Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

ephi144

Detecting Sideways Market?

Recommended Posts

sorry i am noob so forgive my asking:

is their a such a thing as indicator that detects sideways market?

i would be interested in such an indicator for Tradestation.

 

thanks

 

Hi ephi,

 

Nothing to do with indicators here but you can compare volume to previous average volumes. For example, today the Nikkei is stuck in a dull range. Notice the volume in comparison to Friday. Low volume today showing not much participation in the markets... these tend to create rangebound days.You can simply wait for the opening 15-30mins as well to gauge activity.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8561&stc=1&d=1226291730

lowvolume.jpg.c16fd925cf81eac7abf659441f502b9c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing the price action should give you enough clues that a sideway markets are in progress. If you see the prices don't break the highs or lows of the time chart you're looking, then it's a sideways market. Pure and simple. Of course determining which time chart to use is another problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys, yeah i agree about looking at the price pattern to see if it breaks above/below that level but sometimes it takes a while for that to come in to play. i am just trying to devise a system based on some emas etc to see if i can come up with something.

 

thank you for your input.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

many traders use a volume weighted MA to look for "sideways " action. If MA period is usually short, and when it goes flat it is considered sideways. I have seen this in practice, but I personally don't use it as I still think it lags compared to being able to read price action itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...when it goes flat it is considered sideways...it lags compared to being able to read price action itself.

 

ephi,

 

lag and responsiveness are issues with regular averages but this principle works well with some of the more adaptive MA's. For example, Jurik, etc. set to 4 periods on a low timeframe ndx chart gets flat quickly enough to be useful in algorhythmic trading.

Have you looked at Joe Ross's definitions of congestion found in Law of the Charts book(s)? These are also easily coded.

 

hth,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys these are great ideas for noob like me thank you so MUCH.

i have been working with (experimenting with) screaming 2 fast MAs that are found on this site along with 55 period EMA. I have incorporated BB Squeeze indicator (though i have yet to figure out how i will use it along with the MAs). Next i am wondering if i can someone figure out the choppy or sideways market.

 

I will look in to Joe Ross' book for more information. Please do send more ideas my way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to look for a book. You can download the Law of charts from his web site. Joe uses a 'measuring bar' to define congestion...all the time subsequent bars have an open or close within the measuring bar you have congestion. His definitions are pretty robust actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What you're asking is really the million dollar question: If there was a way to reliably know when a market was transitioning from sideways to trending or vice-versa, we would all be very rich indeed. One can only really know after the transition has occurred.

 

A problem here is defining a trend. After that, a "sideways market" is a lack of trend as you define a trend.

There are about as many techniques to answer this dilemma as there are indicators. Multiple MA's, Comparing two different ATR periods, Rate of change in the ADX line or just looking at the chart. By it's very nature, you can not tell a trend until it is underway.

 

Welles Wilder's ADX (sometimes called DMI) is specifically designed to differentiate between trending vs. sideways markets. Like any indicator, there are limitless ways to interpret it. Personally, I largely ignore the level of ADX (contrary to Wilder's methodology). What I use to determine trend is the direction and rate of change in the ADX line. Interpretation is largely subjective and very visual. Since it, like any indicator, is simply a manipulation of price, many would argue that you are better off visually detecting trend vs. range directly from price and not from an indicator, which will always lag behind price.

 

Take a look into ADX. It's not a very intuitive indicator and therefore not very popular. It takes some getting used to. Those who are comfortable with it swear by it, and it often becomes their favorite indicator. Personally, ADX is the first indicator I want to attach to any chart and sometimes is the only indicator I use.

Edited by rangerdoc
spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You might want to look at John Ehlers work if you have a mathematical bias. A lot of his stuff is based on separating the cyclical component of a 'signal' (he was an engineer and applies signal processing techniques) from the non cyclical (trend). He nearly always uses the Hilbert transform for this. Fast Fourier transforms are another popular way. Quite a few of his algorithms have been coded and are in the public domain.

