Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

20 EMA & Patterns on FOREX

Recommended Posts

This thread was mainly focused around the ES and other stock indexes, I'd like this thread to be about the same trading premise but on Forex.

 

Just in case we get someone new to this thread, here's a quick review of the chart setup:

1) 5 Minute Candlestick Charts

2) 20 EMA (exponential moving average)

3) That's it.
;)

And the entry setup:

1) A pullback to the 20 EMA

2) A candlestick pattern*

* candlestick pattern(s) to be used is up for debate. BearBull suggests using hammers and inverted hammers only; whereas I am open to most patterns.

 

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION: The idea presented here is a possible ENTRY idea. As discussed in a few threads here on TL, there are many, many different ways to exit a trade.

 

WHY FOREX?: A few reasons:

 

1) I know very little about forex, so hopefully this thread could get some experienced forex traders chiming in about the markets and what to expect. I'll do my best to post some charts and we'll see how it looks.

 

2) It is said the forex can trend more than indexes, so maybe this entry system might work better than on the indexes (just a guess at this point).

 

3) I'm all about leveraging my time. If I can watch a couple indexes and a few currency pairs and trade where the primo setups are, that has my interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some charts from 9-29-08

 

All charts are from the FXDD MetaTrader demo software. If I were to pursue this further, I would need to investigate FX brokers as Open ECry does not have an FX division (yet).

 

I believe these are the main pairs, but could be wrong. If there are other pairs I should watch, please let me know.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8130&stc=1&d=1222701035

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8131&stc=1&d=1222701035

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8132&stc=1&d=1222701035

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8133&stc=1&d=1222701035

5aa70e8d787ef_9-29-08EURUSD.png.aad8921dd23ebf67c84f539a6ea3eff2.png

5aa70e8d7c878_9-29-08GBPUSD.png.af1741da2f5fd6d5f378fa18ca755c1b.png

5aa70e8d809ce_9-29-08USDCHF.png.79c8dacaecf2dcc913d34d4059325ad1.png

5aa70e8d845e4_9-29-08USDJPY.png.11e159b304e867a06aa87d4dd7518f07.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BF,

 

.coming over here from your other invitation post and this is the first thing I noticed...

 

As far as pairs go you might consider substituting EurJpy for the UsdChf.

EJ has plenty of bang for the buck / action, a reasonable spread, etc while

UsdChf is almost perfectly (negatively) correlated with the EurUsd (so even if a setup occurs in the swissf it will follow what the EurUsd does.)

 

hth

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to know that this simple setup can be observed and exploited on a consistent basis even in the forex market. In conjunction with some basic understanding of Wyckoff principles i.e buying and selling pressure via price/vol should provide further confidence and enhance trade management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Bearbull said:
Good to know that this simple setup can be observed and exploited on a consistent basis even in the forex market. In conjunction with some basic understanding of Wyckoff principles i.e buying and selling pressure via price/vol should provide further confidence and enhance trade management.

 

Ahh! There goes the simplicity. Im just joking. If it works for you then thats all that matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

My first post. Here is a trade I caught using the 20EMA system on AUDJPY on the 15 min chart. I exited at around 61.00 support level. On hindsight, i should have let the trade ride further down. Oh well, still need to learn how to manage my exits.:crap:

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8687&stc=1&d=1228124152

AUDJPY_15min.thumb.jpg.164fbf502156e1c6af981a09788dc3e8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  learningtotrade said:

Oh well, still need to learn how to manage my exits.:crap:

 

 

Exits are the toughest thing about this game. Entries are the easy part. If you followed your plan no need to beat yourself about the exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the posts coming... I think you're on to something and you are taking good trades combining pin bars / inverted hammers and candlesticks with the 20 ema.

 

Looks like the only thing you really need to standardize is your management/exits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks daedalus.

 

Here's one which wasn't very successful albeit on a 5 min chart. The inverted hammer formed on the 20EMA and it also looked like a H&S was developing. Perhaps, my mistake was shorting it too close to the support level although eventually, the price did turn south. attachment.php?attachmentid=8709&stc=1&d=1228293394

GBPUSD_5min.thumb.jpg.a82cbc6cd2fcc3f030c714d08fdcf110.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a current one which is still running.

 

Price broke down the symmetrical triangle and its eventual retracement hit a resistance on the trendline and 50EMA which was followed by a 3 bar candle reversal. Then, an inverted hammer formed on the 20EMA (red line).attachment.php?attachmentid=8716&stc=1&d=1228374395

 

Bump: Continuing from my previous post, the trade turned out alright. This time I tried spliting my exits by closing half the position after a certain level of pips. Perhaps not the most optimal way of profit taking.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8717&stc=1&d=1228378642

GBPUSD_15min_example2.thumb.jpg.d3780990134f98e9478ee151872e718a.jpg

GBPUSD_15min_example2_exit.thumb.jpg.8f6f7b5b7753836b0d909f12f9e81d4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been testing a similar system that uses an 21SMA (not ema); it doesn't make much difference. Perfect bouncing is a coincidental rarity for either. I've been using an indicator developed for metatrader to give an arrow alert as soon as 1 (2 min bar) exceeds the wick of another 2 min bar in the opposite direction. Not my own, but developed from someone on FF.

