Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RobinHood

Training with a Simulator

Recommended Posts

What are the best uses of a simulator when preparing to trade with real money?

 

Am I watching it to get a feel for T&S before I begin trading?

Am I trying different methods and ideas?

 

What about "working orders"?, this isn't really possible/realistic in a simulator.

 

 

Some of my ideas for using the simulator were:

Checkout different markets and different time-frames (1min, 2min, 5min, 15min).

Try scalping, try intra-day swing trading

Watching T&S, DOM and price.

See if you can consistently lose money on purpose (its seems easy to make money in a sim, but can I lose my money while still using proper risk management?)

 

 

When should I look to move on to trading real-money?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use tradestations simulator to test out new concepts in real-time. I'm very happy with it. It deducts the commissions per trade and summarizes my daily trades as if a real account. I trade exactly according to my trading plan as if I was using real money. In other words, once I hit my daily loss, I stop. If I reach a daily goal I stop. If the market is not to my liking, I don't trade. At times I almost forget I'm trading fake money.

 

The only complaint is the simulator is not accurate with slippage. So, you will be generating system results slightly better than reality. So, deduct a point or two on each trade for slippage. For a scalper this becomes a big deal while a swing traders this is less of an issue.

 

I'm testing a new concept as well. This is the second week of testing and I'm probably going to trade it for at least 4 weeks total before dedicating real money to it. Even then I may ease into it. During testing is the time to find the kinks and implement improvements. Maybe your stops are too tight or too lose? Maybe your trades work out better the last two hours of the day? Maybe it's best to skip Mondays. Look at all the possibilities.

 

If you can't consistently make money on a simulator there is no hope in the real market. Don't be in a hurry to trade with real money until you feel confident with your system and you can demonstrate an edge over the market.

 

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most realistic simulator out there is X_Trader run in a demo account. You can even use working orders, because it calculates your (worst-case) position in the limit queue (called Estimated Position In Queue or EPIQ) to determine when to execute limit orders. If you know how FIFO limit order books work then you will appreciate that it doesn't get more realistic than that. Slippage is also no problem since you can see in the their DOM (shown in MD_Trader) the number of limit orders on each side. The only thing that it does not take into account is your commission, but you can easily calculate that yourself.

 

You should only trade with real money after you have tested your strategy until you feel confident that you can make money consistently with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch

Remember, most demos are merely sales tools for brokers, and thus tend to present their platform and feed in the fastest and best light. You may go "ooooh and aaaaah" at the laser lightning fast speed and execution of your limit orders in the demo queue, not realizing that the real thing is a far different beast.

 

For example, Open E Cry's sim, called OEC Trader Demo, will treat limit orders sitting in the queue as though they are MIT (market if touched) orders. In other words, with OEC's demo, your limit orders will always be filled if price touches your level, giving you a false sense of "robustness".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For example, Open E Cry's sim, called OEC Trader Demo, will treat limit orders sitting in the queue as though they are MIT (market if touched) orders. In other words, with OEC's demo, your limit orders will always be filled if price touches your level, giving you a false sense of "robustness".

 

Yeah, it's very important to understand how order matching works. That's why I said, the only realistic simulator I have seen is X_Trader because they do it correctly. NinjaTrader does not do it right either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from Ninja-Traders website:

"This is not a simple algorithm that fills your orders once the market trades through your order price. It's comprehensive in that it uses a number of variables such as ask/bid size, trade size, time (to simulated order queue position) and order delay to determine fill amount and probability"
.

 

Anyway, even if X_Trader is just a little more realistic, I need something I can afford. Also it would mean learning the platform when I'm finding figuring out NT hard enough..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"This is not a simple algorithm that fills your orders once the market trades through your order price. It's comprehensive in that it uses a number of variables such as ask/bid size, trade size, time (to simulated order queue position) and order delay to determine fill amount and probability"

 

Yeah, you know, talk is cheap. Why don't they just post their algorithm, so we can see for our self if it's realistic or not.

I personally tried NinjaTrader's Sim and it was totally unrealistic (but not necessarily in a bad way). I'll give you an example of what I saw. The are 100 contracts offered. I join the offer (that means, I also put a limit order at the offered price). That means 100 contracts are in front of my contract since the markets I trade use the FIFO algorithm for order matching. So when 100 contracts trade at that price, my contract should execute next. There is no way around that, that are the rules of the exchange. But in NinjaTrader there might come 200 contracts after my contract, 100 contracts trade (so I should be next), but then another 100 trade and you are still not executed. No matter what they do, it's just not correct. You don't need some fancy algorithm (which obviously does not work correctly) to determine whether to fill a limit order or not, just use the exchange rules, but I guess the NinjaTrader developers don't exactly know how that works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest forsearch
Yeah, you know, talk is cheap. Why don't they just post their algorithm, so we can see for our self if it's realistic or not.

I personally tried NinjaTrader's Sim and it was totally unrealistic (but not necessarily in a bad way). I'll give you an example of what I saw. The are 100 contracts offered. I join the offer (that means, I also put a limit order at the offered price). That means 100 contracts are in front of my contract since the markets I trade use the FIFO algorithm for order matching. So when 100 contracts trade at that price, my contract should execute next. There is no way around that, that are the rules of the exchange. But in NinjaTrader there might come 200 contracts after my contract, 100 contracts trade (so I should be next), but then another 100 trade and you are still not executed. No matter what they do, it's just not correct. You don't need some fancy algorithm (which obviously does not work correctly) to determine whether to fill a limit order or not, just use the exchange rules, but I guess the NinjaTrader developers don't exactly know how that works.

 

Actually, that's NOT a such a bad thing, after all. Forcing price to trade thru your order level makes certain that you're not being too optimistic in your trading strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not say that it's a bad thing and it has nothing to do with being too optimistic. It's just incorrect. For example, The Estimated Position In Queue (EPIQ) that X_Trader calculates is actually the worst-case scenario since they calculate the worst position that you could possibly have. Your position is most of the times better since contracts in front of you might have been canceled. There is no need to add some randomness for not executing your order like NinjaTrader does. I am just saying that it's unnecessary and probably hurts more than it helps since you can't get a realistic feel for getting executed (there are trading strategies that are based on this fact, so I think it's important).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a very easy way around the 'did my order get hit thing' when using a sim like OEC or Ninja where it's basically a MIT order - just place your order 1 tick above/below where you actually want to get in.

 

Example: you want to buy the ES at 1289.00. Well, put your buy order at 1288.75. If it touches 88.75, your 89.00 order would have filled in real-time.

 

In this thread I talk about it more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.