one is new, it can be a slippery slope. However, if you simplify it by using one over different time frames, the fractal nature of the market can be seen and read no differently that using pure price action in my opinion.

 

Getting a little off topic from the original quote above, one could ask the question...

 

I wonder if 2 identical people started at the exact same time. Both learned the basics of reading price action and put in the required screen time. At which point one kept on using nothing more than price action while the other simplified aspects of their process via indicators...how do their path to consistent profitability look as time progresses.

 

Note: I am all for spending a significant amount of screen time with just pure price on different time frames and truly learning the ebb and flow of the market. This is invaluable information that one should not take lightly. In order to be a good surgeon you need to first know how to hold the scalpel. However, I disagree very much with the concept that indicators cannot be used to simplify and potentially even make one more profitable. Just because it's not needed doesn't mean it can't be used. Different strokes for the different folks...and something about skinning a cat. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder if 2 identical people started at the exact same time. One started trying to find the right indicator combo, and one started by trying to learn and understand how price moves...who becomes successful first?

 

I don't know who would become successful first, but from my experience, the number of indicator traders who turn into price action traders far exceeds the number of price action traders who turn into using indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know who would become successful first, but from my experience, the number of indicator traders who turn into price action traders far exceeds the number of price action traders who turn into using indicators.
This would only make sense since the majority of traders go through a phase of reckless indicator behavior. Those that learn to trade pure PA first tend to be more frightened (rational and irrational) of indicators and stay away from them. However, I have seen many traders return to indicators to simplify and make mechanic aspects of their strategy after learning and spending a signficant amount of screen time with price alone. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to add something,

 

Traders that I know that trade price action only and dont use indicators on their charts............. are really using indicators.

 

This is what I mean, they have learned to see the indicators in the price action.

 

For example.

 

They dont need a moving average to tell them the trend.

 

They dont need a oscillator or timing indicators to time there trade.

 

They don't need a momentum indicator to gage volatiltiy.

 

They dont need Bollinger or other similar bands to determine a breakout or

for expansion/contraction of price.

 

They dont need indicaors for divergence.

 

They dont need pivot points for support/ressistance.

 

 

 

Why???

 

Because over time they have learned to see all of that above in the Price action it self and its simpler for them to just watch the price action.

 

So my point is this, just because they dont have indicators up on their screens it does not mean that they do not see the same thing that another person would see with indicators.... they have become the indicators.

 

I personaly dont have a stigma about indicators. If something is useful I would gladly use it.

 

For example if you like to trade stocks, an indicator used in a scanning tool can be very efficient way to scan a large group of equities(or favorit markets) in a short period of time and then do your normal analysis on the screened findings.

 

indeed, many ways to skin a cat...so far I like the naked way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree.

 

Price Action only traders, of which there are many types, are not seeing indicators in price. They are seeing in price what indicators attempt to see in price. Price Action traders simply see it quicker and more purely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like this thread was made a day after I made this thread over at ET:

 

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=146764&perpage=30&pagenumber=1

 

You may want to check that thread out, too. I'm trying to learn PA and have removed all indicators. So far I'm doing horribly :p

 

That thread is much longer, but is also full of a lot of guru fortune cookie BS which you have to wade through.

 

Glad to see there are some PA thread over here on TL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Seems like this thread was made a day after I made this thread over at ET:

 

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=146764&perpage=30&pagenumber=1

 

You may want to check that thread out, too. I'm trying to learn PA and have removed all indicators. So far I'm doing horribly :p

 

That thread is much longer, but is also full of a lot of guru fortune cookie BS which you have to wade through.

 

Glad to see there are some PA thread over here on TL.

 

An interesting thread, but a bad beginning. If you believe that discretionary trading is all guesswork and hate guessing and if you think that volume is useless and if you believe that useful trendlines can't be drawn in real time (and, it follows, are therefore useless), then you are virtually guaranteeing your own failure, or, if you prefer, the failure of anyone else to "prove" the value of trading price (i.e., that which is created by the "market" and not by the trader, such as MAs, trendlines, pivot points, Fib, and the vast array of other indicators).

 

In short, if you're genuinely interested in learning how to trade price, you can't expect to do so if you approach the subject with the attitude that it's all a crock. On the other hand, there's no particular reason why you or anyone else ought to feel as though they are morally obligated in some way to learn how to trade with price alone. Trading by price has no absolutely higher or lower value than trading with indicators. If you believe in your heart of hearts that indicators are the way to go, then stick with them and work it through. Only when you are prepared to address trading by price alone with an open mind will you be prepared to learn how to do it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VolumeJedi

They are seeing in price what indicators attempt to see in price.

 

 

Either I did a poor job of explaining what I meant in writting or you really didnt read the entire post clearly.. regardless.

 

By the way pure price action traders dont need to use volume, they can see it in the price action it self.... its called volatility.

 

If I could edit my post I would add this line that your wrote (They are seeing in price what indicators attempt to see in price. ) instead of this linewhich i mentioned in my original post-->" they have learned to see the indicators in the price action "....

 

because it say sexactly what I meant to say at the top of my post.

Thanks for the line I will borrow it.

 

 

Regards..

Edited by sep34

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An interesting thread, but a bad beginning. If you believe that discretionary trading is all guesswork and hate guessing and if you think that volume is useless and if you believe that useful trendlines can't be drawn in real time (and, it follows, are therefore useless), then you are virtually guaranteeing your own failure, or, if you prefer, the failure of anyone else to "prove" the value of trading price (i.e., that which is created by the "market" and not by the trader, such as MAs, trendlines, pivot points, Fib, and the vast array of other indicators).

