Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ZOSO

Pay for Performance Mentorship?

Recommended Posts

I've had a few struggling traders ask me to mentor them, meaning they want to learn to trade profitably, but I have a real issue of charging big money upfront even though I think my time is very valuable. These traders have already been through the educational service merry-go-round and are already out $000s with very little to show for the so-called training they received.

 

Rather than turning these people away, I was thinking about a compensation plan based on their success from trading based on what I taught them. In other words, they would pay me a percent of their profit over a one year time frame or something like that. If they fail, well I make nothing, a risk I'm willing to take with them because I know them well and I think they have the mindset to win, but perhaps lack the right tools.

 

What do you think is a reasonable cut of their net profits over what period of time? I'm open to any ideas as long they're fair to all parties.

Edited by ZOSO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question zoso and an interesting arrangement you might have there.

 

In a normal hedge fund the fees are 20/2. I think this can give you a base to work from. Since the 2 management fee is probably not practical here, I would say somewhere in the ballpark of 20-40% of profits can work.

 

Setting this up will not be easy if you want to do it right - meaning, proper legal documents would need to be in place. If not, you can try a gentleman's shake, but keep in mind once the intellectual property has been taught, the end user may not feel like paying you for much longer after that...

 

It can be a good situation for all involved if done properly from the onset. But it will not be easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right the educational system can cost thousands of dollars for just a few days. From there a trader can take advanced classes which can cost them thousands more and they havent even made a trade yet. Here are two thoughts for you:

 

1- Since you are taking all of the risk up front have them pay you 50% of their profits (on a month over month basis). They have no risk at all to them.

 

2 - Charge them the higher fee up front and offer a money back Guarantee if they dont make back their money over the next 6 - 12 months trading your system.

 

Hope this helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You are right the educational system can cost thousands of dollars for just a few days. From there a trader can take advanced classes which can cost them thousands more and they haven't even made a trade yet. Here are two thoughts for you:

 

1- Since you are taking all of the risk up front have them pay you 50% of their profits (on a month over month basis). They have no risk at all to them.

 

2 - Charge them the higher fee up front and offer a money back Guarantee if they dint make back their money over the next 6 - 12 months trading your system.

 

Hope this helps

Those are good choices and you're right, I am taking on the risk so I have to be extremely selective and make a judgment if ones failure is do to poor method, psychological hurdles or both.

 

I'm inclined to go with option1 over a one year period. And although I'm not thrilled with taking any upfront money other than for out of pocket expenses, I'm interested to hear what you think the upfront fee should be for 2?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the subject of "due diligence" is an important one to introduce to this thread.

 

While one contemplates how to extract money from students (as is being done here), it is also important for students to have a way to make a realistic decision as to who to spend their time with.

 

I think the best way for a student to execute a due diligence process, is to ask and receive a reference (at least one or two) so that they can talk to people who have acheived success based on the teaching of a so called successful trader.

 

The interview process should include questions as follows

 

1. How long did it take before you started to make consistent money

2. What kind of drawdowns did you experience during the learning process

3. What if any additional software did you have to buy, what was the cost.

4. Did your screen setup become simpler or more complex

5. Did your pre-market process become simpler or more complex

6. How much time did your mentor spend with you on a daily and weekly basis

7. Did you spend time together via Internet connection, or in person

8. Were you able to relate to your mentor easily, or did it require some adjustment on your part

9. Were your mentor's instructions easily understood or did you struggle to "get it"

10. Describe your worst day as a student

11. Describe your best day as a student

12. When did you decide to leave that relationship and why

13. Do you continue to have success trading

14. Is trading your sole source of income

15. Knowing what you know now, would you enter into this relationship again

 

"Performance" is a two way street folks, sure the trader's time is important, but I think the student's time is no less important to him or her.

 

I think this comment brings a little more balance to the thread.

 

Good luck everyone.

 

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Those are good choices and you're right, I am taking on the risk so I have to be extremely selective and make a judgment if ones failure is do to poor method, psychological hurdles or both.

 

I'm inclined to go with option1 over a one year period. And although I'm not thrilled with taking any upfront money other than for out of pocket expenses, I'm interested to hear what you think the upfront fee should be for 2?

 

Thanks.

 

There are companies out there that charge anywhere from 2k - 5k for a two to three day program and there are back end sales of upwards of 35k after that innitial workshop. From what I remember trade the markets gets 5-8k for a week of mentorship (I think it is on the higher side). So to charge 2k - 3k up front for you teaching them seems fair to me.

 

You could also charge lets say 1k up front, to put some money in your pocket for your time and a % of their trading over the next year.

 

Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think about this from a business standpoint.

 

What you are doing is creating a stream of passive income when you take a percentage of your student's earnings. Do this with more than one student and you are creating multiple streams of passive income.

