Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

sillykiddo

Feltontrading Method

Recommended Posts

First, let me say that I don't have any stake in this, and do not have any strong opinions one way or another about Roger Felton -- nor any knowledge of his methods. From my own experiences, I can understand where Roger may be coming from feeling "negativity" which is often expressed at the first sign that someone being a vendor, regardless of the merits the vendor has to contribute.

 

Now as far as sim trading, I've did that for many years and believe it to have value.. Some traders can trade in sim and can't trade live. Some simulators aren't realistic and won't give accurate result. If the simulator is using realistic fill engine then I can't see the problem from the student/learning perspective. I share my sim trades on a regular basis, as well as my live trades.

 

However.... I feel it safe to say that no one in their right mind would sit out $1,000 in profits per day just to teach on a simulator. That part raises a red flag... Great traders are highly motivated to do everything they can and I just can't see a great trader doing that. Also, I don't see any reason too and I don't see the sales being that lucrative. And, I'm sorry if I misunderstood Roger but I felt he was claiming that he wasn't trading live during the best parts of the day? It is usually not that difficult to trade both live and on the simulator at the same time. And really if you are averaging 1k per day then that's what 3 days to buy a top of the line computer to run your order engine from? This is the part that I have a problem with. Plus sharing the live fills couldn't do anything but help your sales and credibility.

 

Again, some traders can trade better on the simulator then live. I sometimes go back to the simulator when I have self doubt or when trying new things. I'm often trading on both sim and live at the same time. And, as long as the vendor is clear on what he is doing and why he is doing it then I don't see any problem. But to suggest that a trader is going to sit on a simulator and not trade live just to help students while giving up thousands in profits doesn't make any sense to me -- as a vendor and a trader.

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First, let me say that I don't have any stake in this, and do not have any strong opinions one way or another about Roger Felton -- nor any knowledge of his methods. From my own experiences, I can understand where Roger may be coming from feeling "negativity" which is often expressed at the first sign that someone being a vendor, regardless of the merits the vendor has to contribute.

 

Now as far as sim trading, I've did that for many years and believe it to have value.. Some traders can trade in sim and can't trade live. Some simulators aren't realistic and won't give accurate result. If the simulator is using realistic fill engine then I can't see the problem from the student/learning perspective. I share my sim trades on a regular basis, as well as my live trades.

 

However.... I feel it safe to say that no one in their right mind would sit out $1,000 in profits per day just to teach on a simulator. That part raises a red flag... Great traders are highly motivated to do everything they can and I just can't see a great trader doing that. Also, I don't see any reason too and I don't see the sales being that lucrative. And, I'm sorry if I misunderstood Roger but I felt he was claiming that he wasn't trading live during the best parts of the day? It is usually not that difficult to trade both live and on the simulator at the same time. And really if you are averaging 1k per day then that's what 3 days to buy a top of the line computer to run your order engine from? This is the part that I have a problem with. Plus sharing the live fills couldn't do anything but help your sales and credibility.

 

Again, some traders can trade better on the simulator then live. I sometimes go back to the simulator when I have self doubt or when trying new things. I'm often trading on both sim and live at the same time. And, as long as the vendor is clear on what he is doing and why he is doing it then I don't see any problem. But to suggest that a trader is going to sit on a simulator and not trade live just to help students while giving up thousands in profits doesn't make any sense to me -- as a vendor and a trader.

 

I think it's probably pretty easy to "armchair quarterback" the other guy and certainly no offense in your doing so with me. It's entertainment, I suppose.

 

I'm up and at my computer by 6am (CST) every day. 2 to 3.5 hours later I'm on the simulator and moderating the FT room for only one and a half hours a day (my student/moderator does the rest). That hour and a half is the most enjoyable part of my day and I wouldn't miss it for anything. I'm with my friends...I help them and they help me.

 

Since the markets are open 20+ hours a day, what trader can't find an hour and a half to do something they thoroughly enjoy? It's not a sacrifice, it's a blessing.

 

Look, I'm not ashamed to say that I have no desire to try to moderate a room, answer numerous questions and PM's, constantly scrolling charts back to show previous day's examples... and trade my live account at the same time! That's nuts. Don't believe me...try it. Interruptions and distractions will kill ya when trading when seconds count and total focus is mandatory. Seriously, if you can find someone who can do that, then take their course and become filthy rich. Funny though, it just never works out that way.

 

If I can't get my personal trading done in that 2 to 3.5 hours of peaceful quiet, something is very wrong. I learned a long time ago that enough is enough and trying to trade all day long is tiring...especially when I'm also trying run a business.

 

The goal is not to take more trades...the secret is to make the trades you do take really count. It's not the number of trades, it's the number of contracts.

Edited by Roger Felton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting

 

with respect to the question about finding a method or room that is profitable, the answer is not going to be welcomed...first it is not "the method" or even "the room" that is going to make a person profitable....unfortunately for most of you, it is a number of other characteristics, most of which people aren't " born with, but need to learn to incorporate in their personality....among them are discipline, focus, mature experience and judgement. Also one needs to have internalized a sense of adult self esteem. By "adult self esteem" we mean a sense of what is real and the ability to subordinate immediate personal "wants" while working on a future goal. If one possess those qualities, there are a number of systematic approaches that work pretty well. If we are talking about trading the S&P Futures for example, currently most skilled participants are using a mix of both trend following (longer time frame) and momentum based (shorter time frame) systems with good result.