 

Personally I'd just stick to HH's and HL's. If you have those you have a trend. In the long term being able to identify a trend by glancing at a chart is likely to serve you best. (Unless you have some other objectives like automation?)

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right, ADX is about the slowest thing out there. Personally, I don't use hardly any indicators anymore. I'll use one medium oscillator for divergances and one volume based indicator... that's it. And in their own window, never on the chart window. I keep the price naked. All these indicators are just derivatives of price. Now you can use the latest computer (quad core) that processes about 59,000 MIPS (Million instructions per second) to determine trends and price action... or you can use your brain which has a processing speed of 100,000,000 MIPS. Which do you think can do a better job of evaluating a price chart? I found that I was trading the indicators, not the price. Once I stripped all the indicators away, my profitability increased about 40%. This takes time though. Personally, it took me five years. Others maybe much more or much less.

 

If that just won't work for you, then print the chart, hang it on the wall and call a five year old kid over and ask him if it's going up or down. If he can't tell, it's sideways. (In other words: use his 100million MIPS computer if your own isn't working) Kids have the huge advantage of not being biased in any way. Hmmm, Maybe I need to put a daycare on retainer???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, im also a noob, though here are some ideas im developing:

 

Using bollinger bands at one deviation, if they're moving sideways, and with the price oscillating between the inner and outer bands at 1 deviation, thats a good clue its going sideways. Also the if the width of the channel formed by the deviation lines is narrowing thats another good clue prices have stopped. (if prices are trending and this is happening thats a whole new story..)

 

Also more loosely, if you can get a historgram of macd, if the volume of the histogram is near 0, thats also a seems like a good indication its sideways.

 

Disclaimer, im also a noob :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sorry i am noob so forgive my asking:

is their a such a thing as indicator that detects sideways market?

i would be interested in such an indicator for Tradestation.

 

thanks

 

Try using an ADX chart.

 

That will let you know if it is trending or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys. Nice discussion about trending and trading markets. I agree that an ADX is too slow to use in its original format, and I wonder if someone found a way to make it respond a bit faster, because the concept is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi guys. Nice discussion about trending and trading markets. I agree that an ADX is too slow to use in its original format, and I wonder if someone found a way to make it respond a bit faster, because the concept is good.

 

By definition any indicator dedecting trending/sidweways markets will be slow and lagging and it can only tell you that the past x period was sideways, but it doesn't tell you anything about the future. The only way to accurately detect a trend/sideways market is after the fact. Unfortunately you will never know early enough if a market is trending/sideways.

 

This is why trend following systems have such low winning percentage, because they assume all breakouts will be the start of a trend and they keep cutting losses until they hit a trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have the skill to predict chop with accuracy that will occure in 15min or 3 days etc.., however I can stay out of choppy price action as price is unfolding...anyone that tells you its not possible...well they are telling you their experience, not a fact of point about technical analysis. Its up to you which you decide to belive.

 

Learn about ease of movement principle, or volatility, or study characteristics of price when its choppy vs. when its moving free/smooth, or define swing points and then compare swing point price composition to next swing point price composition, or even better do all of these. Take notes and see what you come up with.

 

Eventually Im sure you will be able to see chop as its unfolding and before you get trapped in it.

 

Price can leave a lot of clues, but you wont see it if your not paying attention or even worse, if you have already decided that its not possible.

 

 

Regards..

Edited by sep34

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont have the skill to predict chop with accuracy that will occure in 15min or 3 days etc..

 

Neither does anyone else...

to me this whole question is flawed...

Like right now on the index, are we trending off a bottom, trading a range or both? If you get abstract enough, we are always basically doing both...to try to quantify that though to me misses the point that in any market under any macro condition, there are better places to put on bets than other places. Your ability to find patterns in the clouds means nothing if you can't wrap your head around the good places to bet.

