Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wasp

Thread Banter Continuum

Recommended Posts

I'm now just basically waiting for the current hourly candle to close above that steepest trend-line to go long. I'll consider a short if price closes below that bottom trend-line. But that means waiting another hour for the close. OR, I've seen wasp use the close of the 30-min candle to take entries if the 30-min closes above/below a TL. However, I've also seen entries taken on the 30-min become invalidated by the end of the hourly close. It's safest to wait for the hourly close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a word of caution. You shouldn't take the break of the TL. The hourly candle can spike up, then come right back down and close below the trendline. That's why you have to wait for the hourly to close to be safest.

 

EDIT: The BETTER trendline to break would be the shallower one, imo. If price breaks and closes above that, I'll long it. Reason being: It would also (hopefully) close above that S/R zone, which would help further protect stops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great activity going on here... there's more activity here than in the Live indices thread right now. So I'm going to bug you guys a bit more :)

 

I was wondering how many trades you guys on average take per week?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
Great activity going on here... there's more activity here than in the Live indices thread right now. So I'm going to bug you guys a bit more :)

 

I was wondering how many trades you guys on average take per week?

 

None of your business... bugger off to your own board! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
Ey! You shouldn't be posting at all, remember? :deal:

 

No posting of live calls I said... I also said I will stick around to moan at cowpip when he f*cks up and to take the piss out of you so I am allowed!!! :haha:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
As the lows were rejected, I looked then for a long... There was a pullback to S providing the long signal and thus personally, I have entered long on that (per the triangle)

 

I was wondering about that. I was going to take that same trade, but of course, I didn't.

 

Wasp, do you have more than one set of S/R lines, for each time-frame (30-min, hourly, 240)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
I was wondering about that. I was going to take that same trade, but of course, I didn't.

 

Wasp, do you have more than one set of S/R lines, for each time-frame (30-min, hourly, 240)?

 

No, but I adapt them as price changes and S/R moves here and there so they are right as per the last time they were in that region. If you go back, you will see my S/R is perfect for the last time they were used, but go back a week and they would have been slightly different according to PA then... Basically, if price has made a new low say, 10 below my 240m level, once we have moved away from that level, I normally adjust it so next time it is correct per the last time we were at that price. Levels aren't static, they move with the times.

 

A bit like Prince. Or was that the sign of the times? :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Levels aren't static, they move with the times.

 

Argh! And all this time, I was assuming they were always pretty-much fixed in time, which helped (in my mind) explain why you have to go so far back in time to confirm a level. The levels back in time seem to coincide very nicely with current-day levels, which is why I thought they were essentially static. You set them once and they change very little.

 

But I agree - and I can see, that on the 240min charts, the reaction levels are a bit different (by tens of pips in some cases).

 

I wonder if I would have traded any differently had I known this. Hmmm... Back to the drawing board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
Argh! And all this time, I was assuming they were always pretty-much fixed in time, which helped (in my mind) explain why you have to go so far back in time to confirm a level. The levels back in time seem to coincide very nicely with current-day levels, which is why I thought they were essentially static. You set them once and they change very little.

 

But I agree - and I can see, that on the 240min charts, the reaction levels are a bit different (by tens of pips in some cases).

 

I wonder if I would have traded any differently had I known this. Hmmm... Back to the drawing board.

 

Sorry, BUT, I did tell you NOT to try and copy me for this reason among many... There are many things ingrained in my head that I don't even think of mentioning.

 

Yes, they are static from times ago but, everything will change slightly... Sometimes not at all, sometimes a few pips, sometimes they will become redundant and knowing which and how and why, is just something I learnt through experience, trial and error... no fixed rules for them I'm afraid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to be sorry. This is my problem, not yours. I'm not trying to copy you... just learn your methodology, which requires some emulation. I feel like I've almost got this down, although my P&L would beg to differ. But that's ok, I'm patient enough to work through this until all the pieces fit together.

 

Thanks for the info.

 

PS: See, this is why it's nice to have you around - I don't mind picking up all of your brain-leakage. It's valuable to me. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
I don't mind picking up all of your brain-leakage. It's valuable to me. ;)

 

That's good cos the missus was getting fed up with the mess on the shoulder of my t-shirt! :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a thread to dump all the non-call chat on the live threads but without cluttering up the trade analysis thread. (where I normally put it!)

 

Its for Firewalker and I to move anything we see fit after close of business and then discussions can continue here, rather than on the trade analysis thread as it is not always just about singular trades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Hmmmmmmmmmmm, I think this market has pretty much stopped now!

