Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Here is a 'very inexpensive' alternative to Juriks Moving Average contributed in Easy Language by John D. McCormick (TS handle = JDM, see jmactrader.com).

 

  Quote
Moving Averages are used to remove noise. By “noise” is meant the apparently random motion up and down of the prices around their average price. This shows up on a moving average as a jagged appearance on an otherwise smooth line. The jaggedness can trigger false buy and sell signals or simply make the indicator hard to read, so we try to smooth out the average, i.e. remove the noise.

 

Lagging or lateness is the bane of moving averages. You make them longer (average in more bars) and the moving average is smoother, but now it lags way behind the actual price movement.

 

The ideal moving average should filter out noise and respond quickly – and – it would be a plus if it was fast calculating. That’s kind of like having your cake and eating it too.

 

Nevertheless, here’s one, I call it Quick MA, that seems to work as well as any I’ve seen.

 

Full thread is at https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=77583&SearchTerm=a%20better%20moving%20average&txtExactMatch=

Posted with his permission. Please retain his 'copyright' info in the code. Many thanks to JDM.

QUICK.ELDFetching info...

Edited by zdo
add TS link, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is the source in readable text

 

Indicator

 

//
//	Plots a fractional-bar Quick Moving Average 
//	with the option to select gapless daily opens.
//
//	copyright 2008 John McCormick jmactrader.com
//
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free
//	as long as it retains the above acknowledge
//

inputs:
Price(Close),
Quick_Length(9),
displace(0),
gapless(0);	// set gap to a non-zero value to skip over opening daily gaps

Var: Length(maxlist(1,Quick_Length));

// GapLess

Vars:			// gapless O,H,L,C where O=C[1]
RelO(0),
RelH(0),
RelL(0),
RelC(0),
gap(0),
Accum(0),
WtMean(0);

if date<>date[1] then begin
gap		=	O-C[1];
Accum	=	Accum+gap;
end;

RelO	=	O-Accum;
RelC	=	C-Accum;
RelH	=	H-Accum;
RelL	=	L-Accum;

			// Gapless bars - end

WtMean = (RelH+RelL+RelC)/3;

// End Gapless

if gapless=0 
then plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(price,length),"FMA_Quick")
else plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(RelC,length)+accum,"FMA_Quick");

 

 

Function

 

//  generates very smooth and responsive moving average
// 	copyright 2008 John McCormick  jmactrader.com
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free 
//  as long as you don't remove the above acknowledgement
//		

Inputs: 
Price(numericseries), 
Length(numericsimple);

Vars:
j(0),
workinglen(maxlist(1,absvalue(Length))),
peak(workinglen/3),
tot(0),
divisor(0);

Array:
val[100](0);

if workinglen>100 then workinglen=100;  //  use larger array to handle lengths over 100


tot=0;
divisor=0;
for j=1 to floor(workinglen+1) begin
if j<=peak then val[j]=j/peak
else val[j]=(workinglen+1-j)/(workinglen+1-peak);
tot=tot+price[j-1]*val[j];
divisor=divisor+val[j];
end;
if divisor<>0 then FMA_smooth=tot/divisor;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a comparison of JurikMA (cyan) and QuickMA (yellow)

 

The arrows show spots where JMA beat QMA to the turn

(Note, though, there may be instances off this chart where QMA leads JMA)

Enjoy

compareQuickVsJurik.thumb.jpg.a61a5b9f770463c292075d4b4c285b4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! Here's the best I could do in that same time period (6/4 YM 1 min).

 

I'm very impressed by how smooth both of those are.

 

There's three in this pic: the light blue was my attempt at smoothing the thin pink one. The other thin pink one was another smooth attempt but it wasn't good.

 

Those up there are very, very smooth.

5aa70e8cad01c_fastmas.thumb.jpg.31b81e042922b635185619ed41e84636.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  rurimoon said:
zdo, your graph show the Quick MA as yellow, and "AMA" as cyan... not JMA. Can you post another graph that have the QuickMA, AMA and JMA on 1 graph?

 

Thanks

 

rurimoon,

 

Yellow is QuickMA

Cyan is really Jurik

(through the 90's it was the only adaptive mov avg I considered, hence the indicator label of "AMA" … (and obviously) it uses JMA function)

TS has an AdaptiveMovingAverage built in (Kaufman’s) but I would be afraid to even allow it to open on my screen …seriously and ;)

If you have TS you can try it... if not let me know and I will take some serious pain medication ;) and put up a comparison. Keep in mind though that the kaufman effectively just 'dynamically' varies the length parameter via a stochastic rather than actually doing the 'phasing and whatever' that more recent ama do...

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo or any other who has QuickMA with Tradestation, can you post a chart of the recent ES or YM with QuickMA(9) and possibly HMA(9) on it?

I translated the code to ninjascript but I don't have tradestation to vertify if my code is right or not. I don't think my code is right.

 

It would be great if you post a recent chart so that I can compare my QuickMA in Ninjatrader with yours. Please tell me if below value match.

 

ES0309 on Jan23,5min chart,

11:00amCT: Price close: 815.50, QMA(9) 819.87

11:05amCT: Price close: 817.25, QMA(9) 819.15

11:10amCT: Price close: 816.50, QMA(9) 818.36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my chart:

 

es030912320095mintg2.jpg

 

The blue line is my QuickMA and red line is HMA. As you can see, my QuickMA is nowhere as fast as HMA, so I think I may be coding it wrong.. and I need to make sure...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rurimoon,

I don't have TradeStation anymore, but I've converted the QuickMA code from EL and got the exact numbers as you did for the 5min ES. Here's a scrrenshot with my conversion of the QuickMA along with HMA and a conversion I did from what is "supposed to be" JMA converted from Metatrader.

 

Magenta is HMA

Blue is the converted QuickMA

Black is the converted JMA

 

 

VT

MAcomparison.thumb.png.69216c8e1ac856d586cb885f07930b6d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to verifying for me. I have always though that QuickMA should be at least on pair with HMA so I don't believe in my coding skill when I see that it lag behind so much. I am in the process of converting JMA from metatrader to ninjascript also. The problem is I have find at least 5 different version of JMA in Metatrader and I have no idea which one produce more accurate result with the real JMA. Can you tell me which version of JMA from metatrader that you are using? (Of course it would be best if you can share your code :)

 

P.S. I have a version of JMA in metatrader that is so cheesy, it has at least 50 variable defined. Basically it change its formula base on which period it used... the code has so many if then else statement that I wonder how long it takes the coder to fine tune all those numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

compareQuikJmaHull.thumb.jpg.3eb8b195d38ebca04c65b69dc8268e43.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

 

Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

Thanks!

 

btw did something happen to this thread? I got like 50 emails that there were new replies but there was really only one new reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  metalhead said:
Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

 

1st one approx same as time shown above.

2nd one from today... hth

masOverLaid0127.thumb.jpg.ae12a194527ee33f4ecbc2f41f66604d.jpg

masOverPrice.thumb.jpg.c09b41b4568f30cea1195019fa115644.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.