If your talking sideways action your talking patterns that are on the chart vertically, don't know how you beat Dalton there to learn. What you don't want to do though is become a failed trader who ends up teaching bogus market profile "theory"...so don't get too into it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your talking sideways action your talking patterns that are on the chart vertically, don't know how you beat Dalton there to learn. What you don't want to do though is become a failed trader who ends up teaching bogus market profile "theory"...so don't get too into it.

 

 

I cant understand at all what you are saying. If you need a response then clarify your statement.

 

 

Regards..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
By definition any indicator dedecting trending/sidweways markets will be slow and lagging and it can only tell you that the past x period was sideways, but it doesn't tell you anything about the future. The only way to accurately detect a trend/sideways market is after the fact. Unfortunately you will never know early enough if a market is trending/sideways...

 

At beginnings of / Going into congestion - It is possible to algorithmically and statistically

1 assign probabilities to whether a thrust or correction end will turn or congest

2 start putting probabilities on congestion on its very first bar

3 be getting good probabilities as to the ‘quality’ / type of a congestion by as early as its 3rd bar

 

Within congestion – It is possible algorithmically and statistically

1 project probable end of congestion / break out times

2 then, in real time, drill down and test the quality of those projections

3 and by separate measures, identify by end of one bar when a ‘release’ from congestion is likely to have been triggered (well before price has actually broken out)

 

… not picking on you personally Sevensa. Your post is just representative of all the “it can’t be done” assumptions about working congestions before and during instead of only after...

 

congesting is entangled up in the very core of market dynamics... 'Philosophically' / attitudinally, for me it is about a primary choice to be aggressive and creative instead of helpless and reactive in my interaction with this extremely crucial aspect of market behavior... and I'm definitely not saying that I still don't get the living sh!+ kicked out of me by congestions on a routine basis - but with the engaging instead of fleeing way, at least it is with far less frequency and degree. More than the money available around congestions is the benefit of being capable of sustaining 'in synch' both in and out of congesting

 

btw my congestion work is all on very short intraday time frames. For me it would be a complete burnout to attempt to gather this kind of tradeable information manually / observationally / with wetware… but that doesn’t mean it isn’t possible by applying analogues / adaptations of the same techniques to longer time frames and being willing to give up progressively more precision with each larger time frame quanta.

 

Happy new year all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At beginnings of / Going into congestion - It is possible to algorithmically and statistically

1 assign probabilities to whether a thrust or correction end will turn or congest

2 start putting probabilities on congestion on its very first bar

3 be getting good probabilities as to the ‘quality’ / type of a congestion by as early as its 3rd bar

 

Within congestion – It is possible algorithmically and statistically

1 project probable end of congestion / break out times

2 then, in real time, drill down and test the quality of those projections

3 and by separate measures, identify by end of one bar when a ‘release’ from congestion is likely to have been triggered (well before price has actually broken out)

 

… not picking on you personally Sevensa. Your post is just representative of all the “it can’t be done” assumptions about working congestions before and during instead of only after...

 

congesting is entangled up in the very core of market dynamics... 'Philosophically' / attitudinally, for me it is about a primary choice to be aggressive and creative instead of helpless and reactive in my interaction with this extremely crucial aspect of market behavior... and I'm definitely not saying that I still don't get the living sh!+ kicked out of me by congestions on a routine basis - but with the engaging instead of fleeing way, at least it is with far less frequency and degree. More than the money available around congestions is the benefit of being capable of sustaining 'in synch' both in and out of congesting

 

btw my congestion work is all on very short intraday time frames. For me it would be a complete burnout to attempt to gather this kind of tradeable information manually / observationally / with wetware… but that doesn’t mean it isn’t possible by applying analogues / adaptations of the same techniques to longer time frames and being willing to give up progressively more precision with each larger time frame quanta.

 

Happy new year all

 

 

You can assign probabilities and projected start and ending of anything, using any kind of algorithm. How accurate that is, is a complete different matter. :)

 

Care to post a few charts with your probabilities assigned of future congestion and of charts in congestion with your forecast on when it will end?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.