 

Yep... it's definitely ramping down toward a flat-line status. I guess almost all of the air in this balloon has been bled away.

 

T'is a pity that I wasn't able to better capitalize on more of the action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  pipMonster said:
You had to say that, didn't you! :o

 

Price has now moved against me by better than 40 pips :frustrated:

 

Sorry dude. I haven't quite figured out the key here, but I think if you burp, then swallow, then fart, it will run in your direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

excellent posts guys. wish I could understand your reasoning for them. i can guess some of the mechanisms.

however, i am interested in the long-bias that cowpip seems to have.

on 4-hr and 1-hr, i have short-bias. just cant see the long, except the support at 187.50 (easier to see on 4-hrs). and the res at 194-ish from march this year which was clearly rejected on sep-8th.

clearly i am not in same league as wasp, but there appears to be a down-channel, so would be biased towards looking for shorts.

 

all in hindsight, of course. (please forgive the RSI indicator!)

gj-sep11.thumb.jpg.f5b4dfa1cc69145968a8fd6e90a98b5a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI

 

sometimes you get long signals that need to be reversed when it breaks back down but we are talking overall averages here, not perfection.... That costs!

now.gif.d758a1ccc990b1423069b9eb9179457f.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  myrtleturtle said:
excellent posts guys. wish I could understand your reasoning for them. i can guess some of the mechanisms.

however, i am interested in the long-bias that cowpip seems to have.

on 4-hr and 1-hr, i have short-bias. just cant see the long, except the support at 187.50 (easier to see on 4-hrs). and the res at 194-ish from march this year which was clearly rejected on sep-8th.

clearly i am not in same league as wasp, but there appears to be a down-channel, so would be biased towards looking for shorts.

 

all in hindsight, of course. (please forgive the RSI indicator!)

 

myrtleturtle, yeah, hindsight is 20-20, for sure. I hate to blame things for losses, but I really and truly am thinking that I was just too blasted tired to be thinking straight the last few days. Having the laptop beside my bed has turned out to be a bad idea. But hey, you don't know until you try, right? I slept last night without the laptop and I'm thinking a whole lot clearer than I was. Huge difference.

 

Also, I wasn't seeing a channel at all. I saw a range and I was hoping to catch the bounce off the bottom of the range. Not to be so this time, so I took another loss last night on that last trade I annotated.

 

Fatigue can dull the edge. I should have known better.

 

So I will now only be taking trades during the US session - and maybe the early Asian session. I may also start focusing less on GJ and more on the dollar pairs, since GJ often is more noisy during the US session.

 

Yes, the profit targets are smaller, but with less noise, the risk is also lower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
myrtleturtle, yeah, hindsight is 20-20, for sure. I hate to blame things for losses, but I really and truly am thinking that I was just too blasted tired to be thinking straight the last few days. Having the laptop beside my bed has turned out to be a bad idea. But hey, you don't know until you try, right? I slept last night without the laptop and I'm thinking a whole lot clearer than I was. Huge difference.

 

Also, I wasn't seeing a channel at all. I saw a range and I was hoping to catch the bounce off the bottom of the range. Not to be so this time, so I took another loss last night on that last trade I annotated.

 

Fatigue can dull the edge. I should have known better.

 

So I will now only be taking trades during the US session - and maybe the early Asian session. I may also start focusing less on GJ and more on the dollar pairs, since GJ often is more noisy during the US session.

 

Yes, the profit targets are smaller, but with less noise, the risk is also lower.

 

GJ can be a nasty bugger at times and there are smoother easier pairs. Yes, the pip count is smaller but its what you make overall, and the ROI rather than thinking of the large numbers GJ provides.

 

Also, 24hr trading really is bad for your health!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  cowpip said:
It went to +30 for me... I had a feeling it wouldn't run lower, given the 180 pips it already had run for the day.

 

Sorry to hear about your loss. This is one heck of a choppy market. Doesn't look like it'll settle down anytime soon, given how jittery everyone is about Lehman. And hey, have you all heard? The U.S. govt is actively engaged in orchestrating another takeover of Lehman. Woo hoo! More liability on the U.S. taxpayer, perhaps? Now why would the dollar rally on such news? Ah well, nothing makes sense anymore. Not even price action is making much sense.

 

This is my earlier point on news/fundamentals. Just because at face value, you'd expect one thing, to those moving the markets, there could be so many underlying and knock on effects that we don't consider that its hell trying to trade off funnymentals alone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.