Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tasuki

Companies That Build Trading Computers?

Recommended Posts

I'm in the decision making process as well and so far my thinking is as long as it's a dedicated computer (as mentioned earlier) and has 3 gb RAM, decent pentium processor, and a graphics/video card to handle multiple monitors that should be enough for me - why the need for $4,000+ units...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm in the decision making process as well and so far my thinking is as long as it's a dedicated computer (as mentioned earlier) and has 3 gb RAM, decent pentium processor, and a graphics/video card to handle multiple monitors that should be enough for me - why the need for $4,000+ units...?

 

 

Answer is quite simple---the quality of the components. Cheap graphics cards are just not worth the headache. Get quality. Same for hard drives. I'd recommend getting what's known as "server-grade" hard drives. They last longer, are more reliable, etc. Same shtick applies to power supplies and mother boards. Get quality. Hope this helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot of great advice on how to trick out your next computer for trading and I want to thank you all for your input.

I was wondering if anyone has any advice as to which computer company like HP, Dell, etc makes the most reliable computer?

Having the fastest computer to meet your trading needs is great ,but if it is always breaking down all only last a year or two, doesn't sound so great anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use several Dell PC and they last a long time for me,

my current main trading PC is a Dell(3 years old)... Most that use the same platform as I do Also like and use Dell.

 

Note: I'm not implying that Dell is the best PC.

 

Regards..

Edited by sep34

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think all computers "reliability" is more or less equal. Many of the same parts you're going to find on a dell can be found on any other machine and likewise. Only so many manufactures make motherboards, hard drives, etc.

 

I say find some online builder like http://www.cyberpowerpc.com/ and just buy a gaming rig that fits your price range.

 

It comes built, you can customize features and most of them come with more than enough CPU power, HD, and Memory out of the box.

 

What i've found in terms of reliability relates directly to what your trade computer is used for. If you're trading on it AND surfing the internet with it then your probability of it crashing due to malware, viruses, trojans, etc. SKYROCKETS. This isn't the "Computers Reliability" at fault, its what you're using it for .

 

Likewise if you're using your trading computer for gaming... the likelihood of something going wrong from a graphics card driver update, or a patch on a game, or the added stress on the components for the high heat during prolonged gaming again skyrockets.

 

What I decided to do was this:

 

Buy 1 PC FOR ONLY TRADING. Ie the ONLY software on it is my Tradestation platform and my brokerage platform. NOTHING ELSE. This avoids registry errors, the temptation to use it to browse online, etc.

 

Use a separate computer for browsing the internet and playing games. If it goes to shit at least it doesn't affect you're P/L. You cn avoid 90% of your reliability problems if you use your head and restrict the usage of the computer to what it was purchased to be used for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the fast reply back, greatly appreciated. I agree with you about have a seperate computer for trading. I am going to check out your link cyberpowerpc.

Since all the computers are pretty equal in reliablity, I was wondering if you can tell me what your recommendations would be for a desktop setup to meet my needs which is mainly to have a computer that would be able to handle intensive live charting and live news feeds example cnbc all at the same time on 2 seperate monitors with out freezing up or cpu running at 100% plus having a crisp video and chart images.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me I would go for the newer Intel i7 systems as its the "latest & greatest" out right now. You pay a hundred bucks or so premium over the older Core Duo 2's but your technology won't be out of date by the time you purchase it...

 

http://www.cyberpowerpc.com/system/Intel_Core_i7_Configurator/detail

 

Their base one for 799.99 looks just dandy as it is configured stock. You already are going to have 3GB Memory and a decent video card for that price and a very nice CPU. Upgrade what you want to stay within your budget...

 

If you were going to spend an extra 100-150 bucks off the default configuration I would upgrade the memory to one with a faster frontside bus (the 1600mhz is a 29.00 upgrade), I would upgrade the CPU heatsink to any of the other options (see what you like on the comparison, they are all about the same price) for 50.00. Keep things even cooler! And then upgrade the Video card to either a 9600GT 512mb or the 9500GT 1GB for 20-40 bucks depending on what you want. Contrary to popular belife, charting platforms are not graphic intensive. Charting requires good memory, a fast frontside bus, a solid hard drive, and a fast cpu.

 

So for between 800-900.00 depending on how you outfit it you'll have a solid piece of equipment to work with that won't give you any problems running any of your trading stuff.

 

Lets put it this way. I use a computer that is less than half as powerful (2GB mem, 7200RPM HD, Duo 2 Processor, and an ATI X1600 256mb memory card) as the base configuration of that i7 at 799.00 and i've run tradestation with over 100 charts open at one time with live data, two broker platforms up without so much as a glitch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Tresor,

What charting package do you know that will run on a Mac? Seriously, I didn't think there were any.

Tasuki

 

Any charting software can run on MAC PRO provided you install Vista or XP OS on it.

 

I do not have MAC PRO but a friend of mine does. I saw it in action. It works quietly (it has 8 or 12 fans built in its case) and is vey very fast. He runs simultaneously two opeating systems and switches between applications designed for each.

