Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Yacob Hassan

How Much You Risk Your Account Per Week?

Recommended Posts

Some times I use risk more than 30% while trading. In that type of situation I will be in fear until I get some good return from it. But taking risk in trading is important to get some good profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My trading philosophy is very simple. I risk money that I can afford to lose and usually I will only risk 50% of that sum and not the whole sum at one go.

 

You'll risk 50% of your capital on 1 trade? Wow.

 

That's some serious risk or faith in your system.

 

:\

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My trading philosophy is very simple. I risk money that I can afford to lose and usually I will only risk 50% of that sum and not the whole sum at one go.

 

Only 50%? I usually go at least 80% on a trade. I mean, c'mon thats how you make the big bucks. Just hopefully that first trade or two is not a loser, than you screwed.

 

You'd be better off going here:

zt911w.jpg

 

At least there, they will give you free drink and you'll be surronded by pretty woman before they take your money.

 

Risking that much is a recipe for disaster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woah 50%?! Geeze. 30% is quite a bit too. vinodg, you're referring to a given week and not a single trade right? As for me I treat each day individually so I don't have a set number for the week. My theory is this: The market doesn't care if i just lost a certain percentage of my account, so unless it's for psychological recuperation or reassessing my system's reliability, I wouldn't see a point in halting my for the remainder of the week simply because I'm down. But that's just me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He didnt say that he risks 50% of his capital. He said he risks 50% of a sum he can afford to lose. What he can afford to lose might mean his entire trading capital or it might mean $100, if "afford" means to afford emotionally, i.e. which sum can he afford to lose so he can handle it emotionally without difficulties.

I guess that when deciding how much to risk one must consider both aspects: statistical and psychological. Statistical aspect tells him that he needs to risk only that much so he preserves enough capital to stay in the game. Psychological aspect tells him to risk only that much so he can handle the drawdown emotionally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He didnt say that he risks 50% of his capital. He said he risks 50% of a sum he can afford to lose. What he can afford to lose might mean his entire trading capital or it might mean $100, if "afford" means to afford emotionally, i.e. which sum can he afford to lose so he can handle it emotionally without difficulties.

I guess that when deciding how much to risk one must consider both aspects: statistical and psychological. Statistical aspect tells him that he needs to risk only that much so he preserves enough capital to stay in the game. Psychological aspect tells him to risk only that much so he can handle the drawdown emotionally.

 

Fair enough, he will loose that sum at some stage :)

 

The way to set your psychological limit is by knowing your ror and using that to make your judgement other wise you are just guessing. Guessing is OK if you guess conservatively. Low % methods with high R:R have higher RoR as you might expect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even with good money management, it can be stressful taking multiple 1-2% drawdowns. 50% is suicide for most, but I know some people who did 100% and it did pay...but they are the exception, most end up blowing out if they play like that.

 

I believe that would be called luck, unless those people had systems with a 100% winrate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5% at max in a week

 

Hey maildigger...I'm just starting out and my plan is 0.5% per trade, no more than 2% for the day and 5% for the week, and 10% for the month.

 

Does that sound good to you?:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey maildigger...I'm just starting out and my plan is 0.5% per trade, no more than 2% for the day and 5% for the week, and 10% for the month.

 

Does that sound good to you?:)

 

Ok, you didn't ask me, but I have a question... Are you developing a plan for you, or for maildigger? If for you, why does it matter if it sounds good to someone else? Shouldn't your plan be one you are comfortable with?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest ivanbaj
Hey maildigger...I'm just starting out and my plan is 0.5% per trade, no more than 2% for the day and 5% for the week, and 10% for the month.

 

Does that sound good to you?:)

 

Sounds good. But in the beginning it will probably mean that you will loose "0.5% per trade, 2% per day and 5% per week, and 10% per month" at least. Make sure you can take that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sounds good. But in the beginning it will probably mean that you will loose "0.5% per trade, 2% per day and 5% per week, and 10% per month" at least. Make sure you can take that.

 

:o I hear ya............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, you didn't ask me, but I have a question... Are you developing a plan for you, or for maildigger? If for you, why does it matter if it sounds good to someone else? Shouldn't your plan be one you are comfortable with?

 

Hi...I'm just starting out and hoped to get some advice from experienced traders on this board. I know what you're saying, but as far as money management goes, I think there are some "cardinal rules" that successful traders all have in common. Hope that answers your question. Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi...I'm just starting out and hoped to get some advice from experienced traders on this board. I know what you're saying, but as far as money management goes, I think there are some "cardinal rules" that successful traders all have in common. Hope that answers your question. Cheers

 

Yes, the cardinal rule of successful traders are that they do what fits them and their system/methodology and not what fits another person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, the cardinal rule of successful traders are that they do what fits them and their system/methodology and not what fits another person.

 

Hi...Yes, I realize that all traders have different "system/methodologies" that fit their personality. But, I think that all successful traders have similar money management strategies. This is what I'm getting at, not to copy someone's entry or exit method.

 

For example the 2% rule. I believe successful traders follow this rule religiously. Most probably risk even less than 2% on a trade.

 

If your saying it's perfectly fine to risk 25% on trade, if that's the way you want to do it, I'm afraid I'll have to disagree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi...Yes, I realize that all traders have different "system/methodologies" that fit their personality. But, I think that all successful traders have similar money management strategies. This is what I'm getting at, not to copy someone's entry or exit method.

 

For example the 2% rule. I believe successful traders follow this rule religiously. Most probably risk even less than 2% on a trade.

 

If your saying it's perfectly fine to risk 25% on trade, if that's the way you want to do it, I'm afraid I'll have to disagree.

 

I don't recall saying 25% is fine, although I cannot see how you can disagree with the position sizing method of another person without knowing anything about his method or risk tolerance. If someone has a screen and ranking based method that buy the 4 best stocks every week in 4 equal amounts then in effect he is risking 25% on each trade.

 

Anyway, if you believe that one size fits all regardless of the strategy used and this works for you, then continue to do so and don't change. In the end you are responsible and not other people, so you have to do what you believe to be correct. One last thing... remember that asking for advise doesn't help much if you only want to hear answers confirming what you have already decided the answer to be.

 

Best of luck in your trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One last thing... remember that asking for advise doesn't help much if you only want to hear answers confirming what you have already decided the answer to be.

 

 

 

Hi...somehow this discussion has gotten off track!...:o

 

The question was how much should a trader risk for the week, and I think 5% was a good suggestion from maildigger, and you didn't agree. So, we'll just leave her at that, alright. :roll eyes: Cheers bro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi...somehow this discussion has gotten off track!...:o

 

The question was how much should a trader risk for the week, and I think 5% was a good suggestion from maildigger, and you didn't agree. So, we'll just leave her at that, alright. :roll eyes: Cheers bro

 

Unfortunately, you are completely missing the point. Oh well...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.