 

In short, if you're genuinely interested in learning how to trade price, you can't expect to do so if you approach the subject with the attitude that it's all a crock. On the other hand, there's no particular reason why you or anyone else ought to feel as though they are morally obligated in some way to learn how to trade with price alone. Trading by price has no absolutely higher or lower value than trading with indicators. If you believe in your heart of hearts that indicators are the way to go, then stick with them and work it through. Only when you are prepared to address trading by price alone with an open mind will you be prepared to learn how to do it.

 

Corrections:

 

I've never found volume to be useful, and the successful traders I've spoken with say they don't use it, either. I also say I am leaving it up on my charts just in case I am able to finally get something from it.

 

Re: trendlines. 99% of the posts on ET by "gurus" show beautiful trendlines drawn after the fact, and trades made based on trendlines that could not possibly have been drawn at the time. I'm not saying it's impossible to draw trendlines in real time, just that many, many people draw them after the fact and act like they were there all along.

 

If I sound cynical in that thread, it's because there is so much BS on ET. Fake gurus like to lead newbies astray and try to get them to pay for their courses that don't even backtest profitably (i can name 5 ET'ers off the top of my head who are known for this... and I have them all on my ignore list). I'm putting in a lot of work, I just have my BS detector on from the beginning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Corrections:

 

I've never found volume to be useful, and the successful traders I've spoken with say they don't use it, either. I also say I am leaving it up on my charts just in case I am able to finally get something from it.

 

Re: trendlines. 99% of the posts on ET by "gurus" show beautiful trendlines drawn after the fact, and trades made based on trendlines that could not possibly have been drawn at the time. I'm not saying it's impossible to draw trendlines in real time, just that many, many people draw them after the fact and act like they were there all along.

 

If I sound cynical in that thread, it's because there is so much BS on ET. Fake gurus like to lead newbies astray and try to get them to pay for their courses that don't even backtest profitably (i can name 5 ET'ers off the top of my head who are known for this... and I have them all on my ignore list). I'm putting in a lot of work, I just have my BS detector on from the beginning.

 

There may be a fine distinction between not finding volume useful and finding it useless, but it may not be worth pursuing. What may be more pertinent is your concern with what the "successful traders" you've spoken with say. I've spoken with successful traders who can't live without it. But none of that is particularly relevant to your situation. If you don't find volume to be useful, then don't use it. But dismissing it without understanding what it is and what it can do for you, much less because of what other traders who very likely will not share your goals, risk tolerance, etc. are doing or not doing, may be short-sighted.

 

As for gurus and ET and so forth, your thread there is over 500 posts long, so there must be something in it that encourages you to continue. What have you learned so far about trading price action?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi db I beginners in this trading, I very keen to use volume in my trading.But I not know what book should I read to understand use volume in my trading. Can you tell me what book superlative as reference for those beginners. Tks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi db I beginners in this trading, I very keen to use volume in my trading.But I not know what book should I read to understand use volume in my trading. Can you tell me what book superlative as reference for those beginners. Tks

 

Volume is too simple to warrant a book, though a number of people have attempted to make more of it than there is, resulting in books of questionable value.

 

The shortest distance to your goal may be to begin with the stickies at the Wyckoff Forum. These will enable you to put what you learn about volume in a context. If you want to go further, look into the quickie overview of the Forum's content. If you're still hungry, you may find the attached chapter on Volume Studies from Wyckoff's original course helpful, particularly pp. 4-8.

W VOLUME STUDIES (14M).pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you very much Db for the information and i already see your thread at t2w and elitrader.Can I course with you pass email and how many cost necessary for me to pay please email me at za_xc03@yahoo.com

 

No course. Not necessary. There's an enormous amount of information right here, for free, Market Profile in particular. The most important element is practice, and that's entirely up to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No course. Not necessary. There's an enormous amount of information right here, for free, Market Profile in particular. The most important element is practice, and that's entirely up to you.

 

Hai Db i already learn some indicator like stoch, rsi , macd but this all indicator cannot help me to increase my skill in trading so i decide to search indicator for measure behavior in market i see this volume can help me but the problem is to learning this indicator very difficult because this one i search some guru to guide me.Tks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hai Db i already learn some indicator like stoch, rsi , macd but this all indicator cannot help me to increase my skill in trading so i decide to search indicator for measure behavior in market i see this volume can help me but the problem is to learning this indicator very difficult because this one i search some guru to guide me.Tks

 

No need to search for a guru. Just stand still and they'll be all over you.

 

But there's nothing particularly difficult about volume. Volume reflects trading activity. As trading activity increases, so does volume. And vice-versa. As for whether the volume is "bullish" or "bearish", i.e., buying pressure is greater than selling pressure, or vice-versa, just look at what price is doing. If it's rising, buying pressure has the upper hand. If it's falling, selling pressure has taken the lead. If they're more or less equivalent, price sits.

 

That's pretty much it. The pdf I posted will elaborate, as will the other links I provided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PRICE ACTION,I am on the quest to rid myself of indicators.Since i have been trying a method using Stochastics & inside candles, with S/R, Double tops, Bottoms & Fib.Have not been as profitable as when i was using 3 MA, Bol. Bands, RSI, Macd.The impulse is to revert back & add indicators {of which I have,2 MA}.Has it been successful? No.So I am reading Wychofs book[ThanksDBPhoenix} & also have read Tom Williams insightful book on the Tradeguider site.If i could afford there program,as a novice it seems the way to go, I would .But $2995.00 is a bit much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.