 

Before I saw this I didn't even realize this would be possible at all.

 

Regards

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are being blinded by technology and slick bs.

 

If an app is designed to run in windows it will run better in Windows without something shimming the hardware. The link is marketing stuff ... and we all know the difference between a used car salesman and a computer salesman, right?

 

The difference is that the used car salesman actually knows when he's lying to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any charting software can run on MAC PRO provided you install Vista or XP OS on it.

 

I do not have MAC PRO but a friend of mine does. I saw it in action. It works quietly (it has 8 or 12 fans built in its case) and is vey very fast. He runs simultaneously two opeating systems and switches between applications designed for each.

 

Before I saw this I didn't even realize this would be possible at all.

 

Regards

 

Funny, I just mentioned in another thread, I run a mac pro with dual monitors. windows on one screen (for ninja) and osx on the other, works great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
Funny, I just mentioned in another thread, I run a mac pro with dual monitors. windows on one screen (for ninja) and osx on the other, works great.

 

Hi,

 

My friends also runs ninja (4 monitors) on MAC PRO. He says that Windows never hangs or crashes on MAC PRO while it hangs and crashes quite often on machines desiged specifically for Windows.

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

 

This is tech ignorance at a very special level. Now we have a claim that a mac is more reliable running shimmed windows than machines without extra software between the user and the hardware ??? Get a grip.

 

 

If your mate has hangs on another machine then he either has a flawed installation or he has faulty hardware. I have 4 windows machines. I run XP on most of them but also Windows 7 and Vista.

 

Guess what? No hangs. Never. Guess why? They are not faulty and the software was properly installed.

 

So, my small numbers trump your small numbers. But lets get real. The real issue is simple: when you run Windows in a Mac environment it is shimmed in their in one form or another. That means there is extra software between the user and the hardware. This will inevitably have two effects:

- for the same hardware it will in some way be slower.

- more software is involved so it will be less reliable.

 

And that ignores any premium price one might chose to pay for an Apple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

Kiwi

 

put evidence where your mouth is. prove windows is slowler on MACs than on PCs.

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor

All tests and benchmarks I read so far showed that XP and Vista are faster on Apple machines (boot camp) than on PCs.

 

When you claimed than Windows cannot be natively run on MACs I did not say a word of your ignorance, as I myself am ignorant on many issues. But now show hard facts evidence (not your ''expert'' words) to prove my ignorance.

 

Regards

Edited by Tresor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All tests and benchmarks I read so far showed that XP and Vista are faster on Apple machines (boot camp) than on PCs.

 

When you claimed than Windows cannot be natively run on MACs I did not say a word of your ignorance, as I myself am ignorant on many issues. But now show hard facts evidence (not your ''expert'' words) to prove my ignorance.

 

Regards

 

You are talking about two different things now. Bootcamp is something different than what your friend does. You clearly stated "He runs simultaneously two opeating systems and switches between applications designed for each." With bootcamp this is not possible. With bootcamp, you have to either boot the mac up under OS X or Windows. You cannot have both at the same time. Since under bootcamp, Windows has full control and access over the hardware, the performance will be faster than when you run it under something like Parallels or VMWare Fusion. Both provide a virtual machine that have an extra layer between the applications and the hardware, so by definition this would be slower. If you don't understand that then there really is no point talking with you about these things.

 

I don't know how you can claim that Mac runs Windows natively faster than PC's. If you have two machines with the exact same specs, how can one be faster than the other? If the Mac these benchmarks was ran on has more powerful hardware, then of course it will be faster. This is like saying if you have two cars and one is green and the other red with bigger engine, that red cars are faster than green ones.

 

This is what Kiwi has been trying to tell you, but you don't understand that there is a difference between bootcamp and what your friend is doing. You assume both are the same and is basing your arguement on this wrong assumption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sevensa is technically correct that virtualization (eg parallel, vmware, virtualbox) will always be slower than native (eg bootcamp), but with improvements, it may not matter for most applications.

 

http://www.macworld.com/article/137374/vmwarefusion201.html

 

http://www.ednasia.com/article-22701-virtualizationsliconandsoftwaresalvationortechnologicaltowerofbabel-Asia.html

0901pg29_f3.jpg

 

0901pg24_t1.jpg

Edited by thrunner
added graphics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sevensa is technically correct that virtualization (eg parallel, vmware, virtualbox) will always be slower than native (eg bootcamp), but with improvements, it may not matter for most applications.

 

That is true and I am running vmware myself to have easy portability and is happy with it. I was not disputing that it is a viable option, which in my opinion it is. I was disputing the statements by someone who doesn't understand the difference between virtualization and running it natively, that Mac somehow is faster even though it is an apples to oranges comparison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note that I never said that Windows can not be run natively on Mac hardware. That would join some of the other ignorant statements.

 

My statements relate to the foolishness of suggestions that various shimming softwares are either faster or run more reliably than native operation. No tests are required and any tests you have (you haven't quoted them) will be comparing pears with peaches (ie, the hardware will not be the same).