 

with respect to a systematic approach or "room" I can only relate to my own system (one that was published here quite a while ago. In that approach I outlined how large institutions use time based goals to move money in and out of the markets. Last year for instance the longer time frame goal was 1363 (approximately)....participants knew this goal was in play fairly early in the year and we traded around that using both outright positions and options (for the longer term players). If you took this seriously you did both (trading around the open, high and close of each time period from daily, to weekly to monthly to quarterly). and of course markets move up AND down but I don;'t have the time (or inclination) to provide a comprehensive outline of my system here.

 

Now some will suggest that in that thread, there wasn't enough detail on which to base a systematic approach, nevertheless, some folks took that info and ran with it, and had a decent year...I taught two small classes (8 students total) and like any approach where you have a diverse student body, some did well, some did poorly and for some it is a work in progress. Since all of them are either members or read my work here (and aren't posting complaints) it is assumed that (at the very least) they received value for their money (I charged them $200/mo...and this brings me to my final point.

 

I think there are ways of screening for participants who are most likely to be successful in any endeavor...in future if I decide to teach again, the screening process will be weighted so that I can find folks who are most likely to benefit from my approach to teaching. Unfortunately everywhere I look, including Mr. Felton's "room"...if you have a checkbook, you're in...to me that signals that the business's profitabilty takes a higher priority than the student's success. I think that is fine, but not a value that I want to embrace.

 

Steve46, from what I can tell by your vague post, you're a one man band. I can't imagine trying to run a real business with office staff, support personnel, sales department and full time programmer on a $1600 gross income. We don't have the luxury of going out of business whenever we feel like it.

 

How about we have an agreement to respect each other's business model.

Edited by MadMarketScientist
no personal attacks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Steve46, from what I can tell by your vague post, you're a one man band. I can't imagine trying to run a real business with office staff, support personnel, sales department and full time programmer on a $1600 gross income. We don't have the luxury of going out of business whenever we feel like it.

 

How about we have an agreement to respect each other's business model and hold off on the cheap shots. Makes you look small.

 

Hmmm, so lets see here, you've just suggested that your "business model" is justified because you have employees that need to be paid?

 

So its okay to upsell folks from the get go

and its okay to market software that makes your students dependent on YOU to trade your system

and apparently this "business model" is profitable enough that you don't need to trade (except in your most recent post where you recant that comment....now you DO trade at specfic times of the day).....

 

I think the rest of you can connect the dots......

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had a post deleted from this topic (for allegedly being off topic). It named Roger Felton, FeltonTrading, RF or FT six times within it's 105 total words. Discussion with managment confirmed it was not a personal attack.

 

I prefer this be my last post to this subject (but I will adapt to information as the future becomes the present).

 

I raised the question about why onesmith's post was deleted if, as claimed, management confirmed that the post was not a personal attack. It's hard to imagine that it was off-topic if it named the subject of the Thread Title that many times.

 

There has been no response from any of the moderators.

 

I don't want to debate the reasons. It's your board so you can make whatever rules you want - no matter how inconsistent or biased they may be. However, it's in every member's interest to know why a post was deleted if it did not contain a personal attack.

 

And it's in your interest to let us know why. Only then can we ensure that we don't make the same mistake in future posts. Otherwise it wastes your time moderating/deleting them and increases your workload.

I'd have thought it would be important for you to reduce that workload, particularly as you wrote that: "moderating this thread is not something I enjoy!"

 

It's difficult for us to meet your request to: "Lets all get on the same page" , if you can't be bothered to let us know what that page is that warranted the deletion of a post that allegedly did not contain a personal attack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I raised the question about why onesmith's post was deleted if, as claimed, management confirmed that the post was not a personal attack. It's hard to imagine that it was off-topic if it named the subject of the Thread Title that many times.

 

Because it was off-topic to the subject. The subject of the thread was a trading method and we want to keep the posts about that. onesmith's post was accusing him of fraud, clearly not on topic. If someone doesn't like the trading strategy being discussed, please ignore the thread.

 

thx

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't any discussion of a trading method within the last 33 posts (from post #121 through #153). I did not look further back but I recall the posts prior to that are similar. My post which was deleted for allegedly being off-topic, .. conveyed important information relevant to the topic.

 

I'm interested in discussing the FeltonTrading Method with everyone else on this topic.

 

Particularly with those who have subscribed and have experience with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because it was off-topic to the subject. The subject of the thread was a trading method and we want to keep the posts about that. onesmith's post was accusing him of fraud, clearly not on topic. If someone doesn't like the trading strategy being discussed, please ignore the thread.

 

thx

MMS

 

I have been taking free trials in chat rooms and with vendors software for almost 15 yrs. All I can say is, if you ever have to lay out more than $1000 at one time.....run! I can tell you who dollar for dollar gives you the best trading education in a chat room anywhere in the USA. But you have to be open to Fibonacci work. There are actually 2 people doing it and both know and respect each others work. Tell yuh something. I work as a coach, not a trading coach but as a coach to find out where peoples "holes" are in why they are not succeeding at the endeavors they seem to want to so badly. Like a life coach. But Im semi-retired now and dont take any new clients. But if you PM me, I will tell you who I think are the 2 best out there. And yes, Barry Burns is good value for the dollar if you are not yet advanced. Nice guy too! Felton, I think his style, legit or not is not sustainable long term because youd have to wear your nerves out taking those tiny scalping profits he settles for. I think he sells his system because its to stressful to do every day.

 

Vince

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All these snake oil services should be closed down for fraud.

 

Look in the charts, there is no shortcut to trading.

 

S

did it ever occur to you that is precisely what mr felton does? he looks at charts! do you look at charts? if so...is your looking then snake oil? or is it only his looking that is snake oil because he sells what he "sees" in the charts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.