Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Here is a 'very inexpensive' alternative to Juriks Moving Average contributed in Easy Language by John D. McCormick (TS handle = JDM, see jmactrader.com).

 

Moving Averages are used to remove noise. By “noise” is meant the apparently random motion up and down of the prices around their average price. This shows up on a moving average as a jagged appearance on an otherwise smooth line. The jaggedness can trigger false buy and sell signals or simply make the indicator hard to read, so we try to smooth out the average, i.e. remove the noise.

 

Lagging or lateness is the bane of moving averages. You make them longer (average in more bars) and the moving average is smoother, but now it lags way behind the actual price movement.

 

The ideal moving average should filter out noise and respond quickly – and – it would be a plus if it was fast calculating. That’s kind of like having your cake and eating it too.

 

Nevertheless, here’s one, I call it Quick MA, that seems to work as well as any I’ve seen.

 

Full thread is at https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=77583&SearchTerm=a%20better%20moving%20average&txtExactMatch=

Posted with his permission. Please retain his 'copyright' info in the code. Many thanks to JDM.

QUICK.ELD

Edited by zdo
add TS link, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is the source in readable text

 

Indicator

 

//
//	Plots a fractional-bar Quick Moving Average 
//	with the option to select gapless daily opens.
//
//	copyright 2008 John McCormick jmactrader.com
//
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free
//	as long as it retains the above acknowledge
//

inputs:
Price(Close),
Quick_Length(9),
displace(0),
gapless(0);	// set gap to a non-zero value to skip over opening daily gaps

Var: Length(maxlist(1,Quick_Length));

// GapLess

Vars:			// gapless O,H,L,C where O=C[1]
RelO(0),
RelH(0),
RelL(0),
RelC(0),
gap(0),
Accum(0),
WtMean(0);

if date<>date[1] then begin
gap		=	O-C[1];
Accum	=	Accum+gap;
end;

RelO	=	O-Accum;
RelC	=	C-Accum;
RelH	=	H-Accum;
RelL	=	L-Accum;

			// Gapless bars - end

WtMean = (RelH+RelL+RelC)/3;

// End Gapless

if gapless=0 
then plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(price,length),"FMA_Quick")
else plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(RelC,length)+accum,"FMA_Quick");

 

 

Function

 

//  generates very smooth and responsive moving average
// 	copyright 2008 John McCormick  jmactrader.com
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free 
//  as long as you don't remove the above acknowledgement
//		

Inputs: 
Price(numericseries), 
Length(numericsimple);

Vars:
j(0),
workinglen(maxlist(1,absvalue(Length))),
peak(workinglen/3),
tot(0),
divisor(0);

Array:
val[100](0);

if workinglen>100 then workinglen=100;  //  use larger array to handle lengths over 100


tot=0;
divisor=0;
for j=1 to floor(workinglen+1) begin
if j<=peak then val[j]=j/peak
else val[j]=(workinglen+1-j)/(workinglen+1-peak);
tot=tot+price[j-1]*val[j];
divisor=divisor+val[j];
end;
if divisor<>0 then FMA_smooth=tot/divisor;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a comparison of JurikMA (cyan) and QuickMA (yellow)

 

The arrows show spots where JMA beat QMA to the turn

(Note, though, there may be instances off this chart where QMA leads JMA)

Enjoy

compareQuickVsJurik.thumb.jpg.a61a5b9f770463c292075d4b4c285b4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! Here's the best I could do in that same time period (6/4 YM 1 min).

 

I'm very impressed by how smooth both of those are.

 

There's three in this pic: the light blue was my attempt at smoothing the thin pink one. The other thin pink one was another smooth attempt but it wasn't good.

 

Those up there are very, very smooth.

5aa70e8cad01c_fastmas.thumb.jpg.31b81e042922b635185619ed41e84636.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zdo, your graph show the Quick MA as yellow, and "AMA" as cyan... not JMA. Can you post another graph that have the QuickMA, AMA and JMA on 1 graph?

 

Thanks

 

rurimoon,

 

Yellow is QuickMA

Cyan is really Jurik

(through the 90's it was the only adaptive mov avg I considered, hence the indicator label of "AMA" … (and obviously) it uses JMA function)

TS has an AdaptiveMovingAverage built in (Kaufman’s) but I would be afraid to even allow it to open on my screen …seriously and ;)

If you have TS you can try it... if not let me know and I will take some serious pain medication ;) and put up a comparison. Keep in mind though that the kaufman effectively just 'dynamically' varies the length parameter via a stochastic rather than actually doing the 'phasing and whatever' that more recent ama do...

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo or any other who has QuickMA with Tradestation, can you post a chart of the recent ES or YM with QuickMA(9) and possibly HMA(9) on it?

I translated the code to ninjascript but I don't have tradestation to vertify if my code is right or not. I don't think my code is right.

 

It would be great if you post a recent chart so that I can compare my QuickMA in Ninjatrader with yours. Please tell me if below value match.

