Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wasp

I Want Volume (spot Vs Futures)

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have come to the conclusion that the final missing peg in my trading is volume.

 

As a spot FX trader, I do not have it so my question is.........

 

Anyone tried spot and futures and can tell me if there are any major differences between the two? (that may hindrance my trading rather than enhance with volume)... ie liquidity, size, brokers, spreads, hours etc....

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use tic volume of spot as a proxy.

 

Within a 3 trillion a day market knowing how much moves the market one pip is irrelevant. One day it might be 1 million another 1 billion. It depends on time of day and center, customer, market maker etc.

 

As for Futures then there is a constant arbitrage by the spot jokeys who are trying to pick off the retail hence the reason why there is any genuine liquidity in futures at all. Note what happens at Govt. Reports when the Arb conveniently turns its algo off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  alleyb said:
You can use tic volume of spot as a proxy.

 

Within a 3 trillion a day market knowing how much moves the market one pip is irrelevant. One day it might be 1 million another 1 billion. It depends on time of day and center, customer, market maker etc.

 

As for Futures then there is a constant arbitrage by the spot jokeys who are trying to pick off the retail hence the reason why there is any genuine liquidity in futures at all. Note what happens at Govt. Reports when the Arb conveniently turns its algo off

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f24/thoughts-on-forex-volume-4227.html

 

I'll pass on the tic volume.

 

As for the rest, along with the other threads on another forum I have read, it seems futures are not the way forward.

 

Cheers anyhow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  wasp said:

 

As for the rest, along with the other threads on another forum I have read, it seems futures are not the way forward.

 

Why?

 

  alleyb said:
Note what happens at Govt. Reports when the Arb conveniently turns its algo off

 

Please elaborate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if you use a time based chart you can use a chart from the futures market and compare then just enter your orders on the corresponding spot market.

 

Its going to be the same chart patterns (except some will be inverse, but same idea).

 

Or you could just trade CME futures... there is increasing liquidity in those markets so depending on the size you want to trade you should be just fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forsearch said:
Why?

 

Well as you asked so nicely.....

 

 

1. Less liquidity

2. Only a few currency pairs are actually available.

3. less position size flexibility since futures lot sizes are fixed and larger than what can be had in the spot market.

4. Also, total transactions costs could be higher given commission + spread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I recall, as per Brownsfan(perhaps you can check with him), there is enough liquidity on the CME currency futures to trade with, plus the main advantage being a regulated market and the price moves are similar to those on the Spot market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Bearbull said:
If I recall, as per Brownsfan(perhaps you can check with him), there is enough liquidity on the CME currency futures to trade with, plus the main advantage being a regulated market and the price moves are similar to those on the Spot market.

 

Interesting.......... As I was reading elsewhere, the liquidity was dire and the pairs available low, but, they were older threads so if the above is the case, my interest may be re kindled.

 

I obviously want the the best of both worlds so would like to see the same sort of price action, equal or more liquidity, access to many pairs but predominately Yens, low costs, spreads and commissions and the same hours available.

 

All that with volume and regulation would make me a happy man!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wasp said:
Interesting.......... As I was reading elsewhere, the liquidity was dire and the pairs available low, but, they were older threads so if the above is the case, my interest may be re kindled.

 

I obviously want the the best of both worlds so would like to see the same sort of price action, equal or more liquidity, access to many pairs but predominately Yens, low costs, spreads and commissions and the same hours available.

 

All that with volume and regulation would make me a happy man!

 

Through these guy I guess would be a good choice?

 

http://www.fxmarketspace.com/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is as much liquidity as you want during normal trading hours in each center due to the arb who are constantly doing exchange futures for physical (EFP) except right at Govt reports when they momentarily turn the algo off and then you will find out that the liquidity is thin and gaps quite normal. As for turning your nose up at tic volume then you obviously are not aware that tic volume is at least 95% correlated to actual cash or underlying volume on all studies done in futures marklets vs cash markets. Your point about less pairs is correct for the futures markets cannot even provide liquidity in Gbp/Jpy but in Eur/Jpy there is a constant 5 tic bid offer spread again due to the arb however to do something like Aud/Jpy you would have to trade the seperate contracts where as well there is a difference in size the Aud contract being $100k and the Jpy contract being $125k thereby creating a mismatch unless you have the capabilty of trading size.

The question as to volume I thought I had made the point in that the eternal question of how much can move the market 1 tic/pip is it depends IE sometimes it takes 1million to move the mkt and sometimes 1 billion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Thanks Alex - what about CME's new FXMarketSpace. Any thoughts here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  forsearch said:
Thanks Alex - what about CME's new FXMarketSpace. Any thoughts here?

 

http://www.fxmarketspace.com/about/customers.html

 

Customers

 

FXMarketSpace provides services to institutional customers. These include banks, asset managers, proprietary trading desks, leveraged funds, currency overlay managers, hedge funds, CTAs and corporates. Customers must be "market counterparties" under UK FSA rules and Eligible Contract Participants (as defined in US legislation). FXMarketSpace does not trade with individuals trading for their own account. Customers can access FXMarketSpace by using the services of a CME Clearing Member or a Prime Broker (and the Prime Broker's affiliated CME Clearing Member).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
  brownsfan019 said:
http://www.fxmarketspace.com/about/customers.html

 

Customers

 

FXMarketSpace provides services to institutional customers. These include banks, asset managers, proprietary trading desks, leveraged funds, currency overlay managers, hedge funds, CTAs and corporates. Customers must be "market counterparties" under UK FSA rules and Eligible Contract Participants (as defined in US legislation). FXMarketSpace does not trade with individuals trading for their own account. Customers can access FXMarketSpace by using the services of a CME Clearing Member or a Prime Broker (and the Prime Broker's affiliated CME Clearing Member).

