Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MHJ

Raising Corp Tax

Recommended Posts

Is it accurate that raising corporate taxes in the current economic climate will eventually yield a wider and deeper recession.

 

You cannot predict with accuracy what will happen in the future if you do X.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You cannot predict with accuracy what will happen in the future if you do X.

 

And another way to put it, is that the TV pundits don't understand, you cannot project with any accuracy what would have happen today if x had been done in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If history does repeat,then yes. Didn't Herbert Hoover do the same in 1932? Raising taxes in that recession lead to a depression.

First it is my stand that raising taxes on anyone or anything effects each and everyone of us in one way or another. So a tax increase on a select few or on corporations or on capital gains will have an effect on us all, not just the rich, but right down to the homeless windshield cleaners receiving smaller handouts and these "I'll work for food" guys actually having to work for food.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, it's not so easy to draw a direct correlation between taxes and economic growth. In general, I would agree that higher taxes act as a disincentive for entrepreneurs to get a business off the ground and growing.

 

The part of the equation that also needs to be looked at is how those tax receipts are being used. Is the government investing in growth strategies with the funds they receive? Are they using those dollars to employ people? If you think of the government as just another very large business that collect money for providing services to its clients, I think you'll agree that it's important to look at the revenue and the expense side of things before coming to a hasty conclusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.............

The part of the equation that also needs to be looked at is how those tax receipts are being used....

 

Yes exactly. If they use the money efficiently or as efficient as we can expect a governmental oranization to be.

 

It can create needed jobs - the dreaded service variety since they don't manufacture anything but the phoney money the Treasury prints. I say dreaded service jobs tongue-in-cheek, after all what are teachers/doctors/lawyers/architects/lobbyists - well forget the last group. ;)

 

But if they are creating jobs for the sake of creating jobs that is just shifting around tax money from one person to another, adding layers of bureauracy and not very efficient at all. Prime example these days is the Homeland Security Dept.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hot topic on the news stations is "We ne to fix Wall Street". Well what about the Government, there is sooooooooooooo much waste it is silly. We need to put someone in charge that can take the country and run it like a business. Raising taxes isnt the answer, locating and fixing the problem is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can you tax businesses without increasing the price of the goods they produce at every level? Taxes are a part of cost of production. I offer a hypothetical example.

 

Company A produces widgets at the cost of $1.00 and sells at 15% over cost or for $1.15. Government (to the delight of poor customers) taxes the the "rich" businesses 10% so the cost is now $1.10 + 15% so company A now charges the wholesaler $1.27.

 

The wholesaler figures his profits at 25% over cost which is now .12 higher and he is hit with the 10% tax too. So now instead of wholesaling widgets at $1.44 he sells them for $1.59

 

The retailer also must pass on the increase to keep his 50% profits so he retails the goods to the customer at $2.39 for what he sold pre-tax for $2.16.

 

The customer walks out of the store grumbling about inflation and big business sticking it to the little man and goes to vote for the who will make the rich pay their fair share.

 

Meanwhile the government collected 48 cents on every widget to redistribute on their pet projects mostly aimed at enslaving the masses.

 

Hayek got it right in 1947: socialism is the Road to Serfdom.[/I]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How can you tax businesses without increasing the price of the goods they produce at every level? Taxes are a part of cost of production. I offer a hypothetical example.

 

Company A produces widgets at the cost of $1.00 and sells at 15% over cost or for $1.15. Government (to the delight of poor customers) taxes the the "rich" businesses 10% so the cost is now $1.10 + 15% so company A now charges the wholesaler $1.27.

 

The wholesaler figures his profits at 25% over cost which is now .12 higher and he is hit with the 10% tax too. So now instead of wholesaling widgets at $1.44 he sells them for $1.59

 

The retailer also must pass on the increase to keep his 50% profits so he retails the goods to the customer at $2.39 for what he sold pre-tax for $2.16.

 

The customer walks out of the store grumbling about inflation and big business sticking it to the little man and goes to vote for the who will make the rich pay their fair share.

 

Meanwhile the government collected 48 cents on every widget to redistribute on their pet projects mostly aimed at enslaving the masses.

 

Hayek got it right in 1947: socialism is the Road to Serfdom.[/I]

 

 

This is a great point. Companies don't pay taxes. Customers pay the taxes in the form of high costs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess US has fund managers and investment banking institutions looking after the portfolios on behalf of their clients.
    • There are many resources related to forex trading available on forums like babypips and forexfactory etc.
    • Candle stick pattern is one of the easiest charting patterns available to learn and make money. However, new traders never learn about the skills needed for earning money but they rush for making money and eventually lose their money.
    • Nothing wrong with being a ‘progressive’. Nothing wrong with being a ‘conservative’.  Very generally, ‘conservatives’ have preponderance of the here and now neurotransmitters, prefer empirical references, the rule of law, and value individual agency (It has been said that conservatives love humans and progressives love humanity) . Very generally, ‘progressives’ are dopaginaric - driven by passion for a better possible future, prefer references to others  (Example Karmela won’t answer questions with facts.  She cites the opinion of 18 ‘experts’), have a penchant for rule by man/mobs not by law , and value ‘societal' agency.  However, excesses of either tendency indicates mental illness, collective malaise, and has consequences.  When either camp is systematically captured by control seekers and/or, situationally by mobs, the whole is lessened. A key sign that is occurring is when one side no longer allows disagreement.  Progressives have  currently gone crazy in those excesses and are no longer allowing anything but unithought... examples - You can still be a vocal pro choice republican.  Try being a vocal pro life democrat. For snicks just try it.  You’ll get cancelled.  Bust a myth about blacks in America, true up the real  history of Republicans ending slavery and what has happened since, how the democrats are the party of the KKK, how Obama did not a fkn thang for blacks in general, be a black republican, etc.    You will get canceled in a heartbeat. Step up and question the social agendas of federally subsidized schools at a board meeting... get treated like shit and also get an immediate case number with the FBI ... Question the requirements to watch and lickkiss the 'rainbows' and also make sure your kids show up for it, not to mention fund transitions out of your pocket and see what you get ‘labeled’ Question mainstream media bias - even just to mention that biased, agenda driven narrative is different from truth in reporting - and see what happens to your voice... Excesses have consequences... imbalances have consequences... just sayin’
    • SBUX Starbucks stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 99.81 at https://stockconsultant.com/?SBUX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.