Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

If I can I would add Dr. Gary Dayton to this list of go to guys for learning. He studied with David Weiss who himself has a new book coming out this fall. He was one of the authors of Charting the Market the Wyckoff Way.

 

Of course the original course is still being offered at The Stock Market Institute. You can find the tape reading course out of scrib if you look.

But the best bang for the buck and one of the best teachers I have come across Gary Dayton he is very good. He also is a Duke trained psychologist and spent alot of time in the sports Psychology field. . He teaches that as well and that has really changed my trading.

By the way I have never recommended anyone to anybody.

If you tell him Bryant told you about him he may send me a nice email but nothing else. I promise. I just really would like to see everybody do well. He does have some free webinars posted on his site and just did one for SFO mag which is up as well.

 

I would agree with the comments re Gary. I have done a couple of his courses and he teaches very well and talks a great deal of sense. Has helped me. Not sure about the psychological side as I have not looked into that, but he talks sense. And he doesn't know me from Adam so no kick backs here either :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just thought I'd comment on one chart. SUV could be a long setting up. At weekly support and momentum has been shifting to more bullish. I've attached a chart with some comments. Just my opinion.

 

David

suv_daily.thumb.jpg.205967aca0975ffecae5274d51914142.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi drushi

 

 

yea my setup wasent the best to take a trade off..

 

but we need to see demand comin in to change a bear market into a bull market..

and the raection after the climactic action is weak .. please check weekly chart i comented on..

 

 

cheerz

SVUweekly.thumb.png.a040e7964cd4c2f80d3590d2f171092e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest zaq2010
I've been told by Flojo that the original course is available from the Library of Congress (it was never put into book form, as was common back then with regard to courses, which is why so many of them are lost to us).

 

The basics of the basics are provided here in the stickies. Section 1M, the Introduction, is skipped, as are Section 4M, Volume Studies, and Section 6M, Chart Studies. Section 7M, to which you referred, acts as a sort of summary of what's been addressed up to that point in the course. Therefore, regardless of what you decide to do with regard to the entire course, I suggest you read and reread and rereread the first three stickies to become at least acquainted with the underlying concepts, then study the fourth, the analysis of 1930-31, which acts as an illustration through application. The entire course has been uploaded here.

 

A great deal of what has been written about Wyckoff, particularly during the resurgence of interest in the "classics" over the past decade or so, is at best inaccurate and at worst blatantly untrue. Many traders will tell you, for example, that they are "Wyckoff traders" simply because they've decided to incorporate "volume" into their trading, and that by doing so they are employing the "Wyckoff Method". Volume, however, as you will learn, is only a part of the approach and isn't even necessary to applying it. You will also come across a wide range of approaches that claim to be "based on Wyckoff". However, since nearly all of what's been written with regard to technical analysis over the past hundred years is based on either Wyckoff or Schabacker, this claim doesn't mean a great deal. If you want to know what is legitimately Wyckoff, it makes sense for you to study Wyckoff himself, not what I nor anybody else says about him. In this way, you can build a conceptual framework for trading and investing that is uniquely yours.

 

Many Thanks DbPhoenix !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

does anybody know where DBphoenix has been? Haven't heard from him in a while.

 

Cheers :thumbs up:

 

Quinn

 

 

either he made a killing in 2008,

or 2008 killed him.

it happened to many people

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pryme: This is my 1st post. I have been doing a lot of reading in the Wyckoff and VSA forums. I'm working hard to understand the concepts. Db has done a great job of teaching and mentoring. As far as SUV is concerned, your analysis appears solid. The recent move up is not being supported by volume and it appears supply is in the market.

 

I am using Daily and Weekly charts and am glad to see this thread where some daily charts are posted and discussed. Almost all posts are intraday.

 

I appreciate your post and will follow this stock to see what I can learn from it.

 

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heya Don

 

 

sorry for taking so long to respond .. iam busy atm..

 

 

yea mate .. vsa and wyckoff is the shiznit ;) keep reading all material available

and practice ,practice ,practice-- ;)

 

 

about SVU

 

 

Picture is an update

svuU3.thumb.png.fd5c7942c6f569832b0088d2f34da106.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Pryme for getting back on this. I have been reading and studying and keeping up with SVU. I have made some comments on the chart you attached. If you (or anyone else) don't mind, please take a look and let me know your thoughts.

