Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

atto

Chat Junkies

Recommended Posts

  firewalker said:

I don't like how the ranges are getting smaller and volatility is decreasing, but we seem to be working towards a converging point, and - as you said in a previous post - new highs don't seem to exceed previous highs by that much. Perhaps this supplyline is one reason of the problem:

 

Well so much for a converging point. Here's the updated picture:

 

sorry Hlm, I have to take back what I said earlier, the line of least resistance is still up I guess.

es_channel.gif.19617d615751c96bd9ce4ad2cf4c6409.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is what kept me bias sideways to up today. Note the profile I have in blue here. the development of this profile set this time frame up for an attempt to the upside. This was determined when price made it's way above 7850 area and and higher. What I wanted to see was a pullback to hold the in that green thick 7799 area with the lowest of the range being around 7749. If that 7749 line had broken down I would have considered the attempt up to be a failure. Price did attempt at it later but it never cracked so sticking to the bias the long side. A target upside is another time frame midpoint around 7968 which price did get to but made a crap attempt to get past and back down it went.

So now we have an issue . We have price trapped between these 2 value areas. Note the blue regression line of the profile showing that it hold a slight skew to the upside meaning it would ideally like to work away from that red 7850 line. But, we also have a skew down on the top pushing down and away from the 7968 red line area. Bottom line is these red lined areas are vital areas to look at on the YM. We want to see one of the areas to break and also see the value areas broken . So 7749 down below currently and 8068 upside. These numbers can and will change dynamically based on swings we see overnight and during the open tomorrow but thats how I see it now.

5aa70ec83bb8d_Picture22.thumb.jpg.aa658192153391b323764e8b67481b9b.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:

sorry Hlm, I have to take back what I said earlier, the line of least resistance is still up I guess.

 

And so we continue following the path of least resistance.

 

Like I said to TOG today, wait for the EOD rally... we closed at an interesting point. Despite what all the indicators say, we're not yet into overbought territory if you watch the channel.

es_channel.thumb.gif.d5a048077b345ef52970a44ce2a498b7.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  firewalker said:
And so we continue following the path of least resistance.

 

Like I said to TOG today, wait for the EOD rally... we closed at an interesting point. Despite what all the indicators say, we're not yet into overbought territory if you watch the channel.

 

I posted a few charts for Gringo to the WF a few minutes ago that address both the Naz and the SPX. Channels, swing points, resistance. Just makes you go all wet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wjrusnak said:
Interesting spot for the DOW wouldn't you say?

 

 

There was distribution in the Materials and Industrials ETFs yesterday but I didn't bother to look at them until today. That would help explain today's action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is updated from what I posted earlier today in chat.

 

There was some interest in chat over my Trading Journal. I've had it for a while, and have modified and improved it over time. I cleaned up a large portion of it, and am almost to the point where I'd be fine for others to use it.

 

You guys are free to play around with it and let me know what you think. If there's any problems, let me know. It's designed for Excel 2007, so the .xls version does not work quite as well, but I'm leaving it here because several of you don't have Excel 2007 (a free alternative is OpenOffice).

 

I think my instructions included are clear, but let me know if you have any issues. Once you guys play around with this enough and I iron out some kinks, I'll post it for the general TL public.

 

As a visual comparison, this is how it should look (Excel 2007):

attachment.php?attachmentid=11565&stc=1&d=1245461123

The spreadsheet calculates most of that data. Only date, time, instrument, size, and price are required (but the REAL reason this is here is for the Setup / Reason and the Comments).

 

Note: The Stats is dirty and not complete (daily/weekly tracking isn't included yet). I'm working on it.

tradejournal.zipFetching info...

log.PNG.c93added080a58eb0f494b8cc73855c0.PNG

Edited by atto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  atto said:
This is updated from what I posted earlier today in chat.

 

There was some interest in chat over my Trading Journal. I've had it for a while, and have modified and improved it over time. I cleaned up a large portion of it, and am almost to the point where I'd be fine for others to use it.

 

Thank you for posting this. You have no idea how pleased I am to see this kind of product.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New version.

 

Fixed a couple bugs, and added Daily Statistics functionality. Everything is automatically populated (it starts with today, and moves back in time). Weekends are optionally excluded from reporting. Two versions again, no idea how well the .xls version holds up. Everything you need to know should be on the Info worksheet. Could someone let me know what doesn't work as it should?

 

What features should I add?

tradejournal2.zipFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  atto said:
New version.

 

Fixed a couple bugs, and added Daily Statistics functionality. Everything is automatically populated (it starts with today, and moves back in time). Weekends are optionally excluded from reporting. Two versions again, no idea how well the .xls version holds up. Everything you need to know should be on the Info worksheet. Could someone let me know what doesn't work as it should?

 

What features should I add?

I got #NUM! errors in Daily Statistics.

also on the graph. can you label blue and brown lines? One is the PnL line, what's the other one (drawdown?)?

000.thumb.jpg.c223c199f8401e11bcbada4b48eabb71.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ihm said:
I got #NUM! errors in Daily Statistics.

also on the graph. can you label blue and brown lines? One is the PnL line, what's the other one (drawdown?)?

