Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jasont

Sharpe Ratio

Recommended Posts

I have been going through some extensive testing and noticed some talk around in regards to the Sharpe Ratio. I was hoping a few people could please enlighten me in regards to some info on it.

 

From what I found around the net was that it is calculated by dividing the average gains by the standard deviation. Some places offered different specifications to this as to whether or not to include the starting capital in this calculation or not. I also couldn't find a solid explanation on what is deemed a positive outcome Sharpe Ratio. Getting a touch confused at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have been going through some extensive testing and noticed some talk around in regards to the Sharpe Ratio. I was hoping a few people could please enlighten me in regards to some info on it.

 

From what I found around the net was that it is calculated by dividing the average gains by the standard deviation. Some places offered different specifications to this as to whether or not to include the starting capital in this calculation or not. I also couldn't find a solid explanation on what is deemed a positive outcome Sharpe Ratio. Getting a touch confused at this point.

 

Afaik the starting capital is not included in the formula. You can find the correct formula on Wikipedia or Investopedia. In the formula you'll see there is a so called "risk-free" component which is used to compare your system to the most conservative investment (although "risk-free" these days is relative in itself!), but you know what I mean like a savings account or 10-year bonds.

 

The Sharpe ratio is used to offer a measurement to check whether taking more risk is worth the higher return. The higher the Sharpe ratio, the better you are being rewarded for taking risk on your assets/investments/trades. This does not mean the net result in the end is more profitable, it only says something about the "reward-to-variability".

 

Here are two examples. Suppose the risk-free result is 2%.

 

Trader A has a system which gives him a potential of 200% profit/year and the standard deviation of his trades is about 15% (he has pretty wild swings in his account). Sharpe => (200-2)/15 = 13,2.

 

Trader B has a system which gives him only 50% profit/year, but his stdev is only 1%. Sharpe => (50-2/) / 1 = 48.

 

So although Trader A is more profitable, the risk premium per unit of risk is higher for B.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks FW. I was previously working on it according to average $'s made per week divided by the standard deviation of those $'s. I got some weird results so I suspect using the %'s rather than actual $'s would be the right way to go in the calculation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks FW. I was previously working on it according to average $'s made per week divided by the standard deviation of those $'s. I got some weird results so I suspect using the %'s rather than actual $'s would be the right way to go in the calculation.

 

If you used absolute profits in terms of relative, the results should be the same, but since the "risk-free" return is a % you'll then need to transform that number into the net profit based on the starting capital.

 

Take again example of Trader A:

 

Trader A has a system which gives him a potential of 200% profit/year and the standard deviation of his trades is about 15% (he has pretty wild swings in his account). Sharpe => (200-2)/15 = 13,2.

 

Now using absolute values, (let's say starting capital = $10K).

Sharpe => ($20000 - $200)/$1500 = 13,2...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm. Something doesn't quite sit right with me with this particular method. On a daily basis, using the average daily gain and standard deviation of those results you get a certain result. Then using a weekly average gain and standard deviation of those results you get a different result. Obviously that represents the difference in volatility between daily results to weekly results but to me it seems rather useless.

 

If one had a system that produced an average gain of 10% per month but the standard deviation was 15% then the ratio would look something like 0.66. Simply if one had small losses and large gains the standard deviation would be bigger thus the ratio would appear worse than a system which produced small losses and small gains yet produced poorer results.

 

Maybe I am way off on this one but I fail to see where the value of using it lies for judging a system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in order to create a more 'research-intuitive' measure -- re-work the formula. This is done through focusing on the statistical significance of the measure as a key component.

 

In statistics, you can easily be 'fooled by randomness' unless you are careful. the Sharpe Ratio is a prime example of this.

 

Enter the 'Fundamental Law Of Active Management' (Grinold, Kahn) where the true 'Reward-Risk' measure should be thought of as the Information Ratio (IR) Where:

 

IR is apporximately equal to =

'Expected Return' x SqRt(# of independent bets a strategy has)

 

note the first part of equation factors in big wins and small losses into the 'expected return' for a single trade 'opportunity'.

 

the second part of the equation is the part that directly links the 'statistical significance' of the strategy. ie, just a few independent trades a year will not yield a big IR, unless the 'expected' return is huge.

 

The point here is that Sharpe Ratio can be 'garbage in, garbage out' -- you need to focus on the statistical significance of each strategy you design and measure that strategy properly -- by directly building that into the equation. A strategy that generates 4 trading opportunities a year is no good -- why? because that is not enough opportunities to drive the expectancy in a statistically significant way. you are very prone to being 'fooled' by the historical results unless you drive the number of 'observations' up to a big number. lots of little bets like what a casino does with its 'edge' is the only way that these numbers truly 'work' -- otherwise you are just fooling yourself with numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for bringing my attention to that Frank. So I take it that the formula is 'Expected Return' (Average Gain Per Trade) X SqRt of the total number of trades. Do you mind me asking what the overall number should tell me exactly? My thoughts is that it is the average gain made over the set period of trades. Should the number be a certain size for any particular reason or is it used as a comparison to other strategies to find which one performs better over time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
or is it used as a comparison to other strategies to find which one performs better over time?

 

yes.

 

it is used to compare 2 different strategies --- and should be used as a framework on how to think about trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If one had a system that produced an average gain of 10% per month but the standard deviation was 15% then the ratio would look something like 0.66. Simply if one had small losses and large gains the standard deviation would be bigger thus the ratio would appear worse than a system which produced small losses and small gains yet produced poorer results.