 

Ideally, the student will require incrementally less attention as they gain success (if the method and teaching are sound this could be true). In this case your business has scalability, in other words you are doing less work and making more money. Very desirable.

 

What I would recommend is that you have a requirement that the student starts with $XXXXX dollars in their account. That way you know they will at least not blow up immediately, and if they do make a decent percentage gain you will benefit significantly.

 

As a business owner I would not charge up front for an additional potential stream of passive income. I would carefully screen to make sure the student does have potential.

 

People who charge upfront aren't necessarily robbing the student, but they are damaging the student's ability to be successful.

Edited by Soultrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think it will be hard to collect once a student is successful. I mean, they could have a little small account that they pay you from and then have a completely separate 'off the books' account you'll never know about (unless this is done face-to-face).

 

IMO you are risking too much for the reward.

 

And that's why vendors charge up-front. Granted most know that what they are selling is trash, but even if it is good, how can you be sure to be paid accordingly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to mention how messy it would get as April 15 approaches....

 

How it would be done "in theory" would be to have students open an account with a brokerage firm you have a deal with. You have access to account statements, etc.

 

all of a sudden it's a major operation / pain in the a$$, and you used to be your own boss, work your own hours...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the subject of "due diligence" is an important one to introduce to this thread.

 

While one contemplates how to extract money from students (as is being done here), it is also important for students to have a way to make a realistic decision as to who to spend their time with.

 

I think the best way for a student to execute a due diligence process, is to ask and receive a reference (at least one or two) so that they can talk to people who have acheived success based on the teaching of a so called successful trader.

 

The interview process should include questions as follows

 

1. How long did it take before you started to make consistent money

2. What kind of drawdowns did you experience during the learning process

3. What if any additional software did you have to buy, what was the cost.

4. Did your screen setup become simpler or more complex

5. Did your pre-market process become simpler or more complex

6. How much time did your mentor spend with you on a daily and weekly basis

7. Did you spend time together via Internet connection, or in person

8. Were you able to relate to your mentor easily, or did it require some adjustment on your part

9. Were your mentor's instructions easily understood or did you struggle to "get it"

10. Describe your worst day as a student

11. Describe your best day as a student

12. When did you decide to leave that relationship and why

13. Do you continue to have success trading

14. Is trading your sole source of income

15. Knowing what you know now, would you enter into this relationship again

 

"Performance" is a two way street folks, sure the trader's time is important, but I think the student's time is no less important to him or her.

 

I think this comment brings a little more balance to the thread.

 

Good luck everyone.

 

Steve

I totally agree with your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Think about this from a business standpoint.

 

What you are doing is creating a stream of passive income when you take a percentage of your student's earnings. Do this with more than one student and you are creating multiple streams of passive income.

 

Ideally, the student will require incrementally less attention as they gain success (if the method and teaching are sound this could be true). In this case your business has scalability, in other words you are doing less work and making more money. Very desirable.

 

What I would recommend is that you have a requirement that the student starts with $XXXXX dollars in their account. That way you know they will at least not blow up immediately, and if they do make a decent percentage gain you will benefit significantly.

 

As a business owner I would not charge up front for an additional potential stream of passive income. I would carefully screen to make sure the student does have potential.

 

People who charge upfront aren't necessarily robbing the student, but they are damaging the student's ability to be successful.

 

I was never a big fan of upfront fees. What do you think is a reasonable starting account balance for someone who will be trading the S&P e-mini only (that's all I trade).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just think it will be hard to collect once a student is successful. I mean, they could have a little small account that they pay you from and then have a completely separate 'off the books' account you'll never know about (unless this is done face-to-face).

 

IMO you are risking too much for the reward.

 

And that's why vendors charge up-front. Granted most know that what they are selling is trash, but even if it is good, how can you be sure to be paid accordingly?

 

The first step must include getting daily statements from the broker. I suppose you'd need a form of a service agreement between the parties, but if someone wants to screw another, there's little that can be done to stop them. This is a deal that is basically done in good faith. Relying on legal agreements to get paid is a loser in the long run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to mention how messy it would get as April 15 approaches....

 

How it would be done "in theory" would be to have students open an account with a brokerage firm you have a deal with. You have access to account statements, etc.

 

all of a sudden it's a major operation / pain in the a$$, and you used to be your own boss, work your own hours...

Well, I don't want to get into the collection agency business, that's for sure.

 

Yes, I get the acccount statements and then send a weekly bill to the student(s). I'm not planning on scaling this, so I can deal with a small number of people.

