Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Damn I've been rumbled :\ though currently prefer Lord of the Rings Online.

 

I guess I should add something imformative (though I am afraid it is rather negative). Be a little wary of forex yeah it's hugely liquid but most retail 'traders' don't have access to that liquidity. 99/100 'brokers' are actually bookies they are your counter party. Also the volume information is not actual volume it is limit order book changes that are reported. It's decentralised and pretty unregulated. having said that I have traded spot FX both with a 'bookie' and with a proper broker. I am just suggesting there are a lot more things to consider with spot FX than a centralised well regulated market. There is lots more I could say on the subject but better you do your own due diligence.

 

Sorry for the digression I think its important.....back to your normal programming.

 

I've always been more than a little suspicious of the FX market. If the "brokers" are your counter party, isn't this the same as the old-time bucket shops?

 

Not actually buying or selling in the market, but making a bet on direction that the broker takes the other side of or matches with a bet on the opposite direction (less the few pip spread, of course)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've always been more than a little suspicious of the FX market. If the "brokers" are your counter party, isn't this the same as the old-time bucket shops?

 

Not actually buying or selling in the market, but making a bet on direction that the broker takes the other side of or matches with a bet on the opposite direction (less the few pip spread, of course)?

 

I don't want to derail this thread DB quite rightly likes to keep things on track here. In a nutshell yes with a couple of notable exceptions (MBT & IB since you ask, maybe 1 or 2 others)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Opening a MBTrading Forex account is a good way for newbies to go:

The advantages being:

(1) Flexible hours and no need to quit your day job.

(2) MBTrading allows you to trade mini-lot which is $10,000 or one tenth of a full size lot. Where as in e-mini index futures, a single contract controls about $70,000. That is way too much leverage for beginners, I think many would agree with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah MBT have a good rep right back to there stock days...just be aware as banks tend to work in 100k units small orders are matched differently. You either need other MBT customers as counter parties or enough same side mini lots to make a full unit of the currency to trade with an institutional counter party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blowfish,

is forex traded via a DOM with MBT

 

From what you say it would be better to trade currency futures on CME a regulated market and where volume would reflect actual contracts. would it not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm not sure what the topic is. Originally, it had to do with volume. Since FX doesn't have volume, the detour into FX appears to be off topic. So maybe it's a new topic. It seems that the current discussion would better take place elsewhere since those who follow this forum aren't going to have much interest in it (flojomojo tried, but couldn't get anybody to participate). Perhaps someplace in the FX Forum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone,

 

I am starting a thread where I will be posting real-time trades using the Wyckoff method.

 

I have a daily newsletter that I send to paid subscribers. But, I want to do a real-time trading exercise so that potential new subscribers will be able to judge for himself/herself whether the NL is worthwhile. This NL I post here will be the abbreviated version of the NL but will include all real-time trade ideas.

 

I do trade professionally but I am not a registered investment advisor and all recommendations presented here are for educational purposes only.

 

I hope everyone enjoys the posts,

Rollotape

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

My money management rules for the $50,000 portfolio will be as follows:

 

Establish 4 positions with $12,500 allocated to each. This rule is flexible based on market conditions and risk parameters per trade. In a rip-roaring bull market, this portfolio will go on margin allocating as much as $25,000 per position.

 

The portfolio will risk no more than 2.5% of the capital per trade ($1,250) and will risk no more than 10% of the capital on all positions.

 

The objective of the portfolio is to take trades that offer at least a 2:1 but preferrably a 3:1 or higher risk:reward ratio as Wyckoff suggests based on PnF counts.

 

I believe I covered it all.

 

Rollotape

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am starting a thread where I will be posting real-time trades using the Wyckoff method.

 

If you want to post real-time trades, I suggest the chat-room is a better place to do so. Later, or at the end of the day, you can then explain your reasoning approach and include some charts of the setup.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello firewalker,

 

Thanks for the suggestion but I think I will stick with this format. The posts will be time stamped and people will have the opportunity to review the trades if they want anytime in the future.

 

Best of trading to you,

Rollotape

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
. The posts will be time stamped and people will have the opportunity to review the trades if they want anytime in the future.