 

ES0309 on Jan23,5min chart,

11:00amCT: Price close: 815.50, QMA(9) 819.87

11:05amCT: Price close: 817.25, QMA(9) 819.15

11:10amCT: Price close: 816.50, QMA(9) 818.36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my chart:

 

es030912320095mintg2.jpg

 

The blue line is my QuickMA and red line is HMA. As you can see, my QuickMA is nowhere as fast as HMA, so I think I may be coding it wrong.. and I need to make sure...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rurimoon,

I don't have TradeStation anymore, but I've converted the QuickMA code from EL and got the exact numbers as you did for the 5min ES. Here's a scrrenshot with my conversion of the QuickMA along with HMA and a conversion I did from what is "supposed to be" JMA converted from Metatrader.

 

Magenta is HMA

Blue is the converted QuickMA

Black is the converted JMA

 

 

VT

MAcomparison.thumb.png.69216c8e1ac856d586cb885f07930b6d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to verifying for me. I have always though that QuickMA should be at least on pair with HMA so I don't believe in my coding skill when I see that it lag behind so much. I am in the process of converting JMA from metatrader to ninjascript also. The problem is I have find at least 5 different version of JMA in Metatrader and I have no idea which one produce more accurate result with the real JMA. Can you tell me which version of JMA from metatrader that you are using? (Of course it would be best if you can share your code :)

 

P.S. I have a version of JMA in metatrader that is so cheesy, it has at least 50 variable defined. Basically it change its formula base on which period it used... the code has so many if then else statement that I wonder how long it takes the coder to fine tune all those numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

compareQuikJmaHull.thumb.jpg.3eb8b195d38ebca04c65b69dc8268e43.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

 

Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

Thanks!

 

btw did something happen to this thread? I got like 50 emails that there were new replies but there was really only one new reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

 

1st one approx same as time shown above.

2nd one from today... hth

masOverLaid0127.thumb.jpg.ae12a194527ee33f4ecbc2f41f66604d.jpg

masOverPrice.thumb.jpg.c09b41b4568f30cea1195019fa115644.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CVNA Carvana stock, nice top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
    • GDRX GoodRx stock, good day, watch for a bottom range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?GDRX
    • Date: 14th February 2025.   Can The NASDAQ Maintain Momentum at Key Resistance Level?     The price of the NASDAQ throughout the week rose more than 3.00% to bring the price back up to the instrument’s resistance level. However, while taking into consideration higher inflation, tariffs and the resistance level, could the index maintain momentum?   US Inflation Rises For a 4th Consecutive Month The US Consumer Price Index, or inflation, rose for a 4th consecutive month taking the rate even further away from the Federal Reserve’s target. Analysts were expecting the US inflation rate to remain unchanged at 2.9%. However, consumer inflation rose to 3.00%, the highest since July 2024, while Producer inflation rose to 3.5%. Higher inflation traditionally triggers lower sentiment towards the stock market as investors' risk appetite falls and they prefer the US Dollar. However, on this occasion bullish volatility rose. For this reason, some traders may be considering if the price is overbought in the short term.   Addressing these statistics, US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged that the Fed has yet to achieve its goal of curbing inflation, adding further hawkish signals regarding the monetary policy. Other members of the FOMC also share this view. Today, Raphael Bostic, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, stated that the Fed is unlikely to implement interest rate cuts in the near future. This is due to ongoing economic uncertainty following the introduction of trade tariffs on imported goods and other policies from the Republican-led White House.   Most of the Federal Open Market Committee emphasizes additional time is needed to fully assess the situation. According to the Chicago Exchange FedWatch Tool, interest rate cuts may not start until September 2025.   What’s Driving The NASDAQ Higher? Earnings data this week has continued to support the NASDAQ. Early this morning Airbnb made public their quarterly earnings report whereby they beat both earnings per share and revenue expectations. The Earnings Per Share read 25% higher than expectations and Revenue was more than 2% higher. As a result, the stock rose more than 14%. Another company this week that made public positive earnings data is Cisco which rose by more than 2% on Thursday. Another positive factor continues to be the positive employment data. Even though the positive employment data can push back interest rate cuts, the stability in the short term continues to serve the interests of higher consumer demand. The US Unemployment Rate fell to 4.00% the lowest in 8 months. Lastly, investors are also increasing their exposure to the index due to sellers not being able to maintain control or momentum. Some economists also increase their confidence in economic growth if Trump can obtain a positive outcome from the Ukraine-Russia negotiations.   However, during Friday’s pre-US session trading, 80% of the most influential stocks are witnessing a decline. The NASDAQ itself is trading more or less unchanged. Therefore, the question again arises as to whether the NASDAQ can maintain momentum above this area.   NASDAQ - News and Technical analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ is largely witnessing mainly bullish indications on the 2-hour chart. However, the main concern for traders is the resistance level at $21,960. On the 5-minute timeframe, the price is mainly experiencing bearish signals as the price moves below the 200-period simple moving average.   The VIX, which is largely used as a risk indicator, is currently trading 0.75% higher which indicates a lower risk appetite. In addition to this, bond yields trade 6 points higher. If both the VIX and Bond yields rise further, further pressure may be witnessed for index traders.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • LUNR Intuitive Machines stock watch, attempting to move higher off 18.64 support, target 26 area at https://stockconsultant.com/?LUNR
    • CNXC Concentrix stock watch, pullback to 47.16 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?CNXC
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.