 

Don

5aa71055a580d_TLSVU.thumb.png.663d38822a5ba609d3cba75ae28eeb78.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you Pryme for getting back on this. I have been reading and studying and keeping up with SVU. I have made some comments on the chart you attached. If you (or anyone else) don't mind, please take a look and let me know your thoughts.

 

Don

 

 

Hi Don

 

well the climactic action we saw could also mean that locked in Traders who where short

SVU , wanted to get out ab Breakeven.. so they added to demand .. wich caused the two bar

climactic action..

but nevertheless we didnt see signs of strenght after the climactic action , aka the market made no real progress .. and the small spread down bar .. closing in the middle on low volume .. and the close is even near the previous up bar .. shows that there is no real buying power present...

 

 

you wrote

 

that if the 2nd bar (of the climactic action) is an bar on high volume closing on its highs

would suggest supply is present .

 

but thats not correct .. supply is present if the bar closes off the highs .. aka supply swaming demand..

 

or we know if the high volume conatined more selling when the next bar would be a down bar ..

 

a test bar on low volume would be a bar .. wich dips into an area where previoulsy was high volume and supply present ..

 

we have to read the whole story and in this case .. the bar u tagged as a test?? ;)

 

is actually no real test bar .. as the bar is rather small spread .. closing in the middle...

so its actually telling em that there was literraly no trading going on .. neither up nor down.. but in context . as we have ssen a climactic action kinda .. and we see no further progress .. or real signs of tests.. this bar shows me that the market wich is weak.. is still a weak one.. and the SM is not participating in an upmove....

 

 

as u can see on SVU today .. it dropped on high volume like a stone...

 

remeber one bar on its own doesent turn a market.. its just a word in a big book.. we have to read the whole book .. to interpret or understand its meaning.. ;)

 

take care

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear all Brothers and Sisters!

 

I really love VSA and try to learn but I still confuse so many problem. One of my problem which I am not clear is support/resistance and trendline. Look a simple subject but so important in Wyckoff method.

 

Please brother and sisters give me a hand to make me clear some problem about trendline (trendline follow VSA method) as below:

 

1/ what is trendline

2/ how many type of trendline

3/ how to draw a trendline. This one is so important. If we draw a wrong trendline, our analysis will be wrong.

 

Many many thanks for your helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since your question seems to be related rather to VSA than to Wyckoff how he is understood in the Wyckoff forum, I suggest you post your question into the VSA forum.

 

Thanks for your suggestion, I will post these question into VSA forum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

does anybody know where DBphoenix has been? Haven't heard from him in a while.

 

Cheers :thumbs up:

 

Quinn

 

I don't want to put words in his mouth, but the impression I got was that between his contributions on this board/chatroom, his ebook, and finally the link he posted to the rare original Wyckoff course (public domain), he felt he didn't have much more he could contribute. I've learned alot from him and my thanks go out to him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

I would like to buy his book. I saw it mentioned few times in threads but all links are dead. Please give me live link to his ebook or leave his contact email.

 

Thank you.

 

you don't need to pay money for his book.

 

he has posted some of the chapters as previews (do a search and you will find it),

some of the materials are in his posts inside these threads:

 

 

Support and Resistance

Support and Resistance in a Volatile Market

 

Using Daily Support/Resistance for Intraday Trading

What is Support and Resistance?

 

Support and Resistance: Trading in Foresight

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DBCooper come out! :)

 

DBP is (was) the best forum poster I have ever seen - even though we clashed more than once and I never liked his dam attitude about trading ‘syschology’. I would like to see him back.

I doubt something outrageous would draw him out. Let’s try something milder: FX traders can trade via pure price action that follows (sans volume data and work) his same SR ‘points’ (my word not his). It’s not nearly as effective as with the Wychoff like volume work. but can be implemented via ‘breakouts’ from those areas with minimum risks and essentially same profit targets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been studying a lot about Wyckoff, watching Todd Krueger’s VSA seminars, and reading “Master the Markets”. Pretty much anything I can get my hands on. I feel much more confident in knowing when a rally is weakening and thus choosing a time to get out of a stock.