Rollotape

 

Look forward to that, presume it will be on this thread,

are you trading index futures intraday or stock futures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Look forward to that, presume it will be on this thread,

are you trading index futures intraday or stock futures.

 

 

Hello Hakuna,

 

I will be trading ETFs and individual stocks.

 

Yes, the trades will be posted here.

 

Rollotape

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should also post your daily blotter here so we can see how you capitalize on your calls.

 

;)

 

Hello brownsfan019,

 

I don't think you will be disappointed. I will be keeping a updated portfolio and posting it to this thread as trades are made. Everyone will be able to see, without confusion, how much this portfolio is making/losing.

 

Rollotape

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello brownsfan019,

 

I don't think you will be disappointed. I will be keeping a updated portfolio and posting it to this thread as trades are made. Everyone will be able to see, without confusion, how much this portfolio is making/losing.

 

Rollotape

 

Right, but my point was to show some proof that you personally make money at what you do.

 

So, join us in the P/L thread or post your blotters here so we can see the actual trades in an actual account being made.

 

PS

no trades today???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Dbphoenix and all,

 

The 2 attached SnP daily and SPY hourly charts show the Wyckoff behind the trade.

 

The trades in this portfolio will basically be springs and tests of springs in a smaller timeframe chart with the uptrend and/or at important support on a larger timeframe chart and be upthrusts and tests of upthrusts in a smaller timeframce chart with the downtrend and/or at important resistance on a larger timeframe chart. My favorite trades are a smaller timeframe spring or test of spring when the larger timeframe chart is backing up to creek after a strong potential jump across the creek or a smaller timeframe upthrust or test of upthrust when the larger timeframe chart is rallying to ice after a strong potential break under ice.

 

My rules based on the Wyckoff method are really simple.

 

I will send the portfolio summary this weekend which so far only has 1 trade in it but there will be many more.

 

Rollotape

SnPdaily050109.thumb.jpg.b24ff16c3f489fc2df00576895fb5c7a.jpg

SPYhourly050109.thumb.jpg.e92edfd65c811b6fc6989690d33ce4f1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rollotape,

 

Nice analysis. It's good to see Bob Evans's 'One-Eyed Joe,' too. There are a lot of elements favoring the short side in your charts, which you describe well. I think you have a few other things going for you in this trade:

 

The figure chart (short-term, 10-point) indicates that the uptrend since the March lows has run out of cause. There was a count across the 750 line and a Stepping Stone count along 780 that targeted the present levels of the ES.

 

There has been a shortening of the thrust since late in March. Wyckoff was keen on following the trend, but was always looking for a change in trend when the waves in the direction of the trend shortened in time and length and/or the counter trend waves lengthened, and this has been happening. As it has been happening, up waves draw less and less demand (volume).

 

The SDS is in a potential spring position.

 

Even though the market rallied into the close today (SPYs) it was a light, No Demand rally.

 

The trade may not work out, but there is more than enough of a Wyckoff Story to go long SDS/short SPY. The main risk as I see it is that the market holds gains here and goes sidesways a couple of days in an effort to absorb supply at these levels before making a run towards 95. Again, nice to see a Wyckoff analysis like this.

 

Eiger

5aa70ecb0ac2f_PFES10-pt5-1-09.thumb.png.bbe98c8b3fc8d3501087507158ecd6f1.png

5aa70ecb1560d_SOT5-1-09.thumb.png.deb096516081dd98cded164d40bcf082.png

5aa70ecb1db3f_SDSSpring5-1-09.thumb.png.2273e9cb8756655f41bc276eda256500.png

5aa70ecb25c8d_SPYNoDemand5-1-09.thumb.png.5bc6fd782d35fa914ce7ff6124fd4d54.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The trades in this portfolio will basically be springs and tests of springs in a smaller timeframe chart with the uptrend and/or at important support on a larger timeframe chart and be upthrusts and tests of upthrusts in a smaller timeframce chart with the downtrend and/or at important resistance on a larger timeframe chart. My favorite trades are a smaller timeframe spring or test of spring when the larger timeframe chart is backing up to creek after a strong potential jump across the creek or a smaller timeframe upthrust or test of upthrust when the larger timeframe chart is rallying to ice after a strong potential break under ice.

