Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

BlowFish

Hedging Against Property Market Decline

Recommended Posts

I asked this before a while back, and possibly this is not what James had in mind for this sections so apologies if that is the case.

 

I have a modest property portfolio (all UK based) that I don't want to unwind. I feel that further house price decline is on the cards and would like to minimise the effect of it. Can anyone suggest instruments or tactics to hedge against this decline?

 

Thanks,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In very general terms (and to kick off the forum the right way) What I personally would do in your shoes is to try and break your overall risk portfolio down into it's component parts. That way you can seperate them into most likely 3 camps

 

1) Risks you can control and hedge accurately

 

2) Risks you can hedge roughly

 

3) Risks you have no control over

 

So what are the exact factors that would make house prices dip further?

 

An obvious one and good starting point is rate hikes. This probably falls into category 2 unless you have a really accurate model for forecasting just how much your portfolio will take a hit for say a 50bp hike by the BoE. But you can mitigate this risk via interest rate derivatives.

 

Second one - general housing market sentiment. V hard to control, but maybe a proxy can be achieved by constructing a short basket of UK housebuilders? Or even having a SB position on that sector?

 

I'm sure there are otehr factors, but it's not cut and dried what to do. Hopefully this acts as a pointer though.

 

make sense?

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GJ, yes that makes very good sense - it had not occurred to me to think of things in that way. Aidaweb - thanks for jogging my mind, I thought I had heard of an 'instrument' that tracked some sort of house price index. I wonder how the spread betters lay off there risk if it's not an index that is actually traded?

 

EDIT: Incidentally I am surprised that this is not a fairly common requirement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GJ, yes that makes very good sense - it had not occurred to me to think of things in that way.

 

Very welcome. This is pretty much the essence of portfolio risk management

 

Aidaweb - thanks for jogging my mind, I thought I had heard of an 'instrument' that tracked some sort of house price index. I wonder how the spread betters lay off there risk if it's not an index that is actually traded?

 

At a guess (and it is a guess, but an educated one) otc economic derivatives. Probably a bank will make a market in this stuff. Goldies and Deutsche launched this kind of thing for NFP a few years back and it did well. Have a feeling it's even exchange traded now but don't quote me on that.

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Aidaweb - thanks for jogging my mind, I thought I had heard of an 'instrument' that tracked some sort of house price index. I wonder how the spread betters lay off there risk if it's not an index that is actually traded?

 

EDIT: Incidentally I am surprised that this is not a fairly common requirement.

 

The instruments I am aware of track either Rightmove or HBOS House Price Index. Its a synthetic product thats not exchange traded (some people have issues with this) but in my experience it accurately tracks the respective indexes. The issue is in the spread which can be quite large, but if you are hedging with a 6-12mth+ timeframe then it's workable.

 

Not sure I understand your question about laying off the risk?

 

I have friends who own very sizable property portfolios in London and I was surprised how little interest they had in the concept of locking in their current profits by hedging. One guy in particular says he's in it for the long long term and is going to ride the 'dip' and not complicate his business by introducing concepts he doesn't understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re laying off risk this quote from http://www.financial-spread-betting.com/Property-spread-betting.html puts it better than I could.

 

A pretty clear picture of a decisive shift in sentiment is emerging. John Austin, head of proprietary products at IG Index, says that because of this the firm's house price markets are currently suspended and it is only accepting bets to close existing positions. 'There has been such a run of stories in the press talking of meltdown in the housing market that the volume of sell-side business left us with no choice but to close our book to new business for the time being,' he explains.

 

The problem is that there is no easy way for spread betting companies quoting these products to actually hedge their exposure to the house price index. The flipside is that there is a huge degree of interest in these bets. 'We are very eager to get back into the house price market,' acknowledges Austin. 'We have a large exposure to the prices next March and would anticipate that once these figures have been released and the bets settled we will be back taking new positions again,' he adds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The problem is that there is no easy way for spread betting companies quoting these products to actually hedge their exposure to the house price index. The flipside is that there is a huge degree of interest in these bets. 'We are very eager to get back into the house price market,' acknowledges Austin. 'We have a large exposure to the prices next March and would anticipate that once these figures have been released and the bets settled we will be back taking new positions again,' he adds.

 

Fine - just mark the price way lower if you're long and worried. P*ssies. That's market making. They just don't like the money if it aint easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that there is no easy way for spread betting companies quoting these products to actually hedge their exposure to the house price index. The flipside is that there is a huge degree of interest in these bets. 'We are very eager to get back into the house price market,' acknowledges Austin. 'We have a large exposure to the prices next March and would anticipate that once these figures have been released and the bets settled we will be back taking new positions again,' he adds.

 

I've just been into my IG account and it looks like I can go short.