There's some bug, I'll fix it tonight. For now, put =TODAY() into that first cell, and it'll all work.

 

Yeah, I can label the plots. It's P/L and drawdown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  atto said:
New version.

 

Fixed a couple bugs, and added Daily Statistics functionality. Everything is automatically populated (it starts with today, and moves back in time). Weekends are optionally excluded from reporting. Two versions again, no idea how well the .xls version holds up. Everything you need to know should be on the Info worksheet. Could someone let me know what doesn't work as it should?

 

What features should I add?

how about one simple statistic? "%Net" = Net Profit/Gross Profit. so we know how much profit we keep (or commission we pay), percentage wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ihm said:
how about one simple statistic? "%Net" = Net Profit/Gross Profit. so we know how much profit we keep (or commission we pay), percentage wise.

 

You don't get to keep any. It all goes to atto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  DbPhoenix said:
You don't get to keep any. It all goes to atto.

On the upside, he gets a pretty cool trading journal. Fair trade imho.

 

ihm, added. I'll upload a new copy tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lied about the whole tomorrow thing. Whoops. Has anyone else noticed any problems? I think I'll post it for TL tonight or tomorrow.

 

By the way, if any of you guys need monitors, Dell's running an excellent deal. 23" full HD Samsung for $180. I'm switching out my 19" for this one.. Dell : Samsung Samsung 2333SW 23-inch Widescreen Black Flat Panel LCD Monitor : Displays : Small & Medium Business

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  atto said:
Lied about the whole tomorrow thing. Whoops. Has anyone else noticed any problems? I think I'll post it for TL tonight or tomorrow.

 

By the way, if any of you guys need monitors, Dell's running an excellent deal. 23" full HD Samsung for $180. I'm switching out my 19" for this one.. Dell : Samsung Samsung 2333SW 23-inch Widescreen Black Flat Panel LCD Monitor : Displays : Small & Medium Business

 

I don't NEED one, but a 23" Samsung HD for $180 plus free shipping? Duh!

 

Thanks for the heads up. Should be here by mid-week. :)

 

Now I can keep my chat window open all the time.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something to play with.. I started writing a PnF implementation for NinjaTrader, and am not sure how to allow someone to set box size (since the period is only one variable, which I made the reversal size). However, I actually like what came out. Not sure if I'll ever use it, but you guys can mess around with it.

 

It's similar to a Range chart, but a new bar is not drawn if the direction is the same.

 

Wave 2 tick

attachment.php?attachmentid=11759&stc=1&d=1246136403

 

Wave 10 tick

attachment.php?attachmentid=11760&stc=1&d=1246136403

 

Wave 20 tick

attachment.php?attachmentid=11761&stc=1&d=1246136403

wave2t.PNG.9f4d12442940afc8c9bae886c54df191.PNG

wave10t.PNG.17f49280a7849889d283e2d4528e1111.PNG

wave20t.PNG.c3062c46f9f786acb147814f1162a03f.PNG

WaveBarType.zipFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought today was a great day to see many of the Wyckoff concepts in action in a very clear way. I'm attaching a 5s and 1M chart of the NQ from this morning pointing out a few key clues to the beginning of the giant reversal that occurred. And all of these clues were pointed out in real time in chat by Db, atto and others.

 

You can see that with each potential selling climax price drops sharply with a dramatic increase in volume. The final climax that occurred didn't seem to have any big volume bar, but a lot of volume occurred in a small period of time, which you may not pick up if you were following bar by bar. Also, note that the final climaxes and shakeout occurred at support (or right below), which signals a much higher chance of a reversal than if they occurred in the middle of nowhere. You can also see lower volume on the test, and then large volume during the shakeout followed by rapid price reversal. The job of a shakeout is to get rid of "weak hands" so that a new move could be started. And as you can see that job was accomplished with great success.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12146&stc=1&d=1247521206

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12145&stc=1&d=1247521206

 

 

If I've made any mistakes please let me know and I'll correct it.

5aa70efdb3f60_NQ09-097_13_2009(1Min).thumb.png.c30ac06c123fb53deeb784d680ae6104.png

5aa70efdbafc0_NQ09-097_13_2009(5Seconds).thumb.png.ecb1d0f4425e1ebebcdea5c822eaee69.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you mind posting these in the Trading The Wyckoff Way thread as well? A simple copy-and-paste will do (if I do it, my name will be on it). I have some comments to make about S/R, but I'd rather make them there, given the floundering I see with regard to several other approaches, and the possibility that the simplicity of this might be more appealing to some than what they're currently bogged down in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Price gave several scaleout opportunities for the short. And on the long, there were several decent spots to add or initiate a position if you didn't catch the bottom real time (I didn't).

 

I got in at the springboard shortly after the bottom. Volume spiked as price broke the 08 area again (longer term zone), and then entered a period of sideways congestion as volume tailed off. On top of that, you have the bounce off of S to the lows, and a series of hh's and hl's (a trend up).

 

The circled areas are places that I'd enter. Logical stops on both are at 07.00-07.25.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12147&stc=1&d=1247523255

wyckoff.PNG.8883b9db4cf771f7772e404b2dbb9dfb.PNG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.