 

I've noticed that waiting for a "bounce" off the 21 in trending conditions does give a higher probability trade on certain conditions. But personally the time and effort involved in monitoring such low time-frames is very labour intensive for what is often a pretty rare signal indeed. And totally dependent on a trend which may never occur. I don't believe its tradeable as a standalone system but something that can be added to the traders repertoire should the oppotunity present itself.

 

The danger I've found in the backtesting/forward testing that I have done, is that the winners with hindsight are so easy to spot it gives a false sense of success rate. Everybody can see that lovely trend bouncing off that 20/21 MA a mile off. But there are plenty of hidden losers. On closer inspection I personally have found it very difficult to guage a correct stoploss for such bounce trades on entry. Such bounce trades can often come after a consolidating ranging period oscillating around a particular MA such as the 21 or 200 MA. But can often continue to range after entry. I've found it dangerous to assume that just because it has seemingly just 'respected' the MA that it will continue to do so; it often does not. This is demonstrated in some of the failed trades shown by learningtotrade. Taking that in mind, I like to see that price has previously shown a tendency to take the MA as support/resistance before the signal I intend to take. That is, a consistent retracement to the MA that is easily indentifible.

 

These events maybe too rare occasions for sufficient trading oppotunities though. In my opinion this is tantamount to restricting your trading to the coincidental times that price retraces to an MA which at the end of the day is a lagging indicator. I hope someone proves me wrong and finds something sufficiently profitable in this and has the patience for it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All charts looks great in hindsight that a strategy works like deepblue27 had said. When trading live, its a completely different story.

 

When price retraces back to the EMA:

>> how do you know if it will not go against you? I know that some say trade in the direction of the EMA [but it lags].

>> how do you know how much momentum is left when it finally retraces to continue further in your direction? I know of Support/Resistance, do you just focus on the daily S/R from the previous day or would you use dynamic S/R?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, Im new to this site. Looking into other markets. Have traded forex for just over a year,

 

@ Brownsfan the 5Min charts in forex will WRECK you. I know from experience lol :). Considering the Market is open 5 days a week 24hours a day its actually tormenting if you have a 5minute strategy. Sure you get more profit but eventually the extra profit was not worth the time in my opinion.

 

The thing I also find with your idea is that the 5min 20 ema is not helping me out in terms of . . . Generating order flow in the direction I want it to go in.

 

If I was using an ema I would use something like . . I have had nothing but success with the 1HR 62 ema . . On all timeframes above 1HR particularly on GBP/USD One Hour . .

 

If I was trading the 5Min what I would do is express the 1Hour 62 ema as a 5minute ema . .

 

1HR 62ema becomes the 5Min 744 ema.

 

If anyone is curious backtest it on GBP/USD for a while and see how often it holds and generates nice candle patterns off of it. You would have less trades as well, with a higher probability of winning (In my opinion)

 

Also try putting up all round numbers on your 5Min charts, so if you are trading 5Min put up all .1000 .1500 .x100 and .xx50 levels, and just look at how price reacts . . .

 

I always try my best to intraday trade AWAY from the big round numbers instead of into them, a better chance of protecting your stop loss and of getting a good reaction in terms of legitimate candlesticks on the 5min.

It's just how order flow builds up around round number in my experience. . .

 

 

Disclaimer : I am by no means a forex expert or anything, nor am I claiming to be. But this is an interesting forum and an interesting discussion so I just thought I would chime in :)

 

Trade well everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in reference to the poster above me, his comments are Highlighted

 

 

 

I've noticed that waiting for a "bounce" off the 21 in trending conditions does give a higher probability trade on certain conditions.

 

Really ? Can you please expound on what you think is causing this ? Also what timeframe is this ?

 

The danger I've found in the backtesting/forward testing that I have done, is that the winners with hindsight are so easy to spot it gives a false sense of success rate. Everybody can see that lovely trend bouncing off that 20/21 MA a mile off. But there are plenty of hidden losers.

 

Agree with this.

 

On closer inspection I personally have found it very difficult to guage a correct stoploss for such bounce trades on entry.

 

Agree with this too . . I always try and put stops where price cant get them.

 

These events maybe too rare occasions for sufficient trading oppotunities though. In my opinion this is tantamount to restricting your trading to the coincidental times that price retraces to an MA which at the end of the day is a lagging indicator. I hope someone proves me wrong and finds something sufficiently profitable in this and has the patience for it!

 

Yes indeed MA's are lagging, however I use them as floating support and resistance on higher timeframes. I like to get a confluence of factors working in my favour before taking any trades. . .

 

 

Enjoyed reading your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.