 

If they are making money, that means I am also and I never have a problem paying taxes on earned income.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The first step must include getting daily statements from the broker. I suppose you'd need a form of a service agreement between the parties, but if someone wants to screw another, there's little that can be done to stop them. This is a deal that is basically done in good faith. Relying on legal agreements to get paid is a loser in the long run.

 

Like I said, there's nothing stopping them from having an 'off the records' account where the serious money is being traded.

 

Sounds like you are a trusting person zoso (and that's an admirable trait) but unless you really know these people, you are putting yourself out there for quite a bit of manipulation and short changing. For example, I would probably do something like this if a close friend/family member asked and not think twice about. But if an anonymous person over the internet found me and asked, I don't think I could do it w/ the way you are suggesting here.

 

Here's an idea to help you get paid and teach at the same time - open a CTA or CPO and set it up so that the interested party must invest in your CTA/CPO for a specified period of time (some sort of lockout type setup like most hedge funds do). While the person is invested in the CTA/CPO, you can open a chat room or however you plan to do this and trade w/ them. They can start small and demo it, all the while you are making money from day #1 by trading the group account.

 

;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoso,

This will sound rude but no offense is intended:

Are you that good at trading that you will be able to teach these people how to make a small fortune?

If you are, why don't you make yourself a pile of money and give the mentoring 'pro bono'?

 

Bump: Hi Zoso,

This will sound rude but no offense is intended:

Are you that good at trading that you will be able to teach these people how to make a small fortune?

If you are, why don't you make yourself a pile of money and give the mentoring 'pro bono'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Zoso,

This will sound rude but no offense is intended:

Are you that good at trading that you will be able to teach these people how to make a small fortune?

If you are, why don't you make yourself a pile of money and give the mentoring 'pro bono'?

 

Bump: Hi Zoso,

This will sound rude but no offense is intended:

Are you that good at trading that you will be able to teach these people how to make a small fortune?

If you are, why don't you make yourself a pile of money and give the mentoring 'pro bono'?

 

And when you are done there perhaps you could come round and mow my lawn? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Zoso,

This will sound rude but no offense is intended:

Are you that good at trading that you will be able to teach these people how to make a small fortune?

If you are, why don't you make yourself a pile of money and give the mentoring 'pro bono'?

 

Bump: Hi Zoso,

This will sound rude but no offense is intended:

Are you that good at trading that you will be able to teach these people how to make a small fortune?

If you are, why don't you make yourself a pile of money and give the mentoring 'pro bono'?

I never said I could make anyone a small fortune or a large one. I have a trading method that is discretionary and highly successful for me. Can others be successful using it? That is the big question and really depends if they have the discipline to take the trade when presented and not get all hot and bothered if the trade goes against them and trying to second guess and everything else a novice does that undermines their results.

 

So, I'm looking to help traders who have overcome the mental demons, but simply haven't found a method that workd well enough to produce a consistent profit.

 

My time is valuable and I won't give it away for free, but I am willing to be an equity partner if what I taught yields profits for the student within a reasonable time frame, say a year. After that, the profit is all theirs.

 

So there you have it.

 

Happy Thanksgiving to all sentient beings.

 

Bump:

And when you are done there perhaps you could come round and mow my lawn? Thanks.

Do I have to provide the lawnmower?:rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoso, thanks for the reply and for not taking offense, I do tend to be rather direct.

 

Perhaps I am being naiaive(sp) but I do believe that if I had "a trading method that is ... highly successful" I would make a fortune.

 

We are taught that just making 10 pips a time is the gateway to sucess and wealth. Instead of making a 10c trade and making a dollar, we make a $1000 trade and make $10,000.

 

It is the question that is or should be asked of all the 'My secret course on $97' sellers. If it is this good why sell it?

 

Again, no offense intended but you are someone of whom I can ask these questions

 

Bump: Hi Zoso, thanks for the reply and for not taking offense, I do tend to be rather direct.

 

Perhaps I am being naiaive(sp) but I do believe that if I had "a trading method that is ... highly successful" I would make a fortune.

 

We are taught that just making 10 pips a time is the gateway to sucess and wealth. Instead of making a 10c trade and making a dollar, we make a $1000 trade and make $10,000.

 

It is the question that is or should be asked of all the 'My secret course on $97' sellers. If it is this good why sell it?

 

Again, no offense intended but you are someone of whom I can ask these questions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not selling it. My intent is to offer it to a few unsuccessful traders who I know and then take a cut of their profits if it works for them. If they fail, I get nothing. Frankly, I think the arrangement is quite fair to all parties. In fact, as brownsfan has pointed out, I'm the one who is at risk.

 

You're entitled to your opinion, but let's be clear: I'm not selling anything except for the opportunity for a few others to turn a losing proposition into a winning one.

