Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

firewalker

Exits Are Entries, Just Upside Down

Recommended Posts

A good question. And the answer is ... drum roll ...

 

because the purpose of an entry is different to that of an exit. :crap:

 

Not in my opinion.

 

At least, that is how I treat them. I enter when I have a high probability that a move will continue in the direction (and magnitude) of my target before it falls back in the direction (and magnitude) of my stop loss. So an entry is about probabilty*magnitude of target move minus or divided by probability*magnitude of loss move.

 

An exit on the other hand has different aims. My exit is essentially based on a high probability that the planned forward motion is ending (but much lower than the probability required for me to enter).

 

I take (repeated) chunks out of trends so my entry is with the trend, has the above probabilities and is taken cautiously. My exit is "against the trend", doesn't care if there is trend continuation afterwards (I'll either catch it or not) and is taken with the enthusiasm of a long time profit enjoyer.

 

That is the difference between I and most others as, as shown in the chart, I am not willing to allow the move to continue after I have exited my position, plus, I want to maximise my profits throughout so no scaling out.

 

My original reasoning for the thread was the comment on Jason's journal about watching the market continue without you and IMO, there is no reason you should let this happen.

nine.thumb.gif.9cf84859c58a1c3f1391f60e272f6d49.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For me the best answer is because you can possibly take more than 10 points out of a 10 point move. We have all no doubt seen big trending days, lets say its a trend up day. Say you enter the market at 1130 and we begin by moving up say 6 points in the initial mark up/buy up/momentum move. At this point you see some signs of a pullback and know from past experience that a small pullback is likely before continuing higher.

 

Instead of holding on through the pullback that you feel is likely to be nothing more than a small retracement though nothing is certain, you decide to take profits at 1135 for a gain of 5 points. You then wait for the pullback you were anticipating and identify the point it will likely reach. Say it comes back 3.5 points at which stage you enter again maybe at 1133. The market then continues up to a resistance point it cannot break at 1140. You take profits at say 1139.

 

Holding on through the pullback would have netted you a gain of 9 points. The risk of holding on was the possibility of netting nothing should one leave their stop at b/e waiting for resistance to be hit. I'd imagine some sort of trail would be used though however for this example we will leave it at break even whilst waiting for resistance to be met. Now the risk at the peak of the initial move up to 1136 was 6 points as one left their stop at break even. I'm assuming that is larger than most accept on a regular stop point.

 

Now the trader who took the initial gains at 1135 and then entered again at 1133 to take the next exit at 1139 has netted 11 points. At the same time this trader has risked their initial stop amount up front, and then when entering again at 1133, would risk the normal stop amount again. This trader's risk however is that they miss the following move should their plan not permit them to re-enter.

 

The above is just a theoretical and can be skewed for the advantage of the trader who buys at support and holds until resistance or can be skewed to the trader who buys, takes an exit and buys again.

 

In all honesty it really comes down to the trader personality and their style of trading. Can I suggest that we possibly put up ideas for traders (such as myself, though I currently feel I have a good solution I am building) in ways to fine tune their exits?

 

I have gone with something simple for the moment which may require more work however I will suggest it anyway. For a way to take the most out of a current move, trailing the stop according to the previous candle low/high seems pretty good.

 

The plus side to this is that during mark up phases we shoot up/down pretty quickly without breaching the previous candle's high/low. We often contract in candle range toward the top/bottom of the current move and that often allows the stop to be brought up in close proximity of the actual top/bottom.

 

The downfall of such a way to exit is that during choppy markets one can get taken out pretty easily. Therefore the ability to pick up on choppy circumstances is necessary to keep one out of unfavorable markets. It also requires one to have a good entry plan. A breakout model, though I don't trade breakouts, may not gather many points as often half a move is made prior to breakout.

 

Any other guys willing to offer suggestions for exiting methods to other traders?

 

I think, as you point out, it is a question of personality and requirements. It also depends on your style and timeframe. I couldn't view firewalkers 1minute chart and see a way to catch the whole of a big swing unless I was trading from a 30minute chart.

 

Trailing is a good way of catching as much as possible without giving too much back but again, its personal preference.

 

My view is posted in my reply to Nine and I trail via S/R and I am all in until I get an opposing signal. I am happy with the win/loss ratio and getting stopped out early if need be but I am an 'all or nothing' type of person. No point fighting that, just merge my personality into my trading.