 

1. Most trading software is designed to run under Windows.

2. Running windows natively on given hardware will always be faster and more reliably than some form of software shim - there are less instructions to run so both will be true by the very nature of software.

 

Note that 2 requires that the hardware be the same (not faulty) and that the people setting up the software don't make mistakes in the setup. Such mistakes form the basis of many benchmarking disputes in the XP/Vista/7/Linux world. I didn't realize they'd crept into macworld as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tresor
You are talking about two different things now. Bootcamp is something different than what your friend does. You clearly stated "He runs simultaneously two opeating systems and switches between applications designed for each." With bootcamp this is not possible.

 

 

Hello sevensa,

 

Rest assurred I knew I was talking about two different things. That's why I put boot camp in brackets to explain to Kiwi that under these conditions tests were run to prove that Vista is quicker on MACs than on PCs.

 

Take high end Apple and a few high end PCs. Vista on Apple will be faster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • AMZN Amazon stock, nice buying at the 187.26 triple+ support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • DELL Dell Technologies stock, good day moving higher off the 90.99 double support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?DELL
    • MCK Mckesson stock, nice trend and continuation breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?MCK
    • lmfx just officially launched their own LMGX token, Im planning to grab a couple of hundred and maybe have the option to stake them. 
    • Date: 2nd April 2025.   Market on Edge: Tariff Announcement and Volatility Ahead!   The US economic and employment data continues to deteriorate with the job vacancies figures dropping to a 5-month low. In addition to this, the IMS Manufacturing PMI also fell below expectations. However, both the US Dollar and Gold declined simultaneously following the release of the two figures, an uncommon occurrence in the market. Traders expect a key factor to be today’s ‘liberation day’ where the US will impose tariffs on imports. USDJPY - Traders Await Tariff Confirmation! Traders looking to determine how the USDJPY will look today will find it difficult to determine until the US confirms its tariff plan. Today is the day when Trump previously stated he would finalize and announce his tariff plan. The administration has not yet released the policy, but investors expect it to be the most expansionary in a century. President Trump is due to speak at 20:00 GMT. On HFM's Calendar the speech is stated as "US Liberation Day Tariff Announcement". Currently, analysts are expecting Trump’s Tariff Plan to impose tariffs on the EU, chips and pharmaceuticals later today as well as reciprocal tariffs. Economists have a good idea of how these tariffs may take effect, but reciprocal tariffs are still unspecified. In addition to this, 25% tariffs on the car industry will start tomorrow. The tariffs on the foreign cars industry are a factor which will particularly impact Japan. Although, traders should note that this is what is expected and is not yet finalised. Last week, President Trump stated that he would implement retaliatory tariffs but allow exemptions for certain US trade partners. Treasury Secretary Mr Bessent and National Economic Council Director Mr Hassett suggested that the restrictions would primarily target 15 countries responsible for the bulk of the US trade deficit. However, yesterday, Trump contradicted these statements, asserting that additional duties would be imposed on any country that has implemented similar measures against US products. The day’s volatility will depend on which route the US administration takes. The harshness of the policy will influence both the Japanese Yen as well as the US Dollar.   USDJPY 5-Minute Chart   US Economic and Employment Data The JOLT Job Vacancies figure fell below expectations and is lower than the previous month’s figure. The JOLT Job Vacancies read 7.57 million whereas the average of the past 6 months is 7.78 million. The ISM Manufacturing Index also fell below the key level of 50.00 and was 5 points lower than what analysts were expecting. The data is negative for the US Dollar, particularly as the latest release applies more pressure on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. However, this is unlikely to happen if the trade policy ignites higher and stickier inflation. In the Bank of Japan’s Governor's latest speech, Mr Ueda said that the tariffs are likely to trigger higher inflation. USDJPY Technical Analysis Currently, the Japanese Yen Index is the worst performing of the day while the US Dollar Index is more or less unchanged. However, this is something traders will continue to monitor as the EU session starts. In the 2-hour timeframe, the USDJPY is trading at the neutral level below the 75-bar EMA and 100-bar SMA. The RSI and MACD is also at the neutral level meaning traders should be open to price movements in either direction. On the smaller timeframes, such as the 5-minute timeframe, there is a slight bias towards a bullish outcome. However, this is only likely if the latest bearish swing does not drop below the 200-Bar SMA.     The key resistant level can be seen at 150.262 and the support level at 149.115. Breakout levels are at 149.988 and 149.674. Key Takeaway Points: Job vacancies hit a five-month low, and the ISM Manufacturing PMI missed expectations, adding pressure on the Federal Reserve regarding interest rate decisions. Traders await confirmation on Trump’s tariff policy, which is expected to impact the EU, chips, pharmaceuticals, and foreign car industries. The severity of the tariffs will influence both the JPY and the USD, with traders waiting for final policy details. The Japanese Yen Index is the worst index of the day while the US Dollar Index is unchanged. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.