Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

atto

Chat Junkies

Recommended Posts

Would you mind posting these in the Trading The Wyckoff Way thread as well? A simple copy-and-paste will do (if I do it, my name will be on it). I have some comments to make about S/R, but I'd rather make them there, given the floundering I see with regard to several other approaches, and the possibility that the simplicity of this might be more appealing to some than what they're currently bogged down in.

 

Sure, no problem. Done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db, mind posting the stock and sector Wyckoff Wave charts? I was a bit surprised at the outcome today. However, there is quite the divergence in the Up Dn volume. Also today, Up vol backed off, Dn vol increased.

 

GOOG missed earnings, and it's off ~4% from the highs today. Think this might be the needle that pops the Balloon of Hope?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Db, mind posting the stock and sector Wyckoff Wave charts? I was a bit surprised at the outcome today. However, there is quite the divergence in the Up Dn volume. Also today, Up vol backed off, Dn vol increased.

 

GOOG missed earnings, and it's off ~4% from the highs today. Think this might be the needle that pops the Balloon of Hope?

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12217&stc=1&d=1247793218

 

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12218&stc=1&d=1247793280

 

 

Up vol was weak yesterday as well, as were new highs.

Image2.gif.d94ebd09e1644f24c2d2d3465e82294d.gif

Image2a.gif.ae0bd2329f777f964f24f05daac4720e.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Db, mind posting the stock and sector Wyckoff Wave charts? I was a bit surprised at the outcome today. However, there is quite the divergence in the Up Dn volume. Also today, Up vol backed off, Dn vol increased.

 

If you don't mind me asking, why were you surprised? A test of the June high seemed likely imo, although the pace at which we rallied off 1400 towards 1500 is something I hadn't suspected during summer "doldrums". The information about volume spread is interesting though.

 

In a review of last 2 weeks, here's my 2c. We spent a week travelling sideways, building up for a sustained rally which has now reached the June highs.

 

Legend on chart

 

- double horizontal lines: rough larger areas of support/resistance from in the past (note this is my interpretation)

 

- small horizontal lines: midpoints or smaller (yet not negligible) areas from intraday S/R

 

- blue box -> 'rectangle'/base/build-up (see also what dbphoenix mentioned about accumulation)

 

- red circle -> shake-out

 

- yellow rectangles -> pauses before continuation

nq_rally.thumb.gif.f4e27e02c36ee162ce54b43d2825a80d.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're correct, I just didn't see it getting that high. A few things I watch on a larger tf are getting quite weak (such as the Up Dn vol div), and the Wyckoff Wave charts have been weaker than the general market. It was more me thinking the bulls didn't have it in them.

 

Today will be fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're correct, I just didn't see it getting that high. A few things I watch on a larger tf are getting quite weak (such as the Up Dn vol div), and the Wyckoff Wave charts have been weaker than the general market. It was more me thinking the bulls didn't have it in them.

 

Today will be fun.

 

A reminder, tho, that the stock canary is for the Dow. The sector canary is for the S&P. And the Dow and S&P have been weaker than the Nasdaq. My comments in chat regarding the weakness in the Naz had to do with new highs and upvol for the past two days.

 

The canary for the Naz was put together hastily. If someone can provide me with a list of the 30 highest percentage gainers in the Naz or NDX from May 9 to June 10, I can confirm its accuracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Db, perhaps this is what you were looking for. It's the A/D ratio, but at least isn't cumulative. I can do intraday as well if you want, but I thought you'd rather the daily.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12254&stc=1&d=1247860058

qc.png.60ec4669a34987ef346e5d250870f251.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so. The AD is the difference, not a ratio. For example, if 150 stocks advance and 100 decline, the difference is 50. The ratio would be 1.5:1.

 

But I didn't intend for anyone actually to do it. I thought there might be some site that does it already. It's a PITA to maintain, which is why I stopped doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If somebody uses IQ Feed, then it is easy to plot A-D difference. For NQ just substract IIQD.Z from IIQA.Z and you have it (for Nasdaq composite). Here plotted as overlay (red) in a today NQ 1 min chart.

attachment.php?attachmentid=12258&stc=1&d=1247864989

AD.thumb.png.d063da929aaf08a117141a69ebd7a3a7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What would it look like on a daily chart for the past six weeks?

 

Incidentally, upvol and new highs for the Naz are still crap.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12261&stc=1&d=1247866865

 

NQ is blue-grey bars. A-D is candles with white knots.

ADdaily.thumb.png.16e35fdf69d7c5538939b1f4aec20c8b.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For some reason, this isn't working. The number for each day should be a point, not a bar. For instance, the difference between advancers and decliners for day one is "253". For day two, it's "312". For day three, it's "284" (or whatever). Then these points are connected with a line, like connect-the-dots.

 

But, again, the highs-lows and upv-dnv info should be plenty. The AD Line is just something else to look at and possibly confirm what these are saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good one. The replies are even better.

 

Too many people say they don’t use indicators, when almost all of them use bars, channels, trendlines, fibs, pivots, etc.
His style of trading also seems very busy. I’m not convinced that trading should require the reflexes of a pro video game player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For some reason, this isn't working. The number for each day should be a point, not a bar. For instance, the difference between advancers and decliners for day one is "253". For day two, it's "312". For day three, it's "284" (or whatever). Then these points are connected with a line, like connect-the-dots.

Ok, I see what you mean. As you could see on the 1 min chart I posted before, the symbols provided by IQ Feed update (almost) continuously during the day. I believe they show the actual number of advancers and decliners and the daily candle represents their difference as it developes since open till close. So if you are interested in a final result for the day, just look at Close of the appropriate candle.

 

Here is your "connect the dots":

attachment.php?attachmentid=12271&stc=1&d=1247923378

ADdaily2.thumb.png.203511497f3cfe32fbe69c1a1c3c619d.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Here is your "connect the dots":

 

Thank you. This makes more sense. And it does confirm what we've been seeing at least the past two days with regard to non-confirmations in new highs and upvol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good one. The replies are even better.

 

Yes, I liked "His style of trading also seems very busy", as compared I suppose to, say, logging on every couple of hours or so to see how one's "daytrade" is going :)

 

Then there was the one about "semantics". He never did understand what the others (or I) were talking about.

 

But my point was made, at least to a few people. Perhaps at some point in the future I will have saved them from the clutches of nonsense.

 

Amen.

 

(But I do find being quoted like this sort of creepy)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They quotes Thales too, on a random post about his daughter.

 

Is it bad that when I saw the link "The Quotable DbPhoenix", I was hoping it was one of your old indicator posts from ET? :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another measure of breadth I watch is the Bullish Percent Index, which is simply the percent of stocks in a index or sector that are on PnF buy signals. Something to note: the way this is calculated, a stock is always in a Buy or Sell signal. This neglects times that a stock is congesting, or makes a quick reversal. The signals also lag, as it takes a couple waves to make a buy or sell signal. However, I've found that it is a great measure of market breadth and participation.

 

StockCharts does an excellent job of calculating EOD values for this index for all major US indexes and sectors.

 

Here is NDX and SPX, showing some divergences and notable weakness (however, as expected, NDX is quite stronger in general).

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=12298&stc=1&d=1248024899

attachment.php?attachmentid=12299&stc=1&d=1248024899

5aa70f02468d0_bpndx.png.95b1d0f10191a891c7566b5c2323dfdc.png

5aa70f0249b2a_bpspx.png.a32152896f2d1dc979a98bf213efe88e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.