 

Things are slightly different for me as FX is 24hr so I can ride it back and forth and not worry about opening gaps as you emini traders have too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firewalker...

 

Both your charts are 1minute charts and whilst I appreciate the method stays the same, in order to get the whole range from a day, IMO, you cannot trade of a 1 minute chart. In order to swing the bigger moves, you'd need a larger view so if you are looking to get me to answer how you would (from a 1minute chart), then I can't.

 

From that timescale, I would be looking to take more trades. same style, but not to catch the whole day in one go.

 

Flip to +30min, then its a whole different story..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Firewalker...

 

Both your charts are 1minute charts and whilst I appreciate the method stays the same, in order to get the whole range from a day, IMO, you cannot trade of a 1 minute chart. In order to swing the bigger moves, you'd need a larger view so if you are looking to get me to answer how you would (from a 1minute chart), then I can't.

 

From that timescale, I would be looking to take more trades. same style, but not to catch the whole day in one go.

 

Flip to +30min, then its a whole different story..........

 

Like your style of trading Wasp, simple (not to say it is easy;) ) but highly effective. I have been making attempts to steer newcomers to simple way of illustrating price action for a while now, Wyckoff kept it simple enough (Dbphoenix also made a concerted effort) , but the mere mention of Wyckoff make a few in here breakout into rashes, mostly those who love to engage in bar by bar analysis and bamboozle with lots of jargon:)

 

Anyway you have aroused my interest in GBPJPY, have no particular expertise in this field, have ony dabbled some in GBP/$ but for most part the Index futures have kept me busy enough.

o.k so your strategy revolves around noting support/resistance levels on 4hr charts and then zooming into lower time frames for entry/exit with the aid of trendlines.

What is the minimum TF you go to, 15min/30min,

Also have you experimented with say, moving averages, oscillators etc for fine tuning entry/exit.

Do you look at Volume at all, realise the real vol is not there on forex, however folks do take into account tick vol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... I am not willing to allow the move to continue after I have exited my position, plus, I want to maximise my profits throughout so no scaling out.

 

No-one really wants to see a move continue after they've exited, but equally, no-one can ever hope to maximise the potential gain from every trade. After many years, I reached the stage of not caring too much, and accepting that taking a profit isn't a failure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No-one really wants to see a move continue after they've exited, but equally, no-one can ever hope to maximise the potential gain from every trade. After many years, I reached the stage of not caring too much, and accepting that taking a profit isn't a failure.

 

No, a profit isn't a failure but I see no reason not to try and max out every move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, a profit isn't a failure but I see no reason not to try and max out every move.

 

As always, it depends on your style of trading, but in my case not trying to max out every move, a) reduces stress, and b) gives me more time to look for another trade that may have a better risk/reward factor, and/or do something else. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As always, it depends on your style of trading, but in my case not trying to max out every move, a) reduces stress, and b) gives me more time to look for another trade that may have a better risk/reward factor, and/or do something else. :)

 

I think that is the case of difference between a lot of traders and just why there is no perfect way. Our own desires, requirements, needs and personalities are personified into our trading and whereas I am only happy exiting if I think it justifies a reversal/entry, others are already out and up the pub.

 

Yet, the original query of Jason's was how to attain the best from any move with minimal risk yet maximum reward. In my view, the best way to not miss a thing, is to get the exits and entries to match like a non-bleached blonde! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As always, it depends on your style of trading, but in my case not trying to max out every move, a) reduces stress, and b) gives me more time to look for another trade that may have a better risk/reward factor, and/or do something else. :)

 

Guess it's all down the personalities! For me, trading less, and staying longer in a trade means (a) less tress and (b) more time to do other things ;)

 

I know myself... by exiting for little profits, I'd be looking for another trade far too quickly, so it's also a protective measure. Especially after I scaled out and moved my stop to breakeven the 'trade management' is much more relaxing than the work to pinpoint the entry without getting stopped out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you need a disciplined and proven exit methodology so you can assess a trade's risk/reward ratio before you take it. I base mine on the nearest attracting structural features. So, for example, if we've exited value and we're heading towards the high or low of the day and I'm in the market, I am looking to take off my trade at that point at the very least. This allows me to assess R/R and not get myself into what my risk manager calls 2 star trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think that you need a disciplined and proven exit methodology so you can assess a trade's risk/reward ratio before you take it. I base mine on the nearest attracting structural features. So, for example, if we've exited value and we're heading towards the high or low of the day and I'm in the market, I am looking to take off my trade at that point at the very least. This allows me to assess R/R and not get myself into what my risk manager calls 2 star trades.