 

Get it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you misquoted him, he said "I have a trading method that is discretionary and highly successful for me. "

 

you left out the key words "DISCRETIONARY" and "FOR ME".

 

Big difference.

 

One of the demons Zoso is undoubtedly talking about is greed, a big one that the rest of your message suggests you haven't overcome.

 

As the saying goes, look to hit a lot of singles, not home runs.

 

Sorry for the interruption...

 

Happy Thanksgiving from an expat in Canada, missing that turkey...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you misquoted him, he said "I have a trading method that is discretionary and highly successful for me. " you left out the key words "DISCRETIONARY" and "FOR ME". Big difference.

 

True, my error. I was just trying to say that if I had such a scheme I would use it for home runs, lots of greed!

 

BTW I don't know what 'discretionary' means in this context.

 

I also didn't intend the 'selling' bit to apply to Zoso, I quite understand what he is saying and what he intends, or rather what he is contemplating. If I were one of his intended 'students' I would be willing to pay an amount of my returns provided it was not extortionate.

 

My problem, as the 'potential student' IN THIS SCENARIO, would be about how much of my money I have to put at risk for how much reward.

 

"The labourer is wothy of his hire" I believe is the quote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MRC & Co
you misquoted him, he said "I have a trading method that is discretionary and highly successful for me. "

 

you left out the key words "DISCRETIONARY" and "FOR ME".

 

Big difference.

 

One of the demons Zoso is undoubtedly talking about is greed, a big one that the rest of your message suggests you haven't overcome.

 

As the saying goes, look to hit a lot of singles, not home runs.

 

Sorry for the interruption...

 

Happy Thanksgiving from an expat in Canada, missing that turkey...

 

If it is a discretionary method, then it can probably not be taught.

 

If the 'trainee' has overcome his mental/psychological demons of trading, then how do you know, unless he is already profitable?

 

Stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Snip

 

So, I'm looking to help traders who have overcome the mental demons, but simply haven't found a method that workd well enough to produce a consistent profit.

 

Snip

 

 

IMVHO this is likely to be a problem. Exersising the daemons is what is likely to determine success or failure. Once you have overcome the daemons just about any method can work.

 

Still, all credit to you anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MRC-

 

Discretionary trading is much more difficult to teach, but very possible.

 

The demons can exist but be under control. All they are are thoughts in your mind, and when you are aware of what they are, and when they come, then you disregard them and their power is dissipated.

 

What's stupid about that?

 

 

Phreddy- there are so many scammers in this business who charge huge amounts of money - and people pay them. Think of this business as any other professional business. You don't walk into a hospital, start swinging a scalpel around and then start cutting people up to become a doctor. Its YEARS of education.

 

Same in the trading business. Learning is EXPENSIVE, possibly more than required to become a doctor. It also takes time! YEARS for some just to get to breakeven trading.

 

Discretionary trading means using evaluation to trade the market. Systematic (algorithmic) trading is using mechanical systems (usually based on statistical data) to enter and exit the market. These are the 2 basic forms of trading.

 

Zoso- I think you are right that there are those who have overcome their demons and are still not profitable. They are the breakeven traders who know what NOT to do, but haven't found their edge to take them to the next plane. This is a difficult period in the evolution of a trader (from personal experience).

Your efforts to teach are noble, and you are risking wasting time and effort in teaching.. but some teachers find it very fulfilling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MRC & Co

A discretionary method is EXTREMELLY difficult to teach, because everybodies psychological makeup is different. Everybody has various risk tolerences, therefore get out/in at various times etc. Some like to fade a trend, some like to trade with the bias of the trend. Some like confirmation to get into a trade, others like to buy pullbacks etc. Once in a trade, some will let it run 30 ticks offside, some won't be caught more than 2 ticks offside. Some will let size run further offside, some will be tighter when they have size on the table. Some will let profits run and take profits when it 'feels' right, others will scale in/out the entire time. The variances in trading styles are DRAMATIC, hence, it is extremelly hard to teach ones trading style exactly to another (unless like the turtles, it is entirely rules based).

 

If you have a rule by rule trading plan, then you are probably a mechanical trader, and will have to update it in a discretionary manner anyways (hence the arguement between mechs and discretionaries always makes me laugh).

 

What are you going on about demonds existing but under control? We ALL rasstle with our demons every single day, this is particularly so for discretionary traders as they do not have a strict plan to use and intraday trdaers, whereby that plan would have to be tinkered with numerous times a day, and where days can look completely different from the next, not to mention, where you are constantly watching your trades and need the discipline to sometimes take profits and other times, give them room to move when you have conviction (telling the difference between the two takes a FINE eye). Having that conviction is an entirely different matter.

 

If you trade intraday for a living, I think you will understand me. If not, then you are probably a cliche, like the rest of the books you read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.