 

However, I would really appreciate someone talking me through what they see on the 2 attached charts. These charts show a price accelerating strongly from a very tight range.

 

My thoughts get a bit muddled here. Let me look at the first chart of SOLO. There is a high velocity and ultra high volume bar on the breakout. The volumes shown are confusing me because they were transacting the full amount of the companies issued shares near the billion mark. There was a LOT of interest in this share when it went up. I therefore assumed that the first up bar could be viewed as a “BUYING CLIMAX” in itself because everyone wanted to pile in and that I should be looking for further signs of weakness.

 

The next bar is on even higher volume and closes in the middle. Is this a sort of half UPTHRUST, half further BUYING CLIMAX? It definitely shows more selling is present because it closed off the highs. This shows the same pattern as seen in the next attached chart of SAR, but the second bar there was a definite UPTHRUST, and we would have been wise to get out at that point. However, these large volume mid close bars confuse me. What should I be interpreting/looking for exit wise when I see that?

 

In SOLO, I didn’t get out on that 2nd bar, but waited and noticed the 3rd and 4th down bars were on low volume, followed soon after with more up bars, one of which was a definite UPTHRUST. I took this to mean that with a second rejection of higher prices that it was not going to be rising any time soon. I got out. The presence of NO DEMAND bars after that gave me confidence in my decision. However, the falling on low volume on the 3rd and 4th bar still has me wondering if I was right?

 

What would everyone here deduce from the two charts?

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

 

P.S. My trading style is not to hold on to a stock for huge rallies over many months. I get out after an immediate rally ends, be it after a few days or a few weeks. I may buy in after it has settled down for the next leg up.

sar.jpg.4fbcbba11769ec2244cc6eb4c8ac6965.jpg

solo.jpg.76eb7ebe8844e0100cc3112a47fbc2ce.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could the 5th bar UPTHRUST on SOLO actually be absorption by smart money? Given the resistance at 1.8p on bar two, could the return to this level on bar five be people selling to get back to break even, which the smart money then mops up with buying? Therefore not a bad upthrust? I realise this is only occurring within a short space of time, but given the price swings it could be possible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest afuturestrader

I have two versions of "The Richard D. Wyckoff Method of Trading and Investing in Stocks". The first is copyrighted in 1931 by "Richard D Wyckoff". I received this version from SMI in Arizona.

 

The second version has a copyright of 1937 by "Wyckoff Associates, Inc.". This version is available in this forum.

 

Does anyone know why the 1937 version was created? There are notable differences in content and sequence.

 

Why do most Wyckoff authorities quote from the 1937 and not the 1931 version? Wyckoff died in 1934.

 

DB himself, in this forum, cites the 1937 version as original Wyckoff. But how can material copyrighted after his death be original?

 

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am studying about "Richard D. Wyckoff Course in Stock Market Science and Technique" It is a great course but the chart example in this course is quite blear ( not clear). or example: I can not know background before example chart, i can not know the result later, it is defficult to compare a bar with another bar ( vol and price is quite far from each other).

 

I love to understand deeply this cousre so i want to view example chart in Amibroker or metastock. unfortunaly, I can not find EOD data of these chart to input it to Amibroker because almost the example is before 1970 and some is not list in exchange anymore, some may be M&A (mergers & acquisitions).

 

here is name of stock example i noted from basic lecture and Lession example:

http://www.mediafire.com/?l7gvky1jdoi468l

or google document link: https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvVR0y_dzwmidHc3bmh6RTRGcHNMWmhnQTNYNTdYY1E&hl=en_US#gid=0

 

If anyone have this data please kindly share it to me ( or guide me how and where i can take this data)

 

many many thanks for your helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By vishnux
      Hey guys , what are the main things you look for to detect if the consolidation area is accumulating or distributing ? 
      1 ) I see springs in top , still markup happens and it becomes accumulation area and vice versa
      2) There is lots of volume absorption in support line and still markdown occurs.
      3) sometimes in market high / low it becomes re-accumulation  / re-distribution
      Is there any clear way to find it ? 
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.