 

My rules based on the Wyckoff method are really simple.

 

Thank you for the elaboration and clarification. As you note on your first chart, however, most of your analysis is based on Bob Evans and not Wyckoff (there are no springs, creeks, ice and so forth in Wyckoff's course). While some members may find Evans' adaptations useful, they are not consistent with the content of the Wyckoff Forum as a whole, focusing as it does on Wyckoff's original course.

 

In order to avoid confusion, therefore, I've retitled the thread. This will enable those who are interested in discussing Evans to do so without getting into unnecessary debates about what is or is not Wyckoff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My rules based on the Wyckoff method are really simple.

 

Rollotape

 

I admit I'm not familiar with Bob Evans' adaptation of the Wyckoff method, but from what I've read in the last couple of posts, it seems this 'version' has a lot in common with VSA.

 

I've seen comments about "an hourly bar that closes poorly on wide spread", references to a "no demand bar", and talk about an upthrust. All this sounds to be like focusing on single bars, which, again if I understood Wyckoff correctly, is somewhat different than focusing on the buying & selling waves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • INTC Intel stock settling at 24.25 double support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?INTC
    • CORZ Core Scientific stock, strong close, watch for a top of range breakout above 18.32 at https://stockconsultant.com/?CORZ
    • BMBL Bumble stock nice start off the 7.94 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?BMBL
    • Date: 22nd November 2024.   BTC flirts with $100K, Stocks higher, Eurozone PMI signals recession risk.   Asia & European Sessions:   Geopolitical risks are back in the spotlight on fears of escalation in the Ukraine-Russia after Russia reportedly used a new ICBM to retaliate against Ukraine’s use of US and UK made missiles to attack inside Russia. The markets continue to assess the election results as President-elect Trump fills in his cabinet choices, with the key Treasury Secretary spot still open. The Fed’s rate path continues to be debated with a -25 bp December cut seen as 50-50. Earnings season is coming to an end after mixed reports, though AI remains a major driver. Profit taking and rebalancing into year-end are adding to gyrations too. Wall Street rallied, led by the Dow’s 1.06% broadbased pop. The S&P500 advanced 0.53% and the NASDAQ inched up 0.03%. Asian stocks rose after  Nvidia’s rally. Nikkei added 1% to 38,415.32 after the Tokyo inflation data slowed to 2.3% in October from 2.5% in the prior month, reaching its lowest level since January. The rally was also supported by chip-related stocks tracked Nvidia. Overnight-indexed swaps indicate that it’s certain the Reserve Bank of New Zealand will cut its policy rate by 50 basis points on Nov. 27, with a 22% chance of a 75 basis points reduction. European stocks futures climbed even though German Q3 GDP growth revised down to 0.1% q/q from the 0.2% q/q reported initially. Cryptocurrency market has gained approximately $1 trillion since Trump’s victory in the Nov. 5 election. Recent announcement for the SEC boosted cryptos. Chair Gary Gensler will step down on January 20, the day Trump is set to be inaugurated. Gensler has pushed for more protections for crypto investors. MicroStrategy Inc.’s plans to accelerate purchases of the token, and the debut of options on US Bitcoin ETFs also support this rally. Trump’s transition team has begun discussions on the possibility of creating a new White House position focused on digital asset policy.     Financial Markets Performance: The US Dollar recovered overnight and closed at 107.00. Bitcoin currently at 99,300,  flirting with a run toward the 100,000 level. The EURUSD drifts below 1.05, the GBPUSD dips to June’s bottom at 1.2570, while USDJPY rebounded to 154.94. The AUDNZD spiked to 2-year highs amid speculation the RBNZ will cut the official cash rate by more than 50 bps next week. Oil surged 2.12% to $70.46. Gold spiked to 2,697 after escalation alerts between Russia and Ukraine. Heightened geopolitical tensions drove investors toward safe-haven assets. Gold has surged by 30% this year. Haven demand balanced out the pressure from a strong USD following mixed US labor data. Silver rose 0.9% to 31.38, while palladium increased by 0.9% to 1,040.85 per ounce. Platinum remained unchanged. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news. Andria Pichidi HFMarkets Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in FX and CFDs products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.