 

That aside, I totally agree with GJ, making a market when it suits should be outlawed! When Ladbrokes first started offering books they were well known to 'investigate and offer a price' on anything (within legal and ethical boundaries) Thats how they made their name. If IG pull the plug on loss making products they'll quickly lose ground to a companies that don't! P*ssies indeed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fine - just mark the price way lower if you're long and worried. P*ssies. That's market making. They just don't like the money if it aint easy.

Yeah, that doesn't make much sense. I've never heard of a bookie shutting down a line because of overwhelming bets on one side.. just change the line (even if you have to change it a lot), and it will balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for shorting REITs to hedge, but watch out on possible hidden beta exposure. I believe (don't have the hard facts with me right now though) that REITs are more market sensitive than the actual housing market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Atto, If I understand this correctly any company that complies with the appropriate regulatory requirements can get its self listed as REIT? Again if I have got things straight there is and index of all the REIT's (though I can't seem to find a ticker for that so wonder if its traded?) Interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe (don't have the hard facts with me right now though) that REITs are more market sensitive than the actual housing market.

 

Stands to reason as it's a long complicated process actually selling a house compared to trading a commoditised instrument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But for people / institutions that trade REITS in size, presumably (and I know nothing at all about this market btw) there must be analysts who will pore over the actual portfolio composition of a given REIT and come up with a fair value (roughly at least) for it, trading when price moves away from this become over extended. Or not......

 

Help me out here.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And on that point. Presumably it also means that if an individual were to use a REIT to hedge property exposure (and I don't even know if you can short sell them so this could all be moot) wouldn't one also have to take into account possible tracking error depending on what the property portfolio you are protecting looks like. E.G. hedging a high end London residential portfolio with a commercial property based, Manchester centric property vehicle would presumably not be anything like a perfect hedge (extreme example just to make a point).

 

Am I talking out my @rse here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No not at all GJ these are all things that perplex me. I think I need to talk to someone who knows, whilst there is a fair amount of information on the interweb it seems to be largely to attract investors. (invest in property without having to worry about managing a portfolio).

 

The other thing is the composition of the various portfolios (none seem to have much/any residential which is what interests me particularly). I have looked at basic price charts for several and they seem to broadly follow a very similar pattern .......Except a couple with large retail property exposure had massive drops a couple of months ago. Kind of perplexing (as most if not all have some retail element) and worrying too, if you are on the wrong side of such a quick and violent move.

 

Short term volatility looks like an issue too (as may have been mentioned) though as a trader I look at that and think hmm those waves would be nice to trade. Got to keep sight of what the object of the exercise is :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably a big part of why they are ofen weighted towards commercial exposure is that you can trade bigger 'blocks'. It's unweildy to trade £300k houses if you have a few hundred million to invest - easier to buy a small office block than a bunch of houses, logistically I reckon.

 

I may well be talking out me aris for all I know, but my god I'm convincing sometimes ;)

 

GJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey BlowFish,

 

I don't know whether this issue is still current with you since you opened this thread some time ago (btw, you were right about the property prices dropping), but you could have a look at Eurex' IPD UK Annual All Property Index Futures (PUKA).

 

Not only is it futures, but the contract size is just £50k which makes it easier to reflect your actual portfolio. Don't have any idea about the actual liquidity though (it says minimum quote size is 20 contract [=£1 million in value] which isn't too bad for hedging). I just heard about it when Eurex announced it some time ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks AK,

 

Actually I think it is always 'current'. Obviously adjusting a property portfolio takes a bit more than a mouse click! Any instrument that lets you hedge (even if you are just a simple home owner) is worth investigation.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an interesting discussion and something I personally haven't thought too much into. However a number of things come to mind.

 

The first thing that hits me is your projected time frame of holding the property BF. I am not too sure about Europe but out here in Australia, banks won't force you to get property revalued unless you are changing the mortgage in some way.

 

If you are planning on holding for a number of years to come (as most property investors tend to do unless they are doing renovations and flipping them), then a good hedge in one way is to simply avoid re-financing as much as possible. Of course this is only worthwhile if a) you plan to hold for say at least 10 years and b) you can afford to continue to pay the repayments quite comfortably.

 

There are the smaller details of locking in fixed rates vs variable ones due to the current rate situation but I think that depends on a property value vs repayments cases by case basis on each property.

 

This does appear to be a typical buy and hold strategy where not realizing paper losses doesn't necessarily mean you haven't lost. However it is the same in any type of trading. If you trade intra day, you don't have to close your trade after 2 minutes because it is in the red when you are looking to hold the position for a couple of hours.

 

Shorter term losses can be held onto and unrealized if your view is to hold for much longer. The same as buy and hold investors if their current outlook on stocks is 10 years plus. Even if they bought at the top of this market back in 2007, it may be premature to close out positions now if they wanted to hold into 2020 on most stocks.

 

So really my point based on what happens out here in Australia, there may not be a need to hedge against one's property portfolio beyond trying to increase rent, if banks don't force you to re-value your property and you plan on holding long term.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.