 

This is one of the drawbacks of Sharpe Ratio in that it penalizes both up and downside volatility equally. Sortino Ratio attempts to address this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have to keep in mind with the sharpe ratio is that alot of the customers of alternate investment vehicles that would use a sharpe ratio, don't want to see massive spikes in the equity curve either. I mean there is no free lunch, your not going to get a massive spike without getting really one off lucky or taking more risk.

Its like the mirror of a draw down. A draw down is not a huge deal if its your own money, its a much bigger deal if someone else is going to invest in you since then they want to know what the worse case scenario is if you step on a land mine the day after their money is in.

If you finish the year up 50% with your own money but took a 30% drawdown midway through the year, your still up 50%, who cares. If someone else is investing in you, it could mean they are down 25% while your up 50% because they got in at the wrong time.

Sharpe is interesting if your courting OPM, if its just your own money to me it seems to make more sense just to stick to profit factors since the equity curve your measuring with your own money is in reality always going to start at zero for the time period you measure. Your not going to "get in" at the wrong time if its your own money and own system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Customers of alternative investments want to see a strategy that has a definable edge and is structured toward 'lots of small bets' rather than a few big bets.

 

If you have an edge AND have lots of small bets, the risk is controlled because the 'risk of a bad run of luck' will be minimized over many bets -- just as a top poker player will have low variance over 10,000 hands played, but might have a 30% (high) chance of losing significant money on the next 50 hands played.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock, with a solid top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX  
    • NFLX Netflix stock, with a solid top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX  
    • It depends. If you have lots of money that you can buy a house without a loan and if you don't have any parents to sponsor then it is a good idea. Otherwise it might be a bad idea depending where in Canada you are heading to. I earned a good middle income in my home country and I migrated to Vancouver 5 years ago at the age of 35. I had to start right from the bottom, lowest of the low.. Now i am finally earning a middle income in Canada but I still cannot afford to buy a one bedroom apartment. Having left behind friends, family and home, most of the times I think it is not worth it.   In short, do not migrate if you already have a good life in your home country and you are happy. Only migrate to Canada if you really have to leave your home country say there is a war or something really bad. Discrimination still exists here and its really tough for newcomers unless you are super rich. Good luck. David Chong, Quora  
    • This is bigger than the internet. Bigger than mobile. Bigger than social media.   While everyone was distracted by stock market fluctuations and political theater…   Most people have NO IDEA what just happened last week with ChatGPT.   Their new memory feature allows ChatGPT to remember EVERYTHING about you across all your conversations.   Think about that for a minute...   While most tech companies have been collecting mere breadcrumbs about you - your likes, your clicks, your browsing history - OpenAI is now collecting the most valuable dataset in human history: your complete psychological profile.   This is Zuckerberg x 5,000.   The more you use ChatGPT, the more it understands you, becoming a supercharged reflection of yourself that improves at an exponential rate.   Are you a regular ChatGPT user?   Consider whether it’s time to turn off the “you can train on my information” feature. To prevent your data from being used for training while still using the memory feature:   Disable Model Training: Navigate to Settings > Data Controls. Toggle off "Improve the model for everyone". Manage Memory Settings: Go to Settings > Personalization > Memory. Here, you can: Turn off memory entirely. Delete specific memories. Use Temporary Chat for sessions that won't be saved or used for training. Now the investment implications…   Why This is Bigger Than You Think Consider this: the relationship between humans and ChatGPT is evolving beyond a mere tool.   People are now treating these AI assistants as friends, confidants, and even romantic partners.   I'm not making this up - there are already documented cases of people ending real human relationships to pursue “connections” with their AI companions.   A viral Instagram meme shows a person going through life with a glowing, featureless humanoid figure - representing ChatGPT - as their companion.   The post has over 1.1 million likes and comments like "Bro ChatGPT is like my best friend. Ain't even ashamed to say it" with 25,000 likes.   But here's where things get really interesting for investors and entrepreneurs...   Three Things to Watch For starters, hardware is the next big thing for the big players.   The iPhone form factor is dead.   It hasn't meaningfully changed in nearly a decade. The next evolution in hardware will be designed specifically to interface with these AI companions.   OpenAI is already working on hardware with Johnny Ive, the legendary designer behind the iPhone and iPod. But you can’t ignore Elon Musk’s edge here.   So what does all of this mean for you?   The companies that control the personal AI relationships will be worth trillions. OpenAI and Elon Musk will have the coziest moats. We're witnessing the birth of a new internet - one built on agents that can communicate with each other across platforms. Google's new agent-to-agent protocol allows AI agents to work together without sharing internal memories or tools. The hardware companies that create the perfect interface for these AI companions will dominate the next decade of technology. And almost nobody is talking about what this means.   My prediction? Within five years, most people will have a personal AI that knows them better than anyone else. And they will interact with it in ways that seem foreign today.   (And, yes, it will almost certainly have dystopian elements.)   In the meantime, the biggest gains won’t come from household names. And, right now, James is seeing a prime opportunity to invest in the most under-the-radar plays in AI…   For dirt cheap. By Chris C. Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/use-chatgpt-protect-yourself-now
    • KBH KB Home stock, nice day and rally off the 50.82 support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?KBH      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.