Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

A question on the dt today and dt's/db's in general.

Do you consider a dt still valid if price exceeds it by a tick or 2?

 

I guess more important than that (in a fast market price might overshoot by more than 2 ticks) is the behavior and by that I mean the way the rejection occurs, if for example the rally stalls and collapses it tells you something about buying interest not being there anymore (nobody else wants it so why would you? ) I could be wrong though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Db, what kept you from taking a long at the HL at 9:48 /49 (dep on datafeed), I just finished replaying the day and couldn't find a reason not to take it, so I was wondering.

 

By that time, we had begun moving sideways. The first effort to exit this failed immediately. Therefore I decided to wait until price had decisively left this consolidation one way or the other before making a commitment. I didn't care about a few points.

 

Yep, now I can see that. Posted the chart so that others who are reading might comment on this.

5aa7121be13c3_NQ06-14(5Tick)28_04_2014.jpg.2844dabfac90423233a1c53fd265d211.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been doing some rough data analysis on night session versus day session. I've included the excel file if anyone is curious. There is raw data for the overnight session and day session going back to April 1st 2010. I didn't exclude holiday's but if someone wants that level of detail they are free to do so.

 

So what is the point of all this? I wanted to see how often the overnight high or low is broken. It turns out that this occurs 96% of the time. Even more interesting is that when the high or low is broken 71% of the time the other extreme is not broken. I have over 1000 days as my sample set so this number is historically accurate. This got me interested in the distribution of ranges where neither end was broken. Surprisingly when this occurs it's most often with ranges of 20 points or less.

 

I also did some distribution work on overnight and day ranges which just give a better sense of what sort or ranges normally occur. I made the excel file for myself so if you can't understand any part of it feel free to ask me - it's not pretty.

NQmasterDATA.xlsx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This appears to be pertinent and may be helpful:

 

I am sick of hearing people say that 90% of traders lose because the market chews them up or the system doesn't work or whatever. That is just BS. The problem is those traders spend all their time playing with indicator values or analyzing timeframes or whatever and they miss the whole point of what they are doing here. This is a MARKET.

 

All markets have buyers and sellers. I don't know why everyone can be experts on value when they look at items in a store or a piece of real estate or whatever but not in the market. If you wanted to sell your house for 500k and you had nobody even look at it in a booming market what would that tell you? The price was too high. Would you then raise the price of the house the next day? Of course not, you drop your offer if you wanted to sell it. You see what I mean? Markets make sense when we are talking about real estate or whatever, but people just blindly look at indicators and follow systems even in the face of obvious current price information.

 

Example: in the last 5 minutes price has had a high failure at 1350 three times and is currently trading at 1348. Do you take a long setup here because a momentum indicator is above zero and the 9 day moving average just crossed over and above the 20 day? Why not, don't we always have to stick to our trading plan blah, blah, blah? That is a great example of how traders follow systems to the letter and then scratch their heads because they can't figure out why they are losing. Into the 90% pile they go. This isn't a ridiculous example either. This scenario repeats itself about once every 10 minutes on most days in any market.

 

Anon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SLA brought along with scratching and realizing I didn't have to lose. That changed everything.

 

AMT was in the wings and I thought would take me from knowing 'not having to lose' to being able to win.

 

AMT taught me something that changed everything, as much or more so than learning I didn't have lose, but it wasn't how to win.

 

AMT required prep work. Once the prep work became kind of consistent, the thing that changed everything was not winning, it was trusting. ...an EQ thing, not so much an IQ thing.

 

I realized I trusted the market. You have been around longer Db and may have heard someone say that before, but actually trusting the market was a foreign concept to me.

 

Then I realized what learning to scratch had done was teach trusting my self in the market. AMT took me further to a place of trusting the market it's self.

 

With the two together, fear doesn't have much room.

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For today. Given that we bounced off the LL and have passed through the mean, the next stop is most likely the UL.

