Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

brownsfan019

20 EMA & Patterns on FOREX

Recommended Posts

This thread was mainly focused around the ES and other stock indexes, I'd like this thread to be about the same trading premise but on Forex.

 

Just in case we get someone new to this thread, here's a quick review of the chart setup:

1) 5 Minute Candlestick Charts

2) 20 EMA (exponential moving average)

3) That's it.
;)

And the entry setup:

1) A pullback to the 20 EMA

2) A candlestick pattern*

* candlestick pattern(s) to be used is up for debate. BearBull suggests using hammers and inverted hammers only; whereas I am open to most patterns.

 

IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION: The idea presented here is a possible ENTRY idea. As discussed in a few threads here on TL, there are many, many different ways to exit a trade.

 

WHY FOREX?: A few reasons:

 

1) I know very little about forex, so hopefully this thread could get some experienced forex traders chiming in about the markets and what to expect. I'll do my best to post some charts and we'll see how it looks.

 

2) It is said the forex can trend more than indexes, so maybe this entry system might work better than on the indexes (just a guess at this point).

 

3) I'm all about leveraging my time. If I can watch a couple indexes and a few currency pairs and trade where the primo setups are, that has my interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some charts from 9-29-08

 

All charts are from the FXDD MetaTrader demo software. If I were to pursue this further, I would need to investigate FX brokers as Open ECry does not have an FX division (yet).

 

I believe these are the main pairs, but could be wrong. If there are other pairs I should watch, please let me know.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8130&stc=1&d=1222701035

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8131&stc=1&d=1222701035

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8132&stc=1&d=1222701035

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8133&stc=1&d=1222701035

5aa70e8d787ef_9-29-08EURUSD.png.aad8921dd23ebf67c84f539a6ea3eff2.png

5aa70e8d7c878_9-29-08GBPUSD.png.af1741da2f5fd6d5f378fa18ca755c1b.png

5aa70e8d809ce_9-29-08USDCHF.png.79c8dacaecf2dcc913d34d4059325ad1.png

5aa70e8d845e4_9-29-08USDJPY.png.11e159b304e867a06aa87d4dd7518f07.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BF,

 

.coming over here from your other invitation post and this is the first thing I noticed...

 

As far as pairs go you might consider substituting EurJpy for the UsdChf.

EJ has plenty of bang for the buck / action, a reasonable spread, etc while

UsdChf is almost perfectly (negatively) correlated with the EurUsd (so even if a setup occurs in the swissf it will follow what the EurUsd does.)

 

hth

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to know that this simple setup can be observed and exploited on a consistent basis even in the forex market. In conjunction with some basic understanding of Wyckoff principles i.e buying and selling pressure via price/vol should provide further confidence and enhance trade management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good to know that this simple setup can be observed and exploited on a consistent basis even in the forex market. In conjunction with some basic understanding of Wyckoff principles i.e buying and selling pressure via price/vol should provide further confidence and enhance trade management.

 

Ahh! There goes the simplicity. Im just joking. If it works for you then thats all that matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

My first post. Here is a trade I caught using the 20EMA system on AUDJPY on the 15 min chart. I exited at around 61.00 support level. On hindsight, i should have let the trade ride further down. Oh well, still need to learn how to manage my exits.:crap:

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8687&stc=1&d=1228124152

AUDJPY_15min.thumb.jpg.164fbf502156e1c6af981a09788dc3e8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well, still need to learn how to manage my exits.:crap:

 

 

Exits are the toughest thing about this game. Entries are the easy part. If you followed your plan no need to beat yourself about the exit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep the posts coming... I think you're on to something and you are taking good trades combining pin bars / inverted hammers and candlesticks with the 20 ema.

 

Looks like the only thing you really need to standardize is your management/exits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks daedalus.

 

Here's one which wasn't very successful albeit on a 5 min chart. The inverted hammer formed on the 20EMA and it also looked like a H&S was developing. Perhaps, my mistake was shorting it too close to the support level although eventually, the price did turn south. attachment.php?attachmentid=8709&stc=1&d=1228293394

GBPUSD_5min.thumb.jpg.a82cbc6cd2fcc3f030c714d08fdcf110.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a current one which is still running.

 

Price broke down the symmetrical triangle and its eventual retracement hit a resistance on the trendline and 50EMA which was followed by a 3 bar candle reversal. Then, an inverted hammer formed on the 20EMA (red line).attachment.php?attachmentid=8716&stc=1&d=1228374395

 

Bump: Continuing from my previous post, the trade turned out alright. This time I tried spliting my exits by closing half the position after a certain level of pips. Perhaps not the most optimal way of profit taking.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=8717&stc=1&d=1228378642

GBPUSD_15min_example2.thumb.jpg.d3780990134f98e9478ee151872e718a.jpg

GBPUSD_15min_example2_exit.thumb.jpg.8f6f7b5b7753836b0d909f12f9e81d4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been testing a similar system that uses an 21SMA (not ema); it doesn't make much difference. Perfect bouncing is a coincidental rarity for either. I've been using an indicator developed for metatrader to give an arrow alert as soon as 1 (2 min bar) exceeds the wick of another 2 min bar in the opposite direction. Not my own, but developed from someone on FF.