 

Yeah, I read that too, BF. I'm looking for an institutional bank/desk trader perspective here though. Maybe AlleyB or GammaJammer can chime in, as appropriate.

Edited by forsearch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strikes me that fxmarketspace is about creating a platform that allows those who currently are barred from the EBS platform to participate in a similar way to how EBS operates. For individuals then the bucket shop is still the only aveneue unless you trade futures but there are many shortcomings to futures as already discussed IE the lack of pairs or at any rate liquid pairs being one of the key issues. Although futures markets standardize terms and conditions of a contract the hopscotch nature of all currency futures being a USD product thereby creating the inverse price structure to the spot in CAD or JPY or CHF also creates confusion and the fact that the GBP and the AUD and CAD are different size contracts to the Euro and CHF also does not help make the product as simple and straightforward as it could be.

For those that wish to trade a single product then the CME currency futures in the majors is great way to particpate but what some might call the exotics or others might just call the X rates is frequently where the the 10000 pip moves are located - the GBP right now of course proving to be the exception but the current move in GBP is a once in 15 year occurence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  smwinc said:
EBS data is your best bet.

 

You can get the data feed through CQG.

 

Just thought I would repeat your post smwinc as it seemed to answer the question but somehow appears to have been missed. My understanding of EBS and how it works is this data would be a good proxy for total volume in certain cureency pairs. Anyone have any thoughts on the EBS data available through CQG? Pros, cons etc.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few points - firstly EBS data would represent a good proxy for the market (in relative, NOT absolute terms of course) in maybe 4 or 5 pairs at best. These are;

 

EUR/USD, USD/JPY, USD/CHF, EUR/CHF, EUR/JPY

 

Secondly, FX Marketspace - think this may be dying a slow death.

 

Thirdly Tic volume. Knowing how it's calculated, I can't personally take it seriously. Even at times when there's correlation there most definitely isn't a sustainable cause / effect line (I bet non of these studies undertaken included granger causality modelling or anything like that). Now it is up to each trader to make his / her own minds up about this kind of thing, and it does apear to be one of those topice that polarises opinion on this and other boards. If I were being really spiky I'd say opinion is polarised roughly along lines of experience but lets not go there for now ;)

 

Wasp however, I think, may have been at least in part swayed by my arguments last time this topic came up. I posted a ton of stuff on this last time so don't propose to go into it again now.

 

fourthly - general point - the fx market, as a function of it's fragmented nature, doesn't have access to market wide data (actually, with the growth of dark pools of liquidity I suspect neitehr do many equities traders either these days but thats anotehr story). And as such hasn't grown to rely on it. Thus any analysis that uses it I'd take with a small pinch of salt.

 

My $0.02

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  GammaJammer said:
Few points - firstly EBS data would represent a good proxy for the market (in relative, NOT absolute terms of course) in maybe 4 or 5 pairs at best. These are;

 

EUR/USD, USD/JPY, USD/CHF, EUR/CHF, EUR/JPY

 

Secondly, FX Marketspace - think this may be dying a slow death.

 

GJ

 

Dead on . . for more explanation, search for other posts from GJ, he's made plenty of great explanations here.

 

Along with EBS, Reuters D2 is the other big player.

 

FX Marketspace . . never heard of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  alleyb said:
As for turning your nose up at tic volume then you obviously are not aware that tic volume is at least 95% correlated to actual cash or underlying volume on all studies done in futures marklets vs cash markets.

 

This is interesting because I have just been reading hundreds of threads saying the opposite. What studies have been done that empirically show positive correlation between tic volume and the spot or even the futures market?

 

Thx.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It also wouldn't matter if there was a 95% correlation if the 5% occurred at important times, thus making the correlation poor for assisting decision making (but how do you prove this correlation if there is no core source of volume to compare it with - which makes it sound like a factoid).

 

I'm in the "show me the studies" camp with snackly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Kiwi said:
It also wouldn't matter if there was a 95% correlation if the 5% occurred at important times, thus making the correlation poor for assisting decision making (but how do you prove this correlation if there is no core source of volume to compare it with - which makes it sound like a factoid).

 

I'm in the "show me the studies" camp with snackly.

 

Well if it was 95% correlated you could use it effectively by hedging for the remaining 5%. The mechanics get a bit more complicated and transaction costs would go up, but a true 95% correlation that was empirical would be extremely welcome. Afterall, the USDCHF is 95% negatively correlated to the EURUSD, is it not? That matters a lot I think. Experts feel free to correct me.

 

But Kiwi you are right, how can you show a 95% correlation without full volume data? That said, if you could correlate it 95% to EBS volume, I think that would be much more informative than having no empirical correlation at all, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  snackly said:
Afterall, the USDCHF is 95% negatively correlated to the EURUSD, is it not? That matters a lot I think. Experts feel free to correct me.

 

snackly, forgive me if I have misinterpreted your comment, but here goes...

 

This near 100% negative correlation between EUR/USD and USD/CHF is because these two are quoted inversely to each other. If EUR/CHF didn't move at all then the negative correlation between the two would be exactly 100%, but only because one is quoted with USD as the base currency, while in the other it is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.