 

You've got yourself a risk manager? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock, with a solid top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX  
    • NFLX Netflix stock, with a solid top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX  
    • It depends. If you have lots of money that you can buy a house without a loan and if you don't have any parents to sponsor then it is a good idea. Otherwise it might be a bad idea depending where in Canada you are heading to. I earned a good middle income in my home country and I migrated to Vancouver 5 years ago at the age of 35. I had to start right from the bottom, lowest of the low.. Now i am finally earning a middle income in Canada but I still cannot afford to buy a one bedroom apartment. Having left behind friends, family and home, most of the times I think it is not worth it.   In short, do not migrate if you already have a good life in your home country and you are happy. Only migrate to Canada if you really have to leave your home country say there is a war or something really bad. Discrimination still exists here and its really tough for newcomers unless you are super rich. Good luck. David Chong, Quora  
    • This is bigger than the internet. Bigger than mobile. Bigger than social media.   While everyone was distracted by stock market fluctuations and political theater…   Most people have NO IDEA what just happened last week with ChatGPT.   Their new memory feature allows ChatGPT to remember EVERYTHING about you across all your conversations.   Think about that for a minute...   While most tech companies have been collecting mere breadcrumbs about you - your likes, your clicks, your browsing history - OpenAI is now collecting the most valuable dataset in human history: your complete psychological profile.   This is Zuckerberg x 5,000.   The more you use ChatGPT, the more it understands you, becoming a supercharged reflection of yourself that improves at an exponential rate.   Are you a regular ChatGPT user?   Consider whether it’s time to turn off the “you can train on my information” feature. To prevent your data from being used for training while still using the memory feature:   Disable Model Training: Navigate to Settings > Data Controls. Toggle off "Improve the model for everyone". Manage Memory Settings: Go to Settings > Personalization > Memory. Here, you can: Turn off memory entirely. Delete specific memories. Use Temporary Chat for sessions that won't be saved or used for training. Now the investment implications…   Why This is Bigger Than You Think Consider this: the relationship between humans and ChatGPT is evolving beyond a mere tool.   People are now treating these AI assistants as friends, confidants, and even romantic partners.   I'm not making this up - there are already documented cases of people ending real human relationships to pursue “connections” with their AI companions.   A viral Instagram meme shows a person going through life with a glowing, featureless humanoid figure - representing ChatGPT - as their companion.   The post has over 1.1 million likes and comments like "Bro ChatGPT is like my best friend. Ain't even ashamed to say it" with 25,000 likes.   But here's where things get really interesting for investors and entrepreneurs...   Three Things to Watch For starters, hardware is the next big thing for the big players.   The iPhone form factor is dead.   It hasn't meaningfully changed in nearly a decade. The next evolution in hardware will be designed specifically to interface with these AI companions.   OpenAI is already working on hardware with Johnny Ive, the legendary designer behind the iPhone and iPod. But you can’t ignore Elon Musk’s edge here.   So what does all of this mean for you?   The companies that control the personal AI relationships will be worth trillions. OpenAI and Elon Musk will have the coziest moats. We're witnessing the birth of a new internet - one built on agents that can communicate with each other across platforms. Google's new agent-to-agent protocol allows AI agents to work together without sharing internal memories or tools. The hardware companies that create the perfect interface for these AI companions will dominate the next decade of technology. And almost nobody is talking about what this means.   My prediction? Within five years, most people will have a personal AI that knows them better than anyone else. And they will interact with it in ways that seem foreign today.   (And, yes, it will almost certainly have dystopian elements.)   In the meantime, the biggest gains won’t come from household names. And, right now, James is seeing a prime opportunity to invest in the most under-the-radar plays in AI…   For dirt cheap. By Chris C. Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/use-chatgpt-protect-yourself-now
    • KBH KB Home stock, nice day and rally off the 50.82 support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?KBH      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.