 

I've noticed that waiting for a "bounce" off the 21 in trending conditions does give a higher probability trade on certain conditions. But personally the time and effort involved in monitoring such low time-frames is very labour intensive for what is often a pretty rare signal indeed. And totally dependent on a trend which may never occur. I don't believe its tradeable as a standalone system but something that can be added to the traders repertoire should the oppotunity present itself.

 

The danger I've found in the backtesting/forward testing that I have done, is that the winners with hindsight are so easy to spot it gives a false sense of success rate. Everybody can see that lovely trend bouncing off that 20/21 MA a mile off. But there are plenty of hidden losers. On closer inspection I personally have found it very difficult to guage a correct stoploss for such bounce trades on entry. Such bounce trades can often come after a consolidating ranging period oscillating around a particular MA such as the 21 or 200 MA. But can often continue to range after entry. I've found it dangerous to assume that just because it has seemingly just 'respected' the MA that it will continue to do so; it often does not. This is demonstrated in some of the failed trades shown by learningtotrade. Taking that in mind, I like to see that price has previously shown a tendency to take the MA as support/resistance before the signal I intend to take. That is, a consistent retracement to the MA that is easily indentifible.

 

These events maybe too rare occasions for sufficient trading oppotunities though. In my opinion this is tantamount to restricting your trading to the coincidental times that price retraces to an MA which at the end of the day is a lagging indicator. I hope someone proves me wrong and finds something sufficiently profitable in this and has the patience for it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All charts looks great in hindsight that a strategy works like deepblue27 had said. When trading live, its a completely different story.

 

When price retraces back to the EMA:

>> how do you know if it will not go against you? I know that some say trade in the direction of the EMA [but it lags].

>> how do you know how much momentum is left when it finally retraces to continue further in your direction? I know of Support/Resistance, do you just focus on the daily S/R from the previous day or would you use dynamic S/R?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, Im new to this site. Looking into other markets. Have traded forex for just over a year,

 

@ Brownsfan the 5Min charts in forex will WRECK you. I know from experience lol :). Considering the Market is open 5 days a week 24hours a day its actually tormenting if you have a 5minute strategy. Sure you get more profit but eventually the extra profit was not worth the time in my opinion.

 

The thing I also find with your idea is that the 5min 20 ema is not helping me out in terms of . . . Generating order flow in the direction I want it to go in.

 

If I was using an ema I would use something like . . I have had nothing but success with the 1HR 62 ema . . On all timeframes above 1HR particularly on GBP/USD One Hour . .

 

If I was trading the 5Min what I would do is express the 1Hour 62 ema as a 5minute ema . .

 

1HR 62ema becomes the 5Min 744 ema.

 

If anyone is curious backtest it on GBP/USD for a while and see how often it holds and generates nice candle patterns off of it. You would have less trades as well, with a higher probability of winning (In my opinion)

 

Also try putting up all round numbers on your 5Min charts, so if you are trading 5Min put up all .1000 .1500 .x100 and .xx50 levels, and just look at how price reacts . . .

 

I always try my best to intraday trade AWAY from the big round numbers instead of into them, a better chance of protecting your stop loss and of getting a good reaction in terms of legitimate candlesticks on the 5min.

It's just how order flow builds up around round number in my experience. . .

 

 

Disclaimer : I am by no means a forex expert or anything, nor am I claiming to be. But this is an interesting forum and an interesting discussion so I just thought I would chime in :)

 

Trade well everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just in reference to the poster above me, his comments are Highlighted

 

 

 

I've noticed that waiting for a "bounce" off the 21 in trending conditions does give a higher probability trade on certain conditions.

 

Really ? Can you please expound on what you think is causing this ? Also what timeframe is this ?

 

The danger I've found in the backtesting/forward testing that I have done, is that the winners with hindsight are so easy to spot it gives a false sense of success rate. Everybody can see that lovely trend bouncing off that 20/21 MA a mile off. But there are plenty of hidden losers.

 

Agree with this.

 

On closer inspection I personally have found it very difficult to guage a correct stoploss for such bounce trades on entry.

 

Agree with this too . . I always try and put stops where price cant get them.

 

These events maybe too rare occasions for sufficient trading oppotunities though. In my opinion this is tantamount to restricting your trading to the coincidental times that price retraces to an MA which at the end of the day is a lagging indicator. I hope someone proves me wrong and finds something sufficiently profitable in this and has the patience for it!

 

Yes indeed MA's are lagging, however I use them as floating support and resistance on higher timeframes. I like to get a confluence of factors working in my favour before taking any trades. . .

 

 

Enjoyed reading your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.