Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

JKLM

IB Tick Data ... is It Worth Anything ?

Recommended Posts

IB does not send tick data. The data it sends are 0.2 - 0.3 second snapshots. So they aggregate ticks in 0.2 - 0.3 second intervals and this is the greatest detail you can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

I understand that it may delayed 0.2-0.3 second ..but when I get new refresh do I get info what was happening between two refresh ( trader volume and ticks )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK

I understand that it may delayed 0.2-0.3 second ..but when I get new refresh do I get info what was happening between two refresh ( trader volume and ticks )

No. Sorry for not being clear enough. Actually you dont get tick data in 0.2-0.3 second snapshots, but you get 0.2-0.3 second bars (or candles or whatever).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. You actually get the last price and accurate or probable volume for that 0.2 seconds - there may be other prices during that period but they are not represented.

 

Thats why IB did the 5-second bars ... which do contain an accurate count of volume + a bar representing OHLC for the 5 seconds. But never a tick count that matches other tick counts.

 

Its not that its complete crap - just that if ticks happen more frequently that 0.1-0.2 seconds then the missing count is missing. It can still be very useful - its just not a count of all ticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your options are

 

1) use IB's .2 seconds snapshots you will find a size that has the same look and feel as the tick size that you are used too.

 

2) Use constant volume, time or range charts (different look and feel). Constant volume is likely to be closest to what you are used to and some would argue better for some purposes.

 

3) Use another data provider (Zen Fire, Esignal, DTNIQ) spring to mind.

 

 

Be aware that some exchanges will aggregate ticks certain circumstances. I'm pretty sure (from memory) Globex is one so essentially its impossible to get absolutely full tick data for instruments trading there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of the three mentioned above I would first go with DTN IQ data without opening another broker service. They just supply data for you and are usually pretty solid. Not sure about Zen or how they work. I would not recomend esignal anymore as I have had a lot of trouble with them in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Esignal is a headache. The data is never reliable and bad tick is a common occurrence. Clean data in my opinion is a must in trading. Ive used DTN in the past but never had a problem with them. Though I think this industry needs more data vendors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question of reliability is an interesting one though blowfish.

 

I use IB tick data to generate tick charts. I have for the last few years.

 

I know that backfill won't give it (because backfill is limited to 5 seconds per bar or 30 seconds per bar or whatever best granularity your chart package requests from IB).

 

But in real time my tick charts spread out fast action so that action I wouldn't see on a minute chart after a breakout becomes clear and tradable. So for me, the tick chart is reliable (I don't care that the maximum ticks per second is 10 because thats still 600 tick or 100 6 tick bars in 1 minute).

 

So, for my use, IB ticks are perfectly "reliable." The show slow progress during slow times but spread the action out for clearer signals during fast action.

 

Personally, if you draw channels and trendlines or other angled lines on charts I recommend that you do that with minute charts because tick and volume charts distort them depending on current speed of action. But, although thats a common view, its just one view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely! I really like the 'look and fee'l of IB's 'pseudo' ticks and find them 'reliable'. In a fast market I would far rather have a 200ms sample with timely information than a full tick feed lagging by x seconds.

 

I really don't believe its a big a deal as some people make out though I guess some black boxes or quantitative systems might function better with an un-aggregated feed. I guessed that was the point of your question about application. I really can't imagine too many that would be impaired using IB's data despite its compromises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK ..I understand that RT tick chart is diferent because IB 0.2 sec snapshot data

 

but when I request history tick chart from IB in MC ...what would I get ?

true tick chart as it should be, or something other ?

 

I am asking this because I am not sure... can I test anything on IB history tick charts and expect similar results when it goes live ?

 

in other words ...If I trade on IB tick data ....what data should I use for backtesting and building my system ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what history granularity you charting requests. 5 second is the finest and SierraChart only requests that when you are in a 1 hour or below situation. 30 second is used by SC for longer term backfill requests.

 

 

If you are backtesting a system based on ib tick data you need to use the same fill you will use live ... ie live.

 

But to be frank if you want to test based on tick data you had better pay the money and get a feed that provides you true tick data live and backfill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used DTN IQfeed for almost one year and have never experienced a problem with them. They have been very reliable, and their customer service has been very good.

 

Another one I've heard about, but have not tried is Open Tick. I understand they are not accepting any new customers right now, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just need to see how good is IB tick data

so if anyone have historical CL data ( year or two ) in ASCI format please post it here

 

thanks

Edited by JKLM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well personally, I wouldn't worry about IB data if your not on it already. Forget about the data and make your choice broker wise that way.

I think what gets lost in this is most people don't trade off 1 tick charts, most of what we do involves snapshots of ticks and throwing out data to make a usefull summary at much slower intervals than .2 seconds...

The real difference between IB and a real tick provider is probly nothing unless your doing some high frequency autotrader deal..

If you like their broker services then just go with them and if you really need tick precise data then add DTN into the mix. DTN is impossible to beat bang for the buck wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really depends on on what you are trading and what you want to do with your charts. On something like ES, having an aggregate tick count based on 0.2-0.3 second snapshots has little similarity to what's actually happening in the market. On a true tick data feed, the charts can turn a lot more quickly.

 

I have some indicator based strategies that I run on tick charts. I have other strategies that I run on 5-min candlestick charts. IB data is fine for the candlestick charts but is entirely unreliable for the tick strategies. I use a different broker for charting data.

 

As a risk control strategy, having a separate data feed for charting works out well. At least once a week, market data on one of my brokers will freeze. It's very convenient to have another vendor to inform you that the market is moving against your position.

 

Good trading,

 

Bam-Bam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On a true tick data feed, the charts can turn a lot more quickly.

 

Bam-Bam

 

I thought they only aggregated ticks at the same price? So in theory they should turn at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some confusion arising here about tick and historical data download from IB.

 

 

There are 3 different kind of quote data available form IB:

 

1. Tick data (realtime) is coming (as stated) in 0.2 to 0.3 sec intervals. It is mostly truly realtime but it can (rarely) be lagging max. a few seconds.

It comes as price (of trade) and volume information. If any trades at price levels away from the given price took place you will never know (this could happen only for very liquid instruments). Good thing is you never loose track of volume traded.

 

2. Historical data (to be downloaded). It can be ordered in various granularities (1 sec=minimum NOT 5 sec as was stated, 5 sec, 10 sec ... 1 day). The data comes as: Open, High, Low, Close, Volume (OHLC).

In one data request you can get (depending on interval chosen) about 2000 data points (33.3 minutes if 1 sec interval chosen).

Data download is throttled: If you make several data requests, you can only have one data request every 11 secs or so. That makes downloading of 1 sec data of a longer time interval pretty slow.

 

3. Realtime Bars (realtime at 5 sec intervals, OHLC bars). Currently it is only possible to get 5 sec realtime bars. Data comes (as with historicals) as Open, High, Low, Close, Volume.

The advantage over tick data is that you can be sure that you will see if a new High or Low has been made.

Tick data and Realtime bars from one symbol can be ordered in parallel.

 

 

Main question is in what kind of program you want to use the data.

If you want to make your own program, IB will be fine.

 

I am not aware of any commercially available program that could use all the possibilities that the different IB data formats give you.

 

Program to download data from IB in text form:

http://home.cidadevirtual.pt/jtwsdump/

(I am not the programmer and do not use it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.