 

0910: Traders are unable to find trades above the same level as yesterday.

 

1100: Only two trades by 1100, both scratches. Not unexpected given where we are.

Image1.png.c5e7418fa91faa937d0fe9b5b3afe183.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For today. Given that we bounced off the LL and have passed through the mean, the next stop is most likely the UL.

 

0910: Traders are unable to find trades above the same level as yesterday.

 

1100: Only two trades by 1100, both scratches. Not unexpected given where we are.

Image1.png.856f753fc703044cdd48a512344399c5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I

TRIED

to post that as several posts, so my posts wouldn't have to keep going thru the moderators.

 

But I'm afraid Db scrunched them altogether.... don't know if will sigh or laugh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What else can I say, thank you Db, SLAAMTZEN, saved my day.

 

Fantastic trading Niko, especially on those scratches!

 

I have been reading through all the old material and I have enjoyed seeing you progress in your trading over the various threads. If I may, I would say that you have gone from "timid" or "fearful" trading to solid, plan-backed trading with confidence. It's a truly remarkable journey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am trying to understand this morning in the context of fear, this is the best I can come up with so far. Sort of trying to see what "they" fear, so I can use it objectively during RT trading.

 

Any comments will be highly appreciated.

 

I doubt that fear enters into it at all, except perhaps in the case of the itty-bitty retail trader who has no plan and doesn't know what's going on. Everybody else is just looking for trades. They don't care where they find them, up, down, whatever. Makes no difference to them. Not much different than a migrant farm worker.

 

They'll let you know when they've found them. If you're paying attention, you can have some too.

5aa7121d92340_NQ06-14(1Min)29_04_2014dynafear.jpg.ce5131315b53d9cf798bf79da4552a94.jpg

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I doubt that fear enters into it at all, except perhaps in the case of the itty-bitty retail trader who has no plan and doesn't know what's going on. Everybody else is just looking for trades. They don't care where they find them, up, down, whatever. Makes no difference to them. Not much different than a migrant farm worker.

 

They'll let you know when they've found them. If you're paying attention, you can have some too.

 

Ok thanks, I am trying to understand the behavior behind the rapid fall after the failure to break the premarket high.

 

So, not thinking in terms of fear but of "acute business sense" it just made no sense to keep holding after buyers failed to pay above the PMH, and the right thing to do was to dump the contracts and take a short.

 

If you were to look at a tick chart, I suspect you'd see a lot of gapping. Even though price movement is continuous, it need not be contiguous.

 

Thanks

Edited by Niko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's very little difference between this morning's chart and yesterday's, though the market is providing a good example of the difference between the median and the mean.

 

Usually these two align, more or less, but the median of the trend channel, at about 30, is below the level where traders have decided to set up camp, 20pts higher at about 50. Therefore, the "middle" of the trend channel will not necessarily provide fireworks if and when price declines to that point. What will be more important this morning is how traders behave around 50.

 

The upper limit as of this morning is around 90, so one would be well-advised to let traders work all this out and wait for a test of 90 or thereabouts rather than get entangled in the trading activity around the "mean" at 50.

Image1a.png.73f44448d1e44e41d77958fa02a2dd18.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's very little difference between this morning's chart and yesterday's, though the market is providing a good example of the difference between the median and the mean.

 

Usually these two align, more or less, but the median of the trend channel, at about 30, is below the level where traders have decided to set up camp, 20pts higher at about 50. Therefore, the "middle" of the trend channel will not necessarily provide fireworks if and when price declines to that point. What will be more important this morning is how traders behave around 50.

 

The upper limit as of this morning is around 90, so one would be well-advised to let traders work all this out and wait for a test of 90 or thereabouts rather than get entangled in the trading activity around the "mean" at 50.

 

For those who prefer to cut to the chase, the charts I've posted to this thread along with subsequent charts may be found here, without discussion.

Image1a.png.a4f52ac57247a8fd9087a3220ec61f5c.png

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.