Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Here is a 'very inexpensive' alternative to Juriks Moving Average contributed in Easy Language by John D. McCormick (TS handle = JDM, see jmactrader.com).

 

Moving Averages are used to remove noise. By “noise” is meant the apparently random motion up and down of the prices around their average price. This shows up on a moving average as a jagged appearance on an otherwise smooth line. The jaggedness can trigger false buy and sell signals or simply make the indicator hard to read, so we try to smooth out the average, i.e. remove the noise.

 

Lagging or lateness is the bane of moving averages. You make them longer (average in more bars) and the moving average is smoother, but now it lags way behind the actual price movement.

 

The ideal moving average should filter out noise and respond quickly – and – it would be a plus if it was fast calculating. That’s kind of like having your cake and eating it too.

 

Nevertheless, here’s one, I call it Quick MA, that seems to work as well as any I’ve seen.

 

Full thread is at https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=77583&SearchTerm=a%20better%20moving%20average&txtExactMatch=

Posted with his permission. Please retain his 'copyright' info in the code. Many thanks to JDM.

QUICK.ELD

Edited by zdo
add TS link, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is the source in readable text

 

Indicator

 

//
//	Plots a fractional-bar Quick Moving Average 
//	with the option to select gapless daily opens.
//
//	copyright 2008 John McCormick jmactrader.com
//
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free
//	as long as it retains the above acknowledge
//

inputs:
Price(Close),
Quick_Length(9),
displace(0),
gapless(0);	// set gap to a non-zero value to skip over opening daily gaps

Var: Length(maxlist(1,Quick_Length));

// GapLess

Vars:			// gapless O,H,L,C where O=C[1]
RelO(0),
RelH(0),
RelL(0),
RelC(0),
gap(0),
Accum(0),
WtMean(0);

if date<>date[1] then begin
gap		=	O-C[1];
Accum	=	Accum+gap;
end;

RelO	=	O-Accum;
RelC	=	C-Accum;
RelH	=	H-Accum;
RelL	=	L-Accum;

			// Gapless bars - end

WtMean = (RelH+RelL+RelC)/3;

// End Gapless

if gapless=0 
then plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(price,length),"FMA_Quick")
else plot1[displace](FMA_Smooth(RelC,length)+accum,"FMA_Quick");

 

 

Function

 

//  generates very smooth and responsive moving average
// 	copyright 2008 John McCormick  jmactrader.com
//	feel free to copy and use this code royalty free 
//  as long as you don't remove the above acknowledgement
//		

Inputs: 
Price(numericseries), 
Length(numericsimple);

Vars:
j(0),
workinglen(maxlist(1,absvalue(Length))),
peak(workinglen/3),
tot(0),
divisor(0);

Array:
val[100](0);

if workinglen>100 then workinglen=100;  //  use larger array to handle lengths over 100


tot=0;
divisor=0;
for j=1 to floor(workinglen+1) begin
if j<=peak then val[j]=j/peak
else val[j]=(workinglen+1-j)/(workinglen+1-peak);
tot=tot+price[j-1]*val[j];
divisor=divisor+val[j];
end;
if divisor<>0 then FMA_smooth=tot/divisor;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a comparison of JurikMA (cyan) and QuickMA (yellow)

 

The arrows show spots where JMA beat QMA to the turn

(Note, though, there may be instances off this chart where QMA leads JMA)

Enjoy

compareQuickVsJurik.thumb.jpg.a61a5b9f770463c292075d4b4c285b4e.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! Here's the best I could do in that same time period (6/4 YM 1 min).

 

I'm very impressed by how smooth both of those are.

 

There's three in this pic: the light blue was my attempt at smoothing the thin pink one. The other thin pink one was another smooth attempt but it wasn't good.

 

Those up there are very, very smooth.

5aa70e8cad01c_fastmas.thumb.jpg.31b81e042922b635185619ed41e84636.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zdo, your graph show the Quick MA as yellow, and "AMA" as cyan... not JMA. Can you post another graph that have the QuickMA, AMA and JMA on 1 graph?

 

Thanks

 

rurimoon,

 

Yellow is QuickMA

Cyan is really Jurik

(through the 90's it was the only adaptive mov avg I considered, hence the indicator label of "AMA" … (and obviously) it uses JMA function)

TS has an AdaptiveMovingAverage built in (Kaufman’s) but I would be afraid to even allow it to open on my screen …seriously and ;)

If you have TS you can try it... if not let me know and I will take some serious pain medication ;) and put up a comparison. Keep in mind though that the kaufman effectively just 'dynamically' varies the length parameter via a stochastic rather than actually doing the 'phasing and whatever' that more recent ama do...

hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo or any other who has QuickMA with Tradestation, can you post a chart of the recent ES or YM with QuickMA(9) and possibly HMA(9) on it?

I translated the code to ninjascript but I don't have tradestation to vertify if my code is right or not. I don't think my code is right.

 

It would be great if you post a recent chart so that I can compare my QuickMA in Ninjatrader with yours. Please tell me if below value match.

 

ES0309 on Jan23,5min chart,

11:00amCT: Price close: 815.50, QMA(9) 819.87

11:05amCT: Price close: 817.25, QMA(9) 819.15

11:10amCT: Price close: 816.50, QMA(9) 818.36

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my chart:

 

es030912320095mintg2.jpg

 

The blue line is my QuickMA and red line is HMA. As you can see, my QuickMA is nowhere as fast as HMA, so I think I may be coding it wrong.. and I need to make sure...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rurimoon,

I don't have TradeStation anymore, but I've converted the QuickMA code from EL and got the exact numbers as you did for the 5min ES. Here's a scrrenshot with my conversion of the QuickMA along with HMA and a conversion I did from what is "supposed to be" JMA converted from Metatrader.

 

Magenta is HMA

Blue is the converted QuickMA

Black is the converted JMA

 

 

VT

MAcomparison.thumb.png.69216c8e1ac856d586cb885f07930b6d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to verifying for me. I have always though that QuickMA should be at least on pair with HMA so I don't believe in my coding skill when I see that it lag behind so much. I am in the process of converting JMA from metatrader to ninjascript also. The problem is I have find at least 5 different version of JMA in Metatrader and I have no idea which one produce more accurate result with the real JMA. Can you tell me which version of JMA from metatrader that you are using? (Of course it would be best if you can share your code :)

 

P.S. I have a version of JMA in metatrader that is so cheesy, it has at least 50 variable defined. Basically it change its formula base on which period it used... the code has so many if then else statement that I wonder how long it takes the coder to fine tune all those numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

compareQuikJmaHull.thumb.jpg.3eb8b195d38ebca04c65b69dc8268e43.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Find attached screenshot with

Red = Hull

White = Quick

Blue = Jma

 

All set to 4 periods

 

Hull definitely turns faster

Jma definitely goes flat faster and more smoothly than the other two (and that is about the only utility for mov avgs I have)

Quick came along for free so I shared it for ppl who don’t like to buy closed source products etc.

 

ie best one depends on your own distinctive needs.

 

hth

 

PS rurimoon re "Basically it change its formula base on which period it used"

That particular one is not it... :hmpf:

 

Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

Thanks!

 

btw did something happen to this thread? I got like 50 emails that there were new replies but there was really only one new reply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for posting that chart. Would you mind posting another one with the MAs overlaid over the candles, too? I want to see how price bars interact with the MAs.

 

 

1st one approx same as time shown above.

2nd one from today... hth

masOverLaid0127.thumb.jpg.ae12a194527ee33f4ecbc2f41f66604d.jpg

masOverPrice.thumb.jpg.c09b41b4